CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A êmese induzida por quimioterapia é fator limitante no tratamento de crianças com câncer. O uso de quimioterapia com drogas emetogênicas tem aumentado a freqüência desse efeito colateral. O objetivo é comparar a eficácia e a toxicidade do granisetron às da combinação de altas doses de metoclopramida e dimenidrato em crianças com osteossarcoma utilizando a mesma quimioterapia. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Aberto, prospectivo, randomizado, realizado no Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, Departamento de Pediatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brasil. MÉTODOS: Entre fevereiro e agosto de 1994, 26 crianças com idade de 7 a 18 anos (média de 14 anos), recebendo quimioterapia para osteossarcoma, entraram no estudo. A quimioterapia consistiu de ciclos repetidos de: A) ifosfamida 2.500 mg/m² + epirrubicina 75 mg/m²; B) ifosfamida 2.500 mg/m² + carboplatina 600 mg/m²; C) carboplatina 600 mg/m² + epirrubicina 75 mg/m². 80 tratamentos quimioterápicos foram avaliados para o controle de náuse e vômito. Os pacientes foram randomizados para receber dose única de granisetron (50 µ/kg) ou metoclopramida (2 mg/kg) mais dimenidrato (5 mg/kg) infundidos por oito horas. Êmese e náusea foram monitoradas por 24 horas por meio de escore de MANE (Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis). Foram utilizados testes de Qui-quadrado, t e Mann Whitney, além da técnica de análise exploratória de dados. RESULTADOS: O granisetron induziu resposta completa em 62,5% dos pacientes submetidos aos tratamentos quimioterápicos comparado a apenas 10% obtidos com a combinação de metoclopramida associado ao dimenidrato (p < 0,0001). CONCLUSÕES: Concluímos que o granisetron é droga segura e eficiente em crianças com osteossarcoma superior à associação de metoclopramida e dimenidrato no controle de náuseas e vômitos induzidos por quimioterapia para osteossarcoma em crianças.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy-induced emesis is a limiting factor in treating children with malignancies. Intensive chemotherapy regimens along with emetogenic drug administration have increased the frequency and severity of emesis and nausea. Our study was designed to consider the importance of this problem and the need for improvement in emesis treatment for patients receiving chemotherapy. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of the antiemetic drug granisetron and a regimen of metoclopramide plus dimenhydrinate. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open, prospective and randomized study at Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, Department of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: From February to August 1994, 26 patients (mean age: 14 years) with osteosarcoma received 80 chemotherapy cycles of iphosphamide (2,500 mg/m²) plus epirubicin (75 mg/m²) or carboplatin (600 mg/m²), or epirubicin (75 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (600 mg/m²). Eighty chemotherapy treatments were analyzed regarding nausea and vomiting control. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of granisetron (50 µg/kg) or metoclopramide (2 mg/kg) plus dimenhydrinate (5 mg/kg infused over eight hours). Emesis and nausea were monitored for 24 hours by means of the modified Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis. Statistical analysis utilized the chi-squared, Student t and Mann-Whitney tests, plus data exploration techniques. RESULTS: 62.5% of the patients undergoing chemotherapy responded completely to granisetron, whereas 10% responded to metoclopramide plus dimenhydrinate (p < 0.0001). No severe adverse reactions were found in either of the treatments given. CONCLUSION: In children and adolescents with osteosarcoma, granisetron was safe and more efficient than metoclopramide plus dimenhydrinate for controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis and nausea.

BACKGROUND: The empirical use of antibiotic treatments is widely accepted as a means to treat cancer patients in chemotherapy who have fever and neutropenia. Intravenous monotherapy, with broad spectrum antibiotics, of patients with a high risk of complications is a possible alternative. METHODS: We conducted a prospective open-label, randomized study of patients with lymphoma or leukemia who had fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy. Patients received either monotherapy with ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (T) or ceftriaxone plus amikacin (C+A). RESULTS: Seventy patients who presented 136 episodes were evaluated, 68 in each arm of the study. The mean neutrophil counts at admission were 217cells/mm³ (T) and 201cells/mm³ (C+A). The mean duration of neutropenia was 8.7 days (T) and 7.6 days (C+A). Treatment was successful without the need for modifications in 71% of the episodes in the T group and 81% in the C+A group (p=0.23). Treatment was considered to have failed because of death in two episodes (3%) in the T group and three episodes (4%) in the C+A group, and because of a change in the drug applied in one episode in the T group and two episodes in the C+A group. Overall success was 96% (T) and 93% (C+A). Adverse events that occurred in group T were not related to the drugs used in this study. CONCLUSION: In pediatric and adolescent patients with leukemia or lymphoma, who presented with fever and neutropenia, during chemotherapy, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid was as successful as the combination of ceftriaxone plus amikacin. It should be considered an appropriate option for this group of patients at high risk for infections.