Resumo Objetivo: Apresentar e verificar a reprodutibilidade de um sistema quantitativo de avaliação da qualidade de exames de ultrassonografia (SQUALUS), levando em consideração as imagens documentadas e a coerência entre as imagens obtidas e o laudo final. Materiais e Métodos: Foram elaborados quesitos considerando o número de imagens, a adequação das imagens ao protocolo estabelecido, o ajuste do foco, a profundidade e ganho e a adequação das medidas. Para exames com Doppler também foram avaliadas a adequação das fotos coloridas, a análise espectral e a correção do ângulo. Para a qualidade do laudo foi considerada a coerência com as imagens documentadas e seu conteúdo. Um sistema numérico foi atribuído conferindo uma nota final à qualidade das imagens, ao conteúdo do laudo e à média das duas avaliações. Trinta exames de ultrassonografia de diferentes tipos foram avaliados por dois examinadores independentes, cegos à avaliação um do outro. Resultados: Os avaliadores apresentaram concordância estatisticamente significante em 8 de 10 quesitos para avaliação da qualidade da imagem. Na avaliação dos laudos, a concordância entre os avaliadores foi quase perfeita. Conclusão: O sistema quantitativo de avaliação da qualidade de exames ultrassonográficos proposta é uma ferramenta reprodutível que pode ser utilizada em auditorias e em programas de acreditação.

Abstract Objective: To present a quantitative system for assessing the quality of ultrasound examinations-SQUALUS-and to determine its reproducibility, taking into consideration the images on file, as well as the consistency between the images obtained and the final report. Materials and Methods: The system includes questions related to the number of images; the appropriateness of images in relation to the protocol established; focus adjustment; depth; gain; and appropriateness of the measurements for B-mode examinations. For Doppler examinations, the system includes questions related to the appropriateness of color images, the spectral analysis, and correction of the insonation angle. To assess the quality of the report, the system includes questions related to the consistency between the images obtained and the contents of the report. An overall numerical score was assigned by averaging the scores for image quality and for the contents of the report. Two independent examiners, each blinded to the evaluation of the other, assessed 30 different types of ultrasound examinations. Results: There was statistically significant agreement between the two examiners for 8 of the 10 questions related to image quality. For the questions related to the quality of the reports, the interexaminer agreement was almost perfect. Conclusion: The proposed quantitative system for assessing the quality of ultrasound examinations is a reproducible tool that can be used in audits and accreditation programs.

A rare case of primary splenic cyst is shown in a young woman who had a left subcostal abdominal pain. Abdominal echography and CT scan revealed a cyst of the anterior aspect of the spleen. A sorologic test for hidatic disease was negative. On the basis of a presumed diagnostic of nonparasitic cyst, the patient was referred to a laparoscopic decapsulation with excision of the cyst wall not covered by splenic tissue. The patient was discharged 24 hours later. Histological report revelead epidermoid cyst. The laparoscopic approach has being recently considered an effective and less invasive alternative in the treatment of splenic diseases. We demonstrated that it should be considered for the treatment of splenic cysts present in a superficial location, with the advantage of organ preservation.