SARCOMA PLEOMÓRFICO INDIFERENCIADO: FATORES DE PROGNÓSTICO EM 42 CASOS EM EXTREMIDADES

Acta Ortop Bras aob Acta Ortopédica Brasileira Acta ortop. bras. 1413-7852 1809-4406 ATHA EDITORA RESUMO O sarcoma pleomórfico indiferenciado (SPI) de tecidos moles em extremidades, neoplasia rara, correspondente a 5% dos sarcomas de tecidos moles (STM). Objetivo: Avaliar fatores de prognóstico relacionados a óbito, recorrência local (RL) e impacto na sobrevida geral. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de 42 pacientes com SPI tratados cirurgicamente em centro único. Foram comparados dados demográficos, características da neoplasia e de tratamento; e para as variáveis com significância estatística, foi realizada análise de regressão logística. A sobrevida foi avaliada através de gráficos de Kaplan-Meier; e os efeito das variáveis sobre a sobrevida, por meio do teste de log-rank. Resultados: Os pacientes tinham idades entre 25 e 85 anos (média de 58 anos), com seguimento ambulatorial médio de 29,6 meses. As variáveis com maior relação com o desfecho óbito foram tamanho maior que 15 cm (T4), com p = 0,01, metástases e estágio IV de prognóstico da American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), com p < 0,001. A sobrevida média dos pacientes foi de 25,9 meses. Presença de metástase e estágio IV da AJCC foram associados à redução na sobrevida dos pacientes (17,8 meses; p < 0,001). Conclusão: Os principais fatores de mau prognóstico relacionados ao óbito e à redução da sobrevida dos pacientes com SPI foram doença metastática e estágio IV da AJCC. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo Retrospectivo. INTRODUCTION Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) of soft tissues was initially described in the 1960s in case reports developed by Kaufman and Stout1 and Ozzello, Stout, and Murray. (2 In the 1970s, Weiss and Enzinger3 conducted an extensive analysis of cases, describing the neoplasm in detail and establishing it as a primitive mesenchymal lesion with partially fibroblastic and histiocytic differentiation. UPS usually presents in men over 50 years old, affecting the lower limbs in most cases. Due to its deep structure origin, there is difficulty in early diagnosis and management, with approximately 5% of cases diagnosed with metastatic lesions, the lungs being the main site. (4), (5 Identifying prognostic factors is one of the main approaches used to improve the efficacy of cancer treatments. These factors are important both in practice and in conducting trials and clinical studies. On the one hand, to select and plan the most appropriate treatment, and on the other hand, to enable the analysis of differences in possible study outcomes and identify subgroups for new treatment possibilities. (6 Due to the various phases related to the evolution of UPS diagnosis since 1960, much of the published data regarding prognostic factors are still associated with the period prior to 2002 when it was still considered as Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma (MFH) and accounted for virtually 60-70% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) diagnoses, making the application of these factors inadequate, when considering only UPS cases. (7 Given the lack of studies available in the Brazilian literature and elaborated by orthopedists involving prognostic factors of UPS, this research focuses on conducting a retrospective analysis of these factors over a period of 30 years. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to identify possible prognostic factors related to death or local recurrence and to identify possible factors that may have an impact on the survival rates of these patients. METHODS A retrospective study, conducted at a single center (Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Universidade de São Paulo [IOT HC FMUSP]) from January 1988 to December 2018. