Representação social sobre o uso de bebidas alcoólicas por adolescentes

YAMAUCHI, Luciane Maya; ANDRADE, André Luiz Monezi; PINHEIRO, Bruno de Oliveira; ENUMO, Sônia Regina Fiorim; MICHELI, Denise de

Luciane Maya YAMAUCHI

Aichi University, Faculty of Education, Departament of Humanities. Aichi, Japan

Contributors L.M. YAMAUCHI, D. MICHELI, and A. ANDRADE contributed to the conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. B.O. PINHEIRO and S.R.F ENUMO contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. All authors review and approval of the final version of the article.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-821X

André Luiz Monezi ANDRADE Correspondência para/Correspondenceto: A.L.M. ANDRADE. E-mail: andre.andrade@puc-campinas.edu.br.

Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Centro de Ciências da Vida, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia. Av. John Boyd Dunlop, s/n., Prédio Administrativo CCV, Jardim Ipaussurama, 13034-685, Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Contributors L.M. YAMAUCHI, D. MICHELI, and A. ANDRADE contributed to the conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. B.O. PINHEIRO and S.R.F ENUMO contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. All authors review and approval of the final version of the article.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-8935

Bruno de Oliveira PINHEIRO

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia, Unidade de Dependência de Drogas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Contributors L.M. YAMAUCHI, D. MICHELI, and A. ANDRADE contributed to the conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. B.O. PINHEIRO and S.R.F ENUMO contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. All authors review and approval of the final version of the article.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-3171

Sônia Regina Fiorim ENUMO

Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Centro de Ciências da Vida, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia. Av. John Boyd Dunlop, s/n., Prédio Administrativo CCV, Jardim Ipaussurama, 13034-685, Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Contributors L.M. YAMAUCHI, D. MICHELI, and A. ANDRADE contributed to the conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. B.O. PINHEIRO and S.R.F ENUMO contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. All authors review and approval of the final version of the article.

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9038-6151

Denise de MICHELI

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia, Unidade de Dependência de Drogas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Contributors L.M. YAMAUCHI, D. MICHELI, and A. ANDRADE contributed to the conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. B.O. PINHEIRO and S.R.F ENUMO contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. All authors review and approval of the final version of the article.

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-4354

Correspondência para/Correspondenceto: A.L.M. ANDRADE. E-mail: andre.andrade@puc-campinas.edu.br.

Contributors

L.M. YAMAUCHI, D. MICHELI, and A. ANDRADE contributed to the conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. B.O. PINHEIRO and S.R.F ENUMO contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and discussion of the results. All authors review and approval of the final version of the article.

Characteristics		Participants		95% CI
Characteristics		n	%	95% CI
School
	Public	304	79.0	[0.74 -0.82]
	Private	82	21.0	[0.17 -0.25]
Gender
	Male	209	54.0	[0.48 -0.59]
	Female	173	45.0	[0.40 -0.50]
	Missing data	4	1.0
Age range (years)
	11 - 12	42	11.0	[0.08 -0.14]
	13 - 14	127	33.0	[0.28 -0.38]
	15 - 16	101	26.0	[0.21 -0.30]
	17 - 18	116	30.0	[0.28 -0.38]
Living with
	Mother and father	230	59.5	[0.54 -0.64]
	Only with mother	71	18.5	[0.14 -0.22]
	Only with father	16	4.0	[0.02 -0.06]
	Others	69	18.0	[0.14 -0.22]
Social Classes
	A	16	4.0	[0.02 -0.06]
	B1	86	22.5	[0.18 -0.27]
	B2	189	49.0	[0.43 -0.54]
	C	95	24.5	[0.20 -0.29]
Use of alcohol during the last month before the interview
	Did not use	212	55.0	[0.49 -0.60]
	1 to 2 times	79	20.5	[0.16 -0.25]
	Between 3 to 9 times	57	15.0	[0.11 -0.19]
	Between 10 to 20 times	21	5.5	0.03 -0.08]
	More than 20 times	15	4.0	[0.02 -0.06]

Age	Used		95% CI	Did not use		95% CI	Test	p	Effect size
Age	n	%	95% CI	n	%	95% CI	Test	p	Effect size
11- 12	8	4.6	[0.02 -0.08]	36	16.9	[0.12 -0.22]	c² = 202.1	^* ***** p < 0.001. The effect size was calculated by Cramer’s V Test. CI: Confidence Interval; p: significance level.	0.62
13 - 14	33	18.9	[0.13 -0.25]	106	50.0	[0.46 -0.56]
15 - 16	66	37.8	[0.30 -0.45]	52	24.5	[0.18 -0.30]
17 - 18	67	38.7	[0.31 -0.46]	18	8.6	[0.05 -0.13]

	Central Core				1st Periphery
	Evocations	f	MOE	MOI	Evocations	f	MOE	MOI
Frequency > 30	Beer	128^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	2.3	2.6	Adolescence	96^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	3.8^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	2.9^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.
	Parties	124	2.0^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	2.9^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	Fun	88^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	3.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	2.8^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.
	Accident	42	2.4	1.4	Hangover	76	3.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	2.6
	Drunkenness	69	2.6	1.6	Fights	73	3.2	2.5
	Dependency	81	2.6	1.8	Friends	48	3.7^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	2.8^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.
	Death	44	2.8	1.0	Harmful	35	3.1	1.9
	Contrasted Zone				2^nd Periphery
	Evocations	f	MOE	MOI	Evocations	f	MOE	MOI
Frequency < 30	Uncontrolled	29	2.7	2.3	Moderation	20	3.0	2.0
	Drug	29	2.4	1.9	Pranks	22	3.6^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	2.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;
	Pub	25	2.8	1.5	Problems	21	3.3	2.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;
	Bad	19	2.7	1.9	Sex	21	3.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	2.7^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.
	Forget	13	2.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	2.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	Embarrassment	14	3.5^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;	2.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;
	Relax	12	2.0^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	2.8^ Element with overhang elevated in the relevant criterion.	Music	12	3.6	2.4^* * Element with overhang in related criterion;

Items	Participants
Items	n	%
I do not have contacts with alcoholic beverages or with people who drink.	40	23.0
I have little or no contact with alcoholic beverages and with people who drink.	48	27.5
I live with family members who drink sometimes.	108	62.5
I live with friends who drink sometimes.	91	52.0
I live with family members and friends who drink frequently.	45	26.0
If I want, I can quickly get alcoholic beverages.	55	32.0
If my parents/family/guardians catch me drinking (or drunk), I will have problems.	86	49.5
If my parents/family/guardians catch me drinking (or drunk), there won’t be a problem, after all they know that it is a teenager thing.	23	13.5

[1] Correspondência para/Correspondenceto: A.L.M. ANDRADE. E-mail: andre.andrade@puc-campinas.edu.br.

Brasil

Brasil

Representação social sobre o uso de bebidas alcoólicas por adolescentes

Resumo