This research aimed to evaluate the ideal proportion of two stabilizers in elastomeric compositions indicated for tire sidewall. The stabilizers applied in different proportions were N-1,3-dimethyl-butyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD) and oligomerized 2,2,4-trimethyl-quinoline (TMQ). Nine compositions were prepared with 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 phr of 6PPD combined with 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 phr of TMQ. The compounds were exposed to accelerated aging processes, including thermo-oxidative, photochemical and ozone chamber. Also, the samples were aged in the environment for 440 days. At regular intervals, the samples were evaluated. Gas chromatography was used to quantify the content of 6PPD. Overall, the samples exposed to thermo-oxidative aging showed the greatest loss of mechanical properties (tear and tensile strength) as well as the 6PPD content. From the mechanical strength results, it was possible to conclude that the best combination of stabilizers was 2.5 phr of 6PPD and 1.0 of TMQ.

The design of the screw configuration as well as the screw speed, the residence time, the feeder type, and the temperature has a large effect on the dispersion of the clay into the matrix and, consequently, on the mechanical and thermal properties of the polymeric matrix. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the influence of two different screw configurations (left-handed elements) and the feed type (hopper or side feeder) on the dispersion of 5 wt% Cloisite 20A into the PP matrix without the use of compatibilising agents. In profile 1 (lower shear), the 5 wt% C20A/PP (PPC20AP1) nanocomposite morphology presented elliptical agglomerated structures with compacted platelets, whereas in the profile 2, the 5 wt% C20A/PP (PPC20AP2) showed elongated forms with better separated platelets and a better clay distribution into the PP matrix. When the side feeder mode was used in profile 2, a mix of elliptical and elongated structures with some individual clay sheets was observed.The neat PP showed the same tensile modulus and impact strength in both screw configurations. The PPC20AP1 presented a tensile modulus and an impact strength that was lower than the PPC20AP2, because in profile 2 the pressure and residence time are higher due to the two left-handed elements. Thus, the dispersion and distribution of the clay throughout the matrix were improved, and the agglomerated structures were reduced. When the side feeder mode was used, there was a decrease in the PP/clay mechanical properties, but the values found were higher than those in profile 1.

As misturas ou blendas poliméricas continuam, apesar de seu longo estudo, a ser foco de pesquisas em diferentes áreas. A mistura de polipropileno e poliestireno é uma das mais estudadas principalmente pelo baixo custo e relevância tecnológica destes materiais. Neste trabalho, os alunos da disciplina Processamento de Polímeros I (PG24) no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência dos Materiais (PGCIMAT-UFRGS), realizaram em aula todo o processamento dos polímeros (polipropileno e poliestireno) e a produção das misturas poliméricas. A seguir, cada aluno ficou responsável por realizar um tipo de caracterização, que incluía a preparação das amostras, a análise em si e a discussão dos resultados da referida análise. Subsequentemente, os resultados foram confrontados em aula, onde se buscou as correlações existentes. E por fim, todos os alunos fizeram a revisão deste artigo, incluindo sugestões e críticas. Como esperado, a mistura de polipropileno e poliestireno forma uma blenda imiscível. Além disso, o processamento afetou as características dos polímeros, induzindo redução de massa molar e, como reflexo, redução de suas propriedades físicas. Na mistura PP/PS a separação de fase produziu domínios de PS da ordem de micra, com fraca adesão à matriz, o que explica essa perda de propriedades mecânicas.

Polymer blends remain an important research topic in different areas, in spite of innumerous studies over the years. In particular, mixtures of polypropylene and polystyrene are among the most studied, mainly owing to their low cost and technological relevance. In this work, the students enrolled in the discipline Polymer Processing I (PG24) in the Materials Science Graduate Program (PGCIMAT-UFRGS) produced blends of polypropylene and polystyrene, where all polymer processing steps were performed during lab classes. Then, each student undertook a characterization procedure with a specific technique, which included samples preparation, the analysis itself and discussion of the results. Subsequently, the results were confronted in the classroom, where we sought the correlations. Finally, all students reviewed this article, including suggestions and criticisms. As expected, the mixture of polystyrene and polypropylene formed an immiscible blend. Furthermore, the processing affected the characteristics of the polymers, leading to a reduction in molecular weight, and as a result a drop in its physical properties. In the PP/PS mixtures, phase separation produced PS domains with micrometers in size, and low adhesion to the PP matrix, which explains the loss of mechanical properties.