Akay et al.1212 Akay C, Oksayan R, Özdemir H. Influence of various types of surface modifications on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets on Y-TZP zirconia ceramics. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2020 Jun:1-5. (2020) |
48 |
G1) Er:YAG laser (2W) G2) Nd:YAG laser (2W) G3) Sandblasting (SiO2) G4) 9.6% hydrofluoric acid |
Transbond XT light cured composite |
Maxillary central incisor metal brackets |
37ºC deionized water for 30 days |
2,000 cycles between 5±2 - 55±2ºC with 30s dwelling time |
G1: 5.5 ± 0.79 G2: 4.88 ± 0.82 G3: 7.42 ± 0.92 G4: 3.58 ± 0.75 |
Ju et al.44 Ju GY, Lim BS, Moon W, Park SY, Oh S, Chung SH. Primer-treated ceramic bracket increases shear bond strength on dental zirconia surface. Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;13(18):4106. (2020) |
80 |
G1) Sandblasting G2) Sandblasting + Clearfil ceramic primer on zirconia surface G3) Sandblasting + Clearfil ceramic primer on bracket base G4) Sandblasting + Clearfil ceramic primer on both zirconia surface and bracket base |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cure composite |
Monocrystalline ceramic brackets |
At 37ºC and humidity 100% for 24h. |
10,000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
Mean and standard deviation not included |
Ju et al.22 Ju GY, Oh S, Lim BS, Lee HS, Chung SH. Effect of simplified bonding on shear bond strength between ceramic brackets and dental zirconia. Materials (Basel). 2019 May 20;12(10):1640. (2019) |
60 |
G1) Sandblasting + Clearfil Ceramic primer + orthodontic primer G2) Sandblasting + universal adhesive G3) Sandblasting + Clearfil ceramic primer + universal adhesive |
Transbond XT light cured composite |
Maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets |
37ºC and relative humidity 100% incubator for 24h. |
10,000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
Before thermocycling: G1: 9.78 ± 1.94 G2: 9.86 ± 1.33 G3: 9.16 ± 0.78 After thermocycling: G1: 8.16 ± 1.78 G2: 4.99 ± 0.99 G3: 4.31 ± 1.02 |
Mehmeti et al.2626 Mehmeti B, Kelmendi J, Iiljazi-Shahiqi D, Azizi B, Jakovljevic S, Haliti F, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength orthodontic brackets bonded to zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019 Mar;53(1):17-27. (2019) |
48 |
G1) 37% phosphoric acid for 120s + silane primer G2) 5% hydrofluoric acid + silane primer |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cure composite |
i) Metal brackets ii) Polycrystalline ceramic brackets |
Not mentioned |
5,800 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 10s dwelling time |
Metal brackets: G1: 10.85 ± 5.84 G2: 8.52 ± 4.72 Ceramic brackets: G1: 11.84 ± 7.30 G2: 8.99 ± 5.36 |
Cetik et al.1515 Cetik S, Ha TH, Sitri L, Duterme H, Pham V, Atash R. Comparison of shear strength of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets cemented to zirconia depending on surface treatment: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2019 May;13(2):150-5. (2019) |
40 |
G1) Sandblasting + Silane primer G2) Er:YAG laser + Silane primer |
Brack Fix primer + Brack 1Fix light cured composite |
i) Mandibular anterior metal brackets ii) Mandibular anterior ceramic brackets |
Not done |
Not done |
Metal brackets: G1: 23.29 ± 5.34 G2: 21.59 ± 4.03 Ceramic brackets: G1: 20.06 ± 4.05 G2: 17.55 ± 3.88 |
Douara et al.2727 Douara Y, Abdul Kader S, Kassem H, Mowafy M. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to glazed monolithic zirconia using different bonding protocols. Egypt Orthod J. 2019 Dec;56:9-20. (2019) |
