Taxonomic notes on the typology of four species of genus Notodiaptomus Kiefer, 1936 (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae) on the typology of four species of genus

: During a taxonomic study of the genus Notodiaptomus Kiefer 1936, taxonomic materials were located for N. iheringi, N. spinuliferus, N. henseni and N. deitersi , and all had their status investigated. Inconsistencies were found and are reported in this note, from the original details to the current typological situation. Nomenclatural conformations and new types are specified. These reinforce the taxonomic validity of the species, recently redescribed in other research. Thus in this note the neotype to N. iheringi, N. spinuliferus, and N. henseni , and provide a topotype to N. deitersi are defined.


Introduction
Notodiaptomus is a genus of Copepoda Edwards, 1840 originally proposed by Kiefer (1936). A species group from "Nordestinus complex" of the genus Diaptomus (sensu lato) formed the initial basis for the formation of this genus (Wright, 1935), originally with 11 and, currently, 43 valid taxa (WoRMS 2020).
As part of a widest taxonomic revision of the genus Notodiaptomus these species were tracked through the literature, and located at the Museum of the Carcinological Collection of Zoology from the University of São Paulo, and the collection of the Invertebrate Zoology Department from the Smithsonian Institution National Museum Natural History, Washington D.C. (NMNH), where their type-series were accessed and examined. Specimens of N. iheringi and the type-material of N. spinuliferus were found, but not those of N. henseni or N. deitersi, although these were reported as being in this collection (Santos-Silva et al. 2015). All located specimens were analyzed. Those said to be in the collection, but not found, were tracked via the original literature. Finally, four species were found to have typological inconsistencies and required typological adaptation, because they possess some level of damage to their stored material-type.
Accordingly, we provide here definitions of the N. iheringi, N. spinuliferus, N. henseni and N. deitersi type-series. Additionally, we provide comments on the state of preservation, storage and disposal of the analyzed type-material present in of the visited taxonomic collections.

Materials and Methods
Specimens analyzed in this study came from the Carcinological Collection of the Museum of Zoology of the University of São Paulo (MZUSP) and the collection of the Invertebrate Zoology Department of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum Natural History, Washington D.C. (NMNH). The state of preservation and conditions of the preserved material were investigated using the original taxonomic records and applying the norms of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 2012). To assist analysis, a Leica MZ12.5 trinocular optical stereomicroscope and a Leica CTR5000 10x-100x trinocular optical microscope with attached Leica DFC450 camera and Leica Application Software (LAS) were used for images and micrographic measurements of specimens, all accessed with prior authorization from the MZUSP taxonomic collections curator. Permanent slide dissection and assembly procedures followed Kihara & Rocha (2009): lactophenol as medium, whole coverslips (24x24 mm) on self-adhesive plastic wedges and Entellan ® Rapid Micro-Mounting Medium. For wet preservation, 70% alcohol was either deployed or renewed. All material examined, produced or added (i.e., "Additional Material") in this study continues to form part of the initially accessed taxonomic collection, N. spinuliferus, N. henseni and N. deitersi in the Museum of Zoology at the University of São Paulo (São Paulo, Brazil), and N. iheringi in the Smithsonian Institution National Museum Natural History (Washington DC, USA).

Results
Based on the analyzes carried out in the scientific collection of the MZUSP, on focus to the species N. deitersi, N. iheringi, N. henseni, and N. spinuliferus, the descriptive characterization of the respective type-material becomes updated as follows: Notodiaptomus deitersi (Poppe, 1891). Notodiaptomus iheringi (Wright, 1935). Notodiaptomus henseni (Dahl, 1894

