Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Distribution of lipid compounds in sediments from Conceição Lagoon, Santa Catarina Island, Brazil

Abstracts

Lipid compounds from five sediment-water interface samples and a sediment core with 75 cm depth were used to assess sources of organic matter in Conceição Lagoon, located on Santa Catarina Island. The results which were based on the molar C:N:P ratios, relative abundance of sterols (dominated by the C27 sterols), n-alkanols (0.2-1.2 µg g-1), n-alkanes (0.4-5.0 µg g-1) and the Carbon Preference Index (CPI), indicated that the organic matter is predominantly of terrestrial origin (C/N > 10 and CPI > 2). Total phosphorus (TP, average 5.20 µmol g-1) and organic carbon (TOC, average 2.90 mmol g-1) contents were well correlated with the silt and clay fractions at all locations. In the sediment core, chronologically dated with the radionuclide 210Pb, the depth interval from 55 to 75 cm was dominated by the sand fraction (> 50%). However, parameters such as TOC, TP and n-alkane contents increased considerably at this depth suggesting a change in organic matter input sources.

sediments; hydrocarbons; Conceição Lagoon; chromatography


Compostos orgânicos provenientes de cinco amostras de sedimentos e um perfil com 75 cm foram coletados na Lagoa da Conceição, localizada na Ilha de Santa Catarina, com o objetivo de avaliar fontes de matéria orgânica. Os resultados que foram baseados na relação C:N:P, abundância relativa dos esteróis (com predomínio dos C27), álcoois (0,2-1,2 µg g-1) e hidrocarbonetos lineares (0,4-5,0 µg g-1), e no uso do Índice Preferencial de Carbono (CPI), indicaram que a matéria orgânica é preferencialmente de origem terrestre (C/N > 10 e CPI > 2). Em todos os locais observaram-se correlações significativas entre as quantidades de fósforo (TP, média 5,20 µmol g-1) e carbono orgânico total (TOC, média 2,90 mmol g-1) com as frações de silte e argila. No perfil, que foi cronologicamente datado com o radionuclídeo 210Pb, o intervalo de 55 a 75 cm apresentou predomínio de areia (> 50%). Entretanto, outros parâmetros, tais como TOC, TP e hidrocarbonetos também aumentaram nesse intervalo, o que sugere uma mudança na fonte de matéria orgânica.


ARTICLE

Distribution of lipid compounds in sediments from Conceição Lagoon, Santa Catarina Island, Brazil

Cesar A. Silva, Cristiane R. Oliveira, Inês R. W. Z. Oliveira and Luiz A. S. Madureira** e-mail: madureira@qmc.ufsc.br

Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900 Florianópolis-SC, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Lipid compounds from five sediment-water interface samples and a sediment core with 75 cm depth were used to assess sources of organic matter in Conceição Lagoon, located on Santa Catarina Island. The results which were based on the molar C:N:P ratios, relative abundance of sterols (dominated by the C27 sterols), n-alkanols (0.2-1.2 µg g-1), n-alkanes (0.4-5.0 µg g-1) and the Carbon Preference Index (CPI), indicated that the organic matter is predominantly of terrestrial origin (C/N > 10 and CPI > 2). Total phosphorus (TP, average 5.20 µmol g-1) and organic carbon (TOC, average 2.90 mmol g-1) contents were well correlated with the silt and clay fractions at all locations. In the sediment core, chronologically dated with the radionuclide 210Pb, the depth interval from 55 to 75 cm was dominated by the sand fraction (> 50%). However, parameters such as TOC, TP and n-alkane contents increased considerably at this depth suggesting a change in organic matter input sources.

Keywords: sediments, hydrocarbons, Conceição Lagoon, chromatography

RESUMO

Compostos orgânicos provenientes de cinco amostras de sedimentos e um perfil com 75 cm foram coletados na Lagoa da Conceição, localizada na Ilha de Santa Catarina, com o objetivo de avaliar fontes de matéria orgânica. Os resultados que foram baseados na relação C:N:P, abundância relativa dos esteróis (com predomínio dos C27), álcoois (0,2-1,2 µg g-1) e hidrocarbonetos lineares (0,4-5,0 µg g-1), e no uso do Índice Preferencial de Carbono (CPI), indicaram que a matéria orgânica é preferencialmente de origem terrestre (C/N > 10 e CPI > 2). Em todos os locais observaram-se correlações significativas entre as quantidades de fósforo (TP, média 5,20 µmol g-1) e carbono orgânico total (TOC, média 2,90 mmol g-1) com as frações de silte e argila. No perfil, que foi cronologicamente datado com o radionuclídeo 210Pb, o intervalo de 55 a 75 cm apresentou predomínio de areia (> 50%). Entretanto, outros parâmetros, tais como TOC, TP e hidrocarbonetos também aumentaram nesse intervalo, o que sugere uma mudança na fonte de matéria orgânica.

Introduction

Lipid compounds constitute a minor but important fraction of the total organic matter in aquatic sediments. Sources of lipids include primary production, inputs of terrestrial material from the watershed region and products associated with microbial activity in the water and sediment.1,2 Of particular relevance to sediments of estuaries and lagoons are organic compounds such as ketones, sterols, fatty acids, hydroxy acids, n-alkanes and n-alkanols.3,4 These preserved components are also known as geolipids or biomarkers, because they can be linked with biological precursor compounds. Although organic compounds are subject to extensive biochemical processes that may significantly alter their molecular structures and distributions, some of them can be used to reconstruct the history of organic matter production, inputs and preservation in lagoons. However, it is well known that to correlate them with specific living organisms is difficult and other biogenic parameters (e.g. C, N, and P) may be used for assessment of specific sources.5,6 Apart from natural contributions, lagoons are susceptible to inputs of pollutants from diffusive sources, mainly untreated sewage discharges and petroleum-related compounds.

