Abstract Objective: to evaluate the use of a renal health application by kidney transplant recipients. Method: a retrospective, observational study with a sample composed of individuals registered in the kidney transplant section of the application from July of 2018 to April of 2021. Demographic data, data entry, time of use, weight, blood pressure, blood glucose, creatinine, medication schedules, appointments, and tests were the variables collected. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Results: eight hundred and twenty-three downloads of the application were identified, and 12.3% of those were registered as kidney transplant recipients, the majority from southeastern Brazil (44.9%), 36±11 years old, and female (59.1%). Of the sample, 35.1% entered information such as creatinine (62%), weight (58.2%), and blood pressure (51.8%). Most used the application for one day (63.3%) and 13.9% for more than one hundred days. Those who used it for more than one day (36.7%) recorded weight (69%), medication intake (65.5%) and creatinine (62%), and scheduled appointments (69%). Conclusion: the kidney transplant recipient section of the Renal Health application generated interest in the young population, but showed low adherence throughout the assessed months. These results offer a relevant perspective on the implementation of mHealth technologies in kidney transplantation.

Resumen Objetivo: evaluar el uso de la aplicación Renal Health por parte de los receptores de trasplante renal. Método: estudio observacional retrospectivo con una muestra compuesta por usuarios que se registraron en la sección de trasplantados renales dentro de la aplicación desde julio de 2018 hasta abril de 2021. Se recolectaron las siguientes variables: datos demográficos, ingreso de datos, tiempo de uso, registros de peso, presión arterial, glucosa en sangre, creatinina, esquemas de medicación, consultas y exámenes. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los datos. Resultados: Ocurrieron 1.823 descargas de la aplicación y 12,3% se registró en la sección de trasplantados, la mayoría del sudeste de Brasil (44,9%), con edad de 36±11 años y del sexo femenino (59,1%). De la muestra, 35,1% ingresó información como: creatinina (62%), peso (58,2%) y presión arterial (51,8%). La mayoría utilizó la aplicación durante un día (63,3%) y el 13,9% más de cien días. Quienes lo usaron por más de un día (36,7%), agregaron peso (69%), programación de consultas (69%), medicación (65,5%) y creatinina (62%). Conclusión: la sección para trasplantados renales de la aplicación Renal Health despertó interés en la población joven, pero mostró baja adherencia en los meses evaluados. Estos resultados ofrecen una perspectiva relevante en la implementación de tecnologías mHealth en el trasplante renal.

Resumo Objetivo: avaliar o uso do aplicativo Renal Health por transplantados renais. Método: estudo observacional retrospectivo com amostra composta por usuários que realizaram cadastro na seção para transplantados renais do aplicativo de julho de 2018 a abril de 2021. Foram coletadas as seguintes variáveis: dados demográficos, inserção de dados, tempo de uso, registros de peso, pressão arterial, glicemia, creatinina, horários das medicações, consultas e exames. Realizou-se análise descritiva dos dados. Resultados: houve 1.823 downloads do aplicativo e 12,3% cadastraram-se na seção para transplantados renais, a maioria do Sudeste do Brasil (44,9%), com 36±11 anos e do sexo feminino (59,1%). Da amostra, 35,1% inseriram informações como creatinina (62%), peso (58,2%) e pressão arterial (51,8%). A maioria utilizou o aplicativo por um dia (63,3%) e 13,9% por mais de cem dias. Os que utilizaram por mais de um dia (36,7%), inseriram peso (69%), agendaram consultas (69%), medicações (65,5%) e creatinina (62%). Conclusão: a seção para transplantados renais do aplicativo Renal Health despertou interesse na população jovem, mas apresentou baixa adesão ao longo dos meses avaliados. Esses resultados oferecem perspectiva relevante na implementação de tecnologias mHealth no transplante renal.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies involving large samples usually face financial and operational challenges. OBJECTIVES: To describe the planning and execution of ADHERE Brazil, an epidemiological study on 1,105 kidney transplant patients, and report on how the study was structured, difficulties faced and solutions found. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional multicenter study in 20 Brazilian kidney transplantation centers. METHODS: Actions developed in each phase of implementation were described, with emphasis on innovations used within the logistics of this study, aimed at estimating the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment. RESULTS: Coordination of activities was divided into four areas: general, regulatory, data collection and statistics. Weekly meetings were held for action planning. The general coordination team was in charge of project elaboration, choice of participating centers, definition of publication policy and monitoring other coordination teams. The regulatory team provided support to centers for submitting the project to ethics committees. The data collection team prepared a manual on the electronic collection system, scheduled web meetings and was available to respond to queries. It also monitored the data quality and reported any inadequacies found. Communication with the centers was through monthly reports via e-mail and distribution of exclusive material. The statistical team acted in all phases of the study, especially in creating the data analysis plan and data bank, generation of randomization lists and data extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Through these logistics, we collected high-quality data and built a local research infrastructure for further studies. We present supporting alternatives for conducting similar studies. CLINICAL TRIAL ANNOTATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ on October 10, 2013; NCT02066935.