Discussion
Morphological examination in N. iheringi, N. spinuliferus, N. henseni, and N. deitersi revealed related inconsistencies to the original records of the types-specimens of these species (i.e. typological records), some of which were non-existent, disappered, or danified.
The specimens of Notodiaptomus iheringi were the first examined and 11 individuals assigned to the taxon were found to be partially or completely damaged. Adult male semaphoronte specimens were the only ones for which morphometric measurements were possible, though these had damaged morphologies that made them inappropriate for detailed examination. Examination allowed us to determine that the current preservation status of the material was the result of an unsuccessful attempted at alcohol rehydration.
Notodiaptomus iheringi was described by Wright in 1935, initially from Diaptomus sensu lato, with an unspecified holotype and non-specified location, probably with non-existent type material (Reid 1991). Kiefer (1936) in creating Notodiaptomus transferred several taxa to this genus, which has since then undergone some repositioning (Dussart 1985;Rolla et al. 1990) to achieve the present status. Reid (1985) provided a redescription to the species from material from sites in Rio de Janeiro state, Lagoa da Saudade (21°38'17"S 41°11'06"O), precisely. It is likely the material of the MZUSP collections accessed and analysed during the current study, especially the females, from which we could identify only preserved organic residues.
Through the work of Reid (1991), we tracked the existence of material from the species type locality, in the NMNH, under code 79542. Santos-Silva et al. (2015) informed that from this material it would be specified neotype of the taxon, which we verified never to have occurred. Thus, due to the inexistence of the type material, a poor condition in the existing MZUSP specimens, and the existence of specimens from the type locality originally to the taxon, we designate the neotype of the specie (USNM 1548280), from of the material existing at the NMNH' biological collection.
The current records, therefor, satisfy the conditions required by article 75, recommendation 75 of the ICZN (2012), which defines these conditions as necessary presuppositions for typological designation, which is hereby assigned to fix and give greater stability to the N. iheringi.The inconsistencies observed in Notodiaptomus spinuliferus were of different sort and concerned the disappearance of the typespecimen and specific non-observance of the taxonomic availability criteria stated in the nomenclatural code.
Notodiaptomus spinuliferus was described by Dussart (1985), with attributed authority to Dussart & Matsumura-Tundisi in this report. However, even if the specified assignment is as given in Dussart "cf. Dussart & Matsumura-Tundisi, sous presse", the description offered by Dussart (1985) meets the availability (article 11) and publication (article 8) criteria of the ICZN (2012), and therefore it is valid to consider it as the nomenclatural act for this taxon. There are several misquoted citations for the species authority record which, in compliance with ICZN Article 51.2 (51) recommendation 51E, should be cited invariably as Notodiaptomus spinuliferus Dussart & Matsumura-Tundisi in Dussart, 1985. Regarding the typological analysis of the material deposited by Matsumura-Tundisi & Dussart at the MZUSP, the precarious preservation state in which the holotype was stored (on a permanent slide) (Figure 1 makes it unsuitable for accurate and detailed morphological examination. The specimen in question would be a male and only the original slide, deposited in 1985, was found. This was fragmented and probably, because if this, with the type specimen missing. Of the eleven paratypes reported as being in existance (these being: one slide containing a male [MZUSP 6970], and five males and five females [MZUSP 6971]), only eight have been confirmed as still existant: one male (MZUSP 6970), two males (MZUSP 6971), and five females (MZUSP 6971). Of these, one male and one female were identified, dissected and mounted on nine permanent slides, five male-containing slides and four female-containing slides, remaining as the paratypes.
A female from the MZUSP 6971 lot was selected, examined and deposited as an undissected specimen in alcohol 70%, as the neotype MZUSP 40049. This designation was made in accordance with Art. 75 of ICZN (2012). All procedures for dissection and assembly of permanent slides followed the recommendations (Kihara & Rocha, 2009) for type material that are designed for future taxonomic examinations.
Notodiaptomus henseni and N. deitersi were taxa with type material reported by Santos-Silva et al. (2015) to be housed in the MZUSP. However, these accessions appear non-existent, and therefore could not be examined. The type locality for N. henseni was not specified clearly in Dahl (1894), but Santos-Silva et al. (2015) provided evidence that makes the mouth of the Tocantins river, Pará state, the most likely original site. Thus, a specimen was selected for designation as a neotype of the species (MZUSP 40393) and added topotypes to the MZUSP collection, all them derived from the material collected at the above-mentioned location, during the Permanent Amazon Expedition (PAE) in 1970, and located in the National Amazon Research Institute's Plankton Laboratory collection.
For N. deitersi, 20 males and 20 females under code MZUSP 12.823 indicated by Santos-Silva et al. (2015) as topotype of the species could not be located. This is the type species of the genus Notodiaptomus and was intended by Santos-Silva et al. (1999) and Santos-Silva et al. (2015) to provide taxonomic stability. However, through the current contribution, we additional and specified taxon material for the MZUSP, which now that conforms to the information originally specified to paratypes of the taxon (Santos-Silva et al., 1999).
Therefore, we concluded that the typological situation of the investigated taxa is properly stabilized. Thus, all species possess existente type-material, localized, and defined as evidence of their morphological patterns. This grants the necessary nomenclatural validity for the taxa, and it is essential for further accuracy morphological investigations.

Author Contributions
Luis José de Oliveira Geraldes-Primeiro: Responsible for the development of the study, for taxonomic examinations, acquisition and interpretation of data, writing of this proposal, and submission of this manuscript.
Joana D'Arc de Jesus Pinto: As curator of the type-material at carcinological collection of the Museum of Zoology of São Paulo, the co-author was responsible in obtaining the material examined in this study. Futhermore, she was directly responsible for the records and catalogueupdates of the specimens examined and added to the scientific collection.
Raimundo Erasmo Souza Farias: The co-author participated in the interpretation of the analysis of the data obtained and in the writing of the paper. He was a key member of the intellectual consistency of this study and relevant to the critical review of all content.
Edinaldo Nelson dos Santos-Silva: The co-author was decisive in obtaining part of the data and directly examined one of the species presented in this study. Futhermore, he was participating in the critical review and development of intellectual content.