Clinical Significance of Preoperative Neutrophil – to - Lymphocyte Ratio in Renal Cell Carcinoma

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

We investigated the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on tumor stage and Fuhrman nuclear grade in renal cell carcinoma.

Methods:

The records of 432 patients with RCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified as group lower tumor stage(T1 + T2) and higher(T3 + T4). As like tumor stage, Fuhrman nuclear grade were classified lower (G1+G2) and higher(G3+G4) too. The best NLR cut off value was 3.01. Two sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test used for the continuous variables and a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test used for the categorical variables.

Results:

Among the 432 total patients analyzed in our study, there were 275 males (63.7%) and 157 females (36.3%). Mean laboratory values were CRP 2.73 ± 1.93 mg/dL (normal less than 0.3), neutrophil count 4,23 ± 1.46/μL, lymphocyte count 1,61 ± 0,61/μL and NLR 2.64 ± 1.24. According to our data, statistically pretreatment NLR significantly correlated with CRP (p<0.0001). And tumor patologic stage (p=0.08), tumor histologic grade (p<0.001) was significantly associated with NLR.

Discussion:

We compared the relationship of preoperative NLR and NC parameters with RCC tumor stage and grade. And NLR were found to have statistically significant higher T stage and grade at RCC. Further studies with more patients are needed to confirm our study.

Keywords:
Neutrophils; Lymphocytes; Carcinoma; Renal Cell; Epithelium

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal malignancy in adults and leads to a mortality rate of over 100.000 per year worldwide. In the United States renal cell carcinoma accounts for 2.3% of all cancer deaths (¹). RCC is more prevalent in men than in women and occurs most often between 50-70 years of age. Cancer involving the renal parenchyma accounts for the majority of cases, while the minority of cases derive from the renal pelvis. The predominant subtype of RCC is a clear cell type that represents 80% of RCC, and is derived from the tubular epithelium (²). The incidence and the incidental detection of RCC in asymptomatic patients have been increasing worldwide (³-⁵). The increase can be partly explained by the widespread usage of ultrasound, abdominal computorized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging in recent years (⁶).

Cancer and inflammation are inextricably linked, and cancer patients have local and systemic changes in the inflammatory parameters. These include changes in peripheral blood cell numbers (neutrophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophil to the lymphocyte ratio [NLR]), phenotypes, and gene expression patterns, changes in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and alterations in the level of serum inflammatory cytokines, acute-phase proteins (C-reactive protein [CRP], fibrinogen, ferritin, albumin, and transferrin). CRP is a representative marker of a systemic inflammatory response and increased CRP is a poor prognostic factor in several cancer types, including RCC (⁷-⁹).

Another marker of systemic inflammatory response is NLR (¹⁰). It was recently reported that increased pretreatment NLR is associated with poor outcome in colorectal (¹¹), gastric (¹²) and ovarian (¹³) cancer cases. To our knowledge, the prognostic value of NLR in RCC has not been investigated in similar studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the tumor stage and grade which are commonly found in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After receiving approval from our institutional review boards we retrospectively analyzed the prospective kidney cancer databases of the patients who underwent radical and partial nephrectomy between 2005 and 2014 at our institution. The databases contain information on the clinical presentation, demographics, comorbidity, pathological findings, and preoperative laboratory parameters of patients. A total of 432 patients were screened for the study. The variables abstracted from the databases included age, gender, various pathological parameters, lymphocyte, and neutrophil count. The clinical presentation was categorized as symptomatic or incidental. The tumors accompanied by pain, hematuria, abdominal mass, fever, or weight loss, were categorized as symptomatic tumors. The preoperative neutrophil - to - lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count (NC) by the lymphocyte count (LC).

The surgical specimens were processed according to standard pathological procedures and evaluated by the pathologists at our institution. The pathologic staging was performed using the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The histologic subtype was determined according to the 1997 World Health Organization Heidelberg classification, and the tumor nuclear grading was performed according to the Fuhrman nuclear grading system (¹⁴). There are several proposed cut off points to stratify LC, NC, and NLR (¹⁵-¹⁷). The best NLR cut off value was 3.01.

