Abstract
In this article, we explore a few aspects associated with two phenomena, namely, aversion to mathematics and the consequent refusal to learn the subject, both originated in the relationship between society and the process of teaching and learning mathematics. Based on a supposed binariness which is historically believed to exist and defines only the opposed poles, i.e., knowing everything and knowing nothing of mathematics, the conditions are created for triggering a mechanism in which, first, there is the perpetuation of the current view that this subject is only meant for special, illuminated beings and, later, there is an inversion of categories between what is ‘in’ and what is ‘out’ regarding the set of those who know mathematics and the set of those who do not know mathematics. In respect to this binariness, we point its impossibility in today’s society, due to the fact that there are no longer individuals who know all the existing mathematics – the last one of them, according with some historians, would have been Poincaré, in the early 20th century – nor individuals without any mathematical knowledge, even if only a non-formal knowledge. Because of the nature of the phenomena studied and the specificities of our approach, we chose a qualitative methodology. Moreover, we discuss in this article the range and intensity of these phenomena and consider some of the possible causes and consequences thereof, concerning the process of teaching and learning the discipline.
Aversion to mathematics; Knowing mathematics; Refusal to learning