The use of ion exchange resin for reagent immobilization and concentration in flow systems: determination of nickel in steel alloys and iron speciation in waters

Article

The Use of Ion Exchange Resin for Reagent Immobilization and Concentration in Flow Systems. Determination of Nickel in Steel Alloys and Iron Speciation in Waters

Patrícia B. Martelli^a, Boaventura F. Reis^b*, Mauro Korn^c, and Iolanda A. Rufini^b

^a Instituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos - SP, Brazil

^bCentro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, C.P. 96, 13400-970 Piracicaba - SP, Brazil

^cUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil

Received: May 13, 1996; June 17, 1997

Neste trabalho, foi investigado o emprego de persulfato de potássio imobilizado em resina aniônica AG1-X8, como agente oxidante, na determinação espectrofotométrica de níquel em ligas metálicas, e na especiação de Fe (III)/Fe (II) em águas de rio, utilizando-se sistema de análise em fluxo. O diagrama de fluxo foi desenvolvido para que a oxidação da espécie de interesse e o recondicionamento da resina pudessem ser efetuados em linha. A determinação de níquel baseou-se no método da dimetilglioxima, apresentando uma freqüência analítica de 80 determinações por hora. Com este sistema, obteve-se um baixo consumo de reagentes, 10 mg (200 mL) de persulfato de potássio e 8,0 mg (133 mL) de dimetilglioxima por determinação. Para uma solução de amostra contendo 21,5% (m/m) de Ni, encontrou-se um desvio padrão relativo de 1% (n = 10). Aplicando-se o teste-t pareado, obteve-se uma concordância com 95% de confiança entre os resultados do sistema proposto e os obtidos com espectrofotometria de absorção atômica com chama. Na determinação de Fe (III), utilizou-se tiocianato de potássio como reagente cromogênico, alcançando-se uma frequência analítica de 60 determinações por hora. O método apresentou um consumo de reagentes de 3,5 mg (70 mL) persulfato de potássio e de 5,4 mg (270 mL) de tiocianato de potássio por determinação. O desvio padrão relativo calculado para uma solução de amostra contendo 3,17 mg L^-1 de Fe (III) foi de 1,5% (n = 10). Os resultados empregando-se o método proposto para Fe (II) foram comparados com aqueles obtidos com o método espectrofotométrico, baseado na reação com 1,10 - fenantrolina, apresentando uma concordância com nível de confiança de 95%.

Flow injection systems employing potassium peroxydisulphate as oxidizing reagent, immobilized on the anionic exchange resin AG1-X8 are proposed for spectrophotometric determination of nickel in steel alloys and for the speciation of iron (III)/iron (II) in waters. The flow networks were designed to provide facilities to perform on line analyte oxidation and resin reconditioning steps. The feasibility was ascertained by determining nickel in acid solutions of steel alloys and performing speciation of iron (III)/iron (II) in waters, using as chromogenic reagents dimethylglyoxime for nickel and potassium thiocyanate for iron. Profitable features such as a throughput of 80 and 60 samples per hour, 1.0 and 1.5% (n = 10) as relative standard deviations for nickel (21.5% m/m) and iron (III) (3.17 mg L^-1), low reagents consumption (10 and 3.5 mg of potassium peroxydisulphate, 8.0 mg dimethylglyoxime and 5.4 mg of potassium thiocyanate, for nickel and iron, respectively) were observed. The accuracy for both procedures were ascertained by applying paried t-test between results obtained with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) for Ni and 1,10-phenantroline spectrophotometric method for Fe (II), and no significant difference at 95% confidence level were observed.

Keywords: flow analysis, immobilized reagent, chemical speciation, steel alloys

Introduction

Nickel is an important constituent of several steel alloys. Its determination is required to control both raw material and industrial products, and has been usually performed by atomic emission or absorption spectrometry^1,2 or molecular absorption spectrophotometry³.Dimethylglyoxime is a widely reagent used for spectrophotometric determination of nickel in aqueous solutions, producing in alkaline (mainly ammoniacal) medium a water soluble compound detected at 460 nm^3,4. Potassium peroxydisulphate has been generally used as oxidizing reagent, and should be added to the sample following the addition of the dimethylglyoxime solution⁴. In earlier work⁵, the authors observed that potassium peroxydisulphate concentration exerted a remarkable effect on the magnitude of the analytical signal. Since potassium peroxydisulphate solutions with concentrations larger than 5% are difficult to be achieved, therefore, a strategy to increase the peroxydisulphate concentration available for the oxidation process should be appreciated.

