Objectives: To provide practical norms for measuring depressive symptoms with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) in Brazil through a state-of-the-art psychometrics analysis. Methods: We used a large representative dataset from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde – 2019), which included 90,846 Brazilian citizens. To assess scale structure, we assessed a unidimensional model using confirmatory factor analysis. Item response theory was used to characterize the distribution of depressive symptoms. Summed- and mean-based PHQ-9 scores were then linked using item response theory-based scores in generalized additive models. Finally, percentiles, T scores, and a newly developed score, called the decimal score (D score), were generated to describe PHQ-9 norms for the Brazilian population. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit to the unidimensional model, being invariant to age and sex. Item response theory captured item-level information about the latent trait (reliable from 1 to 3 SDs above the mean). Brazilian norms were presented using summed scores, T scores, and D scores. Conclusion: This is the first study to determine Brazilian norms for the PHQ-9 among a large representative sample using robust psychometric tools. More precise PHQ-9 scores are now available and may be widely used in primary and specialized clinical care settings.

Objectives: To provide practical norms for measuring depressive symptoms with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) in Brazil through a state-of-the-art psychometrics analysis. Methods: We used a large representative dataset from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde – 2019), which included 90,846 Brazilian citizens. To assess scale structure, we assessed a unidimensional model using confirmatory factor analysis. Item response theory was used to characterize the distribution of depressive symptoms. Summed- and mean-based PHQ-9 scores were then linked using item response theory-based scores in generalized additive models. Finally, percentiles, T scores, and a newly developed score, called the decimal score (D score), were generated to describe PHQ-9 norms for the Brazilian population. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit to the unidimensional model, being invariant to age and sex. Item response theory captured item-level information about the latent trait (reliable from 1 to 3 SDs above the mean). Brazilian norms were presented using summed scores, T scores, and D scores. Conclusion: This is the first study to determine Brazilian norms for the PHQ-9 among a large representative sample using robust psychometric tools. More precise PHQ-9 scores are now available and may be widely used in primary and specialized clinical care settings.

Abstract Objectives There are no validated instruments to measure education-related stress in Brazilian university students. Thus, we aimed to translate and test the internal reliability, convergent/discriminant validity, and measurement equivalence of the Higher Education Stress Inventory (HESI). Methods The translation protocol was carried out by two independent translators. The instrument was culturally adapted after a pilot version was administered to 36 university students. The final version (HESI-Br) was administered to 1,021 university students (mean age = 28.3, standard deviation [SD] = 9.6, 76.7% female) via an online survey that lasted from September 1 to October 15, 2020. The factor structure was estimated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the first half of the dataset. We tested the best EFA-derived model with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the second half. Convergent/discriminant validity was tested using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Sex, age groups, period of study, family income and area of study were used to test measurement equivalence. Results EFA suggested five factors: career dissatisfaction; faculty shortcomings; high workload; financial concerns; and toxic learning environment. CFA supported the five-factor model (15 items), but not a higher order factor, suggesting multidimensionality. All five factors presented acceptable internal reliabilities, with Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.72 and McDonald’s ω ≥ 0.64. CFA models indicated that the HESI-Br and DASS-21 assess different but correlated underlying latent constructs, supporting discriminant validity. Equivalence was ascertained for all tested groups. Conclusion The 15-item HESI-Br is a reliable and invariant multidimensional instrument for assessing relevant stressors among university students in Brazil.

Objetivo Descrever o caso de um paciente com esquizofrenia em tratamento com clozapina acometido por um episódio de heat stroke. Descrição do caso Durante uma onda de calor em janeiro e fevereiro de 2014, um paciente com esquizofrenia em tratamento com clozapina foi inicialmente encaminhado para diagnóstico diferencial de infecção sistêmica e síndrome neuroléptica maligna, tendo obtido o diagnóstico final de heat stroke, tratado com controle de temperatura corporal e hidratação. Comentários Este relato de caso tem como objetivo alertar os clínicos para este diagnóstico diferencial, que pode surgir com mais frequência à medida que as temperaturas globais continuarem a aumentar, e também destacar a importância da realização de um diagnóstico mais acurado, que possa melhorar as decisões de tratamento e os desfechos clínicos para os pacientes.