Several reports have emphasized the great importance of Conceição Lagoon as a tourist resort and a fishing resource for the local people.7,8 Our study provides background information dealing with biogenic parameters such as total organic carbon (TOC), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (total, TP; organic, OP; and inorganic, IP) and the nature and concentration of organic compounds distributed along the sediment-water interface. Linear hydrocarbons, alcohols (n-alkanes and n-alkanols) and sterols are the classes of compounds that will be addressed here. Temporal changes in n-alkane distribution and nutrient inputs, reflected in the sedimentary record of TOC, N and P were evaluated using 210Pb for dating in a 75 cm core taken from the lagoon.

The within-class distributions of long-chain (> C20) n-alkanes and n-alkanols are often used to infer terrestrial input into sediments.9,10 These compounds are abundant in plant epicuticular waxes, with a strong predominance of odd chain-lengths (mainly C29 and C31) for hydrocarbons and even chain-lengths (mainly C26 and C28) for alkanols.11 Marine algae and bacteria are minor sources, with carbon chain-lengths up to C22.11-13 Apart from being of biogenic origin, saturated hydrocarbons can also be related to petroleum sources, but they show no clear odd/even predominance and a characteristic unresolved complex mixture.14,15

Materials and Methods

Study area

On Santa Catarina Island, where the capital city of Florianópolis is located, the main lagoons were formed by the entrapment of water bodies by sandy belts of reefs along the east coast. Conceição Lagoon is located at latitude 27º 34' S and longitude 48º 27' W. It is the largest saltwater lagoon on the island, with a maximum depth of 9.0 m (average depth of 1.7 m), total area of 19.2 km2 and water volume of 49 × 106 m3 (Figure 1). It is surrounded by mountains along the North, West and South margins with an extensive sandbank belt along the East margin, through which the lagoon is connected to the sea by a channel with an extension of 2 km, 20 m width and 2 m depth. Current direction through the channel to the South changes over the tidal cycle. Salinity is very low in the Southern area of the lagoon (oligohaline waters; 0.5 to 5.0 ‰) and increases in the central area (6.5-32 ‰, average 18.5 ‰). Because of the influence of the João Gualberto River, the waters in the Northern region are also oligohaline (average 8.0 ‰).7


The first Portuguese immigrants from the Azores settled in small villages near the lagoon in the 18th century, but an intensified development occurred during the 19th century due to timber exploration, crops of manioc, sugar-cane and corn, and the uncontrolled urban occupation. Nowadays, despite the tourist activities, sewage treatment is insufficient to cope with the increasing population during the summer vacation and untreated wastes are discharged directly into the lagoon.

Sampling and analysis

Five sediment samples were collected using a van Veen grab sampler from the bottom (0-5 cm depth) of Conceição Lagoon in April 2001. The location of each surface sampling station is shown in Figure 1. These positions were chosen based on previous works, which evaluated chlorophyll in the water and the content of organic matter, nitrogen and grain size in the sediment.7 Divers using a 100 cm × 7.5 cm diameter PVC tube collected one sediment core near station LC6. All surface samples were immediately immersed in CH2Cl2 (2 mL), stored in previously-heated (450 ºC) glass jars, sealed with aluminum foil-lined lids and kept frozen until being freeze-dried in the laboratory. The core was capped in the field and stored frozen until being sectioned in the laboratory. The PVC tube was previously rinsed with 5% extran solution and distilled water (3×).

Bulk parameters

The core was carefully subsectioned into 5 cm intervals and the subsamples stored frozen until chemical analysis. The samples were freeze-dried (Edwards F105) to constant weight; sediments were pulverized with a mortar and stored in glass jars. Dry sediment density and water content data were used to calculate the in situ dry sediment bulk density and porosity, to determine the uncompacted depth for each core section.

Immediately prior to lipid extraction, the storage solvent added to the surface sediments was evaporated and the sediment freeze-dried following the procedure described above for the sediment core. Aliquots from surface locations and all layers of the core were taken for elemental analysis. Subsamples (0.1 g) were transferred to small vials and previously decarbonated using 0.5 mol L-1 HCl solution to determine total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrogen. TOC and N were measured using a Carlo Erba EA1110 CHNS-O analyzer after subsamples being centrifuged, washed with deionized water to eliminate excess of HCl and gently dried at 60 ºC.

Particle size distribution

Samples from all stations were taken for granulometric analysis following the procedure described by Suguio.16

Phosphorus analysis

For each station, two subsamples (with three replicates each) of 0.1 g of dried sediment each were used for the phosphorus analysis. One subsample was initially placed in a furnace for 1 h at 500 ºC. Both subsamples were then shaken with 10 mL of 1.0 mol L-1 HCl solution (2×) for 1 h on a shaker. After centrifugation (6000 rpm, 10 min), the liquid phase was placed in a Teflon® digester. Phosphorus extracted from the calcinated fraction is considered to be the total phosphorus (TP) and phosphorus extracted from the second treatment, with no calcination, the inorganic phosphorus (IP). Both fractions were digested for 4 h with 1.6 mL of potassium persulphate and 4.5 mol L-1 sulfuric acid solution at 80 ºC. The TP and IP fractions were determined as orthophosphate using the acidic molybdate-ascorbic acid method17 modified by Koroleff.18 Calibration curves ranging from 1.0 to 20.0 µmol L-1 were prepared using standard aqueous solution of orthophosphate. The organic fraction (OP) was obtained by subtracting the IP from TP. Procedural blanks did not reveal any contamination.

