RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar as pressões de ruptura dos adesivos teciduais de Cianoacrilato (Omnex®) e de Fibrina (Evicel®), usados como reforço em suturas colônicas de suínos “ex-vivo”. Métodos: Os procedimentos cirúrgicos realizados foram realizados no Laboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica. A partir da divisão em segmentos de 10 cm do colo descendente e colo sigmoide de três suínas fêmeas ex-vivo, da raça Landrace, ressecados em tempo inferior a seis horas em relação ao momento do abate, foram selecionados 30 segmentos, 10 de cada animal. Foram armazenados em soro fisiológico 0,9% a 36 °C, alocando-se aleatoriamente esses segmentos em três grupos (Controle, Evicel e Omnex) com 10 segmentos cada. Resultados: Os menores e maiores valores pressóricos encontrados nos grupos Controle, Evicel e Omnex foram 36 mmHg e 41 mmHg, 70 mmHg e 90 mmHg, 90 mmHg e 120 mmHg, respectivamente. Com significância estatística (Valor-p < 0,0001) para as comparações 2 a 2 (Sutura, Evicel e Omnex) com um intervalo de confiança de 95% construído a partir da aplicação do método de Turkey. Conclusão: A partir desse estudo conclui-se que o uso de adesivos teciduais em anastomoses colônicas, em modelo experimental animal de suíno ex-vivo, aumentou as pressões de ruptura das anastomoses. Dentre os adesivos testados, o adesivo de Cianoacrilato apresentou maiores pressões de ruptura em relação ao adesivo de Fibrina.

ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate rupture pressures of tissue adhesives of cyanoacrylate (Omnex®) and fibrin (Evicel®), used as reinforcement in colonic suture from “ex vivo” swine. Methods: Surgical procedures were performed in the Surgical Technique Laboratory. From a division in segments of 10 cm of descending colon and sigmoid colon from three “ex vivo” female swine, Landrace breed, which were resected in less than six hours after the slaughter time, 30 segments were selected, 10 of each animal. They were stored in saline solution 0.9% at 36 °C, being randomly allocated in three groups (Control, Evicel and Omnex), each one containing 10 segments. Results: The lower and higher pressure values found in the groups Control, Evicel and Omnex were 36 mmHg and 41 mmHg, 70 mmHg and 90 mmHg, 90 mmHg and 120 mmHg, respectively. Containing statistical significance (p-value <0.0001) concerning the 2 to 2 comparisons (Control, Evicel and Omnex) with 95% trusting rate based on the application of the Turkey Method. Conclusion: One concludes that the use of tissue adhesives in anastomoses colonic in an experimental animal model of “ex vivo” swine increased the anastomoses rupture pressures. Among the tested adhesives, cyanoacrylate presented higher rupture pressure in relation to fibrin adhesive.

Boerhaave's syndrome, the spontaneous rupture of the esophagus, is associated with a 35% death rate. Perforated esophagus is a surgical emergency; it is the most serious, and frequently the most rapidly lethal, perforation of the gastro-intestinal tract. Three cases of Boerhaave's syndrome are presented, with their variants and resolutions. Treatment and outcome are largely determined by the time of presentation. We reviewed our experience with esophageal perforations to determine the overall mortality and whether the time of presentation should influence management strategy.

A 49yrs old, male patient presented progressive dysphagia during the last two years, initially to solids and, since two weeks, liquids he had lost 15 kilos. Esophagogram showed an intraluminal lesion with regular mucosa in the middle third of esophagus. The esophagoscopy exhibits regular mucosa up to the lesion, which did not alow passage. There was no evidence of linfonodal disease at CT scan. The hypothesis of esophageal leiomyoma led this patient a right posterior thoracotomy and enucleation of a 30 x 30 mm mass from the esophageal wall. With this case report we intend to review esophageal leiomyomas and their diagnosis and treatment.

A esofagite de refluxo associada ao epitélio de colunar do esôfago predispõe ao adenocarcinoma, cuja incidência vem aumentando nos últimos anos. Entre 1976 e 1993, os autores trataram 11 pacientes com adenocarcinoma primário do esôfago. Em dois casos, a neoplasia desenvolveu-se em epitélio colunar ectópico no esôfago cervical e torácico. Nos demais casos, ocorreu no terço distal do esôfago em epitélio colunar de Barrett, em pacientes com sintomas clínicos de esofagite de refluxo, dos quais sete eram portadores de hérnia de hiato e refluxo gastroesofágico previamente documentados. Nove pacientes foram submetidos a esofagectomia transiatal com esofagogastroplastia, um foi submetido a esofagectomia distal com interposição de jejuno e o último a esofagogastroplastia retroestemal sem esofagectomia. A exceção de três pacientes, os demais tiveram operações consideradas curativas. Cinco doentes encontravam-se em estádios mais iniciais, ainda sem comprometimento linfonodal. Não houve mortalidade operatória, sendo que as principais complicações foram a fístula da anastomose esofagogástrica e a abertura da cavidade pleural, ambas ocorrendo em dois pacientes. A sobrevida média dos pacientes foi de 40,5 meses. Três pacientes permanecem vivos e sem evidência de doença (estádio 0, I e IIA) com 64, 94 e 117 meses de seguimento. Concluiu-se que a esofagectomia neste tipo de tumor é um procedimento seguro e que a sobrevida a longo prazo é possível quando os tumores em estadio inicial são tratados adequadamente.

Esophagitis associated with Barretts esophagus is a recognized predisponent factor for the development of adenocarcinoma. its incidence has been raising through the last years. Between 1976 and 1993, eleven patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated. In two cases, the neoplasia occurred in an aberrant gastric mucosa in the cervical and thoracic esophagus. in the remaining cases, the tumor occurred in the distal third of the organ. in columnar-lined (Barretts) esophagus, in patients with hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal refluxo Nine patients were submitted to transhiatal esophagectomy. one to distal esophagectomy with interposition of jejunum. and one to retrosternal esophagogastroplasty without esophagectomy. All but three patients had curative operations. Five patients had early stage disease, without limphonode involvement. There was no operative mortality and the main complications were anastomotic leackage and openning of pleural cavity, both of them occurring, in two patients. The average survival of these patients was 40.5 months. Three patients remain alive and with no evidence of recurrence (Stage 0, I and IIA), with a follow-up of 64, 94 and 117 months. Patients with gastroesophagic reflux and Barretts esophagus must be properly treated and they need endoscopic surveillance for the evaluation of progressive dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. The authors conclude that esophagectomy is a safe procedure and long term survival is possible when these esophageal tumors are treated in the early stages.