The tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) crop has great economic relevance, being one of the most processed agricultural products worldwide. Some pesticides are chemically stable and can remain in food even after processing. In this context, the objective of this work was to analyze food products derived from tomatoes (extract, sauce and ketchup), regarding the levels of pesticide residues. Fifteen samples were acquired from Vale do Jaguaribe, Ceará, Brazil. Six pesticides (bifenthrin, chlorothalonil, chlorpyrifos, cyfluthrin, pyriproxyfen, trifluralin) authorized by Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) for tomato cultivation were selected for the study. QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) extraction and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) were used in method validation, according to the recommendations of SANTE 11312/2021 guidelines. Statistical analyses of linearity showed that the six pesticides studied were classified as heterocesdastic. Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) values (0.01-0.03 and 0.03-0.10 mg kg-1, respectively) were below the established maximum residue limits (MRLs) for tomatoes. Accuracy and precision (78-121 and 2.3-16.7%, respectively) were satisfactory. The results indicated that among the 15 analyzed samples, one active ingredient was detected (0.05 mg kg-1) in a tomato sauce sample, lower than MRLs (Anvisa 0.15 mg kg-1 and FAO 0.3 mg kg-1). The results show the relevance of monitoring pesticide residues in tomato-derived products and the validation of new methodologies for food control.

Neste estudo, métodos multirresíduos usando extração em fase sólida (SPE) e microextração em fase sólida (SPME) são comparados na determinação de pesticidas em amostras aquosas. Parâmetros como tipo de fibras e espessura, solvente de eluição, volume da amostra, tempo de equilíbrio, coeficiente de partição e solubilidade foram investigados. Resultados satisfatórios foram obtidos para a análise de pesticidas usando cartuchos C18 e acetato de etila como eluente, com taxas de recuperação entre 75-107%. As melhores condições para SPME foram com uma fibra PDMS 100 µm de espessura, volume de amostra de 40 mL, e tempo de equilíbrio de 45 min. O método SPME é o mais adequado para a análise de pesticidas em água, devido à sua rapidez e simplicidade e ao não uso de solventes. Os limites de detecção e quantificação são inferiores aos limites de concentração máximos estabelecidos pelas autoridades brasileiras, sendo portanto aceitável.

In this study, multiresidue method using solid phase extraction (SPE) and solid phase microextraction (SPME) are compared in the determination of pesticides in aqueous samples. Parameters such as fiber type and thickness, elution solvent, sample volume, equilibration time, partition coefficient and solubility were investigated. Satisfactory results were obtained for the analysis of pesticides using C18 cartridges and ethyl acetate as eluent, whith recovery rates between 75-107%. The best conditions for SPME fiber were PDMS with a 100 µm thick, sample volume of 40 mL, and reaction time was 45 min. SPME method is most suitable for the analysis of pesticides in water, due to its speed and simplicity and solvent-free. The limits of detection and quantification are below the maximum concentration limits established by Brazilian authorities and therefore acceptable.