This paper aims to answer the following question that arouse during fieldwork: why some people with hanseniasis and treated with multidrug therapy (MDT) feel healed and others don't? From a multi-sited ethnography in the transnational (global program for hanseniasis from the World Health Organization), national (Portuguese and Brazilian moral landscapes and biopolitical paradigms), local (clinical practice and incorporated experience of people with hanseniasis in both countries) scales, it examines how the uncertainty documented in the clinic and the gap experienced by some people between the bacteriological cure and the feeling of being healed, opens for a controversy on the main postulates that sustain the use of MDT as an autonomous entity and diffract the contemporaneous framing of hanseniasis and the institutional responses to it. Finally, it concludes on the need for including an incorporated choice that might widen hanseniasis' ontological politics and rebuild a new participatory paradigm of care.
hanseniasis; multidrug therapy; cure; controversy; uncertainty; incorporated choice