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (CAAE 80667617.2.0000.0068). Patient-related factors A total of 202 cases of patients with the diagnosis of MFH or UPS were selected from the institution. All cases were evaluated and classified by two pathologists from the institute, both specialists in musculoskeletal sarcoma cases. Cases considered inoperable (1), located in the head and/or neck, chest, trunk, bones (2), and with any type of cellular differentiation reported in the postoperative pathological report (3) were excluded. Thus, 42 patients were included in the study. Treatment-related factors All patients underwent surgical treatment at the institution, with wide and/or radical resection. Surgical margins were classified as negative (the narrow margin was considered negative) or positive, according to the Enneking’s stages. (8 Cases requiring surgical reapproach (debridement, margin enlargement, amputations, and disarticulations) and those who received any type of clinical treatment (radiotherapy or chemotherapy) were also listed. Variables and outcome measures All included UPS were considered to be of high histological grade according to the criteria of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC).9 Follow-up time was measured in months, within the period between the first and last consultation recorded in the medical records. Lesion size was in accordance with the pathological report, (greater axis in cm macroscopically) and classified according to the soft tissue sarcoma classification from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC - T1 up to 5 cm, T2 from 6 to 10 cm, T3 from 11 up to 15 cm, and T4 greater than 15 cm). (10 Local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases or lymph node involvement were also reported. Survival rates were estimated from the date of surgical treatment until the date of death or last consultation recorded in the medical records or online system. Statistical analysis The data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.0. Continuous variables were described using mean, median, standard deviation, interquartile range, minimum and maximum values. Categorical variables were described using counts and percentages. The normal distribution of continuous variables was measured using the Shapiro-Francia test. For comparison of continuous variables between two groups, either the T-test or the Wilcox test was used depending on the distribution of the variable. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test for two groups, whereas the chi-square test was used for three or more groups. In addition, logistic regression was used to identify the effect of candidate variables on death or local recurrence. Finally, actuarial tables and Kaplan-Meier graphs were used for survival rates analysis of the patients, and the Log-rank test was used to compare the effect of a variable on patient survival. P values lower than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS Table 1 presents clinical and demographic characteristics of patients. Table 1 Demographic, pathological, and treatment characteristics of 42 patients with UPS. Variables Total (%) Gender Men (20) 47 Women (22) 53 Age Mean 58 Standard deviation ± 14 Age group 25-85 Site Upper limb 12 (29) Lower limb (30) 71 Laterality Left (30) 71 Right 12 (29) Follow-up (months) Medium 29.6 Minimum 0.6 Maximum 165.9 Size (cm) T1 (0-5) 1 (2) T2 (6-10) 10 (24) T3 (11-15) 10 (24) T4 (> 15) 21 (50) Size (cm) Mean 9 Variation 2-23 Surgery Wide resection (30) 71 Amputation/disarticulation 12 (29) Margin Marginal or intralesional 37 (88) Affected 5 (12) Radiotherapy Yes 26 (62) Preoperative 10 (38) Postoperative 16 (62) No 16 (38) Chemotherapy Yes 25 (59) Neoadjuvant 10 (40) Adjuvant 15 (60) No 17 (41) Local recurrence Yes 6 (14) No 36 (86) Resurgery (two or more surgical procedures) Yes 9 (22) No 33 (78) Deaths A total of 31 patients died during the study period (74%). The variables that showed some relation with a higher chance of death outcome were: having a size larger than 15 cm (T4) (p = 0.01), having stage IV of AJCC prognosis (p < 0.001), and having metastasis (p < 0.001) (Table 2). Table 2 Variables with statistical significance regarding the occurrence of death. Variable Items Death Total Test Yes No Stage of injury IIIA 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 5 (11.90%) P < 0.0001 (Pearson's Chi-Square Test) IIIB 3 (50%) 3 (50%) 6 (14.29%) IV 28 (90.32%) 3 (9.68%) 31 (73.81%) Total 31 (73.81%) 11 (26.19%) 42 (100%) Size of injury T1-T3 12 (57.14%) 9 (42.86%) 21 (50%) P = 0.0140 (Fisher's Exact Test) T4 19 (90.48%) 2 (9.52%) 21 (50%) Total 31 (73.81%) 11 (26.19%) 42 (100%) Presence of metastasis No 3 (27.27%) 8 (72.73%) 11 (26.19%) P = 0.002 (Fisher's Exact Test) Yes 28 (90.32%) 3 (9.68%) 31 (73.81%) Total 31 (73.81%) 11 (26.19%) 42 (100%) To identify which factors have a greater effect on the risk of death, a logistic regression was performed, which showed that the presence of metastasis and