Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among workers from the Company of Generation and Distribution of Energy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Prevalência de síndrome metabólica entre os trabalhadores da Companhia de Geração e Distribuição de Energia no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Abstracts

Little is known about the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the World’s working force. We examined the prevalence of such disease in the Company of Generation and Distribution of Energy in Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was designed to analyze data from employees submitted to the annual company medical check-up in 2008. Medical charts were reviewed for collection of clinical and laboratorial information.

RESULTS:

The total prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 48.6% (95%CI 46.0-51.2). It increased with age and reached 58.7% (95%CI 56.1-61.3) in employees older than 60 years. The age- adjusted prevalence was 38.2% (95%CI 35.7-40.7). Increased waist circumference was the most prevalent component of the syndrome (94.2%; 95%CI 92.1-95.7), followed by high blood pressure (69.3%; 95%CI 65.7-72.7). In a multivariate analysis age, sedentary lifestyle and level of uric acid were significantly associated with the metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSION:

Metabolic syndrome is highly prevalent in the studied working population in Rio de Janeiro. Our study will help delineating key risk factors for the development of metabolic syndrome in Brazil and may help the creation of new preventive public health policies.

metabolic syndrome X; cardiovascular disease; diabetes mellitus; hypertension; obesity


MÉTODOS:

Um estudo transversal foi projetado para analisar os dados dos funcionários, apresentado à empresa durante o check-up médico anual realizado em 2008. Foram revisados os prontuários para coleta de informações clínica e laboratoriais.

RESULTADOS:

A prevalência de síndrome metabólica foi de 48,6% (IC95% 46,0-51,2). Ele aumentou com a idade e chegou a 58,7% (IC95% 56,1-61,3) em empregados com mais de 60 anos. A prevalência ajustada por idade foi de 38,2% (IC95% 35,7-40,7). O aumento da circunferência da cintura foi o componente de maior prevalência da síndrome (94,2%; IC95% 92,1-95,7), seguido por pressão arterial elevada (69,3%; IC95% 65,7-72,7). Em uma análise multivariada, idade, sedentarismo e nível de ácido úrico foram significativamente associados com a síndrome metabólica.

CONCLUSÃO:

A síndrome metabólica é altamente prevalente na população ativa estudada no Rio de Janeiro. Nosso estudo vai ajudar a delinear os principais fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento da síndrome metabólica no Brasil e pode ajudar na criação de novas políticas preventivas de saúde pública.

síndrome X metabólica; doença cardiovascular; diabetes mellitus; hipertensão; obesidade


INTRODUCTION

As the worldwide prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes continues to rise, the metabolic syndrome and its associated risk factors might have an enormous burden on world's economy and public health. For instance, it is estimated that by 2030 the number of overweight and obese adults in the world will be close to 2 billion1Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(9):1431-7.. In Brazil alone, data from 2009 demonstrated that 50.1% of men and 48.0% of women were overweight2IBGE. Household Budget Survey 2008 - 2009. Anthropometry and nutritional status of children, adolescents and adults in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2010., and in a recent systematic review that included 10 studies of different regions in Brazil, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was in 29.6%3de Carvalho Vidigal F, Bressan J, Babio N, Salas-Salvadó J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1198..

Metabolic syndrome is a clustering of risk factors that raises the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, which was first called "Syndrome X", in 1988, by Reaven4Reaven G. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595-607.. These factors include dysglycemia, high blood pressure, elevated triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (HDL-C), and obesity. Several definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed, making it difficult to compare its prevalence between different studies5World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of WHO consultation. Geneve: World Health Organization; 1999.

Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-97.
- 7Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J; IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group. The metabolic syndrome - a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1059-62.. In 2009, several major organizations, such as the International Diabetes Federation, the American Heart Association and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, attempted to unify these criteria8Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640-5., which was adopted in the present study.