In order to evaluate the extraction efficiency of our method for phosphorus analysis (TP), a certified estuarine sediment sample (NIST, SRM1646a) was also analyzed. The result obtained for the recovery of total phosphorus (TP = 267 µg g-1), with an RSD value of 4.7% (triplicate analyses), was not significantly different from the certified TP value (270 µg g-1; t-Student's test, P < 0.05, n = 5).

Analytical procedure

Lipids were extracted from the remaining freeze-dried samples for analysis. From each station, around 20 g of sediment were placed in glass tubes. The extractable lipids were obtained by successive extraction of the sediment with a mixture of CH2Cl2:CH3OH (2:1, v/v) and CH2Cl2, by ultra-sound for 20 min each. A solvent to sediment ratio of approximately 3:1 was used. Extracts were combined and rotary evaporated to just dryness. Lipids were then taken up in 2 mL of CH2Cl2 and passed through a Pasteur pipette micro column containing 1 g of combusted Na2SO4 to remove any residual water.19 Lipid isolations were performed in a glass column (0.5 cm i.d. × 4 cm effective length) filled with previously activated alumina (2 g, top part of the column) and silica (2 g, lower part).20 The lipid extract was fractionated into three fractions using solvents of increasing polarity: F1 eluted with 18 mL hexane (hydrocarbons), F2 eluted with 20 mL CH2Cl2 (no polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were detected in this fraction) and F3, containing the sterols and n-alkanols, eluted with 25% methanol in ethyl acetate. Each fraction was transferred to small vials (2 mL) and stored frozen at -18 ºC until analysis by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Immediately before GC and GC-MS analyses, sterols and n-alkanols were converted to trimethylsilylether derivatives using bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA). A known amount of 5α-cholestane (12.5 µg g-1) was added to fractions F1 and F3 as an internal standard. Individual compounds were quantified from gas chromatographic peak areas by comparison with the area of the internal standard. Response factors were determined from quantitative mixtures of known compounds.

In order to verify the extraction efficiency, surrogate solutions containing deuterated alkanes (C20, C24 and C30) were added to the surface subsamples and recovered together with the F1 fraction. Based on the recovery of the surrogates, the extraction efficiency was greater than 70%.

GC analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu GC model 17A fitted with a split/splitless injector and a flame ionization detector. Temperatures: capillary injection port 300 ºC, detector 320 ºC. Injection mode: manual (1 µL) splitless (inlet purge on for 0.5 min) with a split flow of 1:40. The column was a DB-1 capillary column of 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. and 0.25 µm film thickness, with the following oven temperature program: 50-180 ºC at 10 ºC min-1, 180-310 ºC at 4 ºC min-1, with a 15 min isotherm at 310 ºC. N2 was used as the carrier gas.

Data acquisition and processing were performed on a Shimadzu CLASS-GC10 integrator. GC-MS analysis (EI mode, 70 eV; mass range 40-550 Daltons; 2.0 scan s-1) was carried out on a Shimadzu QP2000A MS interfaced to a Shimadzu GC model 14A. Conditions for the GC-MS analysis were as for GC except that He was used as the carrier gas. Identification of the compounds was based on comparing the gas chromatographic retention times of some peaks with those of authentic standards and by characteristic mass fragmentograms. Structural assignments were achieved by comparison with mass spectra of authentic standards and data published in the literature.

Results and Discussion

Elemental composition at the sediment-water interface

Bulk sediment parameters and molar ratios for all locations are listed in Table 1. TOC values showed no significant variation, with maximum content at station LC4 (3.81 mmol g-1) and minimum content at station LC5 (2.03 mmol g-1). The range of TOC values is consistent with those previously reported for the same lagoon,7,8 and for other subtropical lagoons and estuaries.2,21 Total phosphorus ranged from 2.89 to 10.00 µmol g-1, and the highest values of TP and TOC were found at the same two stations (LC3 and LC4). The other three parameters analyzed (N, OP and IP), followed the same trend.

Interesting results were observed for the P fractions. Samples contained an average of 80% IP, ranging from 73% to 88%. These values are higher than those found in the sediments of Ratones Mangrove (59 to 61%), with no contribution of anthropogenic sources, but similar to those reported for the highly sewage contaminated sediments of Itacorubi Mangrove (79-87%), both located on Santa Catarina Island.22 From these results it is clear that the OP:IP ratio is affected by sources of phosphorus. According to Marins et al.23, IP accounts for the major fraction of total phosphorus in the estuary of the Jaguaribe River, in Ceará State, and comprises 60% of TP in sediments without anthropogenic input. However, the IP percentage can increase to 87% due to inputs from anthropogenic sources. Similar results have been reported for TP concentration in the sediments of the Tietê River, in the Pirapora Reservoir, in São Paulo State.23 As the average IP content found in the sediments of Conceição Lagoon is higher than 60% (from 73 to 88%), it indicates the influence of non biogenic phosphorus on the IP:TP ratio.