Resumo Objetivo: investigar crenças sobre o transplante renal em pacientes submetidos a esse procedimento cirúrgico. Método: pesquisa qualitativa, realizada com 34 pacientes. A elaboração da entrevista e a discussão dos resultados foram realizadas a partir do Modelo de Crenças em Saúde e os dados organizados de acordo com a Análise de Conteúdo. Resultados: amostra com média de idade de 45,94 (±10,67) anos, mediana de tempo de transplante de 13 anos, sendo 55,9% masculina. Discussão: observou-se predominância das crenças relacionadas aos benefícios percebidos na realização do transplante renal em comparação às dificuldades percebidas; as crenças sobre motivação pela escolha do transplante e motivação para o tratamento estavam associadas às crenças sobre o transplante renal e às crenças relativas aos benefícios percebidos.

Abstract Objective: to investigate beliefs about kidney transplantation in transplanted patients. Method: qualitative research with 34 participants. The elaboration of the interview and discussion of the results were based on the theory of the Health Belief Model and the data was organized according to the Content Analysis. Results: A mean age of 45.94 (± 10.67) years, median transplant time of 13 years, being 55.9% of men. Discussion: we observed a predominance of beliefs related to perceived benefits in renal transplantation compared to perceived difficulties; and beliefs about motivation for choosing a transplant and motivation for treatment were associated with beliefs about kidney transplantation and beliefs perceived benefits.

Resumo Introdução: Clínicas multidisciplinares são a melhor abordagem para pacientes com doença renal crônica (DRC) em fases pré-dialíticas. Os poucos estudos sobre receptores de transplante renal (RTR) comparam clínicas multidisciplinares e não multidisciplinares. Métodos: Neste estudo, comparamos a qualidade do atendimento multidisciplinar para DRC entre 101 RTR e 101 pacientes pré-dialíticos (PPD) não transplantados pareados com escore de propensão. A prevalência de pacientes sem tratamento específico em qualquer momento e a porcentagem de tempo sem tratamento específico para complicações de DRC foram nossos desfechos principais, e a sobrevida do paciente e da função renal, declínio da taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG), prevalência de complicações relacionadas à DRC e porcentagem de tempo dentro dos objetivos terapêuticos foram os exploratórios. Resultados: O tempo no alvo para a maioria dos objetivos foi semelhante entre os grupos, exceto para a pressão arterial diastólica (83,4 vs. 77,3%, RR 0,92, IC 0,88-0,97, p = 0,002) e hipertrigliceridemia (67. 7 vs. 58,2%, OR 0,85, IC 0,78-0,93, p < 0,001), melhor em PPD não transplantados, e para proteinúria (92,7 vs. 83,5%, RR 1,1, IC 1,05-1,16, p < 0,001), melhor em RTR. A sobrevida do paciente e o declínio da TFG foram semelhantes entre os grupos, embora PPD não transplantados tendessem a progredir mais cedo para a diálise (9,9% vs. 6,9%, HR 0,39, p = 0,07, IC 0,14-1,08). Discussão: Os resultados semelhantes entre PPD não transplantados e os RTR sugerem que a qualidade multidisciplinar boa e comparável é uma estratégia válida para promover a gestão clínica ideal de complicações relacionadas à DRC em RTR.

