Abstract
Brazilian science and graduate studies go back to a recent past, with significant growth over the last decades. Considering the scientist’s behavior as an object of psychological study, this study investigated possible differences among the variables responsible for installing and maintaining the academic behavior of senior and beginner researchers. Six professors with productiveness scholarships granted by the CNPq in the areas of Psychology, Genetics and Physics (always in pairs of one senior researcher and one beginner researcher in each area) participated in this study. The data that were collected through interviews were analyzed with use of the analytic-behavioral interpretation procedure. The analysis of the verbal report of senior participants indicates that the academic behavior of interviewees was established through contingencies associated with classical formation; the beginner participants, on the other hand, were exposed to basic vocational training. Moreover, the senior participants qualified for doctorates under informal contingencies, and the beginner participants were doctored by means of institutionally-delimited contingencies. Currently, the academic behavior of senior participants is maintained through contingencies of natural reinforcement. The verbal account of the beginner participants, in turn, indicates that the academic behavior of the interviewees is currently distanced from its immediate natural consequences. The main differences found between the contingencies that originated and maintained the academic behavior of senior and beginner participants seem to express, especially, the different contingencies to which the interviewees were exposed throughout their academic training.
Keywords:
Scientific Practice; Behavior Analysis; Contingency Analysis