Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Editorial Comment: Endoclips as novel fiducial markers in trimodality bladder preserving therapy of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: feasibility and patient outcomes

COMMENT

Titanium Endoclips (TE) are safe and not expensive. It has been applied in various tissues of the human body due to its high histocompatibility and no foreign body reaction. TE has also been used as a fiducial marker to assist radiotherapy in several tumors, helping the detection of the target area, reducing the damage to healthy tissues (11. Pos F, Remeijer P. Adaptive management of bladder cancer radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010;20:116-20.).

When radiotherapy is planned, the inability to visualize the exact tumor location, due to the bladder wall movement, is by far the biggest challenge to be overcome. The search for the ideal fiducial marker is ongoing in bladder cancer, but today, despite the use of different agents and materials, (22. de Ridder M, Gerbrandy LC, de Reijke TM, Hinnen KA, Hulshof MCCM. BioXmark® liquid fiducial markers for image-guided radiotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: a safety and performance trial. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20200241.

3. Wortel K, Hovius MC, van Andel G, de Reijke TM, Hulshof MCCM. The Feasibility and Utility of Cystoscopy-Guided Hydrogel Marker Placement in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:195-201.

4. Freilich JM, Spiess PE, Biagioli MC, Fernandez DC, Shi EJ, Hunt DC, et al. Lipiodol as a fiducial marker for image-guided radiation therapy for bladder cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:190-7.
-55. Garcia MM, Gottschalk AR, Brajtbord J, Konety BR, Meng MV, Roach M 3rd, et al. Endoscopic gold fiducial marker placement into the bladder wall to optimize radiotherapy targeting for bladder-preserving management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: feasibility and initial outcomes. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89754. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164558.) no ideal strategy was found.

The concept to guide radiotherapy in partial bladder treatment opens perspectives for future studies to explore the benefits with its use. Among these benefits, it is noteworthy that partial bladder radiotherapy allows the increase of dose in a reduced volume of the organ based on the rationale of improving the local control, without a significant increase in toxicity (66. Cowan RA, McBain CA, Ryder WD, Wylie JP, Logue JP, Turner SL, et al. Radiotherapy for muscle-invasive carcinoma of the bladder: results of a randomized trial comparing conventional whole bladder with dose-escalated partial bladder radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:197-207.). Currently, partial bladder radiotherapy is performed using findings from cystoscopy, and pre-surgical tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI) (77. McBain CA, Logue JP. Radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: treatment planning and delivery in the 21st century. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:42-8.) but The clinical target volume (CTV) delimitation on the planning CT based on pre-surgical images brings uncertainty about the exact tumor boundaries (88. Rothwell RI, Ash DV, Jones WG. Radiation treatment planning for bladder cancer: a comparison of cystogram localisation with computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 1983;34:103-11.). Consequently, to avoid tumor geographic missing, large margins on the CTV to generate the planning tumor volume (PTV) are required (99. Jenkins P, Anjarwalla S, Gilbert H, Kinder R. Defining the clinical target volume for bladder cancer radiotherapy treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1379-84.). The PTV with large volumes limits dose escalation due to the excessive risk of late complications. Thus, the endoscopic bladder fiducials to delimit the CTV give more precision to delineate the target allowing a reduced and more accurate CTV.

Today, there are several forms of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) (1010. Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:938-46.). The association between fiducial and IGRT would guarantee more precision to deliver the radiotherapy beam to the target. Among the IGRT system available, in special, IGRT with cone-beam CT combined with bladder fiducials would allow not only a reduction of margins with great precision, but it would also serve as an instrument to control the bladder volume during the radiotherapy fractions, translating in a more significant and realistic relationship between radiotherapy planning and treatment for the prediction of late complications (1111. McDonald F, Lalondrelle S, Taylor H, Warren-Oseni K, Khoo V, McNair HA, et al. Clinical implementation of adaptive hypofractionated bladder radiotherapy for improvement in normal tissue irradiation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013;25:549-56.). Adaptive radiotherapy combining the cone-beam CT images and treatment planning information still being developed, and in theory, has the potential of improving therapeutic ratio for bladder preservation. In this scenario, the bladder fiducial can have great value to adapt the treatment to the plans (1010. Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:938-46., 1212. Vestergaard A, Muren LP, Lindberg H, Jakobsen KL, Petersen JB, Elstrøm UV, et al. Normal tissue sparing in a phase II trial on daily adaptive plan selection in radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:997-1004., 1313. Burridge N, Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes J, Stratford J, Henry A, et al. Online adaptive radiotherapy of the bladder: small bowel irradiated-volume reduction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:892-7.).