The molar TOC/TP ratio ranged from 366 to 757. Lower ratios were obtained for samples from locations LC3 and LC4 (Table 1). It is interesting to note that none of these sediment samples showed values close to the expected Redfield ratio of 106 for recent marine organic matter.24 The molar TOC/TP ratio seen in Conceição Lagoon sediments suggests a mix of terrestrial and marine organic matter inputs. The other two ratios shown in Table 1 also indicate mixed sources. It has been established that C:P and N:P values in freshwater generally tend to be higher than in the marine environment and, therefore, it is possible that the land-derived organic matter brought by river runoff to the sediments is responsible for both the high average TOC/TP (366-757) and N/TP (33-67) molar values in the sediments analyzed.25 Another possibility is an increase in TOC/TP and N/TP ratios in sediments due to a higher productivity in the water column, in response to an increased anthropogenic input of nitrate and phosphate.26 From the TOC/N ratios in Table 1 (9.2-12.6), the influence of terrestrial organic matter on this ratio can be noted. Generally, values lower than 10 indicate a predominance of marine organic matter influx.

The particle size distribution in Conceição Lagoon sediments revealed that the sample from station LC2 has the highest sand content (87%), which drops to less than 40% for samples from stations LC3 and LC4 (Figure 2a). In contrast, silt is the dominant sedimentary component at these stations, showing good correlation with TOC. High percentages of fine particles are commonly found along with high TOC levels,27,28 which suggest that these may be areas of major accumulation of terrigenous detritus, possibly brought by the Cachoeira River. As for TOC, the increase in TP content was also associated with a decrease in the sand and increase in the silt percentage (Figure 2b).



Lipid compounds

Here we will discuss data on n-alkane, n-alkanol and sterol concentrations and the distribution patterns of individual compounds in the surface sediments of Conceição Lagoon (Table 2). For all samples, the distribution of total n-alkanols (C14-C30) showed a predominance of compounds with even carbon numbers, mainly those extending from C24 to C28 and exhibited bimodal distribution with a maximum at C18 and C28. Concentrations were highest at station LC3 (amounting to 1.2 µg g-1 dry sediment) and the lowest values were found at station LC5 (0.2 µg g-1). With respect to total n-alkanes (C20-C36), samples showed an odd carbon number predominance with major contributions ranging from C25 to C33. The highest concentrations were also detected at station LC3 (5.0 µg g-1 dry sediment) and the lowest values at station LC5 (0.4 µg g-1 dry sediment), which was nearly 10 times lower than that of station LC3. As reported by other authors,29-31 the distribution of n-alkanols and n-alkanes seen in Conceição Lagoon sediments is commonly attributed to land plant inputs.

In fact, the results mentioned above were confirmed by the use of ratios based on the distribution of n-alkanols and n-alkanes in the surface sediment samples. The Carbon Preference Index (CPI) was calculated in the range of C22-C32 for n-alkanols and C23-C31 for n-alkanes and the results show that values were higher than two for both indexes, indicating a large contribution from terrigenous particulate material (Table 2). Another ratio indicative of source dominance is the terrigenous/aquatic ratio (TAR), which is based on the relative abundance of the long-chain over the short-chain compounds (n-alkanols and n-alkanes). All the values calculated were greater than two, showing the importance of the terrigenous compounds. The TARALK values were higher than those for TAROH which may indicate preferential degradation of aquatic n-alkanols relative to aquatic n-alkanes or that the sources of these terrigenous compounds contain a higher proportion of n-alkanes than n-alkanols.32 However, station LC6 showed distinct ratios, with TAROH (6.0) being greater than TARALK (5.0). The results for both TAR ratios suggest a dominant allochthonous input of extractable lipid compounds.

All sterols detected in the surface samples are described below. Their identifications were based on their mass spectra, relative retention times, comparison with authentic standards and key fragment ions of TMS derivatives: m/z 129 for C27-C29Δ5 and Δ5,22 components; 251 for C27 -C29Δº and 257 for C27-C29Δ22. Sterols are composed mainly of C27 components (5β-cholestan-3β-ol, cholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol, cholest-5-en-3β-ol and 5α-cholestan-3β-ol), which account for 39-43% of the total sterols, and are usually associated with microbes or other marine sources, since they are not commonly found in higher plant waxes.9 Cholest-5-en-3β-ol (C27Δ5) is the major component of C27 sterols in all the surface samples. Compounds that are generally employed as fecal pollution indicators were identified: 5β-cholestan-3β-ol (coprostanol) and 5α-cholestan-3β-ol. However, using the ratio (5β/5β + 5α) stanol proposed by Grimalt et al.33, we found values ranging from 0.17 to 0.20, which are not considered to be indicative of significant sewage contamination.

The abundance of C28 and C29 sterols detected are close to the C27 components (Table 2). On average, they account for 30 and 28% of the total sterols, respectively. 24-Methylcholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol (C28Δ5,22) and 24-ethylcholest-5-en-3β-ol (C29Δ5) are the major components. These two groups of sterols come mainly from higher plants.11 However, in sediments dominated by terrestrial sterols, 24-ethylcholest-5-en-3β-ol is usually detected as the major component.

