The karyotype of Adenomera diptyx (Boettger 1885) (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from northeastern Argentina

The karyotype of Adenomera diptyx (Boettger 1885) (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from northeastern Argentina

Víctor Hugo Zaracho; Alejandra Beatriz Hernando

Laboratorio de Herpetología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina

^{Send correspondence to}

ABSTRACT

In this work we analyzed the karyotype of five populations of Adenomera diptyx from Argentina after conventional staining, Ag-NOR and C-banding. All specimens presented 2n = 26 and FN = 34. The karyotype was formed by three submetacentric, one metacentric and nine telocentric pairs. Silver staining revealed that the NOR was located on a secondary constriction in pair 7. C- banding evidenced constitutive heterochromatin at the pericentromeric region of all chromosomes. The karyotype of A. diptyx was similar to that of A. hylaedactyla (2n = 26, FN = 34) and different from that of A. andreae (2n = 26, FN = 40) in the fundamental number and secondary constriction position. It also differed from the karyotypes of A. marmorata (2n = 24, FN = 34 and 36) and of A. aff. bokermanni (2n = 23, FN = 34) in diploid number. Until a comprehensive cytogenetic analysis of all the species of the genus is performed, their chromosome evolution will remain poorly understood.

Key words:Adenomera diptyx, Argentina, standard karyotype, Ag-NOR, C-bands.

The genus Adenomera Fitzinger in Steindachner, 1867 was revalidated by Heyer (1974) to include the species of Leptodactylus belonging to the marmoratus group (Heyer, 1969). At present, the relationships between Adenomera and Leptodactylus are subject to debate and several authors advanced different taxonomic proposals. Frost et al. (2006) considered Adenomera as a synonym of Leptodactylus, suggesting the creation of the subgenus Leptodactylus (Lithodytes), which would include the species of the former genera Lithodytes and Adenomera. Some authors refer to the species of Adenomera as the Leptodactylus marmoratus species group sensu Heyer (1973) (Almeida and Angulo, 2006; Angulo and Reichle, 2008; Campos et al., 2009), whereas others recognize Adenomera as a valid genus (Kwet, 2007; Kwet et al., 2009; Ponssa and Heyer, 2007). In this paper, we adopted the latter systematic approach because there is morphological, ethological, and bioacoustic evidence suggesting that all species of Adenomera may form a natural group with a single ancestral lineage (Kwet et al., 2009).

Adenomera occurs east of the Andes, from northern South America to northeastern Argentina and southern Brazil. Currently, 15 species of Adenomera are recognized, most of them described or revalidated in recent years: A. andreae, A. hylaedactyla, A. diptyx, A. thomei, A. heyeri, A. araucaria, A. lutzi, A. martinezi, A. bokermanni, A. marmorata, A. nana, A. ajurauna, A. coca, A. engelsi, and A. simonstuarti (Angulo and Icochea, 2010).

Only five species had their karyotype described: A. andreae (2n = 26, FN = 40), A. hylaedactyla (2n = 26, FN = 34), A. lutzi (2n = 26), A. bokermanni (2n = 23, FN = 34), and A. marmorata (2n = 24, FN = 34 and 36) (Bogart, 1974; Kuramoto, 1990; Campos et al., 2009).

The karyotypes of A. aff. bokermanni, A. hylaedactyla and of taxa belonging to the A. marmorata species-complex were recently analyzed after silver staining of the NORs, C-banding, fluorochrome staining and FISH (Campos et al., 2009). The telocentric pairs 6, 7 and 11 were reported as NOR-bearing chromosomes and all chromosomes presented pericentromeric C-bands (Campos et al., 2009).

The species identity in the genus Adenomera is hard to resolve because of the intra- and inter-populational morphological variation and due to the existence of cryptic species (Heyer, 1984; de la Riva, 1996; Angulo et al., 2003). To clarify the systematics of the genus, it is necessary to use non-morphological characters, such as advertisement calls, cytogenetic and molecular data (Heyer, 1984).

In this work we describe the karyotype, Ag-NOR location and C- banding patterns of five Adenomera populations from northeastern Argentina currently recognized as A. diptyx. This taxon was revalidated by de la Riva (1996), including the populations of Adenomera from the oriental region of Paraguay, southeastern Bolivia, Mato Grosso (Brazil), and northern Argentina, but the identity of these populations remains poorly investigated (Lavilla and Cei, 2001).

