Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Can intraoral mask be a safe alternative for COVID-19 patients?

Dear Editor,

We have read with great interest the article of Foley et al.11 Foley LJ, Urdaneta F, Berkow L, et al. Difficult Airway Management in Adult COVID-19 Patients: Statement by the Society of Airway Management. Anesth Analg. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005554 Online ahead of print.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000...
concerning difficult airway management in adult COVID-19 patients and try to implement their statement in our clinical practice. In this article Society of Airway Management emphasize that COVID 19 patients may have both physiologically and anatomically difficult airway. For this reason, effective pre-oxygenation and mask ventilation options, which reduce aerosol formation, gain importance in these patients who can desaturate rapidly. An important focus of the article is to optimize successful airway management while minimizing healthcare workers’ exposure risk.

Foley et al.11 Foley LJ, Urdaneta F, Berkow L, et al. Difficult Airway Management in Adult COVID-19 Patients: Statement by the Society of Airway Management. Anesth Analg. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005554 Online ahead of print.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000...
recommend using a well-sealed facemask with HEPA filter for pre-oxygenation prior to induction. They also recommend performing bag-mask ventilation with a well-sealed facemask after induction. In case of a significant leak they recommend using a supraglottic device.

We hypothesize that the intraoral mask can be used successfully in the preoxygenation and mask ventilation of these patients by preventing leakage and aerosol formation, and we wanted to share it with anesthesiologists’ public opinion. Although there is no literature proving that aerosol formation is reduced when intraoral mask is used; we think that there is a literature that can give an idea on this subject.

Nimmagadda et al.22 Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Voronov D, et al. The NuMask® is as Effective as the Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygentation. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2016;23:605. showed on healthy volunteer that that the intraoral mask is as effective as the classic face mask in achieving maximal pre-oxygenation during tidal volume breathing. They stated that in patients with a high risk for developing leak under the face mask (e. g. Patients with beard) would benefit from the use of the NuMask because of a different anatomical seal.

Intraoral mask is positioned inside the mouth between lips and teeth of the patient like a snorkel and well tolerated by awake patients. It can be used even with novice users and practitioners with small hand by reducing hand interface size33 Amack AJ, Barber GA, Ng PC, et al. Comparison of ventilation with one-handed mask seal with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed face mask in a cadaver model: a randomized crossover trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:12-7.,44 McCrory B, Lowndes BR, Thompson DL, et al. Workload comparison of intraoral mask to standard mask ventilation using a cadaver model. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Sage CA; 2012. (Figs. 1 and 2). Additionally intraoral mask can be used for noninvasive ventilation in intensive care for respiratory support.55 Pillar G, Segev A, Kurtz E. The SomnuSeal oral mask is reasonably tolerated by otherwise CPAP non compliant patients with OSA. Sleep. 2012;35:A164.

Figure 1
Intraoral mask.

Figure 2
Airway management with an intraoral mask.

As a result, we wanted to share our opinion immediately to open it up for discussion by anesthesiologists and other experts interested in airway management. Intraoral mask may be useful in confirmed and suspicious COVID-19 patients’ airway management and noninvasive ventilation management with advantage of minimal air leak and effective ventilation.

References

  • 1
    Foley LJ, Urdaneta F, Berkow L, et al. Difficult Airway Management in Adult COVID-19 Patients: Statement by the Society of Airway Management. Anesth Analg. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005554 Online ahead of print.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005554
  • 2
    Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Voronov D, et al. The NuMask® is as Effective as the Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygentation. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2016;23:605.
  • 3
    Amack AJ, Barber GA, Ng PC, et al. Comparison of ventilation with one-handed mask seal with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed face mask in a cadaver model: a randomized crossover trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:12-7.
  • 4
    McCrory B, Lowndes BR, Thompson DL, et al. Workload comparison of intraoral mask to standard mask ventilation using a cadaver model. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Sage CA; 2012.
  • 5
    Pillar G, Segev A, Kurtz E. The SomnuSeal oral mask is reasonably tolerated by otherwise CPAP non compliant patients with OSA. Sleep. 2012;35:A164.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Feb 2022
  • Date of issue
    Jan-Feb 2022

History

  • Published
    19 Apr 2021
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) Rua Professor Alfredo Gomes, 36, Botafogo , cep: 22251-080 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ / Brasil , tel: +55 (21) 97977-0024 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: editor.bjan@sbahq.org