This study aims to establish an analysis about the agencies which produce the difference to be included. Based on the suspicion that the overuse of the pronoun we in widely different speeches that intend to make a difference through advocacy of the inclusion consists of an abstraction of particularity mechanism, also from contingency and occupying positions of power who enunciates these speeches, I try to show how they fit in and do not appear to offer significant resistance to forms of overlap between disciplinary power and normalization biopolitical power in contemporary societies. This will therefore imply a criticism of evidence of identity. This identity is admitted by the various minority movements.
Difference to be Included; Protective Devices; Consensus; Evidence of Identity; Biopolitics