INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Different assays to evaluate dyslipidemia may show significant variations in the obtained results and a consequent inappropriate clinical approach may be adopted. This study aimed to compare the results of total cholesterol (CT), triglycerides (TG), HDL-C, Apo A1, Apo B, lipoprotein (a) and lipidic indexes (not-HDL-C, CT/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, TG/HDL-C and Apo B/HDL-C) of hypertensive and/or diabetic patients. METHODS: The following reactive kits and respective analyzers were applied to verify the reproducibility of results: Gold Analisa, DiaSys (CCX-ABBOTT), Dade Behring (Nephelometer BN 100) and Roche (COBAS Integra 400). Ninety nine patients (36 male and 63 female gender) were investigated. Comparing the results, we observed that all mean numbers of lipid constituents showed a significant difference. A similar number of patients had high CT, TG, Lp (a) and Apo A-1 serum levels. There was also disagreement in HDL-C, LDL-C, ApoB, CT/LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C indexes. For not-HDL-C and ApoB/HDL, there was similarity in the number of patients with not recommended values. As a consequence of this difference, the choice of therapeutic approach may be inappropriate as to LDL-C levels, whereas Not-HDL-C not only showed atherogenic particles but also a number of hypertensive patients with similar not recommended serum values, regardless of the methodology and the equipment used. CONCLUSION: In the analyzed group of hypertensive patients, not-HDL-C was an important inter assay correction factor of lipidic parameters. The association with Apo B/HDL-C relation may be an additional factor as to the choice of hypolipemiant treatments.
Not-HDL-C; LDL-C; Hypertensive patients; Inter-assays variability