On the other hand, even using simpler IGRT systems, such as planar images from kilovoltage or megavoltage sources, the bladder fiducial also brings precision in controlling the tumor bed's positioning (1010. Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:938-46.). Therefore, the technique developed by Shahbaz et al. has the potential to help for solving historical problems related to organ motion and the inability to safely deliver adequate dose for bladder preservation.

Irritative bladder symptoms are a major source of bothersome for patients, especially when foreign bodies are placed in the bladder. The authors reported no bladder symptoms, or complications as urinary tract infection or hematuria, during the follow-up, but we need to take into account that no symptom severity scale was applied. The small sample size and the short follow-up do not support any treatment effectiveness conclusion. We congratulate the authors by their innovative approach in a challenge field (1414. Shahbaz M, Ammar A, Wang Y, Farhaj Z, Qiao L, Niu J. Endoclips as novel fiducial markers in trimodality bladder-preserving therapy of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: feasibility and patient outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47:93-9.).

References

  • 1
    Pos F, Remeijer P. Adaptive management of bladder cancer radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010;20:116-20.
  • 2
    de Ridder M, Gerbrandy LC, de Reijke TM, Hinnen KA, Hulshof MCCM. BioXmark® liquid fiducial markers for image-guided radiotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: a safety and performance trial. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20200241.
  • 3
    Wortel K, Hovius MC, van Andel G, de Reijke TM, Hulshof MCCM. The Feasibility and Utility of Cystoscopy-Guided Hydrogel Marker Placement in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:195-201.
  • 4
    Freilich JM, Spiess PE, Biagioli MC, Fernandez DC, Shi EJ, Hunt DC, et al. Lipiodol as a fiducial marker for image-guided radiation therapy for bladder cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:190-7.
  • 5
    Garcia MM, Gottschalk AR, Brajtbord J, Konety BR, Meng MV, Roach M 3rd, et al. Endoscopic gold fiducial marker placement into the bladder wall to optimize radiotherapy targeting for bladder-preserving management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: feasibility and initial outcomes. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89754. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164558.
  • 6
    Cowan RA, McBain CA, Ryder WD, Wylie JP, Logue JP, Turner SL, et al. Radiotherapy for muscle-invasive carcinoma of the bladder: results of a randomized trial comparing conventional whole bladder with dose-escalated partial bladder radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:197-207.
  • 7
    McBain CA, Logue JP. Radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: treatment planning and delivery in the 21st century. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:42-8.
  • 8
    Rothwell RI, Ash DV, Jones WG. Radiation treatment planning for bladder cancer: a comparison of cystogram localisation with computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 1983;34:103-11.
  • 9
    Jenkins P, Anjarwalla S, Gilbert H, Kinder R. Defining the clinical target volume for bladder cancer radiotherapy treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1379-84.
  • 10
    Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:938-46.
  • 11
    McDonald F, Lalondrelle S, Taylor H, Warren-Oseni K, Khoo V, McNair HA, et al. Clinical implementation of adaptive hypofractionated bladder radiotherapy for improvement in normal tissue irradiation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013;25:549-56.
  • 12
    Vestergaard A, Muren LP, Lindberg H, Jakobsen KL, Petersen JB, Elstrøm UV, et al. Normal tissue sparing in a phase II trial on daily adaptive plan selection in radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:997-1004.
  • 13
    Burridge N, Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes J, Stratford J, Henry A, et al. Online adaptive radiotherapy of the bladder: small bowel irradiated-volume reduction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:892-7.
  • 14
    Shahbaz M, Ammar A, Wang Y, Farhaj Z, Qiao L, Niu J. Endoclips as novel fiducial markers in trimodality bladder-preserving therapy of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: feasibility and patient outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47:93-9.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    18 Nov 2020
  • Date of issue
    Jan-Feb 2021

History

  • Received
    10 Sept 2020
  • Accepted
    15 Sept 2020
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia Rua Bambina, 153, 22251-050 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel. +55 21 2539-6787, Fax: +55 21 2246-4088 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br