A meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphism and non-small cell lung cancer outcomes

Abstract

We aimed to analyze the correlation between ABCG2 gene polymorphisms of 34 GG/(GA + AA) loci, 421 CC/(AC + AA) loci, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapeutic effects via meta-analysis. With key words, the databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for clinical studies on ABCG2 polymorphism and NSCLC. RR and 95% CIs were used to compute combined effects, followed by heterogeneity testing. Publication bias was examined using the funnel plot method. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Ten studies were included. No evidence of heterogeneity exists in these studies. The results indicate that two polymorphic loci of ABCG2 gene (34 G>A, and 421 C>A) had no relationship with the curative effect of chemotherapy for NSCLC, except ABCG2 34G>A, which had a significant relationship with the skin toxicity complication. There was no significant relationship between these polymorphisms and complications (skin toxicity, diarrhea, interstitial pneumonia, liver dysfunction, and neutropenia). Begg’s test and Egger’s test indicated that there was no obvious publication bias. The meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant correlation between ABCG2 gene polymorphism and NSCLC outcomes.

Keywords:
ABCG2; polymorphism; Non-small cell lung cancer; chemotherapy; meta-analysis

Introduction

Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2) performs certain physiological functions in vivo, such as maintaining cell homeostasis (Susanto et al., 2008), the blood-brain barrier (Cisternino et al., 2004; Eisenblätter et al., 2003), disease susceptibility (Phippsgreen et al., 2010), and pharmacokinetics (Lee et al., 2015). Additionally, studies have reported that it has an effect on multi-drug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents, such as mitoxantrone and camptothecin analogues (Yoshikawa et al., 2004, Nakagawa et al., 2006). Previous studies have suggested that several naturally occurring single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, variations in a single nucleotide at a specific position in the genome), in the ABCG2 gene may affect the expression and function of ABCG2 protein (Kobayashi et al., 2005; Lepper et al., 2005). More than 80 SNPs have been identified in the ABCG2 gene (Sharom 2008). Specifically, ABCG2 polymorphism caused by the 421 locus change in the fifth exon could lead to a decrease in ABCG2 protein expression, which in turn affects the removal and absorption of pravastatin (Oh et al., 2013) and simvastatin (Zhou et al., 2013). Chen et al. (2012) have indicated that the ABCG2 421C>A (rs2231142) polymorphism, resulting in a Glu141Lys substitution, is a protective factor for developing cancer. Additionally, ABCG2 34G>A (rs2231137), resulting in a Val12Met substitution, is also well studied and is related to the adverse effect of many drugs that are transported by ABCG2 (Imai et al., 2002).

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and approximately 85% of lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Aggarwal et al., 2010). Chemotherapy is a common choice for NSCLC treatment (Reynolds 1995; Ren et al., 2011), while chemoresistance is a challenge during the treatment (Chang 2011). As mentioned above, SNPs in ABCG2 can affect the expression of ABCG2 protein. ABCG2 protein expression is reported to be related to the response of advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy (Ota et al., 2009). Some studies have focused on investigating the relationships between ABCG2 gene polymorphism and treatment effects of chemotherapy on NSCLC patients, however no consensus has been reached (Cusatis et al., 2006; Han J Y et al., 2007; Akasaka et al., 2010; Müller et al., 2010; Lemos C et al., 2011; Campa et al., 2012; Mariko et al., 2012; Fukudo et al., 2013; Kobayashi et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015). Tamura et al. (2012) suggest that ABCG2 34G>A would be useful in predicting a worsening of skin rash. Lemos et al. (2011) did not find any significant association between the evaluated ABCG2 polymorphisms and response, clinical benefit, time to progression (TTP), or overall survival (OS). Moreover, due to the small sample sizes of the individual studies, there is a need to perform a meta-analysis to combine them and systematically analyze the relationships between ABCG2 gene polymorphism and treatment effects among NSCLC patients.

Therefore, this study aims to explore the prognosis value of ABCG2 gene polymorphism on the chemotherapy effect of NSCLC through a systematic review of studies and meta-analysis.