Abstract Introduction: Multidisciplinary clinics are the best approach towards Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients in pre-dialysis phases. The few studies regarding kidney transplant recipients (KTR) compare multidisciplinary and non-multidisciplinary clinics. Methods: In this study, we compared the quality of multidisciplinary CKD care between 101 KTR and 101 propensity score-matched non-transplant pre-dialysis patients (PDP). Prevalence of patients without specific treatment at any time and percent time without specific treatment for CKD complications were the main outcomes and patient and kidney function survival, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline, prevalence of CKD-related complications, and percent time within therapeutic goals were the exploratory ones. Results: Time within most goals was similar between the groups, except for diastolic blood pressure (83.4 vs. 77.3%, RR 0.92, CI 0.88-0.97, p = 0.002) and hypertriglyceridemia (67.7 vs. 58.2%, OR 0.85, CI 0.78-0.93, p < 0.001), better in non-transplant PDP, and for proteinuria (92.7 vs. 83.5%, RR 1.1, CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001), better in KTR. Patient survival and GFR decline were similar between the groups, although non-transplant PDP tended to progress earlier to dialysis (9.9% vs. 6.9%, HR 0.39, p = 0.07, CI 0.14-1.08). Discussion: The similar findings between non-transplant PDP and KTR suggests that good and comparable quality of multidisciplinary is a valid strategy for promoting optimal clinical management of CKD-related complications in KTR.

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence and variability of nonadherence to immunosuppressives and nonpharmacological treatment across kidney transplantation centers and two health access-disparate regions in Brazil. METHODS In a cross-sectional design, a random multistage sample of 1,105 patients was included, based on center transplantation activity (low/moderate/high) and region (R1: North/Northeast/Mid-West; and R2: South/Southeast). Nonadherence to immunosuppressives (implementation phase) was assessed using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS)©. Self-report questionnaires assessed nonadherence to physical activity, smoking cessation, alcohol intake, and appointment keeping. We compared regions using the adjusted-χ2 or t-test. RESULTS Most patients were men (58.5%), white (51.4%), and had a mean age of 47.5 (SD = 12.6) years. Regarding kidney transplantation centers, 75.9% were from R2 and 38.2% had low activity. The patients in R2 were older, white-majority, had more frequently steady partners, and received peritoneal dialysis. Nonadherence to immunosuppressives ranged from 11–65.2%; 44.5–90% to physical activity; 0–23.7% to appointment keeping; and 0–14% to smoking cessation. The total prevalence of nonadherence and by region (R1 versus R2) were: for immunosuppressives, 39.7% (44.9% versus 38.1%, p = 0.18); for smoking, 3.9% (1% versus 5%, p < 0.001); for physical activity, 69.1% (71% versus 69%, p = 0.48); for appointment keeping, 13% (12.7% versus 12%, p = 0.77); and for alcohol consumption, 0%. CONCLUSION Despite differences among centers and high variability, only the nonadherence to smoking cessation was higher in the region with greater access to kidney transplantation. We suppose that differences in healthcare access may have been overcome by other positive aspects of the post kidney transplantation treatment.