As cholest-5-en-3β-ol (C27Δ5) and 24-ethylcholest-5-en-3β-ol (C29Δ5) have been shown to relate to autochthonous and allochthonous material, respectively, we used the ratio C27Δ5/C29Δ5 for comparison with data reported by other authors.34,35 Values of this ratio ranged from 1.21 to 1.30 in the surface sediments of Conceição Lagoon. Considering the possible sewage origin of cholesterol, the high ratio values encountered at these stations suggest that there is more than one source of cholesterol. Besides domestic discharges, the sources of the inputs may vary with time and include plankton production and bioaccumulation.35

Another interesting issue regarding sterols is the possible changes that occur in the sterol skeletons. These changes have been used to assess microbially-mediated diagenetic transformation reactions. Two reactions are commonly employed, the reduction of cholest-5-en-3β-ol to 5α-cholestan-3β-ol and of 24-ethylcholest-5-en-3β-ol to 24-ethyl-5α-cholestan-3β-ol.36,37 However, stanols in sediments can originate from direct biogenetic inputs and possible mixtures of 5α-stanols from marine organisms cannot be ruled out. Previous data have shown that the stanol/stenol ratios are only 0.1-0.2 in plankton32,38 and leaf waxes.9 Ratios for the three sterol pairs were calculated: 5α-cholestan-3β-ol/cholest-5-en-3β-ol (C27Δº/C27Δ5), 24-methylcholest-5-en-3β-ol/24-methyl-5α-cholestan-3β-ol (C28Δº/C28Δ5) and 24-ethyl-5α-cholestan-3β-ol/24-ethylcholest-5-en-3β-ol (C29Δº/C29Δ5) (Table 2). Values for these ratios averaged 0.80 and are very high compared to other studies in which the average values for stanol/stenol pairs are below 0.60.35,39 One possible reason for the higher ratios is a direct input of 5α(H)-stanols from diatoms as they are likely to be found in Conceição Lagoon.8 Duan et al.32 also reported high values (> 0.91) for stanol/stenol ratios in sediments from marsh deposits.

Particle size and elemental composition with depth profile

The core interval from 0 to 50 cm is dominated by silt and clay, averaging close to 70% (Figure 3a). However, below 50 cm the relative percentage of sand showed a strong increase. The maximum value occurs at a depth of 60-65 cm, amounting to 80%. These variations appear to be associated with events which occurred in the 19th century. The first immigrants from the Azores used to grow their crops around the lagoon and it was a common practice to burn the primary vegetation to clear the land. Thus, between plantation periods the soil might have been exposed to erosion, and high levels of sand may have been transported to the bottom of the lagoon. This agricultural practice had ended by the beginning of the last century. The results seen here for particle size changes with depth are in agreement with the chronology obtained through the 210Pb (Figure 4e) determination. Variations in the TOC concentration with depth were observed in the deeper sediments, with maximum concentration at a depth of 60-65 cm (4.5 mmol g-1; Figure 3b). Nitrogen did not vary considerably with depth and ranged from 0.17 to 0.33 mmol -1. However, the TOC/N ratio varied more significantly through the profile. The upper sediment (5-55 cm) values ranged from 8 to 10, while in the deeper sediments they increased to around 11.5, with the highest value of 12.4 at a depth of 60-65 cm.









The TP values showed large variations with the depth (Figure 3c) and were consistent with the changes in TOC, TOC/N and particle size composition. Values ranged from 8.52 to 1.90 µmol g-1 (at depths of 5-10 and 45-50 cm, respectively). In the deeper sediments (below 55 cm) TP increased again and had a profile similar to TOC. The IP fraction had the same profile as TP, with the maximum (6.5 µmol g-1) value found in the upper sediment (5-10 cm), dropping to near 0.58 µmol g-1 at 50-55 cm. In contrast, it was observed that OP remained almost constant, with values raging from 0.95 (45-50 cm) to 2.02 µmol g-1 (60-65 cm). Only at the depth intervals of 50-55 and 55-60 cm were OP concentrations higher than those of IP.

From the results obtained for particle size in the core, it would be expected that below a depth of 50 cm concentrations of organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus would decrease, given the predominance of sand particles (over 60%). However, the bulk organic matter was very high below 50 cm, showing that in the past an important source of organic matter associated with a high influx of sand formed the bottom sediments of Conceição Lagoon.

Hydrocarbon variations with depth profile

In order to investigate possible changes in the sources of organic matter through the core, we plotted the vertical profile of three saturated hydrocarbons (Figure 4b), representing typical land-derived sources,40 and compared it with the TOC profile (Figure 4a). The relative distributions of C27, C29 and C31 were very similar to that of TOC through the core, suggesting the same source for all three compounds. However, a strong increase in C29 and C31 concentrations (over 100 ng g-1) was observed below 50 cm, with values approximately 2- to 3-fold higher than the average concentration above this depth. To further investigate these results, we employed the CPI index and ratios of long to short n-alkane chains, to assess relative changes in the contribution of allochthonous vs. autochthonous components.2,41 The CPI in the range of C23-C31 showed considerable variation with depth, with a value of 4.8 in the surface sediment and a decrease with depth to 3.1-3.3 at 30-40 cm. The CPI increases again in the deeper sediments where higher ratios were observed (Figure 4c), in agreement with the TOC variation (Figure 4a). Such variation with depth may be associated with distinct sources of these long-chain n-alkanes. It is also possible that due to the different sources and events in the past, these hydrocarbons show different extents of degradation. According to Gagozian and Peltzer42 hydrocarbons associated with sources of refractory organic material become less susceptible to biodegradation and result in variations of CPI with depth. The C29/C19 ratio also varies considerably with depth and shows a strong increase below 50 cm, consistent with the TOC profile (Figure 4d). Changes in the relative proportions of long to short n-alkane chains are probably caused by an enhanced contribution of terrigenous biomass.

