ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a broad spectrum of hip pathologies, including femoral or acetabular dysplasia, hip instability, or both. According to the medical literature, ultrasonography is the most reliable diagnostic method for DDH. Several techniques for the assessment of hips in newborns and infants, using ultrasonography, have been described. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of the Graf technique and other diagnostic techniques for DDH. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of studies that analyzed ultrasound techniques for the diagnosis of DDH within an evidence-based health program of a federal university in São Paulo (SP), Brazil. METHODS: A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and LILACS databases for articles published up to May 5, 2020, relating to studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of different ultrasound techniques for diagnosing DDH. The QUADAS 2 tool was used for methodological quality evaluation. RESULTS: All hips were analyzed using the Graf method as a reference standard. The Morin technique had the highest rate of sensitivity, at 81.12–89.47%. The Suzuki and Stress tests showed 100% specificity. The Harcke technique showed a sensibility of 18.21% and specificity of 99.32%. CONCLUSION: All the techniques demonstrated at least one rate (sensibility and specificity) lower than 90.00% when compared to the Graf method. The Morin technique, as evaluated in this systematic review, is recommended after the Graf method because it has the highest sensitivity, especially with the three-pattern classification of 89.47%. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Identifier: CRD42020189686 at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42020189686).

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a broad spectrum of hip pathologies, including femoral or acetabular dysplasia, hip instability, or both. According to the medical literature, ultrasonography is the most reliable diagnostic method for DDH. Several techniques for the assessment of hips in newborns and infants, using ultrasonography, have been described. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of the Graf technique and other diagnostic techniques for DDH. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of studies that analyzed ultrasound techniques for the diagnosis of DDH within an evidence-based health program of a federal university in São Paulo (SP), Brazil. METHODS: A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and LILACS databases for articles published up to May 5, 2020, relating to studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of different ultrasound techniques for diagnosing DDH. The QUADAS 2 tool was used for methodological quality evaluation. RESULTS: All hips were analyzed using the Graf method as a reference standard. The Morin technique had the highest rate of sensitivity, at 81.12–89.47%. The Suzuki and Stress tests showed 100% specificity. The Harcke technique showed a sensibility of 18.21% and specificity of 99.32%. CONCLUSION: All the techniques demonstrated at least one rate (sensibility and specificity) lower than 90.00% when compared to the Graf method. The Morin technique, as evaluated in this systematic review, is recommended after the Graf method because it has the highest sensitivity, especially with the three-pattern classification of 89.47%. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Identifier: CRD42020189686 at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42020189686).

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a prevalência de displasia de desenvolvimento de quadril (DDQ), ou seja, quadris de tipo de Graf IIc ou maior, em amostra da população de recém-nascidos de 0 a 3 dias de vida, e correlacionar os achados com os principais fatores de risco descritos na literatura. Métodos Estudo observacional, transversal e prospectivo em amostra de recémnascidos, em um hospital maternidade em São Paulo, para avaliar a prevalência da DDQ diagnosticada pelo método de Graf e verificar sua correlação com os fatores de risco. Resultados Um total de 678 recém-nascidos foram submetidos a ultrassonografia de quadril (1.356 quadris). A prevalência de DDQ (quadris tipo IIc, D, IIIa, IIIb, e IV de Graf) foi de 5,46%. A análise de regressão logística mostrou razões de chances (RCs) com significância estatística para os parâmetros etnia branca (RC = 2.561; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]: 1,07 a 6,11), multiparidade (RC = 3,50; IC95%: 1,62 a 7,38), sexo feminine (RC = 4,95; IC95%: 1,86 a 13,13), e apresentação pélvica (RC = 2,03; IC95%: 1,01 a 4,11). Conclusão A prevalência de DDQ na amostra foi de 5,45% usando a ultrassonografia como método de diagnóstico. Este resultado é diferente do dos estudos que avaliam a prevalência exclusivamente do exame físico (manobra de Ortolani). Os principais fatores de risco associados ao maior risco de DDQ foram recém-nascidos do sexo feminino, com apresentação pélvica, primogênitos, e de etnia branca.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), that is, hips classified as Graf type-IIc or higher, among a sample of the population of newborns aged from 0 to 3 days of life, and to correlate the findings with the main risk factors described in the literature. Methods An observational, cross-sectional, prospective study on a sample of newborns at a Maternity Hospital School in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, to assess the prevalence of DDH diagnosed by the Graf method and verify its correlation with the risk factors. Results A total of 678 newborns underwent hip ultrasound (1,356 hips). The prevalence of DDH was of 5.46%. The logistic regression analysis showed odds ratios (ORs) with statistical significance for the following parameters: white ethnicity (OR = 2.561; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.07 to 6.11); multiparity (OR = 3.50; 95%CI: 1.62 to 7.38), female gender (OR = 4.95; 95%CI: 1.86 to 13.13); and breech presentation (OR = 2.03; 95%CI: 1,01 to 4.11). Conclusion The prevalence of DDH in the sample was of 5.45% using ultrasound as a diagnostic method. This result is different from that of studies that assessed prevalence exclusively through physical examination (Ortolani maneuver). The main risk factors associated with a higher risk of developing DDH were newborns of the female gender, with breech presentation, firstborns, and of white ethnicity.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar se o uso do crescimento guiado com placas em oito é mais eficaz que os grampos de Blount na correção do geno varo idiopático ou geno valgo idiopático. Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática (RS), de acordo com a metodologia apropriada para busca de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR). Pesquisamos em sete bancos de dados por meio de uma metodologia definida anteriormente e incluímos ECR, independentemente do idioma, período ou status da publicação. Resultados: Foram recuperados 6830 artigos. Destes, 14 estudos possivelmente elegíveis foram encontrados, mas apenas um ECR foi incluído para a RS. O ECR incluído compara placas em oito e grampos de Blount, não mostrando diferença estatisticamente significante para os resultados de tempo na correção da deformidade, dor pós-operatória após 24 horas e dor pós-operatória após 72 horas. O estudo é de nível baixo ou muito baixo de evidência para determinar a técnica mais eficaz. Não encontramos um ECR que comparasse a correção do geno varo. Conclusão: Ensaios clínicos randomizados de boa qualidade comparando grampos de Blount com oito placas devem ser realizados para determinar qual técnica é superior para correções do plano coronal. Nível de Evidência I, Revisão sistemática de ECRC.

ABSTRACT Objective: Our objective is to evaluate whether the use of guided growth with eight-plates is more effective than the use of Blount staples for the correction of the idiopathic genu varum or idiopathic genu valgum. Methods: A systematic review (SR) was carried out according to the appropriate methodology for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We searched seven databases through a previously defined methodology, and we included RCTs, regardless of language, period of publication and status of publication. Results: Resulted in 6830 articles retrieved. Of theses, we identified 14 potential eligible studies. but just one RCT was included for the SR. The included RCT compares the eight-plate and the Blount staple and showed no statistically significant difference for the outcomes of time to correct the deformity, postoperative pain after 24 hours and postoperative pain after 72 hours. The study is of low or very low level of evidence to determine the most effective technique. We didn’t find a RCT that compared the correction of the genu varum. Conclusion: Good quality randomized clinical trials comparing Blount staples versus eight-plaque must be performed to determine which technique is superior for coronal plane corrections. Level of Evidence I, Systematic review of Level RCTs.