Statistical analysis

The baseline characteristics of the subjects were compared using a two sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test for the continuous variables and a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for the categorical variables. All the statistical tests were two-tailed, and the statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. All the analysis was conducted using SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

RESULTS

Among the 432 total patients analyzed in our study, there were 275 males (63.7%) and 157 emales (36.3%). The demographic analyses and clinicopathologic characteristics are shown in Table-1. The median age at the time of surgery was 57.76±10.97. Radical and partial nephrectomy was performed in 379 (87.7%) and 53 (12.3%) patients, respectively. Of the tumors, 348 were incidental and 84 were symptomatic. The tumor pathologic stage was determined at a lower stage (T1 or T2) and at a higher stage (T3 or T4) in 360 (83.3%) and 72 (16.7%) of the patients respectively. Also, the histopatologic nuclear grades were stratified as lower grade (G1 or G2) and higher grade (G3 or G4) in 332 (76.9%) and 100 (23.1%) of the patients respectively (Table-1).

Table 1
Patient characteristics and pathological findings.

		No. Pts(%)
Average Age		57.76±10.97
Gender
	Male	275 (63.7%)
	Female	157(36.3%)
Presentation
	Incidental	348 (80.5%)
	Symptomatic	84(19.5%)
Radical Nephrectomy		379 (87.7%)
Partial Nephrectomy		53(12.3%)
Stage
	Lower stage (T1-T2)	360 (83.3%)
	Higher Stage (T3-T4)	72(16.7%)
Nuclear Grade
	Fuhrman Grade 1 and 2	332 (76.9%)
	Fuhrman Grade 3 and 4	100(23.1%)

Mean laboratory values were CRP 2.73±1.93mg/dL (normal less than 0.3), neutrophil count 4.23±1.46/μL, lymphocyte count 1.61±0.61/μL, and NLR 2.64±1.24. Patients were also stratified according to NLR using cutt off value 3.01. Of 360 patients with lower stage (T1 or T2), 146 were found to have NLR >3.01; while 41 patients with higher stage (T3 or T4) tumor have NLR >3.01. Additionally, of 100 patients with higher grade (G3 or G4) tumor, 71 were found to have NLR >3.01. The details were demonstrated in Table-2.

Table 2
The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio according to tumor parameters and markers in surgery group.

Characteristic		NLR < 3.01	NLR > 3.01	P value
Age				0.486
	≥60	109	82
	<60	136	105
Gender				0.537
	Male	156	119
	Female	89	68
CRP level				0.015 *
	≥0.3	108	103
	<0.3	137	84
Tumor Stage				0.008 *
	T1+T2	214	146
	T3+T4	31	41
Nuclear Grade				<0.001 *
	G1+G2	216	116
	G3+G4	29	71	698.4

• ^*
  = Statiscally meaningful

According to our data, no statistically difference was found in NLR value in terms of age (≥60, <60) and gender distribution. The pretreatment NLR significantly correlated with CRP (p=0.015). The tumor patologic stage (p=008), and the tumor histologic grade (p<0.001) were significantly associated with NLR. The median NC was significantly associated with the tumor stage and the Fuhrman grade (p=0.048, p=0.021), but LC was not associated (p= 0.841, p=0.774). The detailes were depicted in Table-2 and 3.

Table 3
NC, LC and NLR associations with pathological parameters.

		Neutrophil Count			Lymphocyte Count
		No. Pts	Median	P Value	Median	P Value
Tumor Stage				0.048 *		0.841
	T1+T2	360	4.08(3.1-6.2)		1.60(1.2-2.3)
	T3+T4	72	5.01 (3.5-6.9)		1.71 (1.2-2.2)
Nuclear Grade
	G1+G2	332	3.96 (3.4-5.3)	0.021*	1.61 (1.3-2.1)	0.774
	G3+G4	100	5.11 (3.4-6.3)		1.67(1.3-2.2)

• ^*
  = Statiscally meaningful

DISCUSSION

Many well-known prognostic factors exist, including the anatomical factors (the TNM stage and the tumour size), histological factors (the nuclear grade, the histological type, and the microscopic venous invasion), and clinical factors (symptoms, performance status, and anemia) (¹⁸). Molecular markers represented by carbonic anhydrase IX are also being investigated as potential prognostic factors for RCC, but the TNM stage and nuclear grade remain the most important prognostic factors (¹⁸, ¹⁹).

