The Wits appraisal among a Nigerian sub-population: an assessment of dental base geometric factors

Abstract

The Wits appraisal is a common linear cephalometric analytic tool established by Jacobson. It has been reported to be superior to angular cephalometric measures as it is not dependent on pericranial structures and their variations both during growth and orthodontic treatment. AIM: To obtain reference values for the Wits appraisal among Nigerians and assess the effect of the dental base geometry on it. METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 100 Nigerian subjects with normal occlusion were analyzed to obtain the Wits appraisal, and the effect of the vertical distance from subspinale to supramentale, length of the palatal and mandibular planes, the mandibular plane angle as well as the palatal plane angle were assessed using the ANOVA and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 20.69 ± 4.9 years. Thirty-four (34%) were males and 66(66%) were females. Mean Wits value of -3.43 ± 3.24 mm was obtained based on the functional occlusal plane (FOP). Linear regression analysis showed that the vertical height from subspinale (A point) to supramentale (B point) caused a significant change in the Wits appraisal reading in participants still undergoing active growth process (less than 16 years of age) (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It is advocated that the Wits appraisal be used as a moderator to the ANB angle among Nigerians. However, as a result of dental height variations its use in growing Nigerian children requires caution.

Wits appraisal; Nigeria; dental base; cephalometry

• ¹
  Kannan S, Goyaliya A, Gupta R. Comparative assessment of sagittal maxillo-mandibular jaw relationship - a cephalometric study. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2012;6:14-7.
• ²
  Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1962;39:720-55.
• ³
  Oktay HA. A comparison of ANB, Wits , AF-BF and APDI measurement. Am J Orthod. 1975;99:122-8.
• ⁴
  Italia S, Bhatia AF. Palatal plane and thier comparison with "angle ANB" and "Wits appraisal": A cephalometric study. J Ahmedabad Dental College Hosp. 2011;2:22-6.
• ⁵
  Rotberg S, Fried N, Kane J, Shapiro E. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:636-42.
• ⁶
  Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in ANB angle and wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1983;84:133-9.
• ⁷
  McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-69.
• ⁸
  Freeman RS. Adjusting ANB angles to reflectthe effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:162-171.
• ⁹
  Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;124:470-9.
• ¹⁰
  Nanda RS, Merrill RM. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105:328-44.
• ¹¹
  Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;92:117-22.
• ¹²
  Yang SD, Suhr CH. F-H to AB plane angle(FABA) for assessment of antero-posterior jaw relationships. The Angle orthodontist. 1995;65:223-31.
• ¹³
  Sarhan O. A new cephalometric parameter to aid in dental base relationship analysis. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:59-63.
• ¹⁴
  Kim YH, Vietas JJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:619-33.
• ¹⁵
  Jacobson A. Application of Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:179-89.
• ¹⁶
  Jacobson A. Update on the Wits appraisal. Angle Orthod. 1988;58:205-19.
• ¹⁷
  Jabbar A, Mahmood A. Correlation of overjet , ANB and wits appraisal for assessment of sagittal skeletal relationship. Pakistan Orthod J. 2012;4:17-23.
• ¹⁸
  Lux CJ, Burden D, Conradt C, Komposch G. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:568-78.
• ¹⁹
  Roth R. The "Wits" appraisal - its skeletal and dento-alveolar background. Eur J Orthod . 1982;4:21-8.
• ²⁰
  Sachdeva K, Singla A, Mahajan V, Jaj HS Seth V, Nanda M. Comparison of different angular measurements to assess sagittal skeletal discrepancy- A cephalometric study. Indian J Dent Sci. 2012;4:27-9.
• ²¹
  Al-barakati SF. The wits appraisal in a Saudi population sample. Saudi Dent J. 2002;14:89-92.
• ²²
  Ramoðlu SÝ, Yaðci A, Uysal T. Wits Appraisal in Cappadocian Turkish Population. J Health Sci. 2009;18:111-7.
• ²³
  Davis GS, Cannon JL, Messersmith ML. Determining the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible/ : A cephalometric analysis to clear up the confusion. J Tennessee Dent Assoc. 2013;22-30.
• ²⁴
  So LLY, Dvis JP, King NM. Wits appraisal in Southern Chinese children. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:43-8.
• ²⁵
  Isiekwe MC, Sowemimo GOA. Cephalometric findings in a normal Nigerian population sample and adults with unrepaired clefts. Cleft palate journal. 1984;21:323-8.
• ²⁶
  Kapoor DN, Chandna A, Shalini T. Linear assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent. 2004;22:187-92.
• ²⁷
  Chen F, Terada K, Wu L, Saito I. Longitudinal Evaluation of the Intermaxillary Relationship in Class III Malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:955-61.
• ²⁸
  Zamora N, Cibrián R, Gandia J, Paredes V. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography(CBCT ). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e725-32.
• ²⁹
  Lisson JA, Heib N, von Moeller S Spitzer WJ, Ludwig B. Treatment result at 10, 15 and 18 years of age in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate: An intercentre comparison. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50:19-24.
• ³⁰
  Wu JYC, Hägg U, Wong RWK, McGrath C. Comprehensive cephalometric analyses of 10 to 14 year old Southern Chinese. Open Anthropol J. 2010;3:85-95.
• ³¹
  Zhou L, Mok C-W, Hägg U, McGrath C, Bendeus M, Wu J. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:1023-9.
• ³²
  Shendre S, Karan GK, Ravinarayana RPR, Mamtha T. Correlation of the anteroposterior relationships of the dental arch and jaw-base in subjects with class I, class II and class III malocclusions. Int J Contemporary Dent. 2011;2:68-73.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  31 Jan 2014
• Date of issue
  Dec 2013

History

• Received
  10 June 2013
• Accepted
  27 Sept 2013