Studies suggest high prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the working population compared to the general population, and an association between work stress exposure and risk of metabolic syndrome9Sánchez-Chaparro MA, Calvo-Bonacho E, González-Quintela A, Fernández-Labandera C, Cabrera M, Sáinz JC, et al. Occupation-related differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(9):1884-5.

10 Davila EP, Florez H, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Goodman E, LeBlanc WG, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. workers. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2390-5.

11 Schultz AB, Edington DW. Metabolic syndrome in a workplace: prevalence, co-morbidities, and economic impact. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7(5):459-68.
- 1212 Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M. Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ. 2006;332(7540):521-5..

However, to our knowledge, metabolic syndrome prevalence in the working force in Brazil has not been addressed in scientific studies. In view of the recent economic growth and increases in the formal employment rate in Brazil, it is imperative that we determine the burden of metabolic syndrome in the Brazilian working force. To approach this gap, we examined the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the work force of the Company of Generation and Distribution of Energy in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design

This cross-sectional study was designed to analyze data from employees of the Company of Generation and Distribution of Energy (city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), who were submitted to the annual company medical check-up, in 2008. The studied population is represented by workers of offices in non-laborious activities and during regular working hours of the day. The great majority with high level of education consisted of engineers, but some were architects, biologists, and physicians. Those at the medium level of education were mainly personnel in office support. Every medical chart was reviewed for collection of clinical and laboratorial data. Only cases with complete information for all items relevant to the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome were included. No other exclusion criteria were applied.

Definition

Metabolic syndrome and its components were diagnosed employing the consensus definition8Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640-5.. This requires the presence of three or more of the following risk factors: increased waist circumference (≥90 cm in men and ≥80 cm in women for the South American population); triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL (1.70 mmol/L) or treatment for high triglycerides; HDL-C <40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L) for men or <50 mg/dL (1.30 mmol/L) for women or treatment for reduced HDL-C; blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg or anti-hypertensive drug treatment; and glucose ≥100 mg/dL (5.55 mmol/L) or treatment for high glucose.

Clinical evaluation

The database was developed to include sociodemographic variables like gender, age, ethnicity and education; medical history of diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia; and lifestyle parameters such as smoking and physical activity.

Blood pressure was taken in the left arm in the sitting position, after five minutes at rest, using an aneroid sphygmomanometer with a 5-mmHg accuracy. The first and fifth Korotkoff sounds were recorded, and the mean value of three measurements was used for analysis. Body weight was measured with light clothing and without shoes applying an adjusted scale. Height was calculated without shoes using a stadiometer attached to the scale to the nearest 0.1 cm. The body mass index (BMI) was achieved as the weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of the height (in meters). The following cutoffs were employed to classify individuals according to the BMI (kg/m²): underweight <18.5, normal ≥18.5 to <25, overweight ≥25 to <30, and obese >301313 World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. Trained nurses took all measurements.

Laboratorial evaluation

Blood and urine analyses were performed in the laboratory of the company in samples obtained after at least 12 hours of fasting. The serum levels of fasting plasma glucose, uric acid, creatinine, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and total triglycerides were measured by enzymology using an automatic Selectra-E (Wiener Lab, Rosario, Argentina).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, SPSS 17.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). The results of continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation if distribution was Gaussian, and alternatively as median and range if the distribution was not normal. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies. Comparisons between both groups were accomplished through the unpaired t test in case of normal distribution or, alternatively, by its nonparametric equivalent, Mann-Whitney's test. Analyses of the frequencies were performed using the χ2IBGE. Household Budget Survey 2008 - 2009. Anthropometry and nutritional status of children, adolescents and adults in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2010. test. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was calculated and adjusted by age using data of 2008 from the Brazilian Institute of Demography and Statistics (IBGE)1414 IBGE. [Internet]. Population estimates of the countries in 2008. [cited 2011 Mar]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1215&id_pagina=1
http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/...
by the direct method. Association of risk factors with metabolic syndrome was assessed by the backward conditional method of logistic regression. Only variables that were not part of the adopted diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome were included in the model. Effective addition of the variable in the multivariate model required a high probability of association with metabolic syndrome in a univariate analysis (p<0.10). P-values lower than 0.05 were deemed significant.

