Dear Editor,
Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) is an extremely rare tumor (1/100,000) that represents up to 10% of sarcomas, divided into those related to Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), which corresponds to 50% of cases, and sporadic ones.1,2 The most widely accepted hypothesis today is that NF1-related MPNST arises from a neurofibroma that undergoes multiple genetic and phenotypic alterations until transforming into a malignant lesion. It presents diagnostic criteria that are not yet consolidated in the literature due to its variable morphological, immunohistochemical (IHC), and genetic pattern, which is not yet fully elucidated.2,3 Thus, this case demonstrates an evolution of NF1-related MPNST, the diagnostic difficulties, as well as the role of the dermatologist in the final diagnosis of the neoplasm.
A 43-year-old white male patient, a waiter with no known comorbidities, complained of a progressively growing mass on his right thigh for three months, with intense local pain associated with the externalization of the tumor 30 days before (Fig. 1). Dermatological examination revealed a violaceous tumor mass measuring approximately 23 cm with areas of hemorrhage, necrosis, and a fistulous tract with fetid serosanguineous drainage.
Tumor mass respectively: (A) on the day of admission and (B) recurrence 68 days after surgery.
Patient was hospitalized for diagnostic elucidation, chest and abdominal CT scans were performed, which were normal. MRI of the right thigh demonstrated a large, septate, heterogeneous expansile mass located in the region of the extensor muscles with peripheral contrast enhancement (Fig. 2).
(A) Pre-surgery MRI of the thigh showing an expansile mass in the region of the extensor muscles measuring approximately 23.3 by 12.8 × 13.0 cm, with a volume of approximately 2000 mL, with a heterogeneous liquid content, areas suggestive of hemorrhage, and peripheral contrast uptake. (B and C) Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography performed 68 days after complete excision of the lesion showed several pulmonary nodules with a neoplastic appearance.
Right rip disarticulation and inguinal lymphadenectomy were performed uneventfully. The pathology and IHC results (Fig. 3) were consistent with poorly differentiated sarcoma, with a spindle cell pattern, high cellularity, moderate atypia, fibrillar and edematous stroma, a mitotic index of 8 per 2 mm, diffusely positive CD34, diffusely positive monoclonal H3K27me3, Sox10-, S100-, Desmin-, and Myogenin-, suggesting a possible diagnosis of MPNST, especially if there are clinical signs of NF1-type genetic comorbidity.
(A and B) Excisional fragment of a right hip disarticulation product stained with hematoxylin and eosin, ×100 and ×400, respectively, demonstrating proliferation of spindle cells with high cellularity, mitotic index of 8 per 2 mm2, moderate atypia, forming fascicles with variable, narrow elongations, in fibrillar and edematous stroma. (C) Immunohistochemistry of the specimen weakly positive for CD34. (D) Immunohistochemistry of the specimen negative for S100.
The patient returned with regrowth of the tumor lesion 68 days after surgery (Fig. 1). Upon re-admission, he was evaluated by the Dermatology team, and revealed multiple café-au-lait macules, multiple cutaneous neurofibromas, axillary freckles, and Lisch nodules in both irises. Diagnosis was confirmed by the National Institutes of Health criteria for NF1 (Fig. 4), which, together with the anatomopathological pattern and IHC, confirmed the diagnosis of MPNST.3 New staging exams were performed, which demonstrated recurrence of the local tumor associated with iliac lymph node involvement and pulmonary metastasis, recurrent stage IV T4 N1 M1 (Fig. 2). Palliative chemotherapy with ifosfamide and doxorubicin was initiated; the patient remains under multidisciplinary follow-up.
Presence of multiple superficial cutaneous neurofibromas, axillary freckles and multiple café-au-lait spots.