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence and variability of nonadherence to immunosuppressives and nonpharmacological treatment across kidney transplantation centers and two health access-disparate regions in Brazil. METHODS In a cross-sectional design, a random multistage sample of 1,105 patients was included, based on center transplantation activity (low/moderate/high) and region (R1: North/Northeast/Mid-West; and R2: South/Southeast). Nonadherence to immunosuppressives (implementation phase) was assessed using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS)©. Self-report questionnaires assessed nonadherence to physical activity, smoking cessation, alcohol intake, and appointment keeping. We compared regions using the adjusted-χ2 or t-test. RESULTS Most patients were men (58.5%), white (51.4%), and had a mean age of 47.5 (SD = 12.6) years. Regarding kidney transplantation centers, 75.9% were from R2 and 38.2% had low activity. The patients in R2 were older, white-majority, had more frequently steady partners, and received peritoneal dialysis. Nonadherence to immunosuppressives ranged from 11–65.2%; 44.5–90% to physical activity; 0–23.7% to appointment keeping; and 0–14% to smoking cessation. The total prevalence of nonadherence and by region (R1 versus R2) were: for immunosuppressives, 39.7% (44.9% versus 38.1%, p = 0.18); for smoking, 3.9% (1% versus 5%, p < 0.001); for physical activity, 69.1% (71% versus 69%, p = 0.48); for appointment keeping, 13% (12.7% versus 12%, p = 0.77); and for alcohol consumption, 0%. CONCLUSION Despite differences among centers and high variability, only the nonadherence to smoking cessation was higher in the region with greater access to kidney transplantation. We suppose that differences in healthcare access may have been overcome by other positive aspects of the post kidney transplantation treatment.

Resumo Pacientes com doença renal crônica (DRC) utilizam polifarmácia, que, associada ao comprometimento renal, os expõe ao risco de problemas relacionados a medicamentos (PRMs). No Brasil, não existem instrumentos para sistematizar a avaliação da farmacoterapia e a gestão de PRMs nessa população. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi validar o instrumento PAIR (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) para uso em português brasileiro. Trata-se de um estudo observacional longitudinal retrospectivo. Foram analisados prontuários de 100 pacientes com DRC, em tratamento conservador, atendidos entre 2016 e 2017, em clínica de nefrologia. O PAIR foi aplicado por farmacêuticos em duas consultas do mesmo paciente, com intervalo de 6 meses. Avaliou-se confiabilidade, validade conceitual, responsividade do instrumento e prevalência de PRMs na amostra. Uma média de 1,26 ± 0,96 PRM/paciente foi identificada. Na confiabilidade entre avaliadores, o coeficiente k variou de 0,58 a 0,94 e no teste-reteste, de 0,79 a 1,00, revelando grau de concordância moderada a perfeita. Na validade conceitual, uma média de 1,60±1,24 PRM/paciente foi identificada pelo nefrologista, por meio do julgamento clínico, comparado com 1,33 ± 0,76 PRM/paciente identificada pelo farmacêutico, usando o PAIR (p = 0,07). Portanto, o PAIR permitiu identificar PRMs clinicamente significativos. Na responsidade, uma média de 1,26 ± 0,96 PRM/paciente foi identificada na primeira consulta e 1,11 ± 1,02 PRM/paciente na consulta subsequente (p = 0,17) pelo farmacêutico, usando o PAIR, não sendo observada diferença no número de PRMs entre os períodos. Dessa forma, o PAIR permitiu identificar PRMs clinicamente significativos em pacientes com DRC, constituindo um novo instrumento validado para ser utilizado no Brasil.