The neutrophil - to - lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily measurable parameter of the systemic inflammation and stress in patients (¹⁰). Our study suggests that the pretreatment NLR may have some prognostic value for the renal cell carcinoma. In this retrospective study, the patients with the lower pretreatment NLR who underwent radical nephroctomy had a lower T stage and nuclear grade with the histopathologic results. This study shows that NLR is an independent prognostic factor after surgery for RCC.

Increasing evidence supports the involvement of systemic inflammation in cancer development and progression (²⁰). A systemic inflammatory response can be assessed by the concentration of acute phase proteins, CRP, fibrinogen, ferritin, albumin and transferrin, or peripheral blood leukocyte components, including neutrophils and lymphocytes. CRP, which is an acute phase protein, has been widely studied as a prognostic parameter for various cancers (⁹, ²¹). Increased pretreatment CRP is associated with poor survival in patients with localized and metastatic RCC (⁷, ⁸). CRP kinetics also have an impact on the survival of patients with metastatic RCC since the decreased CRP during treatment is a predictor of a better prognosis (²²). In regard to the prognostic significance of peripheral blood leukocyte components, neutrophilia and lymphocytopenia were reportedly associated with a poor prognosis in patients with metastatic RCC (²³, ²⁴). However, the prognostic significance of the peripheral blood leukocyte component in patients with localized RCC remains unclear.

A high NLR reflects an increased neutrophil and/or a decreased leucocyte ratio. It is generally accepted that the inflammatory processes in the tumor microenvironment play a crucial role in promoting proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of the malignant cells (²⁰, ²⁵). The infiltrating leucocytes, including neutrophils and lymphocytes, are important factors in this process (²⁰). Neutrophilia has been associated with malignancy. However, the cause is not completely understood. Neutrophils in the peripheral blood, or in the tumor microenvironment, were shown to produce pro-angiogenic factors including the vascular endothelial growth factor to stimulate tumor development and progression (²⁶). The cytokines involved in cancer-related inflammation, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor- alpha (TNFα), may induce neutrophilia (²⁷, ²⁸). The para-neoplastic production of myeloid growth factors by the cancer cells may represent an additional cause of neutrophilia (²⁹). Hence, a high peripheral neutrophil level may indicate a cancer-related inflammation or tumor progression, and predict a poor clinical outcome. The immune cells that infiltrate into or around the tumor engage in dynamic and extensive crosstalk with the cancer cells (³⁰).

Over the past decade, there has been growing evidence that lymphocytes operate as crucial components for the adaptive immune system, and are the cellular basis of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting (³¹). Furthermore, infiltrating lymphocytes have been reported to indicate the generation of an effective anti-tumor cellular immune response (³²). Therefore, a low lymphocyte count may be responsible for an inadequate immunologic reaction to the tumor, and consequently a weakened defence against cancer, resulting in poor prognosis (³³). Activated specific CD8+T cells were shown to control tumor growth by cytotoxic activity and inducing the apoptosis of the tumor cells (³⁴). CD4+T cells are crucial for screening cytokines such as IL-2, which are essential for CD8+T cell growth and proliferation. Furthermore, recent reports reveal that the activation of CD4+T cells is required for the immunization of the CD8+T cells against cancer (³⁵). In vitro studies showed that the cytolytic activity of lymphocytes and natural killer cells were suppressed when co-cultured with neutrophils, and the extent of the suppression was proportionally enhanced by the addition of neutrophils (³⁶, ³⁷). Accordingly, an elevated pre-treatment NLR was reported to correlate with the reduced survival in several types of cancers.

