Frequency of the allelic variant c.1150T > C in exon 10 of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene is not increased in patients with pathogenic mutations and related chondrodysplasia phenotypes

Frequency of the allelic variant c.1150T > C in exon 10 of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene is not increased in patients with pathogenic mutations and related chondrodysplasia phenotypes

Thatiane Yoshie Kanazawa; Luciana Cardoso Bonadia; Denise Pontes Cavalcanti

Grupo de Displasias Esqueléticas, Departamento de Genética Médica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

^{Correspondence}

ABSTRACT

Mutations in the FGFR3 gene cause the phenotypic spectrum of FGFR3 chondrodysplasias ranging from lethal forms to the milder phenotype seen in hypochondroplasia (Hch). The p.N540K mutation in the FGFR3 gene occurs in ~70% of individuals with Hch, and nearly 30% of individuals with the Hch phenotype have no mutations in the FGFR3, which suggests genetic heterogeneity. The identification of a severe case of Hch associated with the typical mutation c.1620C > A and the occurrence of a c.1150T > C change that resulted in a p.F384L in exon 10, together with the suspicion that this second change could be a modulator of the phenotype, prompted us to investigate this hypothesis in a cohort of patients. An analysis of 48 patients with FGFR3 chondrodysplasia phenotypes and 330 healthy (control) individuals revealed no significant difference in the frequency of the C allele at the c.1150 position (p = 0.34). One patient carrying the combination `pathogenic mutation plus the allelic variant c.1150T > C' had a typical achondroplasia (Ach) phenotype. In addition, three other patients with atypical phenotypes showed no association with the allelic variant. Together, these results do not support the hypothesis of a modulatory role for the c.1150T > C change in the FGFR3 gene.

Keywords: FGFR3, F384L, hypochondroplasia, skeletal dysplasia.

The FGFR3 protein is encoded by a gene of the same name that has been extensively studied because of its role in the regulation of linear bone growth. Mutations in this gene cause the phenotypic spectrum of FGFR3 chondrodysplasias that classically include hypochondroplasia (Hch), achondroplasia (Ach), thanatophoric dysplasia types I and II (TDI and TDII) and SADDAN (Severe Achondroplasia with Developmental Delay and Acanthosis Nigricans) (Warman et al., 2011).

The mutations c.1620C > A and c.1620C > G in exon 13 of the FGFR3 gene both lead to the p.N540K substitution, a mutation found in 50-70% of individuals with Hch (Bellus et al., 2000). Other mutations in the FGFR3 gene associated with Hch account for ~2% of the cases (Castro-Feijóo et al., 2008). For ~30% of individuals with the Hch phenotype no mutations have been found in the FGFR3 gene, suggesting that this condition is clinically and genetically heterogeneous (Bonaventure et al., 1996).

The diagnosis of Hch is usually suspected or established at school age when short stature plus clinical and radiological changes become evident (Spranger et al., 2012). However, in cases where the phenotype is more severe, the diagnosis can be made already in the neonatal period (Karadimas et al., 2006).

The identification of a severe case of Hch diagnosed in the neonatal period associated with a combination of the typical mutation (c.1620C > A) in exon 13 and the c.1150T > C change (p.F384L) in exon 10, together with the suspicion that the change in exon 10 could modulate the phenotype (Trujillo-Tiebas et al., 2009), prompted us to investigate this hypothesis in a cohort of patients with FGFR3 chondrodysplasia phenotypes.

We studied 48 patients with FGFR3 chondrodysplasia phenotypes. All subjects provided formal informed consent prior to enrollment, and this study was approved by an institutional Committee for Ethics in Research (protocol no. 992/2007). Blood samples were collected and genomic DNA was extracted using a standard phenol-chloroform method. The molecular diagnosis was done by direct sequencing after PCR amplification of the exons related to the respective phenotypes. The amplified products were purified and sequenced using an ABI3500XL^® sequencer in conjunction with BigDye v.3.1 sequencing kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The data were processed using ABI software and analyzed using CodonCode Aligner 4.1.1. Exon 10 was sequenced in all cases. In addition, exons 7, 13 and 15 related to the TDI, Hch and TDII phenotypes, respectively, were sequenced in patients with the respective phenotypes. Patients with Ach had no other exon sequenced since the hot spot for this phenotype is located in exon 10. Table 1 shows the eight pathogenic mutations identified in the 48 patients studied.

Two of the 48 patients presented the c.1150T > C change in addition to the pathogenic mutation. One of these two patients had Hch because of the c.1620C > A mutation and was diagnosed in the first months of life because of the severity of his phenotype (birth length of 44 cm plus corporal disproportion with rhizomelic shortening of limbs at birth). As his diagnosis was initially doubtful (mild Ach or severe Hch), exons 10 and 13 were analyzed. The second patient had a typical Ach phenotype (c.1138G > A). In both cases, the c.1150T > C change was inherited, but without apparent phenotypic consequences in the respective parents. Paternal inheritance was confirmed in the patient with Hch and maternal inheritance in the patient with Ach. Molecular cloning was used to determine whether this change was cis or trans in relation to the pathogenic mutation. In the Ach patient, the c.1150T > C change was in trans with the c.1138G > A mutation. A haplotype analysis was not feasible in the patient with Hch because of the distance (1,447 bp) between the two changes in the FGFR3 gene.

With regard to phenotype, we identified four atypical patients: one with Ach (c.1138G > A) associated with corporal asymmetry, mental retardation and acanthosis nigricans, two with severe Hch (one with c.1620C > A and the other with c.1620C > G, and clinical and radiological manifestations in the neonatal period) and one with TD1 (c.742C > T) and long-term survival. Except for the patient with Hch already described, no other patient among these three atypical individuals had the allelic variant c.1150T > C.

