Pollen analysis of honey and pollen collected by Apis mellifera linnaeus, 1758 (Hymenoptera, Apidae), in a mixed environment of Eucalyptus plantation and native cerrado in Southeastern Brazil

Espectro polínico do alimento coletado por Apis mellifera linnaeus, 1758 (hymenoptera, apidae), em ambiente contendo plantações de Eucalyptus e cerrado nativo no sudeste brasileiro

Abstract

Eucalyptus plantations are frequently used for the establishment of bee yards. This study was carried on at Fazenda Brejão, northwestern region of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. This farm is covered both with native Cerrado vegetation (Brazilian savanna) and eucalyptus plantations. This paper reports on the botanic origin of pollen pellets and honey collected from honeybee (Apis mellifera) hives along a thirteen-month period (January 2004 to January 2005). The most frequent pollen types found in the pollen pellets during the rainy season were Trema micrantha (Ulmaceae), Copaifera langsdorffii (Fabaceae), an unidentified Poaceae, unidentified Asteraceae-2, Cecropia sp. 1 (Cecropiaceae) and Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae); during the dry season the most frequent pollen types were Acosmium dasycarpum (Fabaceae), Cecropia sp. 1 (Cecropiaceae) and Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae). Pollen grains of Baccharis sp. (Asteraceae), Cecropia sp. 1 (Cecropiaceae), Copaifera langsdorffii (Fabaceae), Mimosa nuda (Fabaceae), Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae) and Trema micrantha (Ulmaceae) were present in the honey samples throughout the study period.

Keywords:
Apis mellifera; Cerrado; pollen; honey; palynology

Resumo

Plantações de Eucalyptus são, frequentemente, utilizadas como locais de instalação para colmeias. Este estudo foi realizado na Fazenda Brejão, localizada no noroeste de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Esta fazenda é coberta por Cerrado nativo (savana brasileira) e por plantações de eucaliptos. Este trabalho indica a origem botânica de bolotas e mel coletados em colmeias de Apis mellifera por um período de 13 meses (Janeiro/2004 a janeiro/2005). Os tipos polínicos mais frequentes nas amostras de pólen durante a estação chuvosa foram Trema micrantha (Ulmaceae), Copaifera langsdorffii (Fabaceae), Poaceae, Asteraceae não identificada 2, Cecropia sp. 1 (Cecropiaceae) e Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae); na estação seca, os tipos polínicos mais frequentes foram Acosmium dasycarpum (Fabaceae), Cecropia sp. 1 (Cecropiaceae) e Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae). As espécies Baccharis sp. (Asteraceae), Cecropia sp. 1 (Cecropiaceae), Copaifera langsdorffii (Fabaceae), Mimosa nuda (Fabaceae), Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae) e Trema micrantha (Ulmaceae) estiveram presentes durante todo o período amostrado.

Palavras-chave
s: Apis mellifera; Cerrado; pólen; mel; palinologia

1 Introduction

The Cerrado is an important Brazilian ecosystem with diverse phyto-physiognomies such as forest, savanna and field (Brandão, 2000). It is considered one of the 25 biodiversity hotspots in the World (Mittermeier et al., 2000) for its exceptional concentration of endemic species and experiencing exceptional loss of habitat because of human activities (Silva and Bates, 2002). Currently, only 20% of its primary vegetation is left and only 1.2% is protected in conservation units (Mittermeier et al., 2000). Some features of the Cerrado, such as vegetation diversity, great richness in nectariferous/pollineferous plants and low density of trees, make this a favorable region for beekeeping (Bastos et al., 2003). According to Carvalho and Bego (1995, 1996) and Viana et al. (1997), A. mellifera is one of the most common flower visitors of the Cerrado.

Nowadays, large portions of the Cerrado has been substituted by eucalyptus plantations (generally extensive), with more than 67% of the planted area concentrated in southeastern Brazil (Bernardo et al., 1998). In the state of Minas Gerais, most of the 1.5 million hectares of planted forest is eucalyptus plantations (Silveira, 2004), of wich the species used for the production of cellulose, wood and charcoal, are considered to be important pollen and nectar sources for the honeybees (Bastos, 1995; Bastos et al., 2003; Melo, 2004). For this reason, beekeepers frequently search for eucalyptus plantations to establish their bee yards.