Reagents in solid phase or immobilized on appropriated surfaces have been used in flow injection systems, in order to accomplish several analytical requirements⁶. Columns packed with solid reagents have been employed to convert nitrate to nitrite⁷, ammonium to ammonia⁸ etc. Also, reagents adsorbed on surface such as silica have been used to improve selectivity^9-11.

Anionic exchange resins have been coupled to the flow network to perform on line preconcentration and separation^12,13. As they present the ability to adsorb ligands and metallic anionic complexes as well, its use has been proposed to enhance selectivity¹⁴. Some anionic resins, such as AG1-X8, present a high capacity to adsorb anions, therefore when they are saturated with a specific chemical species, its availability on the resin column may be much higher than in solution. This feature suggests a possibility for increasing amount of reagent, when its availability is limited by low solubility in water.

Speciation of iron (III)/iron (II) is interest in studies concerning water pollution¹⁵. The ratio between the concentrations of these two chemical species undergoes changes with time, therefore it is mandatory their simultaneous determination. Considering that thiocyanate reacts with iron (III) ions producing a colored compound but not with iron (II) ions⁴, it is possible to design a flow manifold for the simultaneous determination of iron (III) and iron (II) in waters, coupling a resin column loaded with peroxydisulphate anions to the flow network in order to perform on line oxidation of iron (II) to iron (III).

This work investigates the possibility of employing an anionic resin column loaded with peroxydisulphate ions, coupled to a flow network, in order to increase reagent amount available for oxidation step. The effectiveness of the approach was ascertained by spectrophotometric determination of nickel in steel alloys and iron (III)/iron (II) in waters, using dimethylglyoxime and potassium thiocyanate as chromogenic reagents.

Experimental

Apparatus

The flow set up consisted of a 432 Femto (São Paulo, Brasil) spectrophotometer with a flow cell (180 mL inner volume, 12 mm optical path), coupled to a REC 61 Radiometer strip chart recorder, an Ismatec IPC-8 peristaltic pump, with Tygon pumping tubes of different inner diameters, a home made automatic injector designed as described in the next section, three-way solenoid valves⁵, coiled reactors and flow lines of polyethylene tubing (0.8 mm inner diameter), a resin column (10 mm long, 4 mm i.d) machined in perspex as described elsewhere¹², a 486 microcomputer equipped with an interface PCL-771S Advantech Corp. and other needful electronic interface⁵. The microcomputer run a software written in Quick Basic 4.5, which controlled injector and solenoid valves.

Solutions

The solutions were prepared from analytical grade reagents and freshly distilled-deionized water.

The 0.6% (m/v) dimethylglyoxime solution was prepared by dissolution an appropriate amount of reagent in 250 mL of a 2.0 mol L^-1 NaOH solution. The 3.0% (v/v) triethanolamine solution was prepared by dilution of 3 mL of reagent up to 100 mL with water. The 5.0% (m/v) potassium peroxydisulphate solution was prepared by dissolving 5.0 g of the compound in 100 mL of water at 80 °C and stirring until its complete dissolution. The 2.0% (m/v) potassium thiocyanate solution was prepared by dissolving 4.0 g of reagent in 200 mL of water.

The nickel standard stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1.000 g of metallic nickel in 14 mL of concentrated HNO₃ and making the volume up to 1000 mL with water. Analytical solutions of 0.00, 5.00, 10.0, 20.0 and 30.0 mg L^-1 were prepared by appropriate dilutions of the stock solution in 0.5 mol L^-1 HCl in the presence of 200 mg L^-1 iron (III).

The iron (III) stock solution, 1000 mg L^-1, was prepared by dissolution of 1.000 g of metallic iron in 20 mL HCl-HNO₃ (1:1) and warming gently up to complete dissolution, after cooling, the volume was made up to 1000 mL with water. Iron (II) stock solution, 1000 mg L^-1, was prepared by dissolving 0.996 g of ferrous sulphate heptahydrate in 200 mL of water. Analytical solutions of 0.00, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00, 6.00, 8.00 and 10.0 mg L^-1 for Fe (II) and Fe (III) were prepared by appropriate dilutions of respective stock solutions, with 0.014 mol L^-1 HNO₃ solution.

Alloy samples for nickel determination were prepared by weighing about 500 mg of scraps, dissolving in 15 mL of concentrated HCl plus 5 mL of concentrated HNO₃, and gently heating up to 95 °C until complete dissolution. After cooling, the volume was made up to 250 mL with water.

The samples for iron speciation were collected in several sites of the Piracicaba river and analyzed in the same day. At the collection, samples were filtered through 0.45 mm membrane filters and 1 mL of concentrated HNO₃ was added per litre of sample¹⁶.

