RESUMO Púrpura trombocitopênica trombótica (PTT) é uma síndrome hemorrágica grave caracterizada por trombocitopenia, anemia hemolítica microangiopática e oclusão microvascular, bem como por sintomas associados que podem ou não estar presentes, como febre, comprometimento neurológico variável e comprometimento renal. A fisiopatologia implicada na doença envolve a deficiência, seja por inibição autoimune ou defeito genético, seja pela atividade de uma metaloproteinase (ADAMTS-13), responsável pela clivagem de multímeros do fator de von Willebrand (FvW). O tratamento consiste na plasmaférese e, em casos agudos graves ou recorrentes, associa-se a corticoterapia e imunossupressores. Neste artigo, abordaremos um relato de caso sobre essa doença, cuja paciente foi atendida inicialmente em pronto-socorro, sendo em seguida internada em uma unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) de um hospital público de referência da cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Todos os critérios clínicos diagnósticos foram completamente preenchidos, facilitando a abordagem terapêutica da paciente. O relato evidencia que a rápida intervenção, quando se faz o diagnóstico precoce, evolui com bom prognóstico, devendo esta patologia estar presente como diagnóstico diferencial no cotidiano médico.

ABSTRACT Thrombocytopenic thrombotic purpura (TTP) is a severe hemorrhagic syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and microvascular occlusion, besides the associated symptoms that may or may not be present: fever, neurological and renal impairment. The pathophysiology involves the autoimmune or genetic deficiency of a metalloproteinases activity (ADAMTS-13), responsible for the von Willebrand Factor cleavage. The treatment is based on plasmapheresis; and in acute or recurrent cases, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants are associated. In this article, we will discuss a case report about this disease, initially treated in the Emergency Room and followed in the Intensive Care Unit of a public reference hospital in São Paulo city, Brazil. All clinical diagnostic criteria were completely filled, facilitating the therapeutic approach of the patient. The report evidences that rapid intervention when made early diagnosis evolves with a good prognosis, and this pathology must be present as a differential diagnosis in the medical routine.

OBJECTIVES: Verify the efficacy of clinical and morphologic parameters currently applied, including an immunohistochemical panel, in the prognostic of prostate cancer, in specific stages of the disease MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from 2002 to 2005, 40 surgical specimens were selected from patients submitted to radical prostatectomy, with their respective diagnostic biopsies. Based on the pathological stage pT2 or pT3, the specimens were separated into two groups, each one with 20 specimens. The results were confronted with pre- and postoperative clinical data. Between the groups studied, the following was also analyzed: the profile of the expression of molecular markers such as PSA, E-caderin, chromogranin-A, synaptofisin, P53 and Ki-67, both in the material coming from the prostatic biopsy and from the surgical specimens of all patients RESULTS: Data showed that patients with prostate-confined disease (pT2) presented lower PSA and Gleason score rates, in relation to the group with extra-prostatic disease (pT3). Quantitative measures obtained for the percentage of positive fragments from the biopsy revealed that patients from the pT2 group presented a lower mean percentage when compared to the pT3 group. Positive margins of both groups influenced the need for complementary treatment before biochemical progression. The comparison of the molecular marker expression in both stages was not significantly different CONCLUSION: It is evident the need to improve new methods, predominantly morphologic and molecular, that are able to further exploit the study of the material from the prostatic biopsy. As to the profile of the molecular markers used in both studied groups, there was no significant difference in the sense of outlining an additional prognostic factor in the clinical practice.