the stage of the lesion were related to an increased risk of death in patients (Table 3). Note that due to the perfect correlation between the presence of metastasis and the occurrence of grade IV tumors, two models were made to demonstrate that both variables had identical coefficients. Table 3 Logistic regression models regarding the occurrence of death and their respective coefficients. Metastasis Tumor grade (Intercept) -1.74 -1.74 -1.08 -1.08 Gender (men) 0.23 0.23 -1.01 -1.01 Metastasis (yes) 3.14* N/A -1.01 Lesion size (T4) 1.74 1.74 -1.05 -1.05 Stage of injury (IV) N/A 3.14* -1.01 N 42 42 Pseudo R2 0.53 0.53 *p < 0.01; ( ): standard deviation. Local recurrence Six patients presented tumor recurrence (14%). None of the studied variables presented statistical significance with the recurrence outcome, however male patients showed a higher tendency to LR (Table 4). Table 4 Demographic data of the population in relation to the occurrence of local recurrence of the lesion. Variable Items Local Recurrence Total Test Yes No Older than 60 years No 3 (14.29%) 18 (85.71%) 21 (50.00%) p = 1.0000 (Fisher's Exact Test) Yes 3 (14.29%) 18 (85.71%) 21 (50.00%) Total 6 (14.29%) 36 (85.71%) 42 (100.00%) Age Min/Max 36.0/74.0 25.0/85.0 25.0/85.0 p = 0.7322 (T test) Med [IQR] 62.5 [56.5;69.2] 59.5 (-51.2;67.5) 59.5 [52.0;69.2] Average (SD) 60.2 (13.7) 57.9 (15.0) 58.2 (14.6) N 6 (14.29%) 36 (85.71%) 42 (100.00%) Gender Men 5 (25.00%) 15 (75.00%) 20 (47.62%) p = 0.0866 (Fisher's Exact Test) Women 1 (4.55%) 21 (95.45%) 22 (52.38%) Total 6 (14.29%) 36 (85.71%) 42 (100.00%) Med: median; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation. General survival rates In addition, patient survival rates were demonstrated using a Kaplan-Meier chart, in which it was found that the mean survival rate of patients was 25.9 months (Table 5 and Figure 1). Table 5 Table containing the results of survival tests for death. Item Time up to 50% survival LOGRANK Test General 25 months -- Presence of metastasis Yes: 17.8; No: N/A p < 0.001 Stage of injury IIIA-B: N/A; IV: 17.8 p < 0.001 N/A: not applicable (population did not reach values less than 50% survival). Figure 1 Survival time without death of the cohort studied. Dotted line indicates median survival time of the population. Finally, we observed the presence of metastasis or of stage IV lesion were significantly associated with a reduction in patient survival rate (Table 5 and Figures 2 and 3). Figure 2 Survival time without death of the cohort studied in relation to the presence of metastasis. Dotted line indicates median survival time of the subpopulation. Dotted line indicates median survival time of the subpopulation. Figure 3 Survival time without death of the cohort studied in relation to the stage of the lesion. Dotted line indicates median survival time of the subpopulation. DISCUSSION Aggressive clinical behavior is the only aspect of MFH/UPS that remained unchanged since its initial descriptions by Kauffman and Stout; (1 Ozello, Stout, and Murray; (2 and Kempson and Kyriakos. (11 This pathology usually presents with high-grade histological lesions, deep location, and the capacity to reach dimensions larger than 10-15 cm. Unfortunately, it also has high rates of metastatic disease and recurrences, which directly influence disease-free survival and overall survival. (3), (9), (12 As MFH/UPS was a leading diagnosis for STS during much of the 1990s, it influenced a whole generation of studies (Figure 4). (13), (14 Figure 4 A and B: Macroscopy; soft tissue tumor in the hip, surface with ulcerated center. Affects a deep margin; C, D and E: Microscopy (H&E) revealing cytological and nuclear pleomorphism. The tumors often contain giant cells, spindle cells, and histiocyte-like round cells in varying proportions. Storiform cell patterns and chronic inflammatory stroma are also common. The spindle component resembles fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, or smooth muscle patterns. (4 Source: A cortesy from pathology IOT HC FMUSP/CEDAP Joinville. With the evolution of auxiliary techniques within the surgical field, MFH/UPS has been gradually losing relevance and, today, it is considered a diagnosis of exclusion that corresponds to approximately 5% of STS. (4 Thus, being a relatively “new” diagnosis, our study evaluated the main prognostic factors chronologically to compare and analyze possible divergences. Of the patients involved in the study, 