The column was packed with AG1-X8 resin (200-400 mesh) and saturated with peroxydisulphate anion just before use, by pumping through it a 5.0% (m/v) potassium peroxydisulphate solution at 2.0 mL min^-1 during 15 min.

Flow diagrams and flow procedure

The flow networks were designed considering that resin loading and oxidizing steps should be performed on line. In this case, an injector with an appropriated configuration was designed, and details concerning its construction are shown in Fig. 1. The main body of the injector was machined in perspex and the three pieces were assembled together by means of screws with springs. With this mounting, a tight adjustment was achieved in order to avoid fluid linkage between surface contacts, thus allowing the central piece to slide easily from sampling to injection position and vice-versa. Commutation was carried out by two 10 W solenoids, attached to injector sliding bar by means of a lever and controlled by a microcomputer. The solenoid attachment was omitted in the figure to simplify the design. Although the flow networks for nickel determination and for iron (III)/ iron (II) speciation should present a physical structure quite different, the injectors were machined in the same way.

In the flow diagram depicted in Fig. 2, the injector is in the sampling position. The valves V₁ and V₂ are switched off, the sample solution flows through the sampling loop towards waste and the chromogenic reagent (R₃) is pumped back to its reservoir vessel. The resin column (c) is aligned with the flow line of the potassium peroxydisulphate solution (R₂), allowing the resin to be loaded with peroxydisulphate anions. When the microcomputer sends a set of electric pulses to V₁ solenoid valve as indicated in valve timing course, the valve undergoes a sequence of on/off switching. Under this condition, sampling loop (L) is loaded with a string formed of sample (S) slugs in tandem with slugs of triethanolamine (R₁).

The injection step starts when the microcomputer sends an electric pulse to solenoid attached to central sliding bar of injector, displacing it to injection position. In the new position, sampling loop and resin column are inserted in the same pathway and carrier solution flows through them. Under this condition, the analyte ions are transported by carrier solution through the resin column towards the junction point x. As indicated in the valves timing course, microcomputer waits 3 s delay time, then sends an electric pulse to V₂ valve to add an aliquot of chromogenic reagent (R₃) to sample zone. Mixing and chemical reactions occur inside reaction coil (B₂) while sample zone is displaced towards detector by carrier solution (C). After the analytical signal is recorded, microcomputer sends an electric pulse to the other solenoid in order to displace sliding bar back the sampling position. The next analytical cycle starts when the microcomputer sends a set of electric pulses to V₁ valve. The time interval to switch V₁ valve on/off was varied from 0.1:0.2 up to 0.8:0.2 s in steps of 0.1 s. The number of pulses was enough to load the sampling loop (L) with the string of sample and triethanolamine solutions.

Dimethylglyoxime is a widespread reagent for spectrophotometric determination of nickel. However it reacts also with iron ions forming a compound which absorbs at the same wavelength range observed for the nickel compound, thus causing strong interference⁴. To overcome this drawback, a triethanolamine solution was used as masking reagent, added to the sample bulk during the sampling step, by employing the binary sampling approach¹⁷. Under this condition, the reaction coil (B₁) is loaded with a string comprising slugs of sample in tandem with slugs of triethanolamine. While the string is transported towards waste (W) through this reaction coil and sampling loop (L), mixing occurs between sample and reagent slugs, providing facilities for masking reaction to occur in the sampling step.

The lengths of the mixing coil and sampling loop were fixed at 10 and 20 cm, since the length of the slugs may exert a remarkable effect on the mixing level attained inside the sampling loop (L). In order to find the best conditions for the complex formation of the iron, the V₁ valve on/off ratio was varied from 0.5 to 4.0 s in steps of 0.1 s, maintaining the time interval for position on, at 0.2 s. After loading the sampling loop with sample plus masking solution mixture, V₁ valve was switched off to save masking reagent.

The flow diagram in Fig. 3 was designed to perform speciation of iron (III)/iron (II). In the position specified, sample solution (S) is flowing through the sampling loop (L₂) towards waste (W) and the peroxydisulphate solution (R₁) is pumped through resin column, and returning to its reservoir. The sample aliquot previously collected by sampling loop (L₁) is transported by carrier solution (C) towards the confluence point x, where an aliquot of potassium thiocyanate solution (R₂) is added to the sample zone by switching the solenoid valve (V) as indicated in the sampling timing course. Sample and reagent solution mixing, as well as the chemical reaction occur in the reaction coil (B). The signal generated by detector (D) is then related to iron (III) content. After recording analytical signal, microcomputer sends an electric pulse to solenoid in order to displace the sliding bar of the injector to other position. The sample aliquot collected in previous step by the sample loop (L₂) is transported by carrier solution through the resin column (c) where iron (II) ions are oxidized to iron (III) by peroxydisulphate anions retained in the resin column. Chromogenic reagent addition, detection and signal recording are carried out as for iron (III) determination and analytical signal is related to iron(III) plus iron(II) contents in the sample.