The identification of plants visited by bees is an important indicator of nectar and pollen sources, permitting beekeepers to optimize the use of trophic resources, especially in natural vegetation (Howes, 1953). It is possible to identify the main melliferous and polleniferous plants exploited by bees in a delimited region through the identification of the pollen types found in the bee products (Barth, 1989).

Pollen grains is the natural source of proteins, lipids, vitamins and mineral salts for bees, being the only source of nitrogenated food available for bee larvae, and its absence may result in the hive extinction (Minckley et al., 2000). As for the energy source bees make use of nectar, transformed into honey (Doner, 1977).

The knowledge of the food sources most employed by bees is important to define strategies to enhance beekeeping productivity and profitability, as well as to certify the good quality and provenance of honeys (Bastos, 1996; Moreti et al., 2000).

Thus, the aim of the present study was to identify the food sources exploited by honeybees colonies established in firebreaks between native Cerrado vegetation and eucalyptus plantations in the northwestern region of Minas Gerais through the palynological analysis of honey samples and pollen pellets collected in honeybee hives.

2 Material and Methods

This study was carried out in the Fazenda Brejão, a farm owned by V & M Florestal Ltda. located in the municipality of Brasilândia de Minas (17° 01’ S; 45° 52’ W), northwestern region of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The native Cerrado vegetation covers 65% of the 35.899-ha area of the farm and the remaining 32% is covered by eucalyptus plantations (Scolforo et al., 2001). The regional climate is the dry-sub humid tropical of Holdridge, with an annual average temperature between 22 °C and 24 °C, and annual average precipitation between 700 mm and 1000 mm (Golfari, 1975). During the study period, the average temperature and precipitation in the region were of 30.7 °C and 1895 mm, respectively.

Samples of flowering-plant species were collected monthly, between January 2004 and January 2005, along firebreak margins and inside Cerrado reserves. The plants were identified by the staff of the herbarium of the Taxonomic Collections of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BHCB) and deposited in the Laboratório de Palinologia of the Fundação Ezequiel Dias (FUNED), in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Pollen collected from the anthers of these plants were acetolized according to Erdtman (1960) and used to prepare slides, which were deposited in the FUNED-POL reference slide collection, where pollen of plants previously collected in the Fazenda Brejão were already represented.

Two bee yards were established along firebreaks between eucalyptus plantations and native Cerrado vegetation (Beeyard-1: 17° 0’ 38” S; 45^o 51’ 42” W; altitude: 532 m. Beeyard-2: 17° 0’ 46” S; 45° 49’ 31” W; altitude: 551 m), each containing three productive colonies housed in Langstroth hives.

2.1 Obtaining and preparing pollen samples for analysis

Pollen was collected once a week with the aid of pollen traps placed in the hive entrances for 24 hours, during the 13-month sampling period. These pollen traps extract about 50% of the pollen loads brought to the colony by the worker bees (Nagamitsu and Inoue, 1999). Pollen pellets collected were transferred to numbered plastic vials, which were hermetically closed and kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C until use.

Pollen samples from a single colony were weighed, dehydrated, homogenized, crushed, and three aliquots of 0.1 g were separately acetolized and used to prepare microscopic slides according to Erdtman (1960). These slides were deposited in the FUNED-POL slide collection.

2.2 Obtaining and preparing honey samples

Monthly, all frames containing only honey-filled cells (operculated or not) loaded in the past 30-day period were centrifuged (Guerra and Méndez, 2004). The honey obtained was sieved, homogenized and stored in hermetically-closed plastic vials. The pollen contained in each sample was acetolized and mounted in microscopic slides, according to Louveaux et al. (1978).

2.3 Analysis of pollen and honey samples

The identification of the pollen grains, in the previously prepared slides, was obtained through morphological analysis under the microscope comparing with pollen descriptions from Erdtman (1952) and Laboriau (1973) and through comparison with the reference slides in the FUNED-POL reference pollen collection. The frequency of each pollen type in 1200 pollen grains counted in each slide was calculated.

