Respiratory function tests are used to determinate severity, functional consequences and progress of pulmonary and neuromotor dysfunctions. Methodological variations - by means of a mouthpiece or a facemask - and patient's cooperation may interfere in manoeuvre performance and affect measures. The aim of this study was to compare lung volume values (tidal volume [VT] and minute volume [Vm]), respiratory rate (RR), and vital capacity (VC) in healthy individuals when assessed by using a mouthpiece and a facemask. A total of 60 healthy subjects (14 men and 46 women), mean aged 22.86±7.14 years, were evaluated. Items used were a disposable, semi-rigid mouthpiece, with a nose clip, and a plastic facemask with pneumatic inflatable sealing. Measures obtained were statistically compared, with significance level set at 5%. Mean values obtained with the mouthpiece and the facemask were, respectively: RR, 15 rpm x 13 rpm (p<0.01); Vm, 14.87 l/min x 10.02 l/min (p<0.01); VT, 0.93 l x 0.8 l (p<0.01); and VC, 3.85 l x 3.52 l (p<0.01). Lung volumes and vital capacity values were thus shown to be significantly lower when assessed by means of a facemask than with a mouthpiece.
Breath tests; Lung volume measurements; Vital capacity
