Abstract The aging process of reservoirs has been extensively investigated; however, little is known about how fish populations are adjusted after many years of impoundment. Thus, this study aimed to compare the diet, length-weight relationship, sizes classes, variation in size, and age of Astyanax lacustris Lütken, 1875 collected from lotic and lentic habitats of an aging reservoir. The study group consisted of 730 captured fishes. We found that specimens collected from lotic habitats had a wider range of size classes (1.0 to 12.0 cm), were linked to a high frequency of juveniles (48.7%), and had greater feeding activity (higher stomach fullness). In contrast, fishes collected from lentic environments exhibited high rates of capture (78.4%), increased frequency of adults (87.3%), and higher values of mean standard length. The length-weight relationship indicated that lentic fishes were heavier than fish collected from lotic areas. Moreover, we observed 37 food items in A. lacustris diet, mainly plant material, algae, Cladocera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, and Ephemeroptera. Differences among the diet of fishes between sites were evidenced with Permanova (p < 0.05). Astyanax lacustris can be considered a persistent species in Chavantes Reservoir after aging, encountering conditions to complete its life span and adjusting to food resources.

RESUMO A amostragem probabilística, uma recomendação clássica para dados não enviesados, tem sido frequentemente negligenciada. Reservatórios, diferentemente da maioria dos rios, permitem diversos desenhos amostrais probabilísticos para a amostragem de peixes por impor poucas restrições na escolha de pontos de coletas. Neste trabalho, avaliamos se métricas populacionais do Prochilodus lineatus diferem entre amostras de pontos fixos (não mudam a cada campanha) ou variáveis (mudam a cada campanha) nos reservatórios de Volta Grande (VGR) e Jaguara (JR), rio Grande, bacia do alto rio Paraná, Brasil. Amostramos os peixes com redes de emalhar em nove pontos fixos e nove pontos variáveis por campanha, todos probabilísticos. Foram 25 campanhas em RVG e 22 em RJ de 2011 a 2015. Para cada reservatório, fizemos 35 análises para 8 métricas. Encontramos influência do desenho amostral em apenas 7% das análises e em três métricas, aparentemente provocada por dados enviesados dos pontos fixos. Atribuímos a pequena porcentagem de análises influenciada pelo desenho amostral à baixa heterogeneidade espacial dos reservatórios. A escolha do desenho amostral mais apropriado parece depender, além disso, do tipo de variação (temporal ou espacial) que se deseja detectar, e a disponibilidade de tempo e de recurso financeiro.

ABSTRACT Probabilistic sampling, a classical recommendation for unbiased data, has been often overlooked. Fish sampling in reservoirs, unlike most rivers, can be accomplished by a variety of probabilistic sampling designs due to few restrictions in the choice of sampling sites (SSs). We evaluated whether population metrics of Prochilodus lineatus differ between fixed SSs (do not change with each sampling trip) and variable SSs (change with each sampling trip) in the Volta Grande (VGR) and Jaguara (JR) reservoirs of the Grande River, Paraná River basin, Brazil. We used gillnets to sample fish at nine probabilistic fixed SSs and nine probabilistic variable SSs per sampling trip. We conducted 25 sampling trips in VGR and 22 in JR during 2011 to 2015, and performed 35 analyses of 8 metrics for each reservoir. We found sampling design influenced only 7% of the analyses involving three metrics, apparently caused by biased data of fixed SSs. We attribute the small percentage of analyses influenced by sampling design to the low spatial heterogeneity of the reservoirs. The choice of the most appropriate sampling design seems to depend on the type of variation (temporal or spatial) that one wishes to detect, and the availability of time and financial resources.