Abstract Pathological parameters have been indicated as tumor prognostic factors in oral carcinoma. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of pathological parameters on prognosis of patients affected only by tongue and/or floor of the mouth squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methodology: In total, 380 patients treated in the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA) from 1999 to 2006 were included. These patients underwent radical resection followed by neck dissection. The clinical and pathological characteristics were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used in survival analysis. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free interval (DFI) were estimated. Cox residuals were evaluated using the R software version 3.5.2. Worst OS, CSS and DFI were observed in patients with tumors in advanced pathological stages (p<0.001), with the presence of perineural invasion (p<0.001) and vascular invasion (p=0.005). Results: Advanced pathological stage and the presence of a poorly differentiated tumor were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. However, advanced pathological stage and perineural invasion were independent predictors of a shorter OS, DFI and CSS. Conclusion: Pathological stage and perineural invasion were the most significant pathological variables in survival analysis in tongue and/or floor of the mouth SCC.

ABSTRACT The cultivation of genetically modified crops in Brazil has led to the need to assess the impacts of this technology on non-target species. Under field conditions, the potential effect on insect biodiversity was evaluated by comparing a homogeneous corn field with conventional and transgenic maize, expressing different Bt proteins in seven counties of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The richness pattern of non-target insect species, secondary pests and natural enemies were observed. The results do not support the hypothesis that Bt protein affects insect biodiversity. The richness and diversity data of insects studied were dependent on the location and other factors, such as the use of insecticides, which may be a major factor where they are used.

Territórios resultam de interações comportamentais que determinam onde e por quanto tempo um indivíduo consegue se estabelecer. Para espécies de Odonata, as disputas agressivas entre machos são raras, pois, vantagens pré-existentes como idade, tamanho corporal ou residência definem o vencedor. Entretanto, é possível esperar que nas interações interespecíficas, espécies de maior tamanho corporal ou mais agressivas possam ter vantagens nas disputas, sobrepujando as vantagens individuais pré-existentes e gerando um padrão hierárquico entre as espécies. Neste trabalho, eu estudei a agressividade exibida por espécies de Erythrodiplax (Odonata, Libellulidae) e verifiquei se espécies maiores são mais agressivas ou se a vantagem do residente prevalece também nas disputas interespecíficas. Espécies maiores não são mais agressivas e os vencedores das disputas territoriais intra- e inter-específicas foram machos residentes. Logo, a vantagem do residente parece prevalecer sobre qualquer assimetria existente entre as espécies estudadas, o que pode ocorrer porque, apesar do comportamento territorial exibido por elas, o recurso defendido pelos machos é o acesso às fêmeas e vencer disputas interespecíficas pode não afetar positivamente o sucesso reprodutivo dos mesmos.

Residence advantage in heterospecific territorial disputes of Erythrodiplax Brauer species (Odonata, Libellulidae). Territories are the outcome of interactions determining where and how long individuals settle. To odonate species, aggressive disputes are not so common since the outcome can be predetermined by advantages such as residency, age, and body size. However, it is possible to predict that at heterospecific disputes, larger body-sized or more aggressive species have some profits overcoming these individual advantages, generating patterns of species hierarchy. Here, I studied the aggressiveness of five Erythrodiplax species (Odonata, Libellulidae) during territorial disputes and verified if larger body-sized species are more aggressive than smaller ones or if the residence advantage prevails on the heterospecific disputes. Larger species were not more aggressive than smaller ones and winners of intra- and interspecific territorial disputes were defined mainly by the residence. So, the residence advantage between heterospecific opponents appears to prevail over any other asymmetry among these species. This pattern may occur because, despite the territorial behaviour in dragonfly males, heterospecific disputes may not increment male reproductive success because it may not increase their access to females.