Abstract Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) use polypharmacy, which, in combination with renal impairment, exposes them to the risk of drug-related problems (DRPs). There are no available tools in Brazil to systematically assess the pharmacotherapy and management of DRPs in this population. Therefore, the objective of this work was to validate the PAIR instrument (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) for use in Brazilian Portuguese. This is a retrospective longitudinal observational study. Medical records from 100 CKD patients under conservative treatment, between 2016 and 2017, in a nephrology clinic, were analyzed. PAIR was applied by pharmacists in two consultations of the same patient, with an interval of 6 months. Reliability, conceptual validity, responsiveness of the instrument and prevalence of DRPs in the studied sample were assessed. A mean of 1.26 ± 0.96 DRPs/patient was identified. Inter-rater reliability coefficients (k) ranged from 0.58 to 0.94 and from 0.79 to 1.00 for test-retest, revealing moderate to perfect level of agreement. In conceptual validity, a mean of 1.60 ± 1.24 DRPs/patient was identified by the nephrologist through clinical judgment, compared to 1.33±0.76 DRPs/patient identified by the pharmacist using PAIR (p = 0.07). Therefore PAIR allowed the identification of clinically significant DRPs. In responsiveness, a mean of 1.26 ± 0.96 DRPs/patient was identified at the first consultation and 1.11 ± 1.02 DRPs/patient at the subsequent consultation (p = 0.17) by the pharmacist using PAIR. The number of DRPs between the periods did not change. As a conclusion, the PAIR allowed the identification of clinically significant DRPs in CKD, constituting a new validated instrument to be used in Brazil.

Resumo Indivíduos com doença renal crônica (DRC) frequentemente utilizam polifarmácia o que os expõe ao risco de problemas relacionados a medicamentos (PRMs). No Brasil, não existem instrumentos que possam sistematizar a avaliação da farmacoterapia e a gestão de PRMs nesta população. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar a adaptação transcultural do instrumento PAIR (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) para o português brasileiro. O PAIR consiste numa lista de 50 PRMs considerados clinicamente significativos para renais crônicos. O processo de adaptação transcultural envolveu as etapas de tradução, síntese, retrotradução, análise por um comitê de especialistas e pré-teste da versão preliminar. O comitê de 2 farmacêuticos e 2 nefrologistas analisou a equivalência semântica, idiomática, experiencial e conceitual entre as versões original e traduzida. Todos os itens que obtiveram acordo inferior a 80% foram revisados. Foram realizados ajustes de palavras, assim como a exclusão de 6 PRMs devido à não aplicabilidade ao contexto brasileiro. Assim, foi obtida a versão final do PAIR definida como “Avaliação da farmacoterapia na doença renal crônica”, traduzida e adaptada na língua portuguesa do Brasil.

Abstract Individuals suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) are often on multiple medications, which exposes them to drug-related problems (DRP). There are no available tools in Brazil to assess the pharmacotherapy and management of DRPs systematically in this population. The scope of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of PAIR criteria (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) to Brazilian Portuguese. PAIR criteria consist of 50 DRP clinically significant items for CKD. The process of cross-cultural adaptation involved translation, synthesis, back-translation, and an analysis by an expert committee as well as a pre-test of the first draft document. A review committee consisting of 2 pharmacists and 2 nephrologists analyzed the semantic, linguistic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence between the original and translated versions. All items that obtained a score below 80% were reviewed. Word adjustments were made, as well as the exclusion of 6 DRP due to non-applicability to the Brazilian context. Thus, the final version of PAIR defined as “Avaliação da farmacoterapia na doença renal crônica” was translated and adapted into the Brazilian Portuguese language.

Resumo Indivíduos com doença renal crônica (DRC) frequentemente utilizam polifarmácia o que os expõe ao risco de problemas relacionados a medicamentos (PRMs). No Brasil, não existem instrumentos que possam sistematizar a avaliação da farmacoterapia e a gestão de PRMs nesta população. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar a adaptação transcultural do instrumento PAIR (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) para o português brasileiro. O PAIR consiste numa lista de 50 PRMs considerados clinicamente significativos para renais crônicos. O processo de adaptação transcultural envolveu as etapas de tradução, síntese, retrotradução, análise por um comitê de especialistas e pré-teste da versão preliminar. O comitê de 2 farmacêuticos e 2 nefrologistas analisou a equivalência semântica, idiomática, experiencial e conceitual entre as versões original e traduzida. Todos os itens que obtiveram acordo inferior a 80% foram revisados. Foram realizados ajustes de palavras, assim como a exclusão de 6 PRMs devido à não aplicabilidade ao contexto brasileiro. Assim, foi obtida a versão final do PAIR definida como “Avaliação da farmacoterapia na doença renal crônica”, traduzida e adaptada na língua portuguesa do Brasil.