Material and Methods

Data sources

The search strategy was pre-designed. The databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies on ABCG2 gene polymorphism and NSCLC outcomes published before December 3, 2018. The keywords included: [‘non-small cell lung cancer’ OR ‘NSCLC’ OR ‘squamous cell lung cancer’ OR ‘lung adenocarcinoma’ OR ‘large cell lung cancer’] AND [‘ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2’ OR ‘ABCG2’ OR ‘breast cancer resistance protein’ OR ‘BCRP’ OR ‘CDw338’ OR ‘mitoxantrone resistance protein’ OR ‘MRP’ OR ‘ABCP’] AND [‘polymorphism’ OR ‘polymorphisms’ OR ‘genetic’ OR ‘variation’ OR ‘genotyping’ OR ‘SNP’].

Inclusion criteria and quality assessment

The inclusion criteria were 1) clinical studies with NSCLC patients as cases; 2) studies that investigated the correlation between ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and NSCLC treatment effects; 3) studies that reported the frequencies of gene types and alleles or from which these data can be calculated; 4) studies that reported curative effect indicators such as progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), mortality risk, and response; and adverse effect indicators such as drug-induced diarrhea, skin toxicity, liver dysfunction, and interstitial pneumonia; 5) reviews, reports, comments or letters were excluded. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Stang, 2010) was used for quality assessment.

Data extraction

The following data from the included studies was extracted independently by two researchers, including first author, publication year, distribution of ethnic groups, distribution and frequencies of genotypes and alleles, and the gender and age of patients in each study. If there was inconsistency during data extraction, discussion with a third researcher was initiated until an agreement was reached.

Statistical analysis

Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager Version 5.3 (2008). Mortality risk was combined using HR and 95% CI. RR and 95% CIs (m (mutation)/m + w (wild)/m vs. w/w) were used to calculate the combined effect sizes of the other indicators. Heterogeneity test was conducted according to the chi-square-based Q test (Lau et al., 1997) and I² statistic. If there was significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I² > 50%), the random-effect model (by Dersimonian-Laird method) was used to pool the effect sizes; otherwise, the FE model (by Mantel-Haenszel method) was used. Subgroup meta-analysis based on chemotherapeutics, race, and grade of toxicity was performed. Begg’s test and Egger’s test were used to examine publication bias for studies with the largest number of publications included. All tests were two-sided, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

Study selection and the characteristics of correlational studies

Figure 1 shows the study selection procedure. Firstly, a total of 722 studies (123 in PubMed and 599 in EMBASE) were searched. After removal of duplicates or irrelevant studies, 63 studies remained for reading of the full text and abstract. Of these, 10 reviews and 20 cell experiments, 16 non-NSCLC related studies and three without extractable data were rejected, leaving 14 studies. Additionally, two studies without data associated with 34 G>A and 421 C>A, and two studies without the correlation between ABCG2 polymorphism and efficacy and side effects of chemotherapy were excluded. Finally, a total of 10 studies (Cusatis et al., 2006; Han et al., 2007; Muller et al., 2009; Akasaka et al., 2010; Lemos et al., 2011; Tamura et al., 2012; Fukudo et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015; Kobayashi et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2017) were included in this meta-analysis.

Figure 1
Flow chart of literature search and study selection.

The characteristics of correlational studies are listed in Table 1. These studies were mainly conducted in China, Japan, Germany, Italy, and Korea. The patients mainly were at stages III–IV. The chemotherapy regimens included Etoposide + Gemcitabine + Platinum-based drugs, Gefitinib and Erlotinib. The studies had relatively high-quality scores of 5–7 (Table 2).

Table 1
Characteristics of the included studies.

Author	Year	Area (race)	No. of patients	Chemotherapy regimen	Stage	Evaluation criteria
Akasaka	2010	Japan (Asian)	75	Gefitinib	I-IV	WHO
Chen	2015	China (Asian)	70	gefitinib, erlotinib and icotinib	I-II	ECOG
Cusatis	2006	Italy (Caucasian)	173	Gefitinib	I-IV	WHO
Fukudo	2013	Japan (Asian)	88	Erlotinib	IIIB-IV	ECOG
Han	2007	Korea (Asian)	107	Irinotecan and cisplatin	IIIB-IV	ECOG
Kobayashi	2014	Japan (Asian)	31	Gefitinib	IIIB-IV	CTCAE
Lemos	2011	Italy (Caucasian)	94	Gefitinib	IIIB-IV	ECOG
Ma	2017	China (Asian)	59	Gefitinib	IIIB-IV	ECOG
Muller	2009	Germany (Caucasian)	187	Etoposide+Gemcitabine+Platinum-based drugs	II-IV	RECIST
Tamura	2012	Japan (Asian)	83	Gefitinib	I-IV	CTCAE

WHO, World Health Organization; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Table 2
Quality assessment of the included studies with Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.