Pollen grains identified in the honey samples were grouped in four frequency classes according to the usual proceedings in melissopalynology, as suggested by Louveaux et al. (1970) and Barth (1970a, b, c): predominant pollen (representing more than 45% of all grains in the sample); accessory pollen (representing between 15% and 44% of the grains); isolated pollen (between 3% and 14%) and occasional isolated pollen (less than 3%). Sub and over-representation of specific pollen types were considered in the data interpretation (Barth, 1989).

The contribution of the different pollen types was presented here relative to the two seasons in which the year is clearly divided and which define the management practices in the apiaries: dry (May to October) and rainy (November to April).

3 Results

3.1 Pollen spectrum in pollen pellets

Sixty-nine pollen types were identified in the 127 samples obtained. They belong to 28 plant families, with Fabaceae accounting for the larger number of species (14) found in the samples (Table 1).

Table 1
Frequency of the pollen types present in pollen pellets samples collected in Fazenda Brejão, in the municipality of Brasilândia de Minas, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, between January 2004 and January 2005.

	Frequency of each pollen type (%)
Pollen types	Rainy Season (November-April) N = 61		Dry Season (May-October) N = 66
Anacardiaceae
Astronium sp.	0.00		5.26
Schinus sp.	0.01		0.00
Tapirira guianensis	1.56		0.02
Araliaceae
Schefflera sp.	0.62		0.27
Asteraceae
Baccharis sp.	3.45		0.58
Echinocoryne holosericea	0.05		0.07
Eremanthus sp.	0.03		0.00
Eupatorium sp.	2.15		2.15
Ichthyothere cunabi	0.01		0.00
Mikania sp.	3.57		0.00
Vernonia sp.	0.04		0.01
Wedelia sp.	0.05		0.00
Asteraceae unidentified 1	0.07		0.15
Asteraceae unidentified 2	14.46		0.00
Asteraceae unidentified 3	0.00		0.03
Asteraceae unidentified 4	0.13		0.49
Bignoniaceae
Arrabidaea florida	0.32		0.00
Memora nodosa	0.02		0.00
Bombacaceae
Eriotheca sp. .	0.00		0.34
Cecropiaceae
Cecropia sp. 1	11.60		25.73
Cecropia sp. 2	0.41		0.01
Combretaceae
Terminalia sp.	0.00		0.02
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea sp.	0.00		0.02
Jacquemontia sp.	0.00		0.02
Cyperaceae
Cyperaceae unidentified 1	0.08		0.01
Dilleniaceae
Davilla elliptica	0.00		3.04
Fabaceae Fabaceae
Acosmium dasycarpum		0.00	34.79
Bauhinia pulchella		0.00	0.10
Bauhinia sp.		0.00	0.03
Canavalia sp.		0.01	0.00
Clitoria fairchildiana		0.00	0.01
Copaifera langsdorffii		16.94	0.00
Leucaena sp.		0.00	2.14
Mimosa nuda		0.47	0.76
Mimosa sp.		0.19	0.00
Stryphnodendron sp.		0.00	0.03
Stylosanthes scabra		0.01	0.01
Trifolium sp.		0.00	0.07
Fabaceae unidentified 1		0.00	0.02
Fabaceae unidentified 2		0.01	0.17
Lamiaceae
Hyptis sp.		0.00	0.01
Lecythidaceae
Cariniana sp.		0.07	0.00
Loganiaceae
Antonia ovata		0.00	0.87
Loganiaceae unidentified 1		0.00	0.33
Loranthaceae
Struthanthus flexicaulis		0.01	0.00
Lythraceae
Lafoensia pacari		0.00	0.01
Malpighiaceae
Byrsonima coccolobifolia		0.02	0.02
Byrsonima sp.		0.53	0.00
Malvaceae
Malvastrum sp.		0.00	0.04
Sida linifolia .		0.03	0.00
Sida sp.		0.02	0.02
Malvacea unidentified 1		0.01	0.00
Melastomataceae
Rhyncanthera sp.		0.00	0.12
Melastomataceae unidentified 1		0.00	0.10
Melastomataceae unidentified 2		0.00	0.02
Myrtaceae
Eucalyptus sp.		8.27	14.54
Eugenia dysenterica		0.00	1.09
Myrcia sp.		0.01	0.03
Myrtaceae unidentified 1		0.00	0.01
Onagraceae
Ludwigia sp.		0.00	0.68
Palmae
Mauritia flexuosa		0.05	0.00
Palmae unidentified 1		0.01	0.02
Poaceae
Poacea unidentified 1		16.12	1.38
Rubiaceae
Diodia sp.		0.25	0.02
Richardia sp.		0.01	0.00
Sapindaceae
Serjania sp.		0.00	0.24
Solanaceae
Solanum sp.		0.53	0.01
Ulmaceae
Trema micranta		17.45	2.15
Verbenaceae
Stachytarpheta sp.		0.01	0.00
Unidentified Families
Unidentified		0.34	1.94

• N = number of samples.