In the RCC field, the first report addressing the usefulness of NLR as a prognostic indicator was published by Ohno et al. and focused on localized RCC (¹⁵). In published studies to date, only patients with RCC (³⁸, ³⁹) or the subtypes were the predominantly clear cells (¹⁶, ⁴⁰) included. In a multivariable model, a variable that combined a categorically coded pretreatment and posttreatment NLR, attained statistical significance. Pichler et al. validated preoperative NLR as an independent prognostic factor in 678 patients with nonmetastatic clear cell RCC (³⁸). In a prospective study, in 83 patients categorically coded ANC and ALC were not associated with disease-free survival, but this study accrued relatively few patients (¹⁶).

This study had some deficiencies. Firstly, it is a retrospective study with the limited number of patients included. It is unavoidable to state that the post follow-up period is as important as the pathology in the follow-up of the patients involved in the study and the aggressiveness of the tumor. Secondly, our results were based on the experience of a single institution in Turkey with a <600 patients with RCC, and there are substantial differences in RCC incidence and mortality rates between Western countries and Turkey. Therefore, the relationship between RCC and NLR should be validated through massive studies worldwide. The factors that are definitely attested to be effective on RCC risk (such as smoking, obesity, hypertension, genetic susceptibility, and enviroment etc.) were not included in the study. Moreover, although there still is no agreement as to which grading system should be used, the most common system is the one proposed by Fuhrman et al. (¹⁴). The Fuhrman grade is based on the nuclear size and shape and the prominence of nucleoli, and we know that when the surgical specimens are evaluated by different pathologist there can be some differences. Thus, it would be better to work with one single pathologist.

