Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Is surgery for proliferative vitreoretinopathy following perforating ocular injury justifiable?

SUMMARY

Objective:

To determine the outcome and satisfaction of ocular trauma patients with perforating injury that underwent surgery for proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Methods:

Charts of sixty patients who were reviewed to assess anatomic status and visual outcome. Thirty patients chosen at random were contacted by telephone.

Results:

Vision improved in most patients. Thirty five (58.3%) patients had an attached retina. A mean of 2. 89 PVR operations were performed per eye. Nineteen (63.3%) patients stated that they would still have had surgery and 14 (46.6%) that the peripheral vision gained was of benefit.

Conclusion:

This form of treatment should be offered to patients and the decision to proceed with surgery should be made by a well-informed patient.

Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia Rua Casa do Ator, 1117 - cj.21, 04546-004 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel: 55 11 - 3266-4000, Fax: 55 11- 3171-0953 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: abo@cbo.com.br