Objective To describe the case of a patient with schizophrenia on clozapine treatment who had an episode of heat stroke. Case description During a heat wave in January and February 2014, a patient with schizophrenia who was on treatment with clozapine was initially referred for differential diagnose between systemic infection and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, but was finally diagnosed with heat stroke and treated with control of body temperature and hydration. Comments This report aims to alert clinicians take this condition into consideration among other differential diagnoses, especially nowadays with the rise in global temperatures, and to highlight the need for accurate diagnosis of clinical events during pharmacological intervention, in order to improve treatment decisions and outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Determinar o perfil epidemiológico das gestantes internadas por infecção do trato urinário, bem como verificar os agentes mais prevalentes e a resposta à antibioticoterapia. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, que incluiu 106 gestantes internadas para tratamento de infecção do trato urinário no período entre janeiro de 2007 a dezembro de 2010. A avaliação constituiu-se de análise de prontuários dessas gestantes, observando-se informações sobre a internação e a gestação, bem como seu desfecho. Foi realizada a análise estatística por meio do programa Statistical Package for the Social Science, versão 15.0. Foram utilizados, para análise dos dados, o teste bilateral exato de Fisher e o teste t de Student, bem como métodos de estatística descritiva. RESULTADOS: Uroculturas positivas foram encontradas em 60,5% das gestantes internadas por infecção do trato urinário. O agente infeccioso mais frequente foi Escherichia coli e não houve diferença quanto à resistência, à recorrência ou a complicações entre os agentes etiológicos mais frequentes. Gestantes com infecção do trato urinário prévia tiveram maior risco de recorrência (OR=10,8; p<0,05). Os antibióticos mais frequentemente utilizados na internação foram ampicilina e cefazolina. Troca de esquema terapêutico por resistência bacteriana ocorreu em 11,9% das pacientes que usaram cefazolina e em 20% das que usaram ampicilina (OR=5,5; p<0,05). O índice de complicações gestacionais foi igual nos dois tratamentos. Não houve diferença entre as médias do número de dias de internação para os dois tratamentos. CONCLUSÃO: A ampicilina esteve associada a maior índice de resistência bacteriana que a cefazolina, necessitando de maior número de trocas do esquema terapêutico, sem resultar em diferença nos desfechos clínicos e tempo de internação.

PURPOSE: To determine the epidemiological profile of women admitted for urinary tract infection as well as to verify the most prevalent agents and response to antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study of 106 pregnant women admitted to a university hospital for urinary tract infection treatment during the period between January 2007 to December 2010. The evaluation was based on analysis of the medical records of these pregnant women, with the observation of hospitalization and pregnancy data, as well as its outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Science, version 15.0. The bilateral Fisher exact test and Student's t test were used for data analysis, as well as descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: Positive urine cultures were observed in 60.5% of pregnant women admitted due to urinary tract infection. The most frequent infectious agent was Escherichia coli and no difference in resistance, recurrence or complications was observed between the most frequent etiologic agents. Pregnant women with previous UTI had a higher recurrence risk (OR=10.8; p<0.05). The antibiotics most commonly used during hospitalization were ampicillin and cefazolin. Change of therapeutic agent due to bacterial resistance occurred in 11.9% of patients who took cefazolin and in 20% of patients who took ampicillin (OR=5.5; p<0.05). The rate of gestational complications was the same for both treatments. There was no difference in mean number of days of hospitalization between the treatments. CONCLUSION: In the studied population ampicillin showed a higher rate of bacterial resistance than cefazolin, requiring a larger number of treatment regimen exchanges, without resulting in differences in clinical outcome or time of hospitalization.