Abstract Individuals suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) are often on multiple medications, which exposes them to drug-related problems (DRP). There are no available tools in Brazil to assess the pharmacotherapy and management of DRPs systematically in this population. The scope of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of PAIR criteria (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) to Brazilian Portuguese. PAIR criteria consist of 50 DRP clinically significant items for CKD. The process of cross-cultural adaptation involved translation, synthesis, back-translation, and an analysis by an expert committee as well as a pre-test of the first draft document. A review committee consisting of 2 pharmacists and 2 nephrologists analyzed the semantic, linguistic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence between the original and translated versions. All items that obtained a score below 80% were reviewed. Word adjustments were made, as well as the exclusion of 6 DRP due to non-applicability to the Brazilian context. Thus, the final version of PAIR defined as “Avaliação da farmacoterapia na doença renal crônica” was translated and adapted into the Brazilian Portuguese language.

RESUMO Introdução: A radiografia digital (RxD) pode representar uma alternativa adequada para investigar o distúrbio mineral e ósseo (DMO) e a perda de densidade óssea (DO) em modelos de roedores da doença renal crônica (DRC). O objetivo deste estudo foi utilizar a RxD para avaliar a DO em ratos com DRC, e avaliar a correlação entre os achados da RxD e marcadores séricos de DMO e histomorfometria óssea. Métodos: A uremia foi induzida pela alimentação de ratos Wistar com dieta enriquecida com adenina (0,75% por 4 semanas/0,10% por 3 semanas); os resultados foram comparados com um grupo controle nas semanas experimentais 3, 4 e 7. Os seguintes marcadores bioquímicos foram medidos: clearance de creatinina (CCr), fosfato (P), cálcio (Ca), fração excretada de P (FeP), fosfatase alcalina (ALP), fator de crescimento de fibroblastos-23 (FGF-23) e paratormônio (PTH). A imagem da RxD foi obtida e a análise histomorfométrica foi realizada com o fêmur esquerdo. Resultados: como esperado, na semana 7, os ratos urêmicos apresentaram redução do CCr e níveis mais altos de P, FeP e ALP em comparação aos controles. A RxD confirmou a menor DO em animais urêmicos (0,57 ± 0,07 vs. 0,68 ± 0,06 u.a.; p = 0,016) em comparação aos controles no final da semana 7, quando a DMO foi mais proeminente. Uma forma grave de doença óssea de alta renovação celular acompanhou essas mudanças bioquímicas. A DO, medida na RxD foi correlacionada a P (r = -0,81; p = 0,002), ALP (r = -0,69, p = 0,01), PTH (r = -0,83, p = 0,01), OS/BS (r = -0,70 p = 0,02) e Ob.S/BS (r = -0,70; p = 0,02). Conclusão: A DO quantificada por RxD esteve associada às complicações típicas da DMO na DRC e mostrou-se viável na avaliação de alterações ósseas na DRC.