Muitas mãos neste trabalho: desenvolvimento de uma tarefa de compreensão de metonímia

Siqueira, Maity; Melo, Tamara; Duarte Jr, Sergio; Baiocco, Laura; Ferrari, Caroline Girardi; Lopes, Nichele

Maity Siqueira

conceptualized the study

study design

statistical data analysis

data validation

manuscript writing

approve the final version of the manuscript and are responsible for all its aspects, including the guarantee of its veracity and integrity

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre - Brazil. E-mail: maity.siqueira@ufrgs.br.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-4563

Tamara Melo

Federal Institute of Santa Catarina. Itajaí - Brazil. E-mail: tameoli@gmail.com.

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-5355

Sergio Duarte Jr

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre - Brazil. E-mail: sergioduartejunior@yahoo.com.br.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-7338

Laura Baiocco

data collection

study design

statistical data analysis

data validation

manuscript writing

approve the final version of the manuscript and are responsible for all its aspects, including the guarantee of its veracity and integrity

The University of Arizona. Tucson - USA. E-mail: laurabaiocco@arizona.edu.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5221-257X

Caroline Girardi Ferrari

data collection

study design

statistical data analysis

data validation

manuscript writing

approve the final version of the manuscript and are responsible for all its aspects, including the guarantee of its veracity and integrity

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre - Brazil. E-mail: caroline.ferrari@ufrgs.br.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-3673

Nichele Lopes

data collection

study design

statistical data analysis

data validation

manuscript writing

approve the final version of the manuscript and are responsible for all its aspects, including the guarantee of its veracity and integrity

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre - Brazil. E-mail: lopesnichele@gmail.com.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-9387

Conflict of interests

The authors hereby declare that we do not have any potential conflict of interest in this study.

Sentences	Questions
Practice: O prédio todo foi à festa de aniversário.	a) Quem foi à festa de aniversário?
[The entire building went to the birthday party.]	[Who went to the birthday party?]
	a’) Quem foi à festa foram as pessoas que moram no prédio ou o prédio?
	[Was it the building or the people who live in it who went to the birthday party?]
Test: Ele bebe duas garrafas inteiras sozinho.	a) O que será que ele está bebendo?
[He drinks two whole bottles by himself.]	[What is he drinking?]
	a’) Será que ele está bebendo a garrafa ou o que está na garrafa? [Is he drinking the bottle or what is in the bottle?]

Sentence	Questions
Test item: Ele comeu um frango no almoço.	a) O que exatamente ele comeu?
[He ate chicken for lunch.]	[What exactly did he eat?]
	a’) Será que ele comeu todas as partes do frango ou só a carne do frango?
	[Did he eat the whole chicken or only parts of the chicken?]

Sentence	Questions
Test item 1:	a) O que será que ele usou?
Ele usou uma garrafa inteira na receita.	[a) What did he use?]
[He used a whole bottle for the recipe.]	a’) Ele usou a garrafa ou o líquido que está na garrafa?
	[a’) Did he use the bottle or what was in the bottle?]
Test item 2:	a) O que será que ele pegou emprestado?
Ele pegou um Monteiro Lobato emprestado hoje.	[a) What did he borrow?]
[He borrowed a Shakespeare yesterday.]	a’) Ele pegou uma pessoa ou algo escrito pela pessoa?
	[a’) Did he borrow a person or something that was written by the person?]

Items	Open-ended	Closed-ended	p**
Items	n (%)	n (%)	p**
1	18 (17.0)^b	69 (65.1)^bc	<0.001
2	7 (6.6)^ab	70 (66.0)^bc	<0.001
3	0 (0.0)^a	60 (56.6)^ab	<0.001
4	3 (2.8)^ab	47 (4.,3)^a	<0.001
5	46 (4.4)^c	59 (55.7)^ab	0.015
6	44 (4.5)^c	86 (81.1)^c	<0.001
p*	<0.001	<0.001

Questions	2 years old	3 years old	4 years old	5 years old	p*
	(n=21)	(n=34)	(n=31)	(n=20)
	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
1
Open	1 (4.8)	6 (17.6)	8 (25.8)	3 (15.0)	0.251
Closed	7 (33.3)	24 (70.6)	22 (71.0)	16 (80.0)	0.004
2
Open	0 (0.0)	1 (2.9)	1 (3.2)	5 (25.0)	0.003
Closed	8 (38.1)	19 (55.9)	24 (77.4)	19 (95.0)	<0.001
3
Open	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	-
Closed	6 (28.6)	19 (55.9)	19 (61.3)	16 (80.0)	0.001
4
Open	0 (0.0)	1 (2.9)	1 (3.2)	1 (5.0)	0.361
Closed	2 (9.5)	15 (44.1)	18 (58.1)	12 (60.0)	0.001
5
Open	8 (38.1)	11 (32.4)	19 (61.3)	8 (40.0)	0.307
Closed	3 (14.3)	15 (44.1)	26 (83.9)	15 (75.0)	<0.001
6
Open	3 (14.3)	14 (41.2)	14 (45.2)	13 (65.0)	0.002
Closed	13 (61.9)	30 (88.2)	24 (77.4)	19 (95.0)	0.039

[1] Conflict of interests

The authors hereby declare that we do not have any potential conflict of interest in this study.

Brasil

Brasil

Muitas mãos neste trabalho: desenvolvimento de uma tarefa de compreensão de metonímia

RESUMO