74% died. Using univariate analysis, the variables that showed some relation with a higher chance of death outcome were having a size larger than 15 cm (T4) (p = 0.01), (p < 0.001), having metastasis (p < 0.001), and having stage IV of AJCC prognosis. Since all stage IV lesions present metastasis, it can be affirmed that they are related variables, a fact that is confirmed through two logistic regression models (Table 3), with identical coefficients. Lesion size and gender showed no relationship after multivariate analysis. These results are similar to the findings of the “new” concepts about the UPS classification. Before 2002, when there was a change of nomenclature from MFH to UPS, Markhede, Angervall, and Stener15 analyzed the STS in a multivariate way and pointed out that there is an increased risk of death in patients with recurrence of injury (p < 0.01), especially in cases of recurrence in the first two years after surgical treatment. In the post-reclassification phase of MFH, Vodanovich et al. (16 in a multivariate analysis of 266 UPS defined that each passed year since lesion and metastasis diagnosis increased the death chance (risk ratio 1.03 and 2.89, p < 0.001 and p = 0.001 respectively) and that lesions in the upper limbs have a lower chance of death (risk ratio 0.57 and p value = 0.043). Around 15% of the sample presented LR. Among the variables analyzed, none presented statistical significance, but men showed a tendency to have LR of the lesions (p = 0.086). Age and stage of injury did not show statistical significance. Kearney, Soule, and Ivins12 evaluated 167 cases of STS retrospectively, with an LR rate of 51% and more than half with more than one episode. Among patients with fascia superficial tumors, 71% presented LR after “complete excision”; high rates are apparently associated with less aggressive resections, longer survival (therefore, more timely for recurrence), and greater ease for detection of palpation. In addition, of the superficial cases, 31% were diagnosed as deep lesions to the fascia. Markhede, Angervall, and Stener, (15 Pisters et al. (17 and Gibbs et al. (18 presented statistically relevant results, relating LR with inadequate surgeries or margin of the affected lesion in up to 76.2% of the relapsed disease in patients. Considering recent evaluations (after 2002), Vodanovich et al. (16 and Ozcelik et al. (19 also showed results associating RL with affected margins in univariate and multivariate analyses, a fact that does not corroborate with the data shown in the present study. The recurrence variable also correlates with radiotherapy treatment. Ozcelik et al. (19 reported good results considering perioperative radiotherapy (p = 0.009 and p = 0.000 respectively). Although it is a variable without impact in our cohort, advanced age showed statistical significance in the prospective study of Pisters et al. (17 for patients ≥ 50 years. Vodanovich et al. (16 also presented statistical significance in multivariate analysis for patients ≥ 70 years (p < 0.016, RR 1.6; p = 0.046, HR 1.03). The authors speculate that such differences may occur due to the small sample size added to the high mortality rate of the disease causing few patients in the sample to present LR. The mean survival of the patients in this study was demonstrated through the Kaplan-Meier graph (Figure 2), with an average of 25.9 months. Presence of metastasis or stage IV AJCC prognosis presented close relationship with the reduction of survival rates, with a mean of 17.9 months (p < 0.001). Among the analyses that precede the reclassification of MFH, Kearney, Soule, and Ivins, (12 Pisters et al., (17 and Gibbs et al. (18 demonstrated that proximal tumors that affect the pelvis and proximal region of the thigh, are of worse prognosis, affecting the survival rates of these patients; the last two authors consider them as independent prognostic factors. The size of tumors was also associated with worse survival by some authors. Pezzi et al. (13 described that survival rates were 82% in patients with lesions up to 5 cm, 68% in cases of 5-10 cm, and 51% for lesions greater than 10 cm with p < 0.05. Pisters et al. (17 and Gibbs et al. (18 corroborate with the finding through multivariate analysis, in which tumors ≥ 10 cm showed a high correlation with worse survival rates (risk ratio 1.5 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, in the studies by Kearney, Soule, and Ivins12 and