First author	Representativeness of the exposed cohort	Selection of the unexposed cohort	Ascertainment of exposure	Outcome of interest not present at start of study	Control for important factor or additional factor	Outcome assessment	Follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur	Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts	Total quality scores
Akasaka 2010	#	--	#	#	--	#	#	#	6
Chen 2015	#	--	#	#	#	#	#	#	7
Cusatis 2006	#	--	#	#	--	#	--	#	5
Fukudo 2013	#	--	#	#	#	#	#	#	7
Han 2007	#	--	#	#	--	#	#	#	6
Kobayashi 2015	#	--	#	--	#	#	#	#	6
Lemos 2011	#	--	#	#	#	#	#	#	7
Ma 2017	#	--	#	#	--	#	#	#	6
Muller 2009	#	--	#	#	#	#	#	#	7
Tamura 2012	#	--	#	#	--	#	#	#	6

Correlation between ABCG2 gene polymorphism and treatment effect of NSCLC

The correlations between the polymorphisms of two loci of the ABCG2 gene and the prognosis of chemotherapy for NSCLC were investigated. The results are displayed in Figures S1 https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/30511a1623c6546670f0d6c3903cb0955e5e4d5d.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/7c22470ed029f24a0dd2d195088f40fd639b249a.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/3b32be73b0fcfc42100ef28c6d82375324b19d5a.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/bd57b4c964a4ae1225a8d226b72fee2cc5967cbd.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/80c6e6c0fd8abad1a1542c50c6c7057ac6052c79.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/4d9f044f6c409afbc8395085791d15182a9e4c50.pdf-S8. For the indicators of OS, PFS, mortality (Figures S1 https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/30511a1623c6546670f0d6c3903cb0955e5e4d5d.pdf-S3), and interstitial pneumonia (Figure S8), the included literature only report the data related to ABCG2 421C>A. There were no heterogeneities among studies for all curative effect indicators and adverse effect indicators (P > 0.05, I² > 50%), thus the FE model was adopted to combine all effect sizes. The meta-analysis results show that the polymorphism ABCG2 421C>A had no relationship with outcomes of chemotherapy for NSCLC (P > 0.05), and ABCG2 34G>A was significantly correlated with skin toxicity (P < 0.05) (Figures S1 https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/30511a1623c6546670f0d6c3903cb0955e5e4d5d.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/7c22470ed029f24a0dd2d195088f40fd639b249a.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/3b32be73b0fcfc42100ef28c6d82375324b19d5a.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/bd57b4c964a4ae1225a8d226b72fee2cc5967cbd.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/80c6e6c0fd8abad1a1542c50c6c7057ac6052c79.pdf https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4685/wnfgVHFYyPDDnVx9Ds69ZCk/4d9f044f6c409afbc8395085791d15182a9e4c50.pdf-S8).

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis of skin toxicity and diarrhea of 421 loci CC/(AC + AA) based on the chemotherapeutics (gefitinib vs. others), races (Asian vs. Caucasian) and grade of toxicity (Grade f 1 vs. 0, Grade y 2 vs. Grade < 2) were performed. The results show that ABCG2 421C>A had no influence on skin toxicity or diarrhea (P > 0.05, Table 3).

Table 3
Subgroup analyses of ABCG2 421C>A (AA+CA vs. CC).