More pollen types were recorded in the dry season (50 types) than in the rainy season (42). During the rainy season, pollen of Eucalyptus represented 8.27% of all pollen grains observed in the pollen pellets and during the dry season this figure rose to 14.54%.

3.2 Pollen spectrum of the honey samples

Twenty-one honey samples were collected during the study. No honey was available in the colonies between March and July 2004 and October 2004 and January 2005, when the populations were in decline.

Forty-eight pollen types were recorded in the honey samples, with Fabaceae and Asteraceae families representing the largest numbers of different plant types (11 and nine, respectively). November was the month with the largest variety of pollen types (30), and February with the smallest (18) (Table 2).

Table 2
Frequency of pollen types present in honey samples collected between January 2004 and December 2004 in Fazenda Brejão, municipality of Brasilândia de Minas, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Pollen types	Frequency of pollen types (%)
	Jan/04	Feb/04	Aug/04	Sep/04	Nov/04	Dec/04
	N = 4	N = 4	N = 2	N = 2	N = 7	N = 2
Anacardiaceae
Anacardiaceae unidentified 1	0.24				4.19
Astronium sp.	0.35	0.45	0.72	5.33	7.10	2.73
Tapirira guianensis			0.36		14.07	12.89
Araliaceae
Schefflera sp.		0.23	1.27
Asteraceae
Achyrocline sp.	0.02
Ageratum sp.		0.02
Ayapana sp.		0.02
Baccharis sp.	17.78	14.70	8.95	3.22	0.09	3.64
Eremanthus sp.		0.02
Eupatorium sp.			0.81			1.21
Mikania sp.		1.02
Tagetes sp.	0.02
Vernonia sp.	0.04		0.27
Bignoniaceae
Arrabidaea florida	0.11	2.27	3.80
Arrabidaea sp.	0.15
Bombacaceae
Eriotheca sp.			0.18	0.10
Cecropiaceae
Cecropia sp. 1	22.89	17.59	32.91	61.62	37.35	53.01
Combretaceae
Terminalia sp.			0.27	2.62	0.44
Cyperaceae
Cyperaceae unidentified 1			0.36		0.05
Fabaceae
Acosmium dasycarpum				14.99	11.29	2.68
Bauhinia sp.					0.03
Copaifera langsdorffii	5.74	27.91	3.07	0.20	0.10	0.30
Leucaena sp.			0.36	0.20	1.91
Mimosa nuda	6.57	8.51	14.10	0.10	0.11	0.30
Mimosa sp.	0.09	0.25	0.45
Stryphnodendron sp.			0.18		0.18
Stylosanthes scabra						0.10
Trifolium sp.			0.99	0.25	0.11
Fabaceae unidentified 1					0.82
Fabaceae unidentified 2	0.19	0.02		0.10
Lamiaceae
Hyptis sp.	0.02		0.18	0.05		0.30
Lecythidaceae
Cariniana sp.					0.08	0.30
Loganiaceae
Antonia ovata			0.63	0.30	0.05
Loranthaceae
Struthanthus flexicaulis			0.18	0.10	0.27	4.75
Malpighiaceae
Byrsonima coccolobifolia					1.29	0.35
Byrsonima sp.					0.78
Melastomataceae
Melastomataceae unidentified 1					0.03
Myrtaceae
Eucalyptus spp.	7.81	8.65	20.61	4.98	9.87	6.37
Eugenia dysenterica			0.18	1.96	0.80	0.30
Myrcia sp. DC.	0.02	0.07	0.18		5.00	1.01
Myrtaceae unidentified 1					0.10
Onagraceae
Ludwigia sp.					0.03
Palmae
Palmae unidentified 1					0.04	0.05
Poaceae
Poaceae unidentified 1	6.35	11.35	3.62	0.35	0.03	1.16
Rubiaceae
Diodia sp.	0.94	0.39	0.18	0.10
Sapindaceae
Serjania sp.	0.02		0.18	0.35	0.13
Ulmaceae
Trema micranta	29.94	4.45	4.25	2.52	3.65	8.49
Verbenaceae
Stachytarpheta sp.	0.02
Unidentified Families
Unidentified	0.69	2.08	0.76	0.56	0.01	0.06
Total number of grains	5404	4407	1106	1988	7920	1979

• N = number of samples.