Cytogenetic analyses were carried out on 19 specimens of A. diptyx (fifteen males and four females) from localities of northeastern Argentina: two males and two females (UNNEC 9719, 9725-9727) from Laguna Naick Neck (25°12' S, 58°08' W); one male (UNNEC 8800) from Comandante Fontana (25°20' S, 59°41' W), both in the Formosa province; one male (UNNEC 8531) from Paraje Las Tablas, Chaco province (26°11' S, 59°38' W); three males and one female (UNNEC 9002, 9003, 9075, 9551) from Paso de la Patria (27°19' S, 58°34' W); eight males and one female (UNNEC 8974, 8994, 9704, 8294, 8295, 8354, 8367, 8505, 8293) from Corrientes (27°29' S, 58°46' W), both in the Corrientes province. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Colección Herpetológica de la Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (UNNEC).

Chromosome spreads were obtained from intestinal epithelium and testes following Schmid (1978). Conventional staining was performed with Giemsa diluted in phosphate-buffered saline solution, pH 6.8. Silver staining of the NORs (Ag-NOR) and C-banding were obtained following Howell and Black (1980) and Sumner (1972), respectively.

Adenomera diptyx presented a karyotype with 2n = 26 chromosomes and FN = 34. The karyotype is composed of three submetacentric pairs (pairs 1-3), one metacentric pair (pair 5), and nine telocentric pairs (pairs 4 and 6-13) (Figure 1a, Table 1). Pair 7 showed a conspicuous proximal secondary constriction. The diploid number was confirmed in meiotic preparations from testes, in which 13 bivalents were observed (not shown).

After silver staining, theAg-NORs were located in the proximal region of both homologues of telocentric pair 7, at the same site of the secondary constriction, in seven specimens from Corrientes (Figure 1a). Three specimens (UNNEC 8294, 8354, 9704) showed a stronger silver impregnation on both homologues due to tandem duplications (Figure 1a). C-banding revealed the presence of constitutive heterochromatin at the pericentromeric region of all chromosomes (Figure 1b).

Current cytogenetic data, available for less than 50% of the recognized species of Adenomera, revealed five different karyotypes (Table 2), suggesting that Adenomera presents variable diploid numbers and chromosome morphologies, in contrast to the close related genera Leptodactylus, Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys (Bogart, 1974; Silva et al., 2000; Amaro-Ghilardi et al., 2006; Lourenço et al., 2007).

The specimens of A. diptyx from five localities of northeastern Argentina presented the same karyotype previously reported for Adenomera with 2n = 26 and FN = 34. The similarities in 2n, FN and NOR distribution between A. diptyx and A. hylaedactyla are shown in Table 2, as well as the differences in relation to the other species.

The presence of a single Ag- NOR-bearing chromosome pair, as observed in A. diptyx, and of tandem duplication involving the ribosomal DNA in one homologue are common in anurans (Schmid et al., 1990). Nevertheless, some of our specimens of A. diptyx exhibited duplications in both homologues.

The C-banding pattern observed in A. diptyx, with heterochromatin at the pericentromeric regions of all chromosomes, is similar to that of other species of Adenomera already analyzed and is the most common pattern found among anurans (Campos et al., 2009).

Two alternative hypotheses have been proposed to explain the chromosome evolution of Adenomera. According to Bogart (1974), Heyer and Diment (1974) and Campos et al. (2009), the karyotype evolution in Adenomera could have involved centric fusions and pericentric inversions of uni-armed chromosomes from an ancestral karyotype with 2n = 26 and a large number of telocentrics. Under this hypothesis, the primitive condition would be represented by A. hylaedactyla and A. diptyx and the karyotypes of A. andreae, of the A. marmorata species-complex and of A. aff. bokermanni would be derived. The typical large metacentric pair 1 and the lower diploid numbers of the A. marmorata species-complex (2n = 24) and of A. aff. bokermanni (2n = 23) may be a result of centric fusions (Bogart, 1974; Campos et al., 2009). Pericentric inversions involving one or three pairs of telocentric chromosomes could explain the two different karyotypes reported for the A. marmorata species-complex (2n = 24, FN = 34 and 2n = 24, FN = 36) and the distinctive fundamental number of A. andreae (2n = 26, NF = 40), respectively (Bogart, 1974, Campos et al., 2009).

An alternative hypothesis assumes that a diploid number of 2n = 24, also found in Leptodactylus silvanimbus and in the Leptodactylus sister-clade formed by Paratelmatobius-Scythrophrys, would be the ancestral condition. In this case, the karyotypes of most Leptodactylus (2n = 22), Lithodytes (2n = 18) and Adenomera species (2n = 26) would represent derived conditions (Amaro-Ghilardi et al., 2006).