Subgroups	Adverse events		P value	Test for heterogeneity
	N	OR(95%CI)		I2 (%)	P
Association between ABCG2 421C>A and skin toxicity
Race
Asian	5	0.88 (0.74, 1.05)	0.17	0%	0.81
Caucasian	2	0.99 (0.78, 1.25)	0.95	0%	0.54
Chemotherapy regimen
Gefitinib	6	0.89 (0.77, 1.04)	0.16	0%	0.71
Others	1	1.00 (0.68, 1.48)	0.98	--	--
Grade of toxicity
Grade ≥	5	0.91 (0.78, 1.06)	0.23	0%	0.64
Grade(0	2	0.92 (0.65, 1.30)	0.63	0%	0.49
Association between ABCG2 421C>A and diarrhea
Race
Asian	6	0.99 (0.70, 1.38)	0.93	22%	0.27
Caucasian	2	0.82 (0.60, 1.12)	0.22	0%	0.43
Chemotherapy regimen
Gefitinib	6	0.80 (0.62, 1.02)	0.07	0%	0.97
Others	2	1.69 (0.86, 3.33)	0.13	48%	0.16
Grade of toxicity
Gradeto	5	0.81 (0.63, 1.04)	0.10	0%	0.93
Grade63	3	1.44 (0.76, 2.71)	0.26	43%	0.17

Publication bias

The publication bias test was conducted on “drug-induced diarrhea” of ABCG2 421C>A that had the most included papers. Both Begg’s test and Egger’s test indicated that no publication bias exists (Begg’s test: P = 0.386, Egger’s test: P = 0.834).

Discussion

This meta-analysis systematically reviewed ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and the efficacy and safety of NSCLC treatment. Polymorphisms at two loci of the ABCG2 gene (34 G>A and 421 C>A) were evaluated. In addition, the qualities of the included studies are relatively high. There is no significant heterogeneity among studies for the entire analysis. Moreover, no publication bias is noted. Furthermore, compared with a recent meta-analysis of Tang et al. (2018), which determined whether ABCG2 gene polymorphisms are associated with the risk of gefitinib-induced toxicity in NSCLC patients, our study added meta-analysis of survival outcomes.

Overall, this meta-analysis did not find a significant relationship between evaluated ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and the curative effects and adverse effects of chemotherapy of NSCLC, except that ABCG2 34G>A showed a negative relationship with skin toxicity in patients after chemotherapy. However there was only one study (Mariko et al., 2012) on 34G>A, which might have resulted in insufficient power. More studies on 34G>A should be performed.

ABCG2 may have an effect on the multi-drug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents such as mitoxantrone and camptothecin analogues (Nakagawa et al., 2006; Yoshikawa et al., 2004). However, for the NSCLC patients, cisplatin (59.73%) and carboplatin (30.20%) are mostly used (Ren et al., 2011). In the studies included in this meta-analysis, gefitinib is the most widely used, followed by etoposide. Drug resistance to gefitinib and etoposide was not noted. Subgroup analysis based on different chemotherapeutics was performed. There was no significant relationship between the polymorphisms on 421C>A and skin toxicity or diarrhea after treatment for gefitinib or other drugs. Similarly, there were no differences between Asians and Caucasians in the relationship.

This meta-analysis did not limit the types of chemotherapy drugs and included as many studies as possible. Additionally, we added the analysis of survival outcomes. Nevertheless, there were shortcomings in this study, due to the small sample size for some indices, and conclusions from the results should therefore be drawn with caution.

In all, it can be concluded that the ABCG2 polymorphism could not be used as a prognosis indicator of chemotherapy for NSCLC. However, due to the limitations in this study, the results should be interpreted cautiously. More studies with large sample sizes, randomized designs, and unified styles of outcomes are necessary.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key Program) (grant number 71532002) and Science and Technology Basic Work of Key Projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant number 2013FY110900).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

LF Conception and design of the research; RW, LY acquisition of data; RW, XS analysis and interpretation of data; RZ, PZ statistical analysis; LF drafting the manuscript LY revision of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