Ethical aspects

The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Medical School of Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).

RESULTS

After reviewing 1,743 medical charts of the employees submitted to the annual company check-up in 2008, data of 1,413 (81%) patients were included in the study. In Table 1, the anthropometric, metabolic and lifestyle characteristics of our sample are presented. The mean age of the participants was 49.4±8.8 years, and the great majority of the subjects included in the study were male (75.6%; 95%CI 73.13-77.61) and white (90.5%; 95%CI 88.88-91.95).

Table 1.
General features of workers from the company of generation and distribution of energy in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil, 2008 (n=1,413)

As shown in Table 2, the total prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 48.6% (95%CI 46.0-51.2). It increased with age and reached 58.7% (95%CI 56.1-61.3) in employees older than 60 years leading to an age-adjusted prevalence of 38.2% (95%CI 35.7-40.7).

Table 2.
Crude prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using the harmonized criteria among workers from the company of generation and distribution of energy in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil, 2008

In Table 3, the anthropometric, metabolic and lifestyle characteristics of employees with and without metabolic syndrome are compared. Subjects with such disease were older, predominantly male and had a higher proportion of non-white ethnicity and sedentary life style. The population with metabolic syndrome also portrayed higher mean values for: waist circumference, BMI, and systolic as well as diastolic blood pressure. Mean serum values of glucose, triglycerides, uric acid (for both genders), and total cholesterol were all higher, whereas HDL-C was lower in the affected employees.

Table 3.
Anthropometric, metabolic, and lifestyle characteristics among employees from the company of generation and distribution of energy in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil, 2008, considering the presence of metabolic syndrome in consideration

Prevalence of individual metabolic syndrome criteria is shown in Table 4. Increased waist circumference was the most common component of the syndrome (94.2%; 95%CI 92.1-95.7), followed by high blood pressure (69.3%; 95%CI 65.7-72.7). Elevated fasting glucose or treatment for hyperglycemia was present in only 38.3% (95%CI 35.7-40.7).

Table 4.
Prevalence rates of metabolic syndrome components among workers from the company of generation and distribution of energy in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil, 2008

In order to explore the relationship between sociodemographic, lifestyle and laboratorial variables with metabolic syndrome, a multivariate regression analysis model was used. As shown in Table 5, only age (OR=1.05; 95%CI 1.03-1.06; p<0.001), sedentary lifestyle (OR=1.73; 95%CI 1.38-2.17; p<0.001), and level of uric acid (OR=1.57; 95%CI 1.43-1.72; p<0.001) were positively associated with higher risk of metabolic syndrome.

Table 5.
Association between metabolic syndrome and sociodemographic, lifestyle, and laboratorial variables among workers from the company of generation and distribution of energy in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil, 2008

DISCUSSION

Metabolic syndrome is a worldwide public health problem; however, absence of a uniform diagnostic criterion makes comparison between different study populations very difficult. Herein, we present the first study in Brazil that determines the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in workers using the consensus definition. A very high prevalence rate of metabolic syndrome was found in our study.

The study population included mostly office workers. The age-adjusted prevalence rate of 38.6% (95%CI 35.7-40.7) found in the present study is higher than the ones reported for workers in either national or international samples9Sánchez-Chaparro MA, Calvo-Bonacho E, González-Quintela A, Fernández-Labandera C, Cabrera M, Sáinz JC, et al. Occupation-related differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(9):1884-5.