Markhede, Angervall and Stener, (15 tumor sizes had no impact on survival, a fact that aligns with the results of our study. The histological grade of tumors was another constant variable in survival analyses, considered a poor prognostic factor. (15), (17), (18 Gibbs et al. (18 and Pisters et al. (17 also evaluated patients at the time of lesion diagnosis and patients who already presented metastatic lesions or local recurrence to measure their effects on survival rates (p = 0.0002 and risk of 1.5, respectively). Correlating studies from different periods, the main prognostic factors related to worsening of survival rates were size (p = 0.02) and presence of metastasis at diagnosis (p = 0.001) increasing the risk of mortality by almost 500% compared to patients without metastasis. (17 The presence of metastatic lesions during the disease showed a negative correlation with survival in our study and in the analyses of Ozcelik et al. (19 with p < 0.001 and = 0.004, respectively. Study limitations The short time to conduct the project and the rare diagnosis (small sampling) studied requires a retrospective design study. This design brings disadvantages, mainly due to systematic errors. Selection bias occurred since it is a single reference center for cancer cases, so there is a higher incidence of severe cases. Confusion bias can also end up influencing outcomes, such as survival rates. Since not every case has the defined cause of death (related to the disease itself or another secondary cause), comorbidities may end up influencing outcomes. The fact that patients received orthopedic and clinical care in independent sectors also generates limitations since it restricts information, such as the chemotherapy and radiotherapy protocols and the exact date of occurrence or recurrence of metastasis. Immunohistochemical reassessment of each case became financially unfeasible since it is a study with independent funding. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the main factors of poor prognosis related to death were size larger than 15 cm (larger diameter), metastatic disease, and stage IV of AJCC prognosis; for recurrence, no variable studied presented statistical relevance, although male patients showed a higher tendency to LR. In terms of survival rates, the main factors related were the presence of metastatic lesions and the stage IV of prognosis. Despite this study being relevant to assist medics in the development of strategies for the treatment of patients, new studies with larger cohorts and with the possibility of immunohistochemical reassessment are necessary to confirm our findings. REFERENCES 1 1. Kauffman SL, Stout AP. Histiocytic tumors (fibrous xanthoma and histiocytoma) in children. Cancer. 1961;14(3):469-82. Kauffman SL Stout AP Histiocytic tumors (fibrous xanthoma and histiocytoma) in children Cancer 1961 14 3 469 482 2 2. Ozzello L, Stout AP, Murray MR. Cultural characteristics of malignant histiocytomas and fibrous xanthomas. Cancer. 1963;16(3):331-44. Ozzello L Stout AP Murray MR Cultural characteristics of malignant histiocytomas and fibrous xanthomas Cancer 1963 16 3 331 344 3 3. Weiss SW, Enzinger FM. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: an analysis of 200 cases. Cancer. 1978;41(6):2250-66. Weiss SW Enzinger FM Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: an analysis of 200 cases Cancer 1978 41 6 2250 2266 4 4. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013. Fletcher CDM Bridge JA Hogendoorn PCW Mertens F WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone 2013 4 Lyon IARC Press 5 5. Camargo OP, Baptista AM, Caiero MT, Camargo AFF. Lesões fibrosas e histiocíticas. In: Barros Filho TEP, Camargo OP, Camanho GL. Clínica ortopédica. Barueri: Manole; 2012. Camargo OP Baptista AM Caiero MT Camargo AFF Barros TEP Filho Camargo OP Camanho GL Clínica ortopédica Lesões fibrosas e histiocíticas 2012 Barueri Manole 6 6. Hermanek P. Prognostic factor research in oncology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(4):371-4. Hermanek P Prognostic factor research in oncology J Clin Epidemiol 1999 52 4 371 374 7 7. Maretty-Nielsen K. Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma: population-based studies on comorbidity, biomarkers, and methodological aspects. Dan Med J. 2014;61(11):B4957. Maretty-Nielsen K Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma: population-based studies on comorbidity, biomarkers, and methodological aspects Dan Med J 2014 61 11 B4957 B4957 8 8. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. 1980. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(415):4-18. Enneking WF Spanier SS Goodman MA A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma 1980 Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 415 4 18 9 9. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, Rouesse J, Bui NB, de Mascarel A, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984;33(1):37-42. Trojani M Contesso G Coindre JM Rouesse J Bui NB de Mascarel A Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system Int J Cancer 1984 33 1 37 42 10 10. Raut CP, Maki RG, Baldini EH, Hornick JL. Soft tissue sarcoma of the abdomen and thoracic visceral organs. In: Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2018. p. 517-21. Raut CP Maki RG Baldini EH Hornick JL Amin MB Edge SB Greene FL Byrd DR Brookland RK Washington MK AJCC cancer staging manual Soft tissue sarcoma of the abdomen and thoracic visceral organs 2018 8 Chicago American College of Surgeons 517 521 11 11. Kempson RL, Kyriakos M. Fibroxanthosarcoma of the soft tissues. A type of malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Cancer. 1972;29(4):961-76. Kempson RL Kyriakos M Fibroxanthosarcoma of the soft tissues. A type of malignant fibrous histiocytoma Cancer 1972 29 4 961 976 12 12. Kearney MM, Soule EH, Ivins JC. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a retrospective study of 167 cases. Cancer. 1980;45(1):167-78. Kearney MM Soule EH Ivins JC Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a retrospective study of 167 cases Cancer 1980 45 1 167 178 13 13. Pezzi CM, Rawlings MS Jr, Esgro JJ, Pollock RE, Romsdahl MM. Prognostic factors in 227 patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Cancer. 1992;69(8):2098-103. Pezzi CM Rawlings MS Jr Esgro JJ Pollock RE Romsdahl MM Prognostic factors in 227 patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma Cancer 1992 69 8 2098 2103 14 14. Fletcher CD. Pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma: fact or fiction? A critical reappraisal based on 159 tumors diagnosed as pleomorphic sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(3):213-28. Fletcher CD Pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma: fact or fiction? A critical reappraisal based on 159 tumors diagnosed as pleomorphic sarcoma Am J Surg Pathol 1992 16 3 213 228 15 15. Markhede G, Angervall L, Stener B. A multivariate analysis of the prognosis after surgical treatment of malignant soft-tissue tumors. Cancer. 1982;49(8):1721-33. Markhede G Angervall L Stener B A multivariate analysis of the prognosis after surgical treatment of malignant soft-tissue tumors Cancer 1982 49 8 1721 1733 16 16. Vodanovich DA, Spelman T, May D, Slavin J, Choong PFM. Predicting the prognosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience of 266 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(9):1045-50. Vodanovich DA Spelman T May D Slavin J Choong PFM Predicting the prognosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience of 266 cases ANZ J Surg 2019 89 9 1045 1050 17 17. Pisters PW, Leung DH, Woodruff J, Shi W, Brennan MF. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(5):1679-89. Pisters PW Leung DH Woodruff J Shi W Brennan MF Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities J Clin Oncol 1996 14 5 1679 1689 18 18. Gibbs JF, Huang PP, Lee RJ, McGrath B, Brooks J, McKinley B, et al. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: an institutional review. Cancer Invest. 2001;19(1):23-7. Gibbs JF Huang PP Lee RJ McGrath B Brooks J McKinley B Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: an institutional review Cancer Invest 2001 19 1 23 27 19 19. Ozcelik M, Seker M, Eraslan E, Koca S, Yazilitas D, Ercelep O, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors in localized high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: report of a multi-institutional experience of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(4):5231-7. Ozcelik M Seker M Eraslan E Koca S Yazilitas D Ercelep O Evaluation of prognostic factors in localized high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: report of a multi-institutional experience of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology Tumour Biol 2016 37 4 5231 5237 2 The study was conducted at Universidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia.