Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils

Heemann, Tagliane Puhl; Arantes, Sayonara; Andrade, Ednaldo; Viana, Daniela; Sella, Heitor

doi:10.1590/2179-8087.046517

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article, Silviculture • Floresta Ambient. 25 (3) • 2018 • https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.046517 copy

Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of forest species for herbicide phytoremediation. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with a randomized block design and a 2x3x3 factorial scheme, using two soils (Red-Yellow Latosol - RYL and Quartzarenic sandy soil - QN), three herbicide solutions (without herbicides/water, 2,4-D and atrazine), and three forest species (Cecropia hololeuca, Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla and Hymenea coubaril), with four replications. After the experiment, Cucumis sativus was cultivated in order to investigate possible herbicide residues in the soils. The evaluated forest species reduced atrazine and 2,4-D residues in most treatments, except for the Jatobá (Hymenaea coubaril ) cultivated in the RYL soil. Eucalyptus was the species that showed the greatest tolerance to herbicide action, demonstrating the potential for phytoremediation of atrazine and 2,4-D. Cecropia hololeuca and Hymenaea coubaril presented the greatest potential for 2,4-D and atrazine, respectively.

Keywords:
leaching; eucalyptus; Jatobá; Embauba

Soil	pH H₂O	P	K	Ca	Mg	Al	H	BS	T	V	O.M
Soil	pH H₂O	mg dm^-3		Ca	--------------- cmolc dm^-3 ---------------					%	g dm^-3
RYL	5.10	1.44	33.0	1.21	0.43	0.25	5.36	1.72	7.33	23.49	30.09
QN	4.40	1.02	14.0	0.13	0.07	0.60	3.53	0.24	4.37	5.51	16.56

Soil	Sand	Silt	Clay	Textural class
Soil	----------------------g kg^-1-----------------------			Textural class
RYL	404	142	454	Clay soil
QN	842	79	79	Sandy soil

	1st APPLICATION		2nd APPLICATION		3rd APPLICATION
	2,4 – D	ATRAZINE	2,4 - D	ATRAZINE	2,4 - D	ATRAZINE
	7 DAYS
*Embaúba*	3.13 bA	6.25 aA	23.44 bB	37.50 aA	20.31 bB	50.00 aA
Eucalyptus	0.00 bA	0.00 aA	9.38 cA	6.25 cAB	17.19 bA	12.50 cA
*Jatobá*	20.31 aA	6.25 aB	45.31 aA	25.00 bB	65.63 aA	29.69 bB
	14 DAYS
*Embaúba*	6.25 bAB	12.50 aA	23.44 bB	45.31 aA	18.75 bB	46.875 aA
Eucalyptus	6.25 bA	4.69 aA	10.94 cA	7.81 cAB	20.31 bA	17.19 cA
*Jatobá*	37.50 aA	7.81 aB	56.25 aA	26.56 bB	70.31 aA	35.94 bB
	21 DAYS
*Embaúba*	7.81 bB	26.56 aA	21.88 bB	50.00 aA	23.44 bB	51.56 aA
Eucalyptus	7.81 bA	4.69 bA	10.94 cA	7.81 cAB	20.31 bA	23.44 cA
*Jatobá*	43.75 aA	7.81 bB	62.50 aA	29.69 bB	70.31 aA	39.06 bB

Treatments	*EMBAÚBA*	EUCALYPTUS	*JATOBÁ*
Treatments	SD (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	91.31 aAB	98.08 aA	78.58 bB
Atrazine	84.72 bB	98.73 aA	106.32 aA
	PH (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	88.07aB	101.54 aA	69.64 bC
Atrazine	96.44 aAB	93.88 aB	108.69 aA
	NL (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	80.03 abA	92.08 aA	43.06 bB
Atrazine	73.57 bB	82.65 aAB	104.38 aA
	Cl a (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	92.87 aA	98.87 aA	74.96 bB
Atrazine	81.90 bB	95.71 aA	96.29 aA
	Cl b (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	87.55 aA	93.80 aA	71.30 bB
Atrazine	64.22 bB	89.29 aA	91.09 aA
	WSB (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	78.96 aAB	98.21 aA	33.59 bB
Atrazine	66.54 aA	84.11 aA	98.25 aA
	DSB (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	70.31 aAB	98.01 aA	41.16 bB
Atrazine	53.65 aB	80.18 aA	99.83 aA
	DRB (%)
Control	100.00 aA	100.00 aA	100.00 aA
2,4-D	91.05 abAB	98.70 aA	101.46 aA
Atrazine	58.22 bB	62.98 bB	107.49 aA

Previous		RYL			QN
species:		Control	2,4-D	ATRAZINE	Control	2,4-D	ATRAZINE
species:	SD
*Embaúba*		0.42 c	0.47 b	0.47 b	0.44 c	0.40 c	0.36 c
Eucalyptus		0.58 b	0.49 b	0.58 a	0.56 b	0.55 b	0.49 b
*Jatobá*		0.85 a	0.65 a	0.68 a	0.68 a	0.70 a	0.66 a
	PH
*Embaúba*		21.37 b	25.66 b	28.80 b	21.85 b	16.78 b	12.93 b
Eucalyptus		35.18 b	26.03 b	38.13 b	35.75 ab	29.14 b	35.50 ab
*Jatobá*		111.31 a	65.87 a	83.33 a	55.39 a	74.18 a	57.35 a
	NL
*Embaúba*		7.50 b	7.00 b	8.50 b	7.50 a	6.25 b	6.25 b
Eucalyptus		9.00 b	7.75 b	9.00 b	9.00 a	7.75 b	7.00 b
*Jatobá*		15.50 a	11.00 a	13.00 a	9.50 a	11.75 a	9.50 a
	Cl b
*Embaúba*		6.60 b	6.58 a	6.43 b	7.60 a	7.63 a	6.75 a
Eucalyptus		8.90 b	9.75 a	9.43 ab	7.75 a	6.18 a	6.75 a
*Jatobá*		13.10 a	10.00 a	10.73 a	5.60 a	7.90 a	6.93 a
	WSB
*Embaúba*		8.45 b	9.23 b	11.62 b	5.90 b	4.72 b	3.55 b
Eucalyptus		14.95 b	10.68 b	20.22 b	7.70 b	12.63 b	8.27 b
*Jatobá*		66.00 a	30.33 a	44.59 a	25.35 a	36.02 a	26.63 a
	DSB
*Embaúba*		1.05 b	1.21 b	1.42 b	0.72 b	0.63 b	0.52 b
Eucalyptus		1.75 b	1.23 b	2.30 b	0.77b	1.37 b	1.49 ab
*Jatobá*		6.15 a	3.08 a	4.37 a	2.50 a	4.13 a	2.67 a

Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro Rodovia BR 465 Km 7, CEP 23897-000, Tel.: (21) 2682 0558 | (21) 3787-4033 - Seropédica - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: floram@ufrrj.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] *Tagliane Puhl HeemannPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciência Ambientais – PPGCAM, Instituto de Ciências Naturais Humanas e Sociais – ICNHS, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso – UFMT, Av. Alexandre Ferronato, 1200, Setor Industrial, CEP 78557-287, Sinop, MT, Brasil e-mail: tagli_heemann@hotmail.com