45 |
G1) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + universal bonding resin (Assure plus) G2) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Silane + Universal bonding resin (Assure plus) + Silane G3) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + 4% hydrofluoric acid + Silane |
Transbond XT primer+ Transbond XT light cure composite resin |
Monocrystalline ceramic brackets |
37ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
500 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
G1: 2.50 ± 0.75 G2: 7.81 ± 2.81 G3: 8.15 ± 2.41 |
Garcia-Sanz et al.99 García-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Mendoza-Yero O, Carbonell-Leal M, Albaladejo A, Montiel-Company JM, et al. The effects of lasers on bond strength to ceramic materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190736. (2018) |
90 |
G1) No treatment G2) Sandblasting G3) Femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser output power- 300 mW, inter-groove distance 60 µm G4) Femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser output power- 200 mW, inter-groove distance 100 µm G5) Femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser output power- 40 mW, inter-groove distance 60 µm. G6) Femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser output power- 200 mW, inter-groove distance 60 µm |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cure composite |
Maxillary incisor metal brackets |
37ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
Not done |
G1: 3.87 ± 0.77 G2: 4.25 ± 0.51 G3: 5.92 ± 1.12 G4: 3.74 ± 0.10 G5: 3.91 ± 0.53 G6: 5.68 ± 0.94 |
Byeon et al.1414 Byeon SM, Lee MH, Bae TS. Shear bond strength of Al2O3 sandblasted Y-TZP ceramic to the orthodontic metal bracket. Materials (Basel). 2017 Feb 9;10(2):148. (2017) |
130 |
G1) Polishing G2) Sandblasting G3) Sandblasting + Silane primer G4) Sandblasting + MDP primer G5) Sandblasting + MDP containing silane primer |
Transbond XT light cured composite |
Maxillary central incisor metal brackets |
37 ± 1ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
5,000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
Before thermocycling: G1: 2.6 ± 1.1 G2: 4.98 ± 1.28 G3: 5.13 ± 0.85 G4: 11.92 ± 1.51 G5: 13.36 ± 2.31 After thermocycling: G1: 0.70 ± 0.4 G2: 0.8 ± 0.3 G3: 1.5 ± 0.4 G4: 5.4 ± 3.5 G5: 5.7 ± 1.2 |
Garcia-Sanz et al.1717 García-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcís C, Mendoza-Yero O, Doñate-Buendía C, Montero J, et al. Effects of femtosecond laser and other surface treatments on the bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets to zirconia. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186796. (2017) |
300 |
G1) No treatment G2) Sandblasting G3) Tribochemical silica coating + Silane primer G4) Femtosecond laser (200 mW) G5) Sandblasting + Femtosecond laser (200 mW) |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cure composite |
i) Maxillary central incisor metal brackets. ii) Maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets. |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Metal brackets: G1: 4.23 ± 0.89 G2: 4.46 ± 1.21 G3: 5.99 ± 1.86 G4: 6.72 ± 2.30 G5: 7.22 ± 2.73 Ceramic brackets: G1: 20.06 ± 2.34 G2: 25.01 ± 4.45 G3: 21.62 ± 6.48 G4: 23.18 ± 6.51 G5: 29.22 ± 8.20 |
Mehmeti et al.2424 Mehmeti B, Azizi B, Kelmendi J, Iljazi-Shahiqi D, Alar Ž, Anić-Milošević S. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Zirconium Crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2017 Jun;51(2):99-105. (2017) |
