The idea of “mature development” is based, frequently, on explanations of school failure: the student does not learn because he is immature and the school has to wait until he gets “mature.” When one says that a child is not mature compared to the development already attained by an adult, one focuses only the quantitative differences between them and forgets that these new qualities of the adult did not arise by the maturation, but by the permanent appropriation process of the human culture. Thus, this idea of “maturity of development” expresses a deep biologization of the human being, reducing social and educational problems explanation to the biological apparatus of the individual. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the relationship between maturation and development, pointing out the limits of biologists' explanations of human phenomena and the possibilities of explanation formulated by the historical-cultural theory to the organization of pedagogical work. This concept gives a new configuration to the role of maturation in the learning process and gives the school education a central role in the development of higher psychological functions. Thus, the school does not have to wait for the child's maturation. Rather, it is its duty to create conditions for his/her maturation to become effective.
Human development; Learning; Childhood development; Cultural-historical theory