Pollen of Eucalyptus spp. was present during all the sampling period, although never as a predominant type pollen (it was accessory in August and isolated pollen in January, February, September, November and December) (Table 2).

4 Discussion

The pattern of resource exploitation observed in Fazenda Brejão is that of a generalist species, as observed previously by other authors for Apis mellifera (e. g.Ramalho et al., 1991; Viana et al., 1997; Strickler and Cane, 2003). However, in spite of the large amount of plant species visited, the honeybees concentrated their foraging activity in a few species, from which they gathered the largest amounts of pollen and nectar at given periods. This behavior of Apis mellifera has been previously described (e.g.Pedro and Camargo, 1991; Viana et al., 1997; Melo, 2004) and according to Lima (1995), it could be explained by the fact that the honeybee colonies concentrate their foraging activity in the most abundant flowering plants in any given time.

The fact that honeybees harvest a larger variety of pollen types during the dry season was already reported (e. g.Oliveira, 1998; Pedro and Camargo, 1991; Viana et al., 1997), and may be due to the low precipitation and air humidity, when honeybee foraging is favored (Szabo, 1980).

The occurrence of pollen grains of Myrtaceae and, especially, Eucalyptus spp. in the pollen samples of the honeybee and other bees is well known (Ramalho et al., 1991; Soares, 2003; Melo, 2004). This is because Eucalyptus produces massive amounts of flowers with large numbers of anthers, which produce large quantity of pollen, a characteristic of the plants most commonly visited by Apis mellifera (Moncur and Boland 1989; Ramalho et al., 1991).

Many species of the Asteraceae family common in antropic environments are frequent pollen sources for the honeybee and regarded as good bee plants (Bastos et al., 1995; Bastos et al., 1998).

Cecropia, a plant genus commonly considered to be anemophylous (Joly, 1979; Barth, 1989; Bastos et al., 1991; Bastos et al., 1993), was present as predominant pollen in September and December and as accessory pollen in January, February, August and November. Soares (2003) also observed large amounts of Cecropia pollen in honey samples of Melipona aff. rufiventris (Apidae, Meliponina) collected at Fazenda Brejão, especially during periods when food was most abundant for the bees. According to Barth (1989), pollen of anemophilous plants can be found in honey, sometimes in large amounts, as contaminants, but it is never used as a nectar source by bees. However, honeybees were observed visiting both male and female Cecropia inflorescences (personal observation) which is interesting because at least one Cecropia species is known to produce nectar (e. g.Andrade, 1984). An alternative explanation is that bees may be collecting honeydew produced by aphids commonly found on these plant’s inflorescences. No analyses have been performed to verify whether the honey containing Cecropia pollen has the typical characteristics of honeydew.

An interesting finding was the relatively large amounts of the Trema micrantha pollen-types in the honey collected at Fazenda Brejão, contrasting with the small amounts generally encountered in other samples of Brazilian honey (Barth, 1989).

The frequent presence of Poaceae pollen found in the honey samples studied is probably a consequence of pollen from body bees, since plants of this family are not nectariferous (Barth, 1989) but bees are known to collect pollen from their flowers.

Our results indicate that although Eucalyptus is an important pollen and nectar source to honeybees, in bee yards established in areas of Eucalyptus plantations, nearby areas of native vegetation are also heavily exploited by the bees as floral resources.

Acknowledgements

We thank Vallourec & Mannesmann Florestal for their logistic and financial support, Graça Leal for her help in the lab, Dr. Luiz Guilherme Heneine and Rânia Mara Santana for the contributions and to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the M.S. scholarship granted to C. M. G. Simeão.

