OBJECTIVE: Urinary lithiasis is a common disease. The aim of the present study is to assess the knowledge regarding the diagnosis, treatment and recommendations given to patients with ureteral colic by professionals of an academic hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five physicians were interviewed about previous experience with guidelines regarding ureteral colic and how they manage patients with ureteral colic in regards to diagnosis, treatment and the information provided to the patients. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of the interviewed physicians were surgeons, and 64% were clinicians. Forty-one percent of the physicians reported experience with ureterolithiasis guidelines. Seventy-two percent indicated that they use noncontrast CT scans for the diagnosis of lithiasis. All of the respondents prescribe hydration, primarily for the improvement of stone elimination (39.3%). The average number of drugs used was 3.5. The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids was reported by 54% of the physicians (i.e., 59% of surgeons and 25.6% of clinicians used this combination of drugs) (p = 0.014). Only 21.3% prescribe alpha blockers. CONCLUSION: Reported experience with guidelines had little impact on several habitual practices. For example, only 21.3% of the respondents indicated that they prescribed alpha blockers; however, alpha blockers may increase stone elimination by up to 54%. Furthermore, although a meta-analysis demonstrated that hydration had no effect on the transit time of the stone or on the pain, the majority of the physicians reported that they prescribed more than 500 ml of fluid. Dipyrone, hyoscine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids were identified as the most frequently prescribed drug combination. The information regarding the time for the passage of urinary stones was inconsistent. The development of continuing education programs regarding ureteral colic in the emergency room is necessary.

As malformações vasculares representam uma das principais causa de hemorragia digestiva baixa em doentes idosos. O acometimento de indivíduos com menos de trinta anos é evento raramente descrito. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente relato é apresentar um caso de angiodisplasia, localizada na região cecal, em doente na terceira década de vida, diagnosticada por meio de arteriografia pré-operatória e confirmada pelo estudo anátomo-patológico. RELATO DO CASO: Homem, 29 anos, com queixa de anemia crônica de origem obscura há vários anos e refratária ao tratamento clínico e transfusional. Com o objetivo de investigar possível origem digestiva foi submetido à arteriografia seletiva abdominal que demonstrou a presença de malformação vascular, localizada na região cecal. Realizou-se colectomia direita onde foi possível confirmar a localização da enfermidade pela arteriografia pós-operatória do espécime extirpado e o diagnóstico definitivo de angiodisplasia pelo estudo anátomo-patológico. Após a intervenção cirúrgica apresentou evolução favorável, estando atualmente no 5º mês pós-operatório sem apresentar sinais de recidiva da anemia. CONCLUSÃO: Não obstante à raridade, a possibilidade de angiodisplasia deverá ser sempre considerada na investigação da anemia de causa obscura em doentes jovens.

The vascular malformations represent one of the main causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients. The incidence of the disease in patients with less than thirty years is a rare described event. The objective of the present report is to show a case of angiodysplasia, located in the cecum region, in-patient on his third decade of life, revealed by preoperative selective angiography and confirmed by histopathological study. Men, 29th years old, presented complaining a chronic anemia of obscure origin for several years and refractory to the clinical and transfusion therapy. With the objective to investigate a possible digestive origin he was submitted to the abdominal selective angiography that demonstrated the presence of vascular malformation located in the cecum. A right colectomy was done and then it was possible to confirm the localization of the disease for postoperative angiography of surgical specimen and the diagnosis of angiodysplasia for the anatomopathologic study. After surgical procedure presented favorable evolution, being currently in the 5th postoperative month without presenting signals of anemia. Despite of an uncommon possibility the presence of angiodysplasia has to be always considered in the clinical investigation of anemia of obscure cause in young patients.