10 Davila EP, Florez H, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Goodman E, LeBlanc WG, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. workers. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2390-5.
- 1111 Schultz AB, Edington DW. Metabolic syndrome in a workplace: prevalence, co-morbidities, and economic impact. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7(5):459-68. , 1515 Lohsoonthorn V, Lertmaharit S, Williams A. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among professional and office workers in Bangkok, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(9):1908-15.. Since work related stressors might affect the development of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, we expected a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the working forces versus the general Brazilian population. In fact, the total prevalence rate of the study population (48.6%) was even higher than the one of a non-randomized sample with a raised prevalence of diabetes and hypertension extracted from a community-based population in Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area (42.5%)1616 Filgueiras Pinto Rde S, Almeida JR, Kang HC, Rosa ML, Lugon JR. Metabolic syndrome and associated urolithiasis in adults enrolled in a community-based health program. Fam Pract. 2013;30(3):276-81..

Aging and predominance of males could account for the high frequency of metabolic syndrome in our study. We found that employees with metabolic syndrome were more likely to be older and male compared to those without it. The prevalence rates of metabolic syndrome for men and women vary widely across different populations1717 Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome. Prevalence and associated risk factors in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427-36.

18 Zuo H, Shi Z, Hu X, Wu M, Guo Z, Hussain A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and factors associated with its components in Chinese adults. Metabolism. 2009;58(8):1102-8.

19 Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2444-9.
- 2020 Hu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Pyorala K; DECODE Study Group. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1066-76..

Ethnic-related factors may also influence the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. In the present study, the proportion of non-whites in the affected population was higher. Two previous investigations in the United States reported low appearance among black subjects1717 Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome. Prevalence and associated risk factors in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427-36. , 1919 Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2444-9.. The strategy adopted to collect this information may account for the differences. In our study, ethnicity was self-reported. It should also be pointed out that the degree of miscegenation in Brazil is very high making comparisons between races hard to be interpreted.

In agreement with the majority of the studies worldwide, sedentary lifestyle was associated with metabolic syndrome in the study population1010 Davila EP, Florez H, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Goodman E, LeBlanc WG, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. workers. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2390-5. , 1717 Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome. Prevalence and associated risk factors in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427-36.. Despite suggestion of a negative relation between education level and risk of metabolic syndrome by previous studies1010 Davila EP, Florez H, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Goodman E, LeBlanc WG, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. workers. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2390-5. , 1111 Schultz AB, Edington DW. Metabolic syndrome in a workplace: prevalence, co-morbidities, and economic impact. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7(5):459-68. , 1717 Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome. Prevalence and associated risk factors in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427-36., such variable did not seem to be an influent factor herein. Potentially modifiable working related stressors as difference in workload and day and night shifts may also affect the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and need to be explored in future studies in the Brazilian working force2121 Plante GE. Sleep and vascular disorders. Metabolism. 2006;55(10 Suppl 2):S45-9. .

Hypertension was the most seen criteria of metabolic syndrome among adults from China and the United States1717 Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome. Prevalence and associated risk factors in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427-36. , 1818 Zuo H, Shi Z, Hu X, Wu M, Guo Z, Hussain A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and factors associated with its components in Chinese adults. Metabolism. 2009;58(8):1102-8.. Differently, increased waist circumference was the most frequent component of metabolic syndrome identified in our study. Such finding is probably associated with the adopted parameters for waist circumference. The values of waist circumference used in the consensus definition have not been validated for the South American population, which is not a homogeneous ethnic group.

With the aim of better individually evaluating the factors associated with metabolic syndrome, the variables that were not part of the adopted diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome were assembled in a model of backward multivariate analysis. Gender was included in our model but no association was found. This is not surprising, considering that a gender effect on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is not a uniform finding3de Carvalho Vidigal F, Bressan J, Babio N, Salas-Salvadó J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1198.. In our analysis, age and sedentary lifestyle were confirmed as independent factors associated with the syndrome. It is worth mentioning the uric acid, whose association with cardiovascular diseases has been observed since the late 19th century2222 Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1811-21., emerged as an independent associated factor with the presence of metabolic syndrome, a finding previously reported in 20052323 Ishizaka N, Ishizaka Y, Toda E, Nagai R, Yamakado M. Association between serum uric acid, metabolic syndrome, and carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese individuals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(5):1038-44..

