PURPOSE: To compare indication criteria, intra- and postoperative complications, visual outcomes and time interval between the first and second eye surgery (phacoemulsification). METHODS: Prospective study was done in 96 eyes of patients who underwent bilateral consecutive phacoemulsification surgery, performed by a third-year ophthalmology resident. An established protocol was filled out before, during and after the surgery. The same surgical technique was used. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn multiple comparison and Student's t tests were used for statistical analysis. Bicaudal tests were used in all situations. p<0.05 rejected the null hypothesis. RESULTS: The indication for the second eye surgery was done earlier and with best correct visual acuity when compared with the first eye (p=0.016). The mean phacoemulsification ultrasound time (US time) of the first eye was significantly higher (p=0.026). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in relation to type of cataract, previous intraocular diseases, final visual acuity and mean spherical equivalent. The incidence of intra- and postoperative complications was smaller in the second eye, but was not statistically significant (p=0.07). Time interval between the first and second eye surgery was significantly lower along the trimesters. CONCLUSION: The patients underwent the second eye phacoemulsification surgery earlier (with better visual acuity and shorter time interval), had a shorter phacoemulsification time and tendency to be followed by less intra- and postoperative complications.
Cataract extraction; Phacoemulsification; Lens implantation, intraocular; Postoperative care; Time factors
