DEVELOPMENT AND RURAL TOURISM

Santos, Clediane Nascimento; Thomaz, Rosângela Custodio Cortez

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Article • Mercator (Fortaleza) 21 • 2022 • https://doi.org/10.4215/rm2022.e21016 copy

DEVELOPMENT AND RURAL TOURISM

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

This research studies the rural development public policy and the rural tourism activity in Rosana and Presidente Epitácio municipalities in São Paulo State/Brazil and Santiago de Compostela and Padrón municipalities in Galicia/Spain. Thus, the general objective is to analyze the tourism territorialization process in rural areas and compare public policies for rural development based on case studies in the Pontal do Paranapanema region in the State of São Paulo and the Autonomous Community of Galicia/SP. The methodological procedures used comparative analysis, highlighting the experience of two Spanish municipalities, Santiago de Compostela and Padrón, to draw similarities and differences with the Brazilian cases. The main results obtained in Brazil derived from the actions of the National Program for the Strengthening of Family Agriculture (PRONAF). The research in Santiago de Compostela and Padrón identified the presence of rural tourism houses, which were restored through subsidies from European Union rural development policies.

Keywords:
Tourism in the Countryside; Local Development; Public Policy

Year	Presidente Epitáclo – SP	Rosana	State of São Paulo	Brazil
2003	167	14	22,718	1,003,837
2004	246	292	26,402	1,345,713
2005	414	188	28,256	2,208,198
2006	481	163	30,734	2,551,497
2007	324	225	30,639	1,923,317
2008	310	138	32,322	1,550,749
2009	377	160	35,122	1,704,947
2010	285	72	33,729	1,585,486
2011	304	149	33,197	1,539,901
2012	203	92	33,526	1,823,210
2013	392	150	34,469	1,988,234

Investment of public funds by axis
Axis 1	46:43%
Axis 2	32.58%
Axis 3	10.37%
Axis 4	10%

Categories	Similarities	Differences
Public policies for the development of tourism in rural areas	Yes	Paulistas: it is ineffective in rural territories and disconnected from other development policies.
	Yes	Galician: There is articulation with other sectors, especially because tourism is one of the main sources of income generation, in the case of Santiago de Compostela.
Programs	There are programs	Paulistas: PRONAF is from the Brazilian Federal Government and depends on the willingness of the local financial institution to make the financing line viable to the settler. The settler must pay the financing received within the specified period.
Programs	There are programs	Galician: LEADER: It is a European Union program, and beneficiaries do not pay for funding after approval.
Programs	They exist for the modality of rural tourism.	Paulistas: Financing for agricultural activities.
Programs	They exist for the modality of rural tourism.	Galician: Financing for the opening of rural tourism accommodation.
Start of tourism activity		Paulistas: individual motivation to seek other sources of income.
Start of tourism activity		Galician: government incentive through financial grants
Work in the agricultural activity	Most had someone in the family dedicated to agriculture	Paulistas: the settlers maintain agricultural production
Work in the agricultural activity	Most had someone in the family dedicated to agriculture	Galicians: have no agricultural activity.
Source of income	Tourism in rural areas is not the main source of income.	Paulistas: agricultural activity is the primary source of income.
Source of income	Tourism in rural areas is not the main source of income.	Galicians: sundry activities are not linked to farming on the property.
Financing		Paulistas: There is no funding for tourism in rural areas
Financing		Galician: LEADER funding
Cultural heritage	Present in both cases	Paulistas: with tourism, settlers believe that there will be an appreciation of their way of life and the natural and cultural elements characteristic of the landscape of the settlements: rivers, wild animals, cuisine, agricultural production, and animal husbandry.
Cultural heritage	Present in both cases	Galicians: with the subsidies, the traditional houses of the Galician countryside can be recovered, safeguarding their existence and elements linked to them, such as barns, mills, crossings, and chapels.

Universidade Federal do Ceará UFC - Campi do Pici, Bloco 911, 60440-900 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, Tel.: (55 85) 3366 9855, Fax: (55 85) 3366 9864 - Fortaleza - CE - Brazil
E-mail: edantas@ufc.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] (*)CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Address: FURG. Rua Glicério P. de Carvalho, 303, Coxilha, CEP: 96230-000, Santa Vitória do Palmar (RS), Brasil. Tel: (+55 11) 984626923. E-mail: cle26santos@gmail.com

Content	Implementation of Rural Tourism Measures
Leader I	Measure 3 (Support for rural tourism).
Leader II	Measure B3 (Rural tourism).
Leader+	Measure 108 (Tourism).
Leader-Axis 4	Measure 413 (Diversification of the rural economy and improvement of the quality of life involving rural tourism activity and agritourism) and Measure 431B (Operating costs, capacity acquisition, and territorial promotion covering the promotion of the tourism sector).