Adenomera seems to be a monophyletic clade (Heyer, 1974; de Sa et al., 2005) without karyotypic uniformity, therefore representing an interesting group for the study of chromosome evolution. Until a comprehensive cytogenetic survey of all the species of the genus is performed, any hypothesis of chromosome evolution will remain poorly supported.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to EO Lavilla and WR Heyer for their valuable suggestions and comments. Dirección de Fauna, Parques y Ecología, Dirección de Fauna y Parques, and Dirección de Recursos Naturales from the Argentinean provinces of Chaco, Formosa and Corrientes, respectively, provided the permits for collecting the specimens analyzed in this paper. This work was supported by Secretaría General de Ciencia y Técnica (Universidad Nacional del Nordeste) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.

Received: April 28, 2010

Accepted: October 22, 2010

Associate Editor: Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

• Almeida AP and Angulo A (2006) A new species of Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, with remarks on the systematics of associated populations. Zootaxa 1334:1-25.
• Amaro-Ghilardi RC, Skuk G, de Sá RO, Rodriguez MT and Yonenaga-Yassuda Y (2006) Karyotypes of eight species of Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) with a description of a new karyotype for the genus. Phyllomedusa 5:119-133.
• Angulo A and Icochea J (2010) Cryptic species complexes, widespread species and conservation: Lessons from Amazonian frogs of the Leptodactylus marmoratus group (Anura, Leptodactylidae). System Biodivers 8:357-370.
• Angulo A and Reichle S (2008) Acoustic signals, species diagnosis, and species concepts: The case of a new cryptic species of Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Chapare region, Bolivia. Zool J Linn Soc 152:59-77.
• Angulo A, Cocroft RB and Reichle S (2003) Species identity in the genus Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae) in southeastern Peru. Herpetologica 59:490-504.
• Bogart JP (1974) A karyosystematic study of frogs genus Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Copeia 3:728-737.
• Campos JRC, Ananias F, Brasileiro CA, Yamamoto M, Haddad CFB and Kasahara S (2009) Chromosome evolution in three brazilian Leptodactylus species (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with phylogenetic considerations. Hereditas 146:104-111.
• de la Riva I (1996) The specific name of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae) in the Paraguay River basin. J Herpetol 30:556-558.
• de Sá RO, Heyer WR and Camargo A (2005) A phylogenetic analysis of Vanzolinius Heyer, 1974 (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae): Taxonomic and life history implications. Arq Mus Nac Rio de Janeiro 63:707-726.
• Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, de Sa RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC et al. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 297:1-370.
• Heyer WR (1969) The adaptative ecology of the species group of the genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Evolution 23:421-428.
• Heyer WR (1973) Systematics of the marmoratus group of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Contrib Sci Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles County 251:1-50.
• Heyer WR (1974) Relationships of the marmoratus species group (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) within the subfamily Leptodactylinae. Contrib Sci Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles County 253:1-46.
• Heyer WR (1984) The systematic status of Adenomera griseigularis Henle, with comments on systematic problems in the genus Adenomera (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 5:97-100.
• Heyer WR and Diment MJ (1974) The karyotype of Vanzolinius discodactylus and comments on usefulness of karyotypes in determining relationships in the Leptodactylus-complex (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Proc Biol Soc Washington 87:327-336.
• Howell WM and Black DA (1980) Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: A 1-step method. Experientia 36:1014-1015.
• Kuramoto M (1990) A list of chromosome numbers of anuran amphibians. Bull Fukuoka Univ Educ 39:83-127.
• Kwet A (2007) Bioacoustic variation in the genus Adenomera in southern Brazil, with revalidation of Leptodactylus nanus Müller, 1922 (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Mitt Mus Nat kd Berl, Zool Reihe 83:56-68.
• Kwet A, Steiner J and Zillikens A (2009) A new species of Adenomera (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Atlantic rain forest in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 44:93-107.
• Lavilla EO and Cei JM (2001) Amphibians of Argentina. A Second Update. Monogr Mus Reg Sci Nat Torino, Torino, 159 pp.
• Lourenço LB, Bacci-Júnior M, Martins VG, Recco-Pimentel SM and Haddad CFB (2007) Molecular phylogeny and karyotype differentiation in Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Genetica 132:255-266.
• Ponssa ML and Heyer WR (2007) Osteological characterization of four putative species of the genus Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with comments on intra- and interspecific variation. Zootaxa 1403:37-54.
• Schmid M (1978) Chromosome banding in Amphibia I. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in Bufo and Hyla Chromosoma 66:361-388.
• Schmid M, Steinlein C, Nanda I and Epplen JT (1990) Chromosome banding in Amphibia. In: Olmo E (ed) Cytogenetics of Amphibians and Reptiles. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 21-45.
• Silva APZ, Haddad CFB and Kasahara S (2000) Chromosomal studies on five species of the genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Amphibia, Anura) using differential staining. Cytobios 103:25-38.
• Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304-306.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  22 Dec 2010
• Date of issue
  2011

History

• Received
  28 Apr 2010
• Accepted
  22 Oct 2010