Mixing processes with depth

The radionuclide 210Pb has been widely used to monitor the role of benthic or infaunal organisms in mixing sediments, which is an important near-surface process in all oxic sediments.43 The importance of 210Pb (t1/2 = 22.3 years) as a mixing tracer is based on the fact that its activity falls exponentially in the first few centimeters of sediment and its relevance to mixing on a 100-year time scale.44,45 The transport of 210Pb and other radionuclides (e.g. 234Th, 228Th, 239,240Pu) to the bottom of a water body appear to be primarily associated with the falling biogenic particles. Hence, the use of 210Pb to evaluate the effect of sediment mixing on lipid compounds also transported to the sediment by biogenic particles is significant.

The depth profile of 210Pbatm activity (Figure 4e) from 0-40 cm shows close similarities with those of TOC and n-alkane concentration. The relatively high abundance of 210Pbatm (150-200 mBq g-1) in the first 20 cm of the core is consistent with the higher TOC values. Similarly to the TOC, 210Pbatm abruptly decreased at a depth of 10-20 cm (Figure 4e). However, this steep decrease is not observed for terrigenous hydrocarbons (Figure 4b). These results appear to imply that the trend in the variation of the excess activity of particle-associated radionuclides with depth, in this case 210Pbatm, resembles that of the bulk TOC rather than land-derived compounds.

Conclusions

The fine particle size (silt and clay) and elemental compositions show good correlation in the five surface samples at the Conceição lagoon. The lipid compositions of these samples have characteristic features of terrigenous and aquatic inputs, with no clear sign of hydrocarbons derived from anthropogenic contamination. n-Alkanols and n-alkanes in the surface samples are dominated by long-chain homologues with a maximum of C26 and C31, respectively, which are commonly assigned to land plants.

The sediment core shows that despite good correlations of fine particle content with variations of TP, TOC/N and long-chain hydrocarbons within the top 50 cm, below this depth the sediment becomes enriched in sand and the other parameters also increase. These increases coincide with the period of agricultural burn-off in the region, which increases erosion and the influx of terrestrial material.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the Rescue & Save Brigade of Florianópolis City for helping us to collect samples at the Conceição Lagoon. Dr Antônio Mozeto and his group for the 210Pb analysis. Scholarships for C. A. Silva and C. R. Oliveira were provided by CAPES. Financial support was provided by Petrobras.

References

1. Meyers, P. A.; Ishiwatari, R.; In Organic Geochemistry, Principles and Applications; Engel, M. H.; Macko, S. A.; eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1993, p. 185.

2. Muri, G.; Wakeham, S. G.; Pease, T.; Faganeli, J.; Org. Geochem. 2004, 35, 1083. Rodrigues Neto, R.; Madureira, L. A. S.; Acta Limnol. Bras. 2000, 12, 113.

3. Canuel, E. A.; Martens, S. C.; Deep Sea Res. 1993, 36, 121.

4. Hernandez, M. E.; Mead, R.; Peralba, M. C.; Jaffé, R.; Org. Geochem. 2001, 32, 21.

5. Xu, S.; Gao, X.; Liu, M.; Chen, Z.; Geomorphology 2001, 41, 207.

6. Ruiz-Fernandéz, A. C.; Hillaire-Marcel, C.; Ghaleb, B.; Soto-Jiménez, M.; Paez-Osuna, F.; Environ. Pollut. 2002, 118, 365.

7. Fonseca, A.; Biotemas 2006, 19, 7. Torronteguy, M. C.; Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2002; Klingebiel, A.; Sierrra de Ledo, B.; Aquitaine Ocean 1997, 3, 129; Odebrecht, C.; Gomas Jr., F. C. In Hidrografia e Matéria Particulada em Suspensão na Lagoa da Conceição, Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC. O Ecossistema da Lagoa da Conceição. Ledo, B. S.; Soriano-Sierra, L., eds., FEPEMA: Florianópolis, Brazil, 1999, 423.

8. Bresciani, L. F. V.; MSc Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil, 1998. Santiago, A. G.; Bianchi, M. F.; Feitosa, F. F.; Rosa, M. M.; http://www.dpi.inpe.br/~flavia/pessoal/files/Santiago paisagem.pdf, accessed in August 2007.

9. Rieley, G.; Collier, R. J.; Jones, D. M.; Eglinton, G.; Org. Geochem. 1991, 17, 901.

10. Madureira, L. A. S.; van Kreveld, S. A. V.; Eglinton, G.; Conte, M. H.; Ganssen, G.; Hinte, J. E.; Ottens, J.; Paleoceanography 1997, 12, 255; Jeng, Woei-Lih.; Mar. Chem. 2006, 102, 242.

11. Volkman, J. K.; Barret, S. M.; Blackburn, S. I.; Mansour, M. P.; Sikes, E. L.; Gelin, F.; Org. Geochem. 1998, 29, 1163.

12. Volkman, J. K.; Eglinton, G.; Corner, E. D. S.; Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 1809.

13. Saliot, A. In Marine Organic Geochemistry; Duursma, E.; Dawson, R.; eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1981, p. 237.

14. Readman, J. W.; Fillmann, G.; Tolosa, I.; Bartocci, J.; Villeneuve, J.-P.; Catinni, C.; Mee, L. D.; Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 44, 48.

15. Medeiros. P. M.; Bicego, M. C.; Castelão, R.M.; Del Rosso, C.; Fillmann, G.; Zamboni, A. J.; Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 77.

