Abstract Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of diarrhea in hospitalized patients worldwide. While metronidazole and vancomycin are the most prescribed antibiotics for the treatment of this infection, teicoplanin, tigecycline and nitazoxanide are alternatives drugs. Knowledge on the antibiotic susceptibility profiles is a basic step to differentiate recurrence from treatment failure due to antimicrobial resistance. Because C. difficile antimicrobial susceptibility is largely unknown in Brazil, we aimed to determine the profile of C. difficile strains cultivated from stool samples of inpatients with diarrhea and a positive toxin A/B test using both agar dilution and disk diffusion methods. All 50 strains tested were sensitive to metronidazole according to CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints with an MIC90 value of 2 μg/mL. Nitazoxanide and tigecycline were highly active in vitro against these strains with an MIC90 value of 0.125 μg/mL for both antimicrobials. The MIC90 were 4 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL for vancomycin and teicoplanin, respectively. A resistance rate of 8% was observed for moxifloxacin. Disk diffusion can be used as an alternative to screen for moxifloxacin resistance, nitazoxanide, tigecycline and metronidazole susceptibility, but it cannot be used for testing glycopeptides. Our results suggest that C. difficile strains from São Paulo city, Brazil, are susceptible to metronidazole and have low MIC90 values for most of the current therapeutic options available in Brazil.

This is part of the series of practice guidelines commissioned by the Brazilian Society for Infectious Diseases through its Practice Guidelines Committee. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide assistance to clinicians in the antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in immunocompetent adults. Panel members and consultants are experts in adult infectious diseases. The guidelines are evidence based where possible. The recommendations included in this document were elaborated based on the most frequently isolated pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibilities. The etiology was based mainly on international studies, since there are very few regional data. On the other hand, the antimicrobial susceptibilities of main bacterial causes of CAP were based on the results of several antimicrobial resistance surveillance studies recently performed in Brazil. Other reference guidelines for the treatment of CAP, such as those elaborated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society, were also discussed by the group during the elaboration of this document.

O controle de tratamento da leishmaniose mucosa (LM) pode ser realizado pelo exame clínico e o acompanhamento dos títulos sorológicos da reação de imunofluorescência indireta (RIFI). Estudamos a correlação entre a presença de antígeno no tecido através da reação de imuno-histoquímica, os títulos da reação de imunofluorescência indireta e os achados anatomopatológicos, em quinze pacientes com LM, antes e após as lesões estarem cicatrizadas pela avaliação otorrinolaringológica, e avaliamos qual destes parâmetros pode ter utilidade no seguimento. Após a terapêutica houve negativação do antígeno tecidual em quatro doentes (grupo A), sendo a redução ou negativação dos títulos da RIFI estatisticamente significante (p<0.05), o que não ocorreu nos doentes, em que houve permanência do antígeno posteriormente ao tratamento (grupo B), sugerindo que o acompanhamento sorológico deva ser realizado conjuntamente com a pesquisa do antígeno tecidual, associação que não conhecemos ter sido utilizada anteriormente em outro estudo. A negativação do antígeno tecidual e o comportamento dos títulos da RIFI nos doentes do grupo A, provavelmente indicam menor possibilidade de recidiva. Ao exame anatomo-patológico, o processo inflamatório persistiu após a terapêutica, mesmo no grupo A, sugerindo que a permanência da atividade inflamatória em lesões clinicamente cicatrizadas, possivelmente correlaciona-se com a presença do antígeno ou a algum fator desconhecido.

Treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) can be controlled by clinical examination and by serologic titers by the indirect immunofluorescence serologic reaction (IISR). We studied the correlation between the presence of antigen in tissue determined by immunohistochemistry, the IISR titers and the anatomopathologic findings in fifteen patients with ML before and after healing of the lesions as determined by otorhinolaryngologic evaluation, and evaluated these parameters to determine which of them could be useful during follow-up. Tissue antigens became negative in four patients (group A) after treatment, with a statistically significant reduction or negativity of IISR titers (p<0.05). This did not occur in patients in whom the antigen persisted after treatment (group B), suggesting that serologic follow-up should be performed together with the search for tissue antigen, a combination which, to our knowledge, has not been used in previous studies. The negativity of tissue antigens and the behavior of IIRS titers in group A patients probably indicate a lower possibility of recurrence. Upon anatomopathologic examination the inflammatory process was found to persist after treatment even in group A, suggesting that the permanence of inflammatory activity even in clinically healed lesions is possibly correlated with the presence of the antigen or of some unknown factor.