The diagnosis of MPNST remains a challenge, given its clinical behavior similar to that of other sarcomas. Anatomopathological examination is nonspecific and aims to exclude other tumor diagnoses, with heterogeneous microscopy findings of a high mitotic index, nuclear atypia, necrosis, and hemorrhage being common. On IHC, S-100 is positive in 50%-60% of cases; however, its negative expression indicates a higher mortality and risk of metastasis4,5; SOX10 is present in 70% of cases; however, when the expression is negative, it also impacts a worse prognosis6; CD34 is weakly positive in high-grade sarcomas7; complete loss of H3K27me3 expression occurs in 30%-90%, with positivity being more common in those related to NF1.8 Negative expression of desmin and myogenin is important for the diagnostic exclusion of “Triton”-type MPNST and rhabdomyosarcoma.9
No defining markers for the disease have yet been discovered. The above case was a major challenge due to the late discovery of NF1, which was only made after tumor recurrence.
When compared with other reports in the literature, this case stands out on IHC, presenting an atypical set of findings, previously outside the patterns reported in MPNST related to NF1.10 Negative for S100 and SOX10, weakly positive CD34, and positive H3K27me3 are extremely rare and, as previously mentioned, indicative of a worse prognosis, which may explain the extremely aggressive behavior of the reported MPNST, which recurred with metastatic lesions 68 days after surgery. The survival rate for neurofibromatosis-related MPNST is estimated at 21% over the next five years,2 possibly lower in this metastatic patient with an atypical and even more aggressive IHC pattern.
The rarity of this case, as well as its diagnostic difficulty and severity, demonstrates the importance of such reports, so that the disease becomes more widely known among healthcare professionals, especially dermatologists who conduct ongoing follow-up of patients with NF1, those primarily affected by the tumor.
Research data availability
Does not apply.
-
Financial supportNone declared.
References
- 1 Stucky CCH, Johnson KN, Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Ocal IT, Rose PS et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): the Mayo Clinic experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:878-85.
- 2 Jesus DC, Formigo A, Florova E, Fernandes C, Fontes L, Vieira MJM, et al. Tumor maligno da bainha do nervo periférico: relato de caso. Rev Soc Bras Clin Méd. 2012;10:67-72.
- 3 Ferner R, Huson S, Thomas N, Moss C, Willshaw H, Evans D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2007;44:81-8.
- 4 Gonzalez-Martinez T, Perez-Piñera P, Díaz-Esnal B, Vega JA. S-100 proteins in the human peripheral nervous system. Microsc Res Tech. 2003;60:633-8.
- 5 Zou C, Smith KD, Liu J, Lahat G, Myers S, Wang WL, et al. Clinical, pathological, and molecular variables predictive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor outcome. Ann Surg. 2009;249:1014-22.
- 6 Ito Y, Kohashi K, Endo M, Yoshimoto M, Ishihara S, Toda Y, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of H3K27 methylation status in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: correlation with skeletal muscle differentiation. Virchows Archiv. 2021;479:1233-44.
- 7 Weiss SW, Nickoloff BJ. CD-34 is expressed by a distinctive cell population in peripheral nerve, nerve sheath tumors, and related lesions. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:1039-45.
- 8 Cleven AH, Sannaa GA, Briaire-de Bruijn I, Ingram DR, van de Rijn M, Rubin BP, et al. Loss of H3K27 tri-methylation is a diagnostic marker for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and an indicator for an inferior survival. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:582-90.
- 9 Hornick JL, Nielsen GP. Beyond “Triton”: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with complete heterologous rhabdomyoblastic differentiation mimicking spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:1323-1330.
- 10 Lucas CHG, Vasudevan HN, Chen WC, Magill ST, Braunstein SE, Jacques L, et al. Histopathologic findings in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor predict response to radiotherapy and overall survival. Neuro-Oncol Adv. 2020;2:vdaa131.
-
EditorHiram Larangeira de Almeida Jr.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
14 Nov 2025 -
Date of issue
2025
History
-
Received
29 Jan 2025 -
Accepted
30 Mar 2025 -
Published
22 Aug 2025








