RESUMO A imobilidade pode causar várias complicações que influenciam na recuperação de doentes críticos, incluindo atrofia e fraqueza muscular esquelética. Esse efeito pode ser amenizado com a realização de mobilização precoce. Seis questões primordiais nortearam essa pesquisa: É segura? Quem é o candidato à mobilização precoce? Quais são as contraindicações? Qual a dose adequada e como defini-la? Quais os resultados obtidos? Quais os indicadores prognósticos em sua utilização? O objetivo desta diretriz foi elaborar um documento que reunisse recomendações e sugestões baseadas em níveis de evidência sobre a mobilização precoce do paciente crítico adulto, visando melhorar o entendimento sobre o tema, com impacto positivo no atendimento aos pacientes. Esta diretriz foi desenvolvida com base em uma revisão sistemática de artigos, utilizando a estratégia de busca no modelo PICO, conforme recomendado pelo Projeto de Diretrizes da Associação Médica Brasileira. Foram selecionados ensaios clínicos randomizados, estudos de coortes prognósticos, revisões sistemáticas com ou sem metanálise, sendo as evidências classificadas segundo Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - Levels of Evidence. Em todas as questões abordadas, foram encontradas evidências suficientes para a realização da mobilização precoce de forma segura e bem definida, com indicadores prognósticos que evidenciam e recomendam a técnica. A mobilização precoce está associada a melhores resultados funcionais, devendo ser realizada sempre que indicada. É segura e deve ser meta de toda equipe multidisciplinar.

ABSTRACT Immobility can cause several complications, including skeletal muscle atrophy and weakness, that influence the recovery of critically ill patients. This effect can be mitigated by early mobilization. Six key questions guided this research: Is early mobilization safe? Which patients are candidates for early mobilization? What are the contraindications? What is the appropriate dose, and how should it be defined? What results are obtained? What are the prognostic indicators for the use of early mobilization? The objective of this guideline was to produce a document that would provide evidence-based recommendations and suggestions regarding the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients, with the aim of improving understanding of the topic and making a positive impact on patient care. This guideline was based on a systematic review of articles conducted using the PICO search strategy, as recommended by the Guidelines Project of the Associação Médica Brasileira. Randomized clinical trials, prognostic cohort studies, and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were selected, and the evidence was classified according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. For all the questions addressed, enough evidence was found to support safe and well-defined early mobilization, with prognostic indicators that support and recommend the technique. Early mobilization is associated with better functional outcomes and should be performed whenever indicated. Early mobilization is safe and should be the goal of the entire multidisciplinary team.

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

RESUMO Hérnias discais lombares são manifestações comuns das doenças degenerativas da coluna, sendo a principal causa de dor lombar irradiada. Esta diretriz seguiu padrão de uma revisão sistemática com recuperação de evidências com base no movimento da Medicina Baseada em Evidências. Utilizamos a forma estruturada de formular a pergunta sintetizada pelo acrônimo P.I.C.O., em que o P corresponde à Hérnia de disco lombar, I à intervenção Tratamento com hidrodiscectomia percutânea, C comparando com Outras modalidades de tratamento, O de desfecho de Evolução clínica e complicações. A partir da pergunta estruturada, identificamos os descritores que constituíram a base da busca da evidência nas bases de dados Medline-PubMed (636 trabalhos) e, assim, após os critérios de elegibilidade (inclusão e exclusão), oito trabalhos foram selecionados para responder à dúvida clínica. Os detalhes da metodologia e dos resultados desta diretriz estão expostos no Anexo I.

SUMMARY Lumbar herniated disc are common manifestations of degenerative spine diseases, the main cause of radiated lower back pain. This guideline followed standard of a systematic review with recovery of evidence based on the movement of evidence-based medicine. We used the structured method for formulating the question synthesized by the acronym p.I.C.O., In which the p corresponds to the lumbar herniated disc, i to the treatment intervention with percutaneous hydrodiscectomy, c comparing with other treatment modalities, o the outcome of clinical evolution and complications. From the structured question, we identify the descriptors which constituted the evidence search base in the medline-pubmed databases (636 papers) and therefore, after the eligibility criteria (inclusion and exclusion), eight papers were selected to answer to clinical question. The details of the methodology and the results of this guideline are exposed in annex i.

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.