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Digital radiography (DRx) may provide a suitable alternative to investigate mineral and bone disorder (MBD) and loss of bone density (BD) in rodent models of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to use DRx to evaluate BD in CKD rats, and to evaluate the correlation between DRx findings and serum MBD markers and bone histomorphometry. Methods: Uremia was induced by feeding Wistar rats an adenine-enriched diet (0.75% for 4 weeks/0.10% for 3 weeks); outcomes were compared to a control group at experimental weeks 3, 4, and 7. The following biochemical markers were measured: creatinine clearance (CrC), phosphate (P), calcium (Ca), fractional excretion of P (FeP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), and parathyroid hormone (PTH). DRx imaging was performed and histomorphometry analysis was conducted using the left femur. Results: As expected, at week 7, uremic rats presented with reduced CrC and higher levels of P, FeP, and ALP compared to controls. DRx confirmed the lower BD in uremic animals (0.57±0.07 vs. 0.68 ± 0.06 a.u.; p = 0.016) compared to controls at the end of week 7, when MBD was more prominent. A severe form of high-turnover bone disease accompanied these biochemical changes. BD measured on DRx correlated to P (r=-0.81; p = 0.002), ALP (r = -0.69, p = 0.01), PTH (r = -0.83, p = 0.01), OS/BS (r = -0.70; p = 0.02), and ObS/BS (r = -0.70; p = 0.02). Conclusion: BD quantified by DRx was associated with the typical complications of MBD in CKD and showed to be viable in the evaluation of bone alterations in CKD.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Descrever os perfis clínicos e epidemiológicos de pacientes hipertensos encaminhados para uma unidade de atendimento secundário e avaliar a adequação dos critérios de referência. MÉTODO Estudo transversal que analisou 943 pacientes hipertensos encaminhados a uma unidade de atenção secundária à saúde de setembro de 2010 a agosto de 2012. Foram coletados dados clínicos e sociodemográficos, bem como dados de interlocução entre os serviços de atenção primária e secundária. RESULTADOS A idade média dos pacientes era de 59 ± 13,1 anos e 61,3% eram do sexo feminino. O estilo de vida sedentário, o consumo de álcool e o tabagismo foram observados em 80,3%, 31,1% e 18,1% dos pacientes, respectivamente. A pressão arterial descontrolada foi observada em 72,5% da amostra, e 80,1% dos indivíduos apresentavam excesso de peso. Houve uma alta prevalência de dislipidemia (73,1%), doença cardiovascular (97,5%) e taxa de filtração glomerular estimada reduzida (49,9%). Trinta e oito por cento dos pacientes não atendiam aos critérios de encaminhamento, dos quais aproximadamente 25% não eram hipertensos. CONCLUSÃO Mesmo em um sistema de saúde de acesso universal, observou-se um controle insuficiente da hipertensão e uma alta prevalência de obesidade e doenças cardiovasculares. Encaminhamentos inadequados e a presença de complicações clínicas sugerem uma baixa eficiência da assistência prestada na atenção primária e reforçam a necessidade de compartilhar cuidados com o nível secundário.