Results and Discussion

Nickel determination

As depicted in the flow diagram of Fig. 2, the sampling loop was loaded with a string formed with slugs of sample in tandem with slugs of masking solution. Better results were obtained when the valve switching on/off ratio was 0.4:0.2 s (1.7 Hz). Under this condition, the volumes of the slugs were 6.7 and 13.3 mL (13.4 and 26.6 mm length) for sample and for masking reagent solutions, respectively, since sampling flow rate was 33.3 mL s^-1. Additional experiments were performed by using a 30.0 mg L^-1 nickel plus 200 mg L^-1 iron standard solution. It was observed that for valve switching on/off ratios lower than 0.4:0.2 s, the iron interference was not fully suppressed. On other hand, ratios higher than 0.4:0.4 s resulted in lowering of analytical signal, presumably because of the sample dilution. Therefore, the valve switching on/off ratio 0.4:0.2 s was employed in further experiments.

The reaction of nickel with dimethylglyoxime occurs also without adding the oxidizing reagent, but the time interval required to complete the chemical reaction was higher than 14 min (Fig. 4). Otherwise, employing the resin column with peroxydisulphate ions, a time interval of 25 s was enough to complete 70% of the chemical reaction. By decreasing the carrier flow rate from 2.5 to 1.6 mL min^-1, the sample residence time interval was incremented in about 40%. Under this condition, the recorded signal reached the maximum value, indicating that chemical reaction was completed in approximately 40 s. The peak shapes A’ and B show that peroxydisulphate exerts a remarkable effect on the kinetics of the chemical reactions. The recorder tracings b and c indicate a good reproducibility and stability of the peak shapes, when the resin column was utilized.

As illustrated in Fig. 2, the peroxydisulphate solution was pumped to circulate through the resin column. Therefore, in sampling step the oxidizing ions consumed by reaction in injection step are replaced. However, consecutive measurements using a 30.0 mg L^-1 nickel standard solution, and 5% peroxydisulphate solution (10 mL) showed that after 50 consecutive injections, a continuous decrease in the signal magnitude was observed. As the carrier stream was a 0.5 mol L^-1 HCl solution, chloride ions could be absorbed by resin in injection step replacing peroxydisulphate ions. When the injector sliding bar was moved to sampling position, an inverse process occurred, increasing chloride concentration in circulating solution. After several analytical cycles, chloride concentration became high enough to cause competition with peroxydisulphate ions by resin active sites. As a result, a drop in analytical signal was observed, since the kinetics of the chemical reaction depends strongly on peroxydisulphate concentration⁵. In order to prevent this drawback, peroxydisulphate solution was changed after that number of analytical cycles. This approach was profitable, improving the kinetics of chemical reaction with a consumption of 10 mg (200 mL) peroxydisulphate per determination.

In order to save chromogenic reagent, the dimethylglyoxime solution was added by switching on the V₂ valve only when the sample zone was crossing the joint point x (Fig.2). Maintaining this valve at the position on for 5 s was enough to ensure a suitable distribution of the dimethylglyoxime throughout the bulk of sample zone. Then, considering that flow rate was 1.6 mL min^-1, the reagent consumption per reading was 8.0 mg (133 mL). This value correspond to 11% of the presumable consumption if a continuous pumping flow were used as in an usual flow system.

Once settled the experimental variables, the feasibility of the proposed approach was ascertained by running a set of steel alloy samples, also analyzed by FAAS, being results showed in Table 1. The accuracy was assessed by applying paired t-test and no significant difference at the 95% confidence level between the results of the proposed method and those of the FAAS was observed. Other profitable features such as a throughput of 80 measurements per hour and a relative standard deviation (n = 10) of 1% for a typical sample 21.5% (m/m) Ni were achieved. For the proposed working condition, a detection limit of 3.1 mg L^-1 was estimated, this value should be improved by increasing the volume of the sample aliquot.

Iron speciation

When the resin column was inserted into the analytical path, its physical structure was changed and, as a consequence, the dispersing effect underwent an increase caused by the resin dead volume. As shown in Fig. 5, the analytical signal decreased in about 20%, and time interval to run the injection step and to record the analytical signal was increased in 30%.

