RESUMO Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) é um patógeno de importância destacada como causa de toxinfecções alimentares em humanos, prejuízos ao setor produtivo e ampla disseminação no ambiente. Este trabalho objetivou identificar fagotipos e padronizar a RAPD/PCR (DNA polimórfico amplificado ao acaso) para a avaliação de isolados de SE. Foram selecionadas 238 amostras, sendo 104 oriundas de carcaças de frango, 106 de alimentos e material biológico de humanos isolados em episódios de toxinfecções alimentares e 28 de materiais de origem avícola. Foram fagotipadas 111 amostras sendo 57,7% (64/111) do fagotipo 4, 32,4% (36/111) fagotipo 4a, 3,6% (4/111) fagotipo 6a e 0,9% (1/111) fagotipo 7, enquanto 5,4% (6/111) não foram fagotipáveis (RDNC, reagent do not conform). Para a RAPD/PCR foram utilizados 238 isolados de SE. Destes, 91,8% (217/238) foram enquadrados no padrão A e 21 isolados (8,8%) foram diferenciados em quatro padrões e sete subtipos com o primer 1254 e em quatro padrões e dez subtipos com o primer OPB 17. A facilidade de execução da RAPD/PCR, após padronizada, habilita a sua implantação em uma rotina laboratorial, auxiliando na monitoria dos isolados de SE e, conseqüentemente, contribuindo para a elaboração de programas efetivos de controle e prevenção de S. Enteritidis.

ABSTRACT Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is an important pathogen, causing both food poisoning outbreaks in humans and economic losses to the poultry industry, being also widely spread in the environment. This work aimed to identify SE phage types and to standardize the Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for evaluating SE isolates obtained from different origins. To do so, 238 SE strains were selected, of which 104 were isolated from broiler carcasses, 106 from food samples and human biological materials involved in food poisoning outbreaks and 28 from different poultry materials. Among these 238 SE isolates, 111 were phage typed, and 57.7% (64/ 111) corresponded to phage type (PT) 4, 32.4% (36/111) to PT 4a, 3.6% (4/111) to PT 6a and 0.9% (1/111) to PT 7, whereas 5.4% .6/111) of the strains were not typeable (RDNC, reacts but does not conform). After the standardization of amplification conditions, all 238 SE isolates were submitted to RAPD/PCR. Among these, 91.8% (217/238) were classified as pattern A. Twenty-one isolates were differentiated into four patterns and into seven subtypes with the use of primer 1254, and into four patterns and ten subtypes using primer OPB 17. The combination of phage typing and RAPD/PCR proved to be a useful tool in epidemiological investigations. RAPD/PCR can be easily used as a routine laboratory method, thus helping with the monitoring of SE isolates and contributing to the establishment of effective Salmonella Enteritidis control and preventive programs.

The influence of a peripheral cue represented by a gray ring on responsivity to a subsequent target varies. When a vertical line inside a ring was a go target and a white small ring inside a ring was a no-go target, reaction time was shorter at the same location relative to a different location. However, no reaction time difference between the two locations occurred when a white cross inside the ring, instead of the white vertical line inside the ring, was the go target. We investigated whether this last finding was due to a forward masking influence of the cue, a requirement of low attention for the discrimination or a lack of attention mobilization by the cue. In Experiment 1, the intensity of the cue was reduced in an attempt to reduce forward masking. In Experiment 2, the vertical line and the cross were presented in the same block of trials so as to be dealt with a common attentional strategy. In Experiments 3 and 4, the no-go target was a 45º rotated cross inside a ring to increase the difficulty of the discrimination. No evidence was obtained that the cross was forward masked by the cue nor that it demanded less attention to be discriminated from the small ring. There was a facilitation of responsivity by the cue when the small ring was replaced by the rotated cross. The results suggest that when the discrimination to be performed is too easy the cue does not mobilize attention.