Abstract Introduction Arterial Blood Pressure is a significant indicator of the current health condition of an individual. The correct detection of hypertension is essential, where this health problem is considered as one of the greatest health risks factors that affect the heart and circulatory system. This paper presents the importance of the application of metrological criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension using a sphygmomanometer aneroid. Methods 72 mechanical aneroid sphygmomanometers were calibrated using a standard manometer and the indication error, hysteresis, air leakage and rapid exhaust were determined; readings of these sphygmomanometers were compared to a properly calibrated and adjusted aneroid sphygmomanometer to carry out pressure measurements as those made during the hypertension diagnosis; the uncertainty of measurement associated with the sphygmomanometers calibration, and pressure values was assessed according to the recommendations of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, defined by the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Results The results obtained have shown that about 61% of the evaluated aneroid sphygmomanometers did not meet the specifications. The variable that most contributed to the final calibration uncertainty was the hysteresis of the standard manometer, with 53% of contribution, followed by the sphygmomanometer resolution with 27%. Conclusion The periodic verifications are essential to evaluate the performance of these devices. It was shown that uncertainty of measurement influences the final diagnosis of hypertension and the application of metrological criteria can increase the reliability of the final diagnosis.

A Engenharia Clínica é uma área com atuação nos Estabelecimentos Assistenciais de Saúde, desenvolvendo atividades baseadas nos conhecimentos de engenharia e de gerenciamento aplicadas às tecnologias de saúde. Nesse contexto, este trabalho relata os impactos econômicos da aplicação de técnicas de gestão em Engenharia Clínica num hospital público brasileiro de grande porte e referência em alta complexidade - Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Trata-se de uma pesquisa quantitativa, onde foram consideradas questões econômicas e de qualidade, suportada por pesquisa documental. O levantamento de dados baseou-se em relatórios e documentos administrativos do hospital do período de 2001 a 2010, referentes a recursos humanos, indicadores de serviços, indicadores de qualidade, custos com peças e contratos. Dentre os resultados encontrados, destaca-se a redução de aproximadamente 20% nas manutenções corretivas e sua estabilização ao longo do tempo, mesmo em face de um elevado aumento do parque tecnológico da instituição. No montante global de gastos com contratos, observou-se uma redução de cerca de 65% no período avaliado. A economia gerada pela gestão em Engenharia Clínica para a instituição foi de aproximadamente R$ 2 milhões em 2010, e a economia acumulada no período de 2001 a 2010 foi de R$ 7,6 milhões. Concluiu-se, que a gestão em Engenharia Clínica na instituição possibilitou uma redução significativa nos custos por meio da formação e capacitação de uma equipe própria, da redução dos custos com contratos e melhor planejamento das manutenções. Tais resultados demonstram a importância de um serviço de Engenharia Clínica para a melhor gestão de custos e das tecnologias em hospitais, sejam eles públicos ou privados.

Clinical Engineering is an important area for health care facilities, capable of applying engineering and management techniques to improve health technologies. In this context, this paper reports the economic impacts of the application of clinical engineering management techniques in a large Brazilian public hospital, which is also a reference for high complexity medical procedures - General Hospital of the Federal University of Uberlândia. The discussion is supported by a quantitative documentary research, which took into account not only the economic aspects, but also the quality of the service provided. The survey was based on reports and administrative documents from 2001 to 2010, related to human resources, service and quality indicators, costs of parts and contracts. Among the findings, it was observed a reduction of approximately 20% in corrective maintenance and their stabilization over time, even as the technological park of the institution increased. As for the overall amount of cost with contracts, there was a reduction of approximately 65% during the period. The savings generated by the Clinical Engineering Service, for the institution, were about R$ 2 million in 2010. The cumulative savings over the period of 2001 to 2010 were about R$ 7.6 million. Based on those results, it can be concluded that the Clinical Engineering Service provided a significant reduction in costs for the institution, by means of setting and training its own team, reducing costs and a better planning of maintenance. Those results demonstrate the importance of a Clinical Engineering Service for best managing costs and technologies in hospitals, whether public or private.