• Aggarwal C, Somaiah N and Simon GR (2010) Biomarkers with Predictive and Prognostic Function in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Ready for Prime Time? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:822-832.
• Akasaka K, Kaburagi T, Yasuda S, Ohmori K, Abe K, Sagara H, Ueda Y, Nagao K, Imura J and Imai Y (2010) Impact of functional ABCG2 polymorphisms on the adverse effects of gefitinib in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 66:691-698.
• Campa D, Müller P, Edler L, Knoefel L, Barale R, Heussel CP, Thomas M, Canzian F and Risch A (2012) A comprehensive study of polymorphisms in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 and lung cancer chemotherapy response and prognosis. Int J Cancer. 131:2920-2928.
• Chang A (2011) Chemotherapy, chemoresistance and the changing treatment landscape for NSCLC. Lung Cancer 71:3-10.
• Chen P, Zhao L, Zou P, Xu H, Lu A and Zhao P (2012) The contribution of the ABCG2 C421A polymorphism to cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of the current literature. BMC Cancer 12:383.
• Chen X, Chen D, Yang S, Ma R, Pan Y, Li X and Ma S (2015) Impact of ABCG2 polymorphisms on the clinical outcome of TKIs therapy in Chinese advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Cell Int. 15:43.
• Cisternino S, Mercier C, Bourasset F, Roux F and Scherrmann JM. (2004) Expression, up-regulation, and transport activity of the multidrug-resistance protein Abcg2 at the mouse blood-brain barrier. Cancer Res. 64:3296-3301.
• Cusatis G, Gregorc V, Li J, Spreafico A, Ingersoll RG, Verweij J, Ludovini V, Villa E, Hidalgo M and Sparreboom A et al. (2006) Pharmacogenetics of ABCG2 and adverse reactions to gefitinib. J Natl Cancer Inst. 98:1739-1742.
• Eisenblätter T, Hüwel S and Galla HJ (2003) Characterisation of the brain multidrug resistance protein (BMDP/ABCG2/BCRP) expressed at the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 971:221-231.
• Fukudo M, Ikemi Y, Togashi Y, Masago K, Kim YH, Mio T, Terada T, Teramukai S, Mishima M and Inui K (2013) Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of erlotinib and pharmacogenomic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 52:593-609.
• Han JY, Lim HS, Yoo YK, Shin ES, Park YH, Lee SY, Lee JE, Lee DH, Kim HT and Lee JS. (2007) Associations of ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2 polymorphisms with irinotecan-pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 110:138-147.
• Imai Y, Nakane M, Kage K, Tsukahara S, Ishikawa E, Tsuruo T, Miki Y and Sugimoto Y (2002) C421A polymorphism in the human breast cancer resistance protein gene is associated with low expression of Q141K protein and low-level drug resistance. Mol Cancer Ther 1:611-616.
• Kobayashi D, Ieiri I, Hirota T, Takane H, Maegawa S, Kigawa J, Suzuki H, Nanba E, Oshimura M and Terakawa N (2005) Functional assessment of ABCG2 (BCRP) gene polymorphisms to protein expression in human placenta. Drug Metab Dispos. 33:94-101.
• Kobayashi H, Sato K, Niioka T, Miura H, Ito H and Miura M (2015) Relationship among Gefitinib exposure, polymorphisms of its metabolizing enzymes and transporters, and side effects in Japanese patients with Non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 16:274-281.
• Lau J, Ioannidis JPA and Schmid CH (1997) Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 127:820-826.
• Lee CA, O’Connor MA, Ritchie TK, Galetin A, Cook JA, Ragueneau-Majlessi I, Ellens H, Feng B, Taub ME, Paine MF et al. (2015) Breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) on clinical pharmacokinetics and frug interactions: Practical recommendations for clinical victim and perpetrator drug interaction design. Drug Metab Dispos 43:490-509.
• Lemos C, Giovannetti E, Zucali PA, Assaraf YG, Scheffer GL, van der Straaten T, D’Incecco A, Falcone A, Guchelaar HJ, Danesi R et al. (2011) Impact of ABCG2 polymorphisms on the clinical outcome and toxicity of gefitinib in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics 12:159-170.
• Lepper ER, Kees N, Jaap V, Acharya MR, Figg WD and Alex S (2005) Mechanisms of resistance to anticancer drugs: the role of the polymorphic ABC transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2. Pharmacogenomics 6:115-138.
• Müller PJ, Dally H, Klappenecker CN, Edler L, Jäger B, Gerst M, Spiegelhalder B, Tuengerthal S, Fischer JR and Drings P (2010) Polymorphisms in ABCG2, ABCC3 and CNT1 genes and their possible impact on chemotherapy outcome of lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer 124:1669-1674.
• Ma Y, Xin S, Huang M, Yang Y, Zhu C, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Chen L, Zhao Y, Li J et al. (2017) Determinants of Gefitinib toxicity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pharmacogenomic study of metabolic enzymes and transporters. Pharmacogenomics J 17:325-330.