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE To describe clinical and epidemiological profiles of patients with hypertension referred to a secondary care unit and to assess the adequacy of the referral criteria. METHOD This descriptive transversal study analysed 943 hypertensive patients referred to a secondary healthcare unit from September 2010 to August 2012. Clinical and sociodemographic data as well as data regarding the liaison between secondary and primary care services were collected. RESULTS Patients’ mean age was 59±13.1 years, and 61.3% were female. Sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption, and smoking were observed in 80.3%, 31.1%, and 18.1% of the patients, respectively. Uncontrolled blood pressure was observed in 72.5% of the sample, and 80.1% of individuals were overweight or obese. There was a high prevalence of dyslipidaemia (73.1%), cardiovascular disease (97.5%), and reduced glomerular filtration rate (49.9%). Thirty-eight percent of patients did not meet the referral criteria, of whom approximately 25% were not hypertensive. CONCLUSION Even in a universal-access healthcare system, poor control of hypertension and high prevalence of obesity and cardiovascular diseases were observed. Inadequate referrals and the presence of clinical complications suggest low efficiency of the assistance provided in primary care and reinforce the need for sharing care with the secondary level.

Resumo Introdução: A salmonelose é uma complicação relativamente rara em transplantados renais, e não pode ser diferenciada de outras formas de enterite pela apresentação clínica. Em pacientes transplantados renais, a salmonelose varia em gravidade, e é frequentemente associada com formas extra intestinais, bacteremia, e, neste caso, com elevada mortalidade. Relato de Caso: Descrevemos o caso clínico de um paciente transplantado renal com salmonelose Ciprofloxacino-resistente. Conclusão: Este caso ilustra o risco, relacionado à imunossupressão, da ocorrência de formas raras de infecção, por vezes de difícil diagnóstico, e com cursos clínicos potencialmente graves e prognóstico ruim, apesar do emprego de antibioticoterapia empírica adequada e de acordo com as evidências disponíveis.

Abstract Introduction: Salmonellosis is a relatively rare complication in kidney transplant recipients that cannot be clinically distinguished from other forms of enteritis. Among kidney transplant patients, it varies broadly in intensity, and is highly associated with extra-intestinal disease, bacteremia, and, in this case, a high mortality rate. Case Report: Here we describe a clinical case of ciprofloxacin resistant salmonellosis in a kidney transplant patient. Conclusion: This case illustrates how immunosuppressed patients can be exposed to rare forms of infection, often clinically difficult to identify, and possibly with severe clinical courses and poor outcomes despite evidence-based empiric antibiotic therapy.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO :Aderência à medicação é uma questão chave para o resultado do transplante e é influenciada por diversos fatores, tais como o estresse e estratégias de enfrentamento ou coping . Entretanto, esses aspectos têm sido pouco explorados. Compararmos o estresse e as estratégias de coping em paciente transplantados renais, aderentes e não aderentes, em uso de imunossupressores. TIPO DE ESTUDOE LOCAL : Realizamos estudo comparativo, transversal e observacional em uma clínica universitária de transplantes em Juiz de Fora, Brasil. MÉTODO :Cinquenta pacientes foram selecionados e classificados como aderentes e não aderentes a partir da escala Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale. O estresse foi avaliado pelo Inventário de Sintomas de Estresse para Adulto de Lipp e as estratégias de coping foram avaliadas pela escala Escala de Modos de Enfrentamento de Problemas. RESULTADOS : O estudo inclui 25 pacientes não aderentes e 25 controles com idade média de 44,1 ± 12,8 anos e mediana de tempo de transplante de 71,8 meses. Estresse esteve presente em 50% dos pacientes. Por regressão linear simples, a não aderência foi associada com o coping paliativo (OR 3,4, CI: 1,02-11,47; P < 0,05) e teve uma tendência marginal a significância com as fases mais avançadas do estresse (OR 4,7, CI: 0,99-22,51; P = 0,053). CONCLUSÃO : Estresse e estratégias de coping podem trazer implicações na compreensão e manejo do comportamento de não aderência dos pacientes transplantados e deveriam ser considerados nas estratégias na redução da não aderência.

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE : Adherence to medication is a key issue relating to outcomes from transplantation and it is influenced by several factors, such as stress and coping strategies. However, these factors have been poorly explored. We aimed to compare stress and coping strategies between adherent and nonadherent renal transplant recipients who were receiving immunosuppression. DESIGN AND SETTING : We conducted a comparative, cross-sectional and observational study at a university-based transplantation clinic in Juiz de Fora, Brazil. METHODS :Fifty patients were recruited and classified as adherent or nonadherent following administration of the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale. Stress was evaluated using the Lipp Stress Symptom Inventory for Adults and coping strategies were assessed using the Ways of Coping Scale. RESULTS : The study included 25 nonadherent patients and 25 controls with a mean age of 44.1 ± 12.8 years and median post-transplantation time of 71.8 months. Stress was present in 50% of the patients. Through simple logistic regression, nonadherence was correlated with palliative coping (OR 3.4; CI: 1.02-11.47; P < 0.05) and had a marginal trend toward significance with more advanced phases of stress (OR 4.7; CI: 0.99-22.51; P = 0.053). CONCLUSION :Stress and coping strategies may have implications for understanding and managing nonadherent behavior among transplantation patients and should be considered among the strategies for reducing nonadherence.