16. Suguio, K.; Introdução à Sedimentologia, Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 1973.

17. Murphy, I.; Riley, S. P.; Analyt. Chim. Acta 1962, 27, 223.

18. Koroleff, F. In Methods of Seawater Analysis; Grasshoff, K.; Ehrhardt, M.; Kremling, K., eds., 2nd ed., Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, 1983, 125.

19. Madureira, L. A. S.; Eglinton, G.; Conte, M. H.; Paleoceanography 1995, 10, 627.

20. Wang, Z.; Fingas, M.; Li, K.; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1994, 32, 361.

21. Jeng, W. L.; Huh, C. A.; Org. Geochem. 2004, 35, 647.

22. Mater, L.; Alexandre, M. R.; Hansel, F. A.; Madureira, L. A. S.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2004, 15, 725.

23. Marins, R. V.; Paula Filho, F. J.; Rocha, C. A. S.; Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 1208; Silva, I. S.; Toledo, M. C. M.; Geochim. Brasil. 1997, 11, 243.

24. Takahashi, T.; Broecker, W. S.; Langer, S.; J. Geophys. Res. 1985, 90, 6907.

25. Bouillon, S.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Rao, A. V. V. S.; Koedam, N.; Dehairs, F.; Hydrobiologia 2003, 495, 33.