References

• Andrade, J.C., 1984. Néctar em Miq. Var. . Cecropia lyratilobanana Andr. & Car. (Cecropiaceae)Rodriguésia, vol. 36, pp. 81-84.
• Barth, O.M., 1970a. Análise microscópica de algumas amostras de mel. 1: pólen dominante. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, vol. 42, pp. 51-366.
• Barth, O.M., 1970b. Análise microscópica de algumas amostras de mel. 1: pólen acessório. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, vol. 42, pp. 571-590.
• Barth, O.M., 1970c. Análise microscópica de algumas amostras de mel. 1: pólen isolado. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 42, pp. 747-772.
• Barth, O.M., 1989. O pólen no mel brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Luxor.
• Bastos, E.M., 1995. Espectro polínico do mel produzido em algumas áreas antrópicas de Minas Gerais. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 55, pp. 789-799.
• Bastos, E.M., 1996. Importância da caracterização dos grãos de pólen em produtos de origem apícola. In: Anais do 11º Congresso Brasileiro de Apicultura, 26-30 November 1996, Teresina, Piauí. Teresina: Confederação Brasileira de Apicultura, pp. 225-228.
• Bastos, E.M., Brandão, M. and Da Silveira, F.R.C., 1995. Espectro dos méis produzidos no Parque Natural da Serra do Caraça – MG. Daphne, vol. 5, pp. 40-45.
• Bastos, E.M., Brandão, M. and Ferreira, J.A., 1993. Inventário da flora apícola de Bom Jesus do Amparo – Minas Gerais – II. Daphne, vol. 3, pp. 21-31.
• Bastos, E.M., Brandão, M., Castelois, I.L. and Soares, A.E.E., 1998. Inventário da flora apícola no estado de Minas Gerais: I – município de Cardeal Mota. Daphne, vol. 8, pp. 44-50.
• Bastos, E.M., Gonçalves, T., Batista, E.B., Brandão, M. and Castellois, B.C.R.J., 1991. Análise microscópica de amostras de mel do estado de Minas Gerais - I. Daphne, vol. 1, pp. 8-10.
• Bastos, E.M.A.F., Silveira, V.M. and Soares, A.E.E., 2003. Pollen spectrum of honey produced in cerrado areas os Minas Gerais State (Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 599-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000400007. PMid:15029371.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000400007
• Bernardo, A.L., Reis, M.G.F., Reis, G.G., Harrison, R.B. and Firme, D.J., 1998. Effect of spacing on growth and biomass distribution in and . Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. pellitaE. urophylla plantations in southeastern BrazilForest Ecology and Management, vol. 104, no. 1-3, pp. 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00199-0.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00199-0
• Brandão, M., 2000. Cerrado. In: M.P. MENDONÇA and L.V. LINS. Lista vermelha das espécies ameaçadas de extinção da flora de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte: Fundação Biodiversitas, pp. 55-64.
• Carvalho, A.M.C. and BEGO, L., 1995. Seasonality of dominant species of bees in the Panga Ecological Reserve, cerrado, Uberlândia, MG. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, vol. 24, pp. 329-337.
• Carvalho, A.M.C. and BEGO, L., 1996. Studies on Apoidea fauna of cerrado vegetation at the Panga Ecological Reserve, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, vol. 40, pp. 147-156.
• Doner, L.W., 1977. The sugars of honey: a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 443-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740280508. PMid:875373.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740280508
• Erdtman, G., 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy: Angiosperms. Waltham: Chronica Botanica.
• Erdtman, G., 1960. The Acetolyses method: a revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, vol. 54, pp. 561-564.
• Golfari, L., 1975. Zoneamento ecológico do estado de Minas Gerais para reflorestamento. Belo Horizonte: Centro de Pesquisa Florestal da Região do Cerrado.
• Guerra, A.G. and Méndez, R.B., 2004. Los Productos de la Colmena: buenas prácticas para su recolección, almacenamiento y conservación. Aplicaciones en la nutrición y salud del hombre. Cuba: Guerra and Méndez.
• Howes, F.N., 1953. Plantas melíferas. Barcelona: Reverté.
• Joly, A.B., 1979. Botânica: introdução à taxonomia vegetal. São Paulo: Nacional.
• Laboriau, M.L.S., 1973. Contribuição à palinologia dos cerrados. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
• Lima, A.O.N., 1995. Pólen coletado por abelhas africanizadas em apiário comercial na caatinga cearense. Fortaleza: Universidade Federal do Ceará, 18 p. Master’s Dissertation in Zootechnics.
• Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A. and Vorwohl, G., 1970. Methods of melissopalinology. Bee World, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 125-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1970.11097312.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1970.11097312
• Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A. and Vorwohl, G., 1978. Methods os melissopalinogy. Bee World, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 139-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1978.11097714.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1978.11097714
• Melo, M.A., 2004. Efeito de Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 (Hymenoptera, Apidae) sobre a utilização de fontes de pólen por Melipona quadrifasciata Lepeletier, 1836 (Hymenoptera, Apidae) na região de Viçosa, MG. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 59 f. Doctoral Thesis in Entomology.
• Minckley, R.L., Cane, J.H. and Kervin, L., 2000. Origins and ecological consequences of pollen specialization among desert bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Bilogical Sciences, vol. 267, pp. 265-271.
• Mittermeier, R.A., Myers, N. and Mittermeier, C.G., 2000. Hotspots: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX.
• Moncur, M.W. and Boland, D.J., 1989. Floral morphology of . Eucalyptus melliodora A. Cunn. ex Schau. and comparisons with other eucalypt speciesAustralian Journal of Botany, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 125-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT9890125.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT9890125
• Moreti, A.C.C.C., Carvalho, A.L., Marchini, L.C. and Oliveira, P.C.F., 2000. Espectro polínico de amostras de mel de . Apis mellifera L., coletadas na BahiaBragantia, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052000000100002.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052000000100002
• Nagamitsu, T. and Inoue, T., 1999. Differences in pollen sources of and Apis mellifera at a primary beech forest in central Japan. Apis ceranaJournal of Apicultural Research, vol. 38, pp. 71-78.
• Oliveira, P.E., 1998. Fenologia e biologia reprodutiva das espécies de cerrado. In: S.M. SANO and S.P. ALMEIDA. Cerrado: environment and flora. Planaltina: EMBRAPA-CPAC, pp. 169-192.
• Pedro, S.R.M. and Camargo, J.M.F., 1991. Interactions on floral resources between the africanized honey bee . Apis mellifera L and the native bee community (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in a natural “cerrado” ecosystem in southeast BrazilApidologie, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 397-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19910405.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19910405
• Ramalho, M., Guibu, L.S., Giannini, T.C., Kleinert-Giovannini, A. and Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L., 1991. Characterization of some southern Brazilian honey and bee plants through pollen analysis. Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 30, pp. 81-86.
• Scolforo, J.R.S., Mello, J.M., Acerbi, J.R.F.W., Oliveira, A.D., BORGES, L.F.R. and OLIVEIRA, L.T., 2001. Diagnóstico e proposta de manejo de fragmentos florestais nativos, na Vallourec & Mannesmann Florestal, região de Brasilândia de Minas, Minas Gerais. Lavras: Universidade de Lavras.
• Silva, J.M. and Bates, J.M., 2002. Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American cerrado: a tropical savanna hotspot. Bioscience, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 225-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0225:BPACIT]2.0.CO;2.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0225:BPACIT]2.0.CO;2
• Silveira, C., 2004. Manejo do eucalipto exige cuidado. Jornal Manuelzão, vol. 28, pp. 7.
• Soares, S.M., 2003. Utilização de recursos alimentares por Melipona rufiventris (Apidae, Meliponina) no cerrado de Brasilândia de Minas, MG. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 95 p. Master’s Dissertation in in Ecology and Wildlife Conservation and Management.
• Strickler, K. and Cane, J.H., 2003. For nonnative crops, whence pollinators of the future? Lanham: Entomological Society of America.
• Szabo, T.I., 1980. Effect of weather factors on honey-bee flight activity and colony weight-gain. Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 19, pp. 164-171.
• Viana, B.F., Kleinert, A.M.P. and Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L., 1997. Abundance and flower visits of bees in a cerrado of Bahia, Tropical Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 212-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650521.1997.11432424.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650521.1997.11432424

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  27 Nov 2015
• Date of issue
  Nov 2015

History

• Received
  10 Dec 2013
• Accepted
  09 Apr 2014