The present study had several limitations, such as its cross-sectional design that did not allow for causal inferences as to the associations found. Another potential limitation was that it was conducted in an employee population of one company in Rio de Janeiro, which limits the generalization of the results. Additional studies including the general Brazilian working force are needed to check if our findings can be extrapolated to multiple demographic and geographic groups. Finally, collected data refers to the year of 2008 and some minor changes may have occurred in the prevalence of risk factors of metabolic syndrome when compared to the present time.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our findings indicated that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is distressingly high in a working population in Rio de Janeiro. Positive association with age, sedentary lifestyle, and level of uric acid was found. Routine check-ups in workers present an opportunity to implement effective preventive programs that could benefit workers to improve their health. Future studies may help identifying specific work related risk factors modifiable for the development of metabolic syndrome in the Brazilian working force. Such studies will help developing new public health policies for the Brazilian workers.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to Doctor Eduardo Nunes Chini by his valuable help regarding the final review of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(9):1431-7.
  • 2
    IBGE. Household Budget Survey 2008 - 2009. Anthropometry and nutritional status of children, adolescents and adults in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2010.
  • 3
    de Carvalho Vidigal F, Bressan J, Babio N, Salas-Salvadó J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1198.
  • 4
    Reaven G. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595-607.
  • 5
    World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of WHO consultation. Geneve: World Health Organization; 1999.
  • 6
    Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-97.
  • 7
    Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J; IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group. The metabolic syndrome - a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1059-62.
  • 8
    Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640-5.
  • 9
    Sánchez-Chaparro MA, Calvo-Bonacho E, González-Quintela A, Fernández-Labandera C, Cabrera M, Sáinz JC, et al. Occupation-related differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(9):1884-5.
  • 10
    Davila EP, Florez H, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Goodman E, LeBlanc WG, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. workers. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2390-5.
  • 11
    Schultz AB, Edington DW. Metabolic syndrome in a workplace: prevalence, co-morbidities, and economic impact. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7(5):459-68.
  • 12
    Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M. Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ. 2006;332(7540):521-5.
  • 13
    World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
  • 14
    IBGE. [Internet]. Population estimates of the countries in 2008. [cited 2011 Mar]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1215&id_pagina=1
    » http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1215&id_pagina=1
  • 15
    Lohsoonthorn V, Lertmaharit S, Williams A. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among professional and office workers in Bangkok, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(9):1908-15.
  • 16
    Filgueiras Pinto Rde S, Almeida JR, Kang HC, Rosa ML, Lugon JR. Metabolic syndrome and associated urolithiasis in adults enrolled in a community-based health program. Fam Pract. 2013;30(3):276-81.
  • 17
    Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome. Prevalence and associated risk factors in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427-36.
  • 18
    Zuo H, Shi Z, Hu X, Wu M, Guo Z, Hussain A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and factors associated with its components in Chinese adults. Metabolism. 2009;58(8):1102-8.
  • 19
    Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2444-9.
  • 20
    Hu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Pyorala K; DECODE Study Group. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1066-76.
  • 21
    Plante GE. Sleep and vascular disorders. Metabolism. 2006;55(10 Suppl 2):S45-9.
  • 22
    Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1811-21.
  • 23
    Ishizaka N, Ishizaka Y, Toda E, Nagai R, Yamakado M. Association between serum uric acid, metabolic syndrome, and carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese individuals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(5):1038-44.
  • Study carried out at the Division of Nephrology, Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói (RJ), Brazil.
  • Financial support: none.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Oct-Dec 2014

History

  • Received
    28 July 2014
  • Accepted
    02 Jan 2015
Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Avenida Horácio Macedo, S/N, CEP: 21941-598, Tel.: (55 21) 3938 9494 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: cadernos@iesc.ufrj.br