26. Emeis, K. C.; Struck, U.; leipe, T.; Pollehme, F.; Kunzendorf, H.; Christiansen, C.; Mar. Geol. 2000, 167, 43.

27. Muniz, P.; Danulat, E.; Yannicelli, B.; Garcia-Alonso, J.; Medina, G.; Bícego, M. C.; Environ. Int. 2003, 1096, 1.

28. Nishigima, F. N.; Weber, R. R.; Bícego, M. C.; Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2001, 42,1064.

29. Gomes, A. O.; Azevedo, D. A.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2003, 14, 358.

30. Azevedo, D. A.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2003, 14, 97.

31. Eglinton, G.; Hamilton, R. J.; Science 1967, 156, 1322.

32. Duan, Y.; Ma, Lanhua.; Org. Geochem. 2001, 32, 1429.

33. Grimalt, J. O.; Fernández, P.; Bayona, J. M.; Albaigés, J.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 357.

34. Huang, W-Y.; Meinschein, W. G.; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1976, 40, 323.

35. Sicre, M-A.; Tian, R. C.; Broyelle, I.; Saliot, A.; Mar. Chem. 1993, 42, 11.

36. Gaskell, S. J.; Eglinton, G.; Nature 1975, 254, 209.

37. Nishinura, M.; Koyama, T.; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1977, 41, 379.

38. Wakeham, S.; Canuel, E.; Org. Geochem. 1990, 20, 563.

39. Fernandes, M. B.; Sicre, M- A.; Cardoso, J. N.; Macedo, S. J.; Sci. Total Environ. 1999, 23, 1.

40. Bourbonniere, R. A.; Meyers, P. A.; Limnol. Ocean. 1996, 41, 352.

41. Meyers, P. A.; Chem. Geol. 1994, 144, 289.

42. Gagosian, R. B.; Peltzer, E. T.; Org. Geochem. 1986, 10, 661.

43. Smith, D. J. Eglinton, G.; Morris, R. J.; Nature 1983, 304, 259.

44. Cochran, J. K.; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1985, 49, 1195.

45. Thomson, J.; Colley, S.; Weaver, P. P. E.; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1988, 90, 157.

Received: October 4, 2007

Web Release Date: September 24, 2008

  • 1. Meyers, P. A.; Ishiwatari, R.; In Organic Geochemistry, Principles and Applications; Engel, M. H.; Macko, S. A.; eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1993, p. 185.
  • 2. Muri, G.; Wakeham, S. G.; Pease, T.; Faganeli, J.; Org. Geochem 2004, 35, 1083.
  • Rodrigues Neto, R.; Madureira, L. A. S.; Acta Limnol. Bras 2000, 12, 113.
  • 3. Canuel, E. A.; Martens, S. C.; Deep Sea Res 1993, 36, 121.
  • 4. Hernandez, M. E.; Mead, R.; Peralba, M. C.; Jaffé, R.; Org. Geochem 2001, 32, 21.
  • 5. Xu, S.; Gao, X.; Liu, M.; Chen, Z.; Geomorphology 2001, 41, 207.
  • 6. Ruiz-Fernandéz, A. C.; Hillaire-Marcel, C.; Ghaleb, B.; Soto-Jiménez, M.; Paez-Osuna, F.; Environ. Pollut 2002, 118, 365.
  • 7. Fonseca, A.; Biotemas 2006, 19, 7.
  • Torronteguy, M. C.; Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2002;
  • Klingebiel, A.; Sierrra de Ledo, B.; Aquitaine Ocean 1997, 3, 129;
  • Odebrecht, C.; Gomas Jr., F. C. In Hidrografia e Matéria Particulada em Suspensão na Lagoa da Conceição, Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC O Ecossistema da Lagoa da Conceição. Ledo, B. S.; Soriano-Sierra, L., eds., FEPEMA: Florianópolis, Brazil, 1999, 423.
  • 8. Bresciani, L. F. V.; MSc Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil, 1998.
  • Santiago, A. G.; Bianchi, M. F.; Feitosa, F. F.; Rosa, M. M.; http://www.dpi.inpe.br/~flavia/pessoal/files/Santiago paisagem.pdf, accessed in August 2007.
    » link
  • 9. Rieley, G.; Collier, R. J.; Jones, D. M.; Eglinton, G.; Org. Geochem 1991, 17, 901.
  • 10. Madureira, L. A. S.; van Kreveld, S. A. V.; Eglinton, G.; Conte, M. H.; Ganssen, G.; Hinte, J. E.; Ottens, J.; Paleoceanography 1997, 12, 255;
  • Jeng, Woei-Lih.; Mar. Chem 2006, 102, 242.
  • 11. Volkman, J. K.; Barret, S. M.; Blackburn, S. I.; Mansour, M. P.; Sikes, E. L.; Gelin, F.; Org. Geochem 1998, 29, 1163.
  • 12. Volkman, J. K.; Eglinton, G.; Corner, E. D. S.; Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 1809.
  • 13. Saliot, A. In Marine Organic Geochemistry; Duursma, E.; Dawson, R.; eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1981, p. 237.
  • 14. Readman, J. W.; Fillmann, G.; Tolosa, I.; Bartocci, J.; Villeneuve, J.-P.; Catinni, C.; Mee, L. D.; Mar. Pollut. Bull 2002, 44, 48.
  • 15. Medeiros. P. M.; Bicego, M. C.; Castelão, R.M.; Del Rosso, C.; Fillmann, G.; Zamboni, A. J.; Environ. Int 2005, 31, 77.
  • 16. Suguio, K.; Introdução à Sedimentologia, Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 1973.
  • 17. Murphy, I.; Riley, S. P.; Analyt. Chim. Acta 1962, 27, 223.
  • 18. Koroleff, F. In Methods of Seawater Analysis; Grasshoff, K.; Ehrhardt, M.; Kremling, K., eds., 2nd ed., Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, 1983, 125.
  • 19. Madureira, L. A. S.; Eglinton, G.; Conte, M. H.; Paleoceanography 1995, 10, 627.
  • 20. Wang, Z.; Fingas, M.; Li, K.; J. Chromatogr. Sci 1994, 32, 361.
  • 21. Jeng, W. L.; Huh, C. A.; Org. Geochem. 2004, 35, 647.
  • 22. Mater, L.; Alexandre, M. R.; Hansel, F. A.; Madureira, L. A. S.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2004, 15, 725.
  • 23. Marins, R. V.; Paula Filho, F. J.; Rocha, C. A. S.; Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 1208;
  • Silva, I. S.; Toledo, M. C. M.; Geochim. Brasil 1997, 11, 243.
  • 24. Takahashi, T.; Broecker, W. S.; Langer, S.; J. Geophys. Res 1985, 90, 6907.
  • 25. Bouillon, S.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Rao, A. V. V. S.; Koedam, N.; Dehairs, F.; Hydrobiologia 2003, 495, 33.
  • 26. Emeis, K. C.; Struck, U.; leipe, T.; Pollehme, F.; Kunzendorf, H.; Christiansen, C.; Mar. Geol 2000, 167, 43.
  • 27. Muniz, P.; Danulat, E.; Yannicelli, B.; Garcia-Alonso, J.; Medina, G.; Bícego, M. C.; Environ. Int 2003, 1096, 1.
  • 28. Nishigima, F. N.; Weber, R. R.; Bícego, M. C.; Mar. Pollut. Bull 2001, 42,1064.
  • 29. Gomes, A. O.; Azevedo, D. A.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc 2003, 14, 358.
  • 30. Azevedo, D. A.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc 2003, 14, 97.
  • 31. Eglinton, G.; Hamilton, R. J.; Science 1967, 156, 1322.
  • 32. Duan, Y.; Ma, Lanhua.; Org. Geochem. 2001, 32, 1429.
  • 33. Grimalt, J. O.; Fernández, P.; Bayona, J. M.; Albaigés, J.; Environ. Sci. Technol 1990, 24, 357.
  • 34. Huang, W-Y.; Meinschein, W. G.; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1976, 40, 323.
  • 35. Sicre, M-A.; Tian, R. C.; Broyelle, I.; Saliot, A.; Mar. Chem 1993, 42, 11.
  • 36. Gaskell, S. J.; Eglinton, G.; Nature 1975, 254, 209.
  • 37. Nishinura, M.; Koyama, T.; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1977, 41, 379.
  • 38. Wakeham, S.; Canuel, E.; Org. Geochem. 1990, 20, 563.
  • 39. Fernandes, M. B.; Sicre, M- A.; Cardoso, J. N.; Macedo, S. J.; Sci. Total Environ 1999, 23, 1.
  • 40. Bourbonniere, R. A.; Meyers, P. A.; Limnol. Ocean 1996, 41, 352.
  • 41. Meyers, P. A.; Chem. Geol 1994, 144, 289.
  • 42. Gagosian, R. B.; Peltzer, E. T.; Org. Geochem 1986, 10, 661.
  • 43. Smith, D. J. Eglinton, G.; Morris, R. J.; Nature 1983, 304, 259.
  • 44. Cochran, J. K.; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1985, 49, 1195.
  • 45. Thomson, J.; Colley, S.; Weaver, P. P. E.; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett 1988, 90, 157.
  • *
    e-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      09 Dec 2008
    • Date of issue
      2008

    History

    • Received
      04 Oct 2007
    • Accepted
      24 Sept 2008
    Sociedade Brasileira de Química Instituto de Química - UNICAMP, Caixa Postal 6154, 13083-970 Campinas SP - Brazil, Tel./FAX.: +55 19 3521-3151 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: office@jbcs.sbq.org.br