• Mariko T, Masashi K, Mihoko H, Maki A, Hiroshi S, Masashi Y, Yoshitsugu H and Yoshinori H (2012) Genetic polymorphisms of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters (ABCG2, ABCB1) and gefitinib toxicity. Nagoya J Med Sci 74:133-140.
• Muller PJ, Dally H, Klappenecker CN, Edler L, Jager B, Gerst M, Spiegelhalder B, Tuengerthal S, Fischer JR, Drings P et al. (2009) Polymorphisms in ABCG2, ABCC3 and CNT1 genes and their possible impact on chemotherapy outcome of lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer 124:1669-1674.
• Nakagawa H, Saito H, Ikegami Y, Aida-Hyugaji S, Sawada S and Ishikawa T (2006) Molecular modeling of new camptothecin analogues to circumvent ABCG2-mediated drug resistance in cancer. Cancer Lett 234:81-89.
• Oh ES, Kim CO, Cho SK, Min SP and Chung JY (2013) Impact of ABCC2, ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of pitavastatin in humans. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 28:196-202.
• Ota S, Ishii G, Goto K, Kubota K, Kim YH, Kojika M, Murata Y, Yamazaki M, Nishiwaki Y, Eguchi K et al. (2009) Immunohistochemical expression of BCRP and ERCC1 in biopsy specimen predicts survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 64:98-104.
• Phipps-Green AJ, Hollis-Moffatt JE, Dalbeth N, Merriman ME, Topless R, Gow PJ, Harrison AA, Highton J, Jones PB, Stamp LK et al. (2010) A strong role for the ABCG2 gene in susceptibility to gout in New Zealand Pacific Island and Caucasian, but not Maori, case and control sample sets. Hum Mol Genet 19:4813-4819.
• Ren HY, Zhang ZQ, Wang PF and Feng-Hua XU (2011) Investigation on the trend of chemotherapeutics for NSCLC during the period of 2005-2008 in our hospital. Chin J Drug Appl Monit5:303-305.
• Review Manager. Version 5.3. (2008) Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Software.
• Reynolds T (1995) Chemotherapy’s benefits bring hope of progress for NSCLC. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1661-1662.
• Sharom FJ (2008) ABC multidrug transporters: structure, function and role in chemoresistance. Pharmacogenomics 9:105-127.
• Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603-605.
• Susanto J, Lin Y-H, Chen Y-N, Shen C-R, Yan Y-T, Tsai S-T, Chen C-H and Shen C-N (2008) Porphyrin Homeostasis Maintained by ABCG2 Regulates Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells. PLoS One 3:e4023.
• Tamura M, Kondo M, Horio M, Ando M, Saito H, Yamamoto M, Horio Y and Hasegawa Y (2012) Genetic polymorphisms of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters (ABCG2, ABCB1) and gefitinib toxicity. Nagoya J Med Sci 74:133-40.
• Tang L, Zhang C, He H, Pan Z, Fan D, He Y, You H and Li Y (2018) Associations between ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and gefitinib toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 11: 665-675.
• Yoshikawa M, Ikegami Y, Hayasaka S, Ishii K, Ito A, Sano K, Suzuki T, Togawa T, Yoshida H, Soda H et al. (2004) Novel camptothecin analogues that circumvent ABCG2-associated drug resistance in human tumor cells. Int J Cancer 110:921-927.
• Zhou Q, Ruan ZR, Jiang B, Yuan H and Zeng S (2013) Simvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects and its relations with CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms. Pharmazie 68:124-128.

Supplementary material

The following online material is available for this article:

Figure S1 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and progression free survival after chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S2 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and overall survival after chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S3 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and mortality due to chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S4 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphism and response to chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 34 GG/(GA+AA), and 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S5 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphism and diarrhea due to chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 34 GG/(GA+AA), and 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S6 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphism and skin toxicity due to chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 34 GG/(GA+AA), and 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S7 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphism and liver dysfunction due to chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 34 GG/(GA+AA), and 421 CC/(AC+AA).

Figure S8 - Meta-analysis of ABCG2 gene polymorphism and interstitial pneumonia due to chemotherapy in the NSCLC for 421 CC/(AC+AA).

• Associate Editor: Emmanuel Dias Neto

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  14 Feb 2020
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  27 Aug 2018
• Accepted
  05 Sept 2018