For comparison, we also sequenced exon 10 of the FGFR3 in 330 healthy control subjects. These control samples consisted of DNA extracted from the cord blood of healthy newborns. The c.1150T > C change was found in four individuals. As Hch is usually not apparent in the newborn period, for all these four controls with the c.1150T > C change the Hch hot spots (exons 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15) were also examined and no mutation was found. Table 2 shows the frequencies of the C allele in the control group and patients, as well as the p value (Fischer test) for the comparison between the two groups.

Trujillo-Tiebas et al. (2004) reported the presence of a c.1150T > C change in two families. In one family, the change was found in a patient with severe but unspecified skeletal dysplasia. Although unaffected, the patients father and grandmother displayed subtle symptoms. No other information about the patients specific mutation was provided. In the other family, the change was found in a patient with Hch, along with the most common mutation (c.1620C > A), and in his mother who was unaffected by the skeletal dysplasia but presented some skeletal signs. An analysis of 194 chromosomes from individuals of the general population detected this change in one chromosome (0.5%). These authors suggested an additive pathological effect of this change in the FGFR3 receptor and reported another affected individual found in a series of prenatal cases. The father carried the same change (c.1150T > C in FGFR3) as the abortus, but with no apparent clinical sign (Trujillo-Tiebas et al., 2009).

In the present study, the presence of a c.1150T > C change in two patients in a relatively small sample appears to be a stochastic event. In addition, there was no significant difference in the frequency of the C allele between the controls and patients. The frequency of the C allele in the control group (0.6%) was the same as that found in a British population (0.6% or one C allele in 178 chromosomes) according to the 1000 Genomes Project (Abecasis et al., 2012). Interestingly, the frequency of the C allele was 3% (three C alleles in 100 chromosomes) among individuals of Turkish descent but was uncommon among those of German descent (no C alleles in 100 chromosomes) (Golla et al., 1997).

Although the c.1150T > C mutation leads to a phenylalanine for leucine substitution at position 384 in the amino acid sequence, this change apparently does not affect receptor function. Both of these amino acids are nonpolar and their substitution does not change the molecular characteristics of the transmembrane domain nor the hydrophobicity of this structure (Adzhubei et al., 2010). Moreover, leucine is present in the bovine FGFR3 homolog, which indicates a normal FGFR3 protein function (Golla et al., 1997).

In conclusion, the data here presented do not support the hypothesis of a modulatory role for the c.1150T > C change in the FGFR3 gene. The more severe phenotype of the patient with Hch reported here was apparently related to the known phenotypic heterogeneity of this condition rather than to any modulatory effect of the c.1150T > C change. We suggest that this phenotypic heterogeneity occurs by chance or via another, as yet unknown, modulatory mechanism.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and families who participated in this study. This work was supported by CNPq (grant nos. 402008/2010-3, 590148/2011-7 and 132270/2012-9).

Received: January 19, 2014

Accepted: June 18, 2014

Associate Editor: Mara H. Hutz

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

• Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS and Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248-249.
• Bellus GA, Spector EB, Speiser PW, Weaver CA, Garber AT, Bryke CR, Israel J, Rosengren SS, Webster MK, Donoghue DJ, et al. (2000) Distinct missense mutations of the FGFR3 Lys650 codon modulate receptor kinase activation and the severity of the skeletal dysplasia phenotype. Am J Hum Genet 67:1411-1421.
• Bonaventure J, Rousseau F, Legeai-Mallet L, Le Merrer M, Munnich A and Maroteaux P (1996) Common mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene account for achondroplasia, hypochondroplasia, and thanatophoric dwarfism. Am J Med Genet 63:148-154.
• Castro-Feijóo L, Loidi L, Vidal A, Parajes S, Rosón E, Álvarez A, Cabanas P, Barreiro J, Alonso A, Domínguez F, et al. (2008) Hypochondroplasia and acanthosis nigricans: A new syndrome due to the p.Lys650Thr mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene? Eur J Endocrinol 159:243-249.
• Golla A, Lichtner P, von Gernet S, Winterpacht A, Fairley J, Murken J and Schuffenhauer S (1997) Phenotypic expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation P250R in a large craniosynostosis family. J Med Genet 34:683-684.
• Karadimas C, Sifakis S, Valsamopoulos P, Makatsoris C, Velissariou V, Nasioulas G, Petersen MB, Koumantakis E and Hatzaki A (2006) Prenatal diagnosis of hypochondroplasia: Report of two cases. Am J Med Genet 1003:998-1003.
• Spranger JW, Brill PW, Nishimura G, Superti-Furga A and Unger S (2012) Bone Dysplasias - An Atlas of Genetic Disorders of Skeletal Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 11 pp.
• The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491:56-65.
• Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Riveiro R, Queipo A, Vallespin E, Cantalapiedra D, Lorda-Sanchez I and Ayuso C (2004) Human gene mutations. Gene symbol: FGFR3. Disease: Skeletal dysplasia. Hum Genet 115:347-356.
• Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Fenollar-Cortés M, Lorda-Sánchez I, Díaz-Recasens J, Redondo AC, Ramos-Corrales C and Ayuso C (2009) Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia due to FGFR3 gene mutations: A 9-year experience: Prenatal diagnosis in FGFR3 gene. J Assist Reprod Genet 26:455-460.
• Warman M, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Krakow D, Lachman R, LeMerrer M, Mortier G, Mundlos S, Nishimura G, Rimoin D, et al. (2011) Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2010 revision. Am J Med Genet A 155A:943-968.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  21 Oct 2014
• Date of issue
  Dec 2014

History

• Accepted
  18 June 2014
• Received
  19 Jan 2014