Resumo Introdução: Nos mamíferos, as células ciliadas e os neurônios auditivos não apresentam capacidade regenerativa. Assim, os danos a esses tipos celulares são permanentes e levam à perda auditiva. Contudo, como não há tratamento que restabeleça a função auditiva, as terapias regenerativas utilizando células-tronco representam uma alternativa promissora. Objetivo: Este artigo tem como objetivo revisar a literatura atual sobre os principais tipos de células-tronco com potencial para aplicação em terapia celular para perda auditiva sensorioneural, os experimentos mais relevantes já realizados em animais, bem como os avanços obtidos recentemente nessa área. Método: As pesquisas incluíram as bases de dados PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct e SciELO, além da literatura cinza. A estratégia de busca incluiu os seguintes termos principais: "stem cells", "hair cells" e "auditory neurons". Além disso, os termos principais foram combinados com os seguintes termos secundários: "mesenchymal", "iPS", "inner ear" e "auditory". A pesquisa foi realizada de forma independente por três pesquisadores. Resultados: A diferenciação de células-tronco em células ciliadas e neurônios auditivos têm alta taxa de sucesso, chegando a 82% para o primeiro caso e 100% para o segundo. Notavelmente, essas células diferenciadas são capazes de interagir com células ciliadas e neurônios auditivos de explantes cocleares através da formação de novas sinapses. Quando transplantadas para a cóclea de animais com perda auditiva, a restauração da função auditiva foi observada, até o momento, apenas em animais com ablação do VIII nervo craniano. Conclusão: Os avanços têm sido mais proeminentes em casos de neuropatia auditiva. A melhora parcial das condições do nervo auditivo por meio de terapia baseada em células-tronco pode aumentar o número de pacientes candidatos a receber implantes cocleares com sucesso.

Abstract Introduction: Mammalian hair cells and auditory neurons do not show regenerative capacity. Hence, damage to these cell types is permanent and leads to hearing loss. However, there is no treatment that re-establishes auditory function. Regenerative therapies using stem cells represent a promising alternative. Objective: This article aims to review the current literature about the main types of stem cells with potential for application in cell therapy for sensorineural hearing loss, the most relevant experiments already performed in animals, as well as the advances that have been recently made in the field. Methods: Research included the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct and SciELO, as well as gray literature. Search strategy included the following main terms: "stem cells", "hair cells" and "auditory neurons". Additionally, the main terms were combined with the following secondary terms: "mesenchymal", "iPS", "inner ear", "auditory". The research was conducted independently by three researchers. Results: Differentiation of stem cells into hair cells and auditory neurons has a high success rate, reaching up to 82% for the first and 100% for the latter. Remarkably, these differentiated cells are able to interact with hair cells and auditory neurons of cochlear explants through formation of new synapses. When transplanted into the cochlea of animals with hearing loss, auditory restoration has been documented to date only in deafferented animals. Conclusion: Advances have been more prominent in cases of auditory neuropathy, since partial improvement of auditory nerve conditions through cell-based therapy may increase the number of patients who can successfully receive cochlear implants.

Ectrodactyly – ectodermal dysplasia and cleft lip/palate (EEC) syndrome (OMIM 604292) is a rare disorder determined by mutations in the TP63 gene. Most cases of EEC syndrome are associated to mutations in the DNA binding domain (DBD) region of the p63 protein. Here we report on a three-generation Brazilian family with three individuals (mother, son and grandfather) affected by EEC syndrome, determined by a novel mutation c.1037C > G (p.Ala346Gly). The disorder in this family exhibits a broad spectrum of phenotypes: two individuals were personally examined, one presenting the complete constellation of EEC syndrome manifestations and the other presenting an intermediate phenotype; the third affected, a deceased individual not examined personally and referred to by his daughter, exhibited only the split-hand/foot malformation (SHFM). Our findings contribute to elucidate the complex phenotype-genotype correlations in EEC syndrome and other related TP63-mutation syndromes. The possibility of the mutation c.1037C > G being related both to acro-dermato-ungual-lacrimal-tooth (ADULT) syndrome and SHFM is also raised by the findings here reported.

TEMA: avaliação audiológica de pais de indivíduos com perda auditiva de herança autossômica recessiva. OBJETIVO: estudar o perfil audiológico de pais de indivíduos com perda auditiva, de herança autossômica recessiva, inferida pela história familial ou por testes moleculares que detectaram mutação no gene GJB2, responsável por codificar a Conexina 26. MÉTODO: 36 indivíduos entre 30 e 60 anos foram avaliados e divididos em dois grupos: grupo controle, sem queixas auditivas e sem história familiar de deficiência auditiva, e grupo de estudos composto por pais heterozigotos em relação a genes de surdez de herança autossômica recessiva inespecífica ou portadores heterozigotos de mutação no gene da Conexina 26. Todos foram submetidos à audiometria tonal liminar (0,25kHz a 8), audiometria de altas freqüências (9kHz a 20) e emissões otoacústicas produtos de distorção (EOAPD). RESULTADOS: houve diferenças significativas na amplitude das EOAPD nas freqüências 1001 e 1501Hz entre os grupos, sendo maior a amplitude no grupo controle. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos para os limiares tonais de 0,25 a 20KHz. CONCLUSÃO: as EOAPD foram mais eficazes, em comparação com a audiometria tonal liminar, para detectar diferenças auditivas entre os grupos. Mais pesquisas são necessárias para verificar a confiabilidade destes dados.

BACKGROUND: audiological evaluation of parents of individuals with autosomal recessive hearing loss. AIM: to study the audiological profile of parents of individuals with autosomal recessive hearing loss, inferred by family history or by molecular tests that detected heterozygous mutations in the GJB2 gene. This gene codes Connexin 26. METHOD: participants were 36 subjects, ranging between 30 and 60 years, who were divided into two groups: a control group composed by individuals without auditory complaints and without family history of hearing loss, and a research group composed by heterozygous parents of individuals with autosomal recessive hearing loss or heterozygous for connexin 26 mutations. All subjects underwent pure tone audiometry (0,25 to 8kHz), high frequencies audiometry (9 to 20kHz) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). RESULTS: there were significant differences between the groups when considering the amplitude of DPOAE in the frequencies of 1001 and 1501Hz. Amplitude was higher in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups for pure tone thresholds from 0.25 to 20KHz. CONCLUSION: the DPOAE were more effective, in comparison to the pure tone audiometry, to detect auditory differences between the groups. More studies of this type are necessary to confirm the observed results.