20 |
37% phosphoric acid for 120s |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cure composite |
G1: Metal brackets G2: Polycrystalline ceramic brackets |
Waterbath for 24 hrs. |
Not done |
G1: 7.35 ± 3.41 G2: 4.66 ± 1.78 |
Lee et al.2828 Lee JY, Ahn J, An SI, Park JW. Comparison of bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using different zirconia primers and a universal adhesive. Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Jan 22;43(1):e7. (2017) |
50 |
G1) Sandblasting G2) Sandblasting + Metal/Zirconia primer G3) Sandblasting + Z-Prime plus G4) Sandblasting + Zirconia liner G5) Sandblasting + Scotchbond universal adhesive |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cured composite |
Ceramic brackets |
37ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
2,000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC for 1 minute |
G1: 1.07 ± 0.81 G2: 5.16 ± 0.83 G3: 10.47 ± 2.89 G4: 9.55 ± 1.75 G5: 13.85 ± 1.48 |
Kim et al.1919 Kim J, Park C, Lee JS, Ahn J, Lee Y. The effect of various types of mechanical and chemical preconditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets on zirconia restorations. Scanning. 2017 Jan 11;2017:6243179. (2017) |
124 |
G1) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Silane primer G2) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Zirconia prime plus G3) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + universal bonding resin G4) Sandblasting (SiO2) + Silane primer G5) Sandblasting (SiO2) + Zirconia prime plus G6) Sandblasting (SiO2) + universal bonding resin |
Transbond XT primer + Transbond XT light cured composite |
Mandibular anterior metal brackets |
100% relative humidity for 7 days |
2,000 cycles between 5º-55ºC for 1 minute with 20s dwelling time. |
Non-thermocycled: G1: 11.4 ± 5.8 G2: 21.6 ± 3.3 G3: 22.9 ± 6.5 G4: 19.7 ± 4.1 G5: 20.5 ± 5.4 G6: 24.2 ± 2.8 Thermocycled: G1: 13.7 ± 5.0 G2: 20 ± 4.9 G3: 22.5 ± 6.9 G4: 25 ± 5 G5: 24.1 ± 3.5 G6: 26.2 ± 3.1 |
Kim et al.2020 Kim NH, Kim YJ, Lee DY. Bond strengths of orthodontic metal brackets to tribochemically silica-coated zirconia surfaces using different 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-containing primers. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(1):21-9. (2017) |
160 |
G1) Sandblasting + ESPE-sil G2) Sandblasting + Alloy primer G3) Sandblasting + Clearfil ceramic primer G4) Sandblasting + Single bond universal primer G5) Tribochemical silica coating + ESPE-sil G6) Tribochemical silica coating + Alloy primer G7) Tribochemical silica coating + Clearfil ceramic primer G8) Tribochemical silica coating + Single bond universal primer |
Transbond XT light cured composite |
Maxillary central incisor metal brackets |
Deionized water 37º C for 24 h |
5000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
Non-thermocycled: G1: 6.6 ± 2.6 G2: 15.9 ± 5.2 G3: 13.1 ± 3.4 G4: 16.7 ± 5.6 G5: 7.9 ± 3.4 G6: 17 ± 3.9 G7: 15.9 ± 5.7 G8: 19.4 ± 4.5 Thermocycled: G1: 5.2 ± 1.4 G2: 14.3 ± 2.9 G3: 12.9 ± 4.3 G4: 15.2 ± 5.3 G5: 5.8 ± 1.6 G6: 8.6 ± 1.7 G7: 14.8 ± 3.9 G8: 7.1 ± 0.9 |
Amer and Rayyan1313 Amer JY, Rayyan MM. Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns. J Orthod Sci. 2018 Nov 15;7:23. (2018) |
60 |
G1) No surface treatment G2) Sandblasting G3) Soflex disc |
i) Clearfil ceramic primer + Panavia F 2.0 adhesive resin cement ii) Rely X U200 self adhesive resin cement |
Lower second premolar metal brackets |
37ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
500 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