When the peroxydisulphate solution was not recycled through the column, a continuous drop in the analytical response was observed after the third measurement (Fig. 6). This drop could be avoided by pumping a 5.0% peroxydisulphate solution through the column while the sampling loop was loaded. In this case, recycling 10 mL peroxydisulphate solution as indicated in Fig. 3, up to 80 consecutive measurements could be performed without any observable loss in the analytical response.

When the resin column was inserted in the analytical path, its dead volume causes a increasing in the dispersion, that should be considered to ascertain oxidizing efficiency. This effect was verified by injecting an iron (III) solution and the results are shown in Fig. 5. The peak profile b’ is broader and lower than a’, indicating that the dispersion caused by the resin column dead volume was about 20%. This value was calculated considering the ratio of the peak’s height (b/a).

The ability of the immobilized reagent to oxidize iron (II) was verified by injecting alternately standard solutions (10.0 mg L^-1) of iron (II) and of iron (III) and an oxidizing efficiency of about 99% was observed. To find this result the dispersion effect caused by the resin column as indicated in Fig. 5 was considered.

To ascertain the feasibility of proposed system, a set of river water samples was analyzed, and the results are shown in Fig. 7 and Table 2. The slope of analytical curve related to iron (II) is lower than that observed for iron (III), probably caused by the increase in the dispersion due to the resin column. One can deduce from this figure, that a sample throughput of 60 determination per hour was achieved.

In the proposed approach iron (II) concentration was determined by subtracting iron (III) from total iron. Then, to ascertain accuracy a set of water samples was also analyzed for iron (II) utilizing 1,10-phenantroline spectrophotometric method and results are shown in Table 3. By applying the paired t-test between the results of the proposed procedure and these of the FAAS (Table 2) and 1,10-phenantroline spectrophotometric method, no significant differences at 95% confidence level were observed. Other profitable features such as a relative standard deviation of 1.5% for a typical iron (III) sample with 3.17 mg L^-1 (n = 10), a reagent consumption of 3.5 mg (70 mL) peroxydisulphate solution, 5.4 mg (270 mL) potassium thiocyanate solution and detection limits of 0.4 mg L^-1 for iron (III) and total iron were estimated.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. E.A.G. Zagatto for comments and FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo), CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for financial support.

FAPESP helped in meeting the publication costs of this article

• 1. Kragten, J.; Parczenski, A. Talanta 1981, 28, 901.
• 2. Murakami, M.; Takada, T. Talanta 1992, 39, 1293.
• 3. Fu-Sheng, W.; Pei-Hua, Q.; Nai-Kui, S.; Fang, Y Talanta 1981, 28, 189.
• 4. Marczenko, Z. In Separation and Spectrophotometric Determination of Elements, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986, p 393.
• 5. Martelli, P.B.; Reis, B.F.; Kronka, E.A.M.; Bergamin Filho, H.; Korn, M.; Zagatto, E.A.G.; Lima, J.L.F.C.; Araújo, A.N. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 308, 397.
• 6. Calatayud, J.M.; Mateo, J.V.G. Chem. Anal 1993, 38, 1.
• 7. Giné, M.F.; Bergamin Filho, H.; Zagatto E.A.G.; Reis, B.F. Anal. Chim. Acta 1980, 114, 191.
• 8. Faria, L.C.; Pasquini, C.; Oliveira Neto, G. Analyst 1991, 116, 357.
• 9. Calatayud, J.M.; Mateo, J.V.G. Trends Anal. Chem. 1993, 12, 428.
• 10. Ruzicka, J.; Andal, A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1989, 216, 243.
• 11. Malamas, F.; Bengtsson, M.; Johnsson, G. Anal. Chim. Acta 1984, 160, 1.
• 12. Reis, B.F.; Martelli, P.B.; Krug, F.J.; Tumang, C.A. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1992, 3 (1&2) 38.
• 13. Hwang, H.; Dasgupta, P.K. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 1356.
• 14. Bysouth, S.R.B.; Tyson, J.F.; Stockwell, P.B. Anal. Chim. Acta 1988, 214, 329.
• 15. Faizullah, A.T.; Townshend, A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1985, 167, 225.
• 16. American Public Health Association, American Water Works and Water Pollution Control Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington, 1976, p. 207.
• 17. Reis, B.F.; Giné, M.F.; Zagatto, E.A.G.; Lima, J. L. F. C.; Lapa, R.A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1994, 293, 129.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  10 Sept 2010
• Date of issue
  1997

History

• Accepted
  17 June 1997
• Received
  13 May 1996