Abstract Aquaculture of cobia (Rachycentron canadum) is still incipient in Brazil, as well as the sale of its meat. However, there is a market demand for this product in the state of Rio de Janeiro. The salting process for the meat of cultivated cobia is a way of preserving and marketing the product for the growers. Thus, the present study aimed to assess the chemical properties of salted cobia meat. Market-sized cobia grown in net-tanks located in Baía de Ilha Grande, Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil were used. The fish were eviscerated (gutted), beheaded and lightly flattened. The fillets “charutos” were then subjected to brine salting for 6 days, immersed in saturated brine at refrigeration temperature. After the preparation of the product, analyzes of percent composition, chloride content and lipid profile were performed. The product had high concentrations of protein (20.16%), lipids (19.88%) and 6.56% of total chloride. Lipid profile assessment showed significant percentages of palmitic (6.66%) and oleic (4.99%) acids. Therefore, it is concluded that the salted meat of cobia has good nutritional quality, and the product is a source of palmitic and oleic acids that help preventing cardiovascular diseases and lowering cholesterol levels.

OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a qualidade protéica da linhaça quando usada nas fases de crescimento e manutenção em ratos. MÉTODOS: Na primeira etapa utilizaram-se 18 Rattus norvegicus, Wistar, fêmeas, recém-desmamadas, recebendo água e ração à vontade. Estas foram distribuídas em 3 grupos (n=6): grupo linhaça - com dieta à base de linhaça, grupo controle - com dieta à base de caseína, grupo controle modificado - com dieta à base de caseína, com maior concentração de fibras e óleo. Na segunda etapa (após 28 dias de experimento) a dieta do grupo linhaça foi modificada, acrescentou-se 5,4% de caseína. Os demais grupos permaneceram com as mesmas dietas. Todas eram isoenergéticas e continham 10% de proteína. Os animais foram acompanhados até 180 dias de vida. Foram determinados o quociente de eficiência protéica e a albumina nas duas fases do experimento. RESULTADOS: Na primeira etapa, o grupo linhaça obteve quociente de eficiência protéica (0,8, DP=0,05) significantemente menor que o grupo controle (2,3, DP=0,1) e o controle modificado (2,3, DP=0,2). A concentração de albumina do grupo linhaça (3,0, DP=0,04g/dL) foi menor (p<0,01) que a do grupo controle (3,9, DP=0,06g/dL) e a do controle modificado (3,9, DP=0,01g/dL). Já na segunda etapa, o grupo linhaça modificado (1,2, DP=0,1) obteve maior (p<0,01) quociente de eficiência protéica que grupo controle (0,9, DP=0,02) e o controle modificado (0,9, DP=0,05). Não houve diferença significante no teor de albumina entre os grupos, caracterizando a recuperação da desnutrição. CONCLUSÃO: Conclui-se que a linhaça não deve ser utilizada como fonte exclusiva de proteína, principalmente na fase de crescimento.

OBJECTIVE: This experiment tested the protein quality of flaxseed when used for the growth and maintenance of rats. METHODS: In the first phase, 18 just-weaned female Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus), receiving water and chow ad libitum, were divided into three groups (n=6): the flaxseed group received a flaxseed-based diet; the control group received a casein-based diet; and the modified control group received a casein-based, high-fiber, high-oil diet. In the second phase (28 days later), 5.4% of casein was added to the flaxseed-based diet. The diets of the other groups remained unchanged. All animals received isocaloric diets with 10% protein content until they were 180 days old. Protein efficiency ratio and albumin concentration was determined in the 2 phases of the experiment. RESULTS: In the first phase, the protein efficiency ratio of the flaxseed group (0.8, SD=0.05) was significantly lower than those of the control group (2.3, SD=0.1) and modified control group (2.3, SD=0.2). The albumin concentration of the flaxseed group (3.0, SD=0.04g/dL) was smaller (p<0.01) than those of the control group (3.9, SD=0.06g/dL) and modified control group (3.9, SD=0.01g/dL). In the second phase, protein efficiency ratio of the modified flaxseed group (1.2, SD=0.1) was higher (p<0.01) than those of the control group (0.9, SD=0.02) and modified control group (0.9, SD=0.05). Albumin concentration was similar in all groups, characterizing recovery from malnutrition. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, flaxseed should not be used as an exclusive source of protein, especially during growth.

Este estudo objetivou avaliar os efeitos cumulativos da utilização das sojas geneticamente modificada e orgânica em duas gerações de ratos. Utilizaram-se 64 ratos Wistar, de duas gerações consecutivas denominadas F0 e F1. Os animais de cada geração foram divididos em três grupos (n=8) alimentados com ração à base de soja orgânica, soja geneticamente modificada e caseína. Determinou-se o Quociente de Eficácia Protéica, Razão Protéica Líquida e Quociente de Eficácia Alimentar. Aos resultados aplicou-se ANOVA. Foi encontrada, em ambas as gerações uma diferença significativa (p<0,05) entre os grupos experimentais e o grupo controle. A suplementação dos grupos GOF0 e GOF1 com Lcistina proporcionou um melhor aproveitamento protéico em relação ao GGF0 e GGF1. Mostrando que a soja manteve seu aproveitamento, no entanto sempre inferior à caseína. Deve-se utilizar as sojas geneticamente modificada e orgânica com cautela na fase de crescimento, pois mesmo suplementada com L-cistina estas se mantiveram inferior ao grupo à base de caseína.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cumulative effects of using genetically modified and organic soybean in two generations of rats. Two consecutive generations of 64 Wistar rats denominated F0 and F1 were used. The animals from each generation were divided into three groups (n=8) and fed chow made of organic soybean, genetically modified soybean and casein. The PER, NPR and CAE were determined. ANOVA was applied to the results. In both the generations, a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference was found between the experimental groups and the control group. The organic soybean supplement with L-cystine provided a better use of this protein in comparison to the genetically modified soybean protein, which demonstrated that the soybean maintained its protein use, although always inferior to casein. Thus, soybean should be used with caution during the growth stages because even with supplements, it remained inferior in relation to the casein group.