Clearfil + Panvia F 2.0: G1: 0 G2: 20.8 ± 4.8 G3: 12.3 ± 2.8 Rely X U200: G1: 0 G2: 16.7 ± 4.6 G3: 11.6 ± 3 |
Ihsan and Al-Dabagh2929 Ihsan H, Al-Dabagh DJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of sapphire bracket bonded to zirconium surface after using different surface conditioning methods: in vitro study. J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2017 Sep;29(3):85-1. (2017) |
40 |
G1) Z prime plus primer G2) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Z prime plus primer G3) Nd:YAG laser (0.888 W, 5s.) + Z-prime plus primer G4) Nd:YAG laser (0.444 W, 10s) + Z-prime plus primer |
Light-cured composite |
Central incisor sapphire brackets |
37ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
Not done |
G1: 11.08 ± 1.96 G2: 22.29 ± 1.18 G3: 30.25 ± 2.31 G4: 30.67 ± 2.33 |
Hosseini et al.1818 Hosseini MH, Gorjizadeh F, Etemadi A, Baghaeian P. Shear Bond Strength of Metal brackets to Zirconia Treated with Er:YAG Laser Sandblasting and Silane. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2016;28(3):110-7. (2016) |
72 |
G1) No treatment G2) Er:YAG laser 1.5 W G3) Er:YAG laser 2.5 W G4) Er:YAG laser 3 W G5) Sandblasting G6) Silane primer |
Transbond XT light cure composite |
Maxillary incisor metal brackets |
37ºC distilled water for 24 hrs. |
500 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
G1: 0.31 ± 0.23 G2: 0.51 ± 0.14 G3: 1.11 ± 0.40 G4: 3.32 ± 1.52 G5: 9.50 ± 2.92 G6: 3.88 ± 2.20 |
Lee et al.2222 Lee JH, Lee M, Kim KN, Hwang CJ. Resin bonding of metal brackets to glazed zirconia with a porcelain primer. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Nov;45(6):299-307. (2015) |
40 |
G1) Non-glazed + Sandblasting + Zirconia primer G2) Glazing + Sandblasting + etching + Zirconia primer G3) Glazing + sandblasting + etching + porcelain primer G4) Glazing + sandblasting + etching + zirconia primer + porcelain primer |
Transbond XT light cured composite |
Mandibular incisor metal brackets |
37ºC distilled water |
2,000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
G1: 13.7 ± 1.3 G2: 3.7 ± 0.9 G3: 16 ± 2.6 G4: 14.4 ± 1.7 |
Kwak et al.2121 Kwak JY, Jung HK, Choi IK, Kwon TY. Orthodontic bracket bonding to glazed full-contour zirconia. Restor Dent Endod. 2016 May;41(2):106-13. (2016) |
70 |
G1 - unglazed): Silicon carbide paper roughening G2) Diamond bur +Z-prime plus primer G3) Pumice + Monobond-S primer G4) 4% hydrofluoric acid + Monobond-S primer G5) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Monobond-S primer G6) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Z-prime plus primer G7) Sandblasting (SiO2) + Monobond-S primer |
Transbond XT light cure composite resin |
Mandibular incisor metal brackets |
37ºC water for 24 hrs |
1,000 cycles between 5º - 55ºC |
G1: 13.38 ± 2.57 G2: 15.48 ± 3.15 G3: 14.90 ± 2.75 G4: 15.24 ± 3.36 G5: 15.78 ± 2.39 G6: 4.60 ± 1.08 G7: 14.81 ± 2.91 |
Yassaei et al.2525 Yassaei S, Aghili HA, Davari A, Mostafavi SM. Effect of four methods of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to zirconium. J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Apr;12(4):281-9. (2015) |
72 |
G1) 9.6% hydrofluoric acid + silane primer G2) Sandblasting (Al2O3) + Silane primer G3) Er:YAG laser (1W) + Silane primer G4) Er:YAG laser (2W) + Silane primer |
Light-cured composite resin |
Metallic maxillary central incisor brackets |
37ºC water for 24 hrs |
500 cycles between 5º - 55ºC with 30s dwelling time |
G1: 5.8 ± 0.78 G2: 7.8 ± 1.02 G3: 6.8 ± 0.92 G4: 6.9 ± 1.13 |