Although it is debatable whether or not to estimate the progression of RCC based on the preoperative blood parameters; our findings are valuable as they show the value of NLR in this respect.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we have found that patients with higher T stage and grade renal cell carcinoma have elevated level of NLR which provides a positive link between RCC and inflammation. This is a practical assessment tool that can easily be used for the risk stratification and prognostic models. Further studies with more patients are needed to confirm our study findings.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent: All participants signed an informed consent form before being enrolled on the study.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11-30.
• ²
  Shanks JH. Pathology of renal cell carcinoma: recent developments. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999;11:263-8.
• ³
  Weikert S, Ljungberg B. Contemporary epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: perspectives of primary prevention. World J Urol. 2010;28:247-52.
• ⁴
  Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:245-57.
• ⁵
  Choi JB, Yoon BI, Kim SJ, Cho HJ, Hong SH, Choi YJ, et al. Changes in clinicopathological characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in the past 25 years: a single-center experience. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:110-4.
• ⁶
  Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF Jr. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA. 1999;281:1628-31.
• ⁷
  Casamassima A, Picciariello M, Quaranta M, Berardino R, Ranieri C, Paradiso A, et al. C-reactive protein: a biomarker of survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with subcutaneous interleukin-2 based immunotherapy. J Urol. 2005;173:52-5.
• ⁸
  Komai Y, Saito K, Sakai K, Morimoto S. Increased preoperative serum C-reactive protein level predicts a poor prognosis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2007;99:77-80.
• ⁹
  McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS. Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:215-9.
• ¹⁰
  Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts––rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001;102:5-14.
• ¹¹
  Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Goulder F, Justin TA, Keeling NJ. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:181-4.
• ¹²
  Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S, Ishiwata R, Nagai Y, Fukushima M. The baseline ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes is associated with patient prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2007;73:215-20.
• ¹³
  Cho H, Hur HW, Kim SW, Kim SH, Kim JH, Kim YT, et al. Pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is elevated in epithelial ovarian cancer and predicts survival after treatment. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:15-23.
• ¹⁴
  Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655-63.
• ¹⁵
  Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, Hatano T, Tachibana M. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictor of recurrence in patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010;184:873-8.
• ¹⁶
  Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, McMillan DC. Prospective study of the relationship between the systemic inflammatory response, prognostic scoring systems and relapse-free and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for renal cancer. BJU Int. 2008;101:959-63.
• ¹⁷
  Saroha S, Uzzo RG, Plimack ER, Ruth K, Al-Saleem T. Lymphopenia is na independent predictor of inferior outcome in clear cell renal carcinoma. J Urol. 2013;189:454-61.
• ¹⁸
  Volpe A, Patard JJ. Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol. 2010;28:319-27.
• ¹⁹
  Bui MH, Seligson D, Han KR, Pantuck AJ, Dorey FJ, Huang Y, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:802-11.
• ²⁰
  Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436-44.
• ²¹
  Pierce BL, Neuhouser ML, Wener MH, Bernstein L, Baumgartner RN, Ballard-Barbash R, Gilliland FD, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:155-67.
• ²²
  Saito K, Tatokoro M, Fujii Y, Iimura Y, Koga F, Kawakami S, et al. Impact of C-reactive protein kinetics on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1145-53.
• ²³
  Atzpodien J, Royston P, Wandert T, Reitz M; DGCIN –– German Cooperative Renal Carcinoma Chemo-Immunotherapy Trials Group. Metastatic renal carcinoma comprehensive prognostic system. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:348-53.
• ²⁴
  Fumagalli LA, Vinke J, Hoff W, Ypma E, Brivio F, Nespoli A. Lymphocyte counts independently predict overall survival in advanced cancer patients: a biomarker for IL-2 immunotherapy. J Immunother. 2003;26:394-402.
• ²⁵
  Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420:860-7.
• ²⁶
  Kusumanto YH, Dam WA, Hospers GA, Meijer C, Mulder NH. Platelets and granulocytes, in particular the neutrophils, form important compartments for circulating vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis. 2003;6:283-7.
• ²⁷
  Ulich TR, del Castillo J, Keys M, Granger GA, Ni RX. Kinetics and mechanisms of recombinant human interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced changes in circulating numbers of neutrophils and lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1987;139:3406-15.
• ²⁸
  Ulich TR, del Castillo J, Guo KZ. In vivo hematologic effects of recombinant interleukin-6 on hematopoiesis and circulating numbers of RBCs and WBCs. Blood. 1989;73:108-10.
• ²⁹
  Teramukai S, Kitano T, Kishida Y, Kawahara M, Kubota K, Komuta K, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-smallcell lung cancer: an analysis of Japan Multinational Trial Organisation LC00-03. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1950-8.
• ³⁰
  Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883-99.
• ³¹
  Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity. 2004;21:137-48.
• ³²
  Rabinowich H, Cohen R, Bruderman I, Steiner Z, Klajman A. Functional analysis of mononuclear cells infiltrating into tumors: lysis of autologous human tumor cells by cultured infiltrating lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 1987;47:173-7.
• ³³
  Hoffmann TK, Dworacki G, Tsukihiro T, Meidenbauer N, Gooding W, Johnson JT, et al. Spontaneous apoptosis of circulating T lymphocytes in patients with head and neck cancer and its clinical importance. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2553-62.
• ³⁴
  Zikos TA, Donnenberg AD, Landreneau RJ, Luketich JD, Donnenberg VS. Lung T-cell subset composition at the time of surgical resection is a prognostic indicator in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60:819-27.
• ³⁵
  Rosenberg SA. Progress in human tumour immunology and immunotherapy. Nature. 2001;411:380-4.
• ³⁶
  Petrie HT, Klassen LW, Kay HD. Inhibition of human cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in vitro by autologous peripheral blood granulocytes. J Immunol. 1985;134:230-4.
• ³⁷
  Shau HY, Kim A. Suppression of lymphokine-activated killer induction by neutrophils. J Immunol. 1988;141:4395-402.
• ³⁸
  Pichler M, Hutterer GC, Stoeckigt C, Chromecki TF, Stojakovic T, Golbeck S, et al. Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:901-7.
• ³⁹
  Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, Gondo T, Hatano T, Tachibana M. Followup of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and recurrence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2012;187:411-7.
• ⁴⁰
  Jagdev SP, Gregory W, Vasudev NS, Harnden P, Sim S, Thompson D, et al. Improving the accuracy of pre-operative survival prediction in renal cell carcinoma with C-reactive protein. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1649-56.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jul-Aug 2016

History

• Received
  20 July 2015
• Accepted
  23 Jan 2016