Influence of the NiO nanoparticles on the ionic conductivity of the agar-based electrolyte

Influence of the NiO nanoparticles on the ionic conductivity of the agar-based electrolyte

Dalal Jaber Suliman Abdullah Audeh^I; José Bernedo Alcázar^I; Carlos Veiga Barbosa^I; Neftalí Lenin Villarreal Carreño^I; César Antonio Oropesa Avellaneda^I; Agnieszka Pawlicka^II; Ellen Raphael^III

^IMaterials Engeneering, Federal University of Pelotas -UFPel

^IIInstitute of Chemistry of Sao Carlos -IQSC, University of Sao Paulo -USP

^IIIDepartment of Natural Sciences -DCNAT, Federal University of Sao Joao Del Rei -UFSJ

^{Corresponding author}

ABSTRACT

NiO nanoparticles with an average size of 15 nm were prepared by a simple, reproducible and low-cost controlled method, using nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O). These nanoparticles were added to an agar-based polymer electrolyte formula, resulting, after reflux and solution casting, in a proton conducting membrane. The highest ionic conductivity values of 5.19x10^-5 S cm^-1 at room temperature and 3.32x10^-4 S cm^-1 at 80 ºC, were obtained for the sample with 50 wt. % of acetic acid and 0.25 g of NiO. Moreover, the samples showed 75 % of transparency in the visible region, a homogeneous surface and mainly amorphous structure. All the obtained results suggest that agar-based polymer electrolyte with NiO nanoparticles are promising candidates for electrochemical devices application.

Keywords: Polymer electrolyte, ionic conductivity, agar, NiO nanoparticles.

Introduction

The accelerated population growth, environmental pollution and energy critical global issues lead to development and application of renewable and environmentally friendly energy materials. This new tendency starts to become the field of materials science in a deeply important and active side^[1]. Fields as aerospace, electronic circuitry, computing architecture^[2,3], new energy storage devices^[1], and solid-state electrochemical devices started to adopt the eco-friendly materials in their product research and development. Particularly, rechargeable batteries, electrochromic displays, capacitors, sensors^[4,5], supercapacitors^{[ 6]}, and electrochromic glasses^[7] are the most researched solid-state electrochemical devices, which can suffer modifications. In such context, the development of polymer electrolyte materials is a challenge to be faced by scientific research^[1,2].With this regard the best candidates for such applications can be ceramics and polymers, including natural ones and resulting in hybrids or gels ionic conducting membranes^[5,8].

Ionic conductivity of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) was firstly observed by P.V. Wright in 1973 but its real technological importance was realized only in early 1980's^[9]. The last few years, poly(ethylene oxide) has been widely studied in many laboratories^[5]. However, as PEO is a synthetic polymer some attention has thus been shifted to the use of natural macromolecules because of their biodegradability, low production cost, good physical and chemical properties and good membrane formation properties. Thus, more recently natural polymer-based electrolytes, such as hydroxyethyl cellulose^[10], starch^[11], chitosan^[12-14], gelatin^[15,16], and agar^[17-19] were also proposed. The analyzed samples revealed that similarly to the poly(ethylene oxide)- based electrolytes^[20-22], the charge carries can be either Li+ species^[23] or protons^[12,15]. Also both, hopping and/ or vehicular mechanism of the conducting species are responsible for ionic conductivity properties^[24]. In the case of hopping model the ionic movement is due to the ions displacement between coordination sites. In the vehicular model, the low glass transition temperatures allow to free volume creation, which promote the segmental motion of the polymer chains facilitating the ions migration and consequently ionic conductivity^[25]. Aiming to increase the ionic conductivity values of the polymer electrolytes some additives as plasticizers and/ or fillers are used^[12,26]. Concerning the ceramic fillers it was found that ionic conductivity is strongly dependent on the particle size and concentration^[26]. It was found that small sized particles and low quantities promoted an increase on ionic conductivity values of the samples^[26].

Attending the new research tendencies the present article describes preparation and characterization of agar-based polymer electrolytes with NiO nanoparticles. As mentioned above an appropriate concentration of NiO nanoparticles may cause an ionic conductivity improvement. Aiming to verify the influence of the NiO nanoparticles on ionic conductivity values of the agar-based proton conducting electrolyte membranes different NiO quantities were added and studied by electrochemical, spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Thus, AC impedance spectroscopy was used to study the influence of NiO nanoparticles concentration and the temperature on the ionic conductivity. The surface morphology of the films was obtained by SEM; the structure was examined by X-ray diffraction measurements and the transmittance was measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy.

Experimental Details

Nickel oxide nanoparticles preparation

The NiO nanoparticles were prepared using slightly modified synthesis described by Yong Hu et al.^[27]. Chemical reagents were used without purification. Figure 1 illustrates the flow diagram of the NiO nanoparticles preparation. First, 0.01 mol of the Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O (Vetec^®) was introduced to a round bottom flask and dissolved in 100 mL of nontoxic ethylene glycol (Synth^®).The solution was stirred under reflux at 190 ºC for 3 hours and then cooled to room temperature. Finally, the nickel oxide nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm for 30 min., using 3K30 centrifuge and dried at 100 ºC for 24 hours.

Polymer electrolytes with NiO nanoparticles

The electrolytes were obtained according to procedure described by Raphael et al.^[18]. Figure 2 illustrates the flow diagram for the modified procedure of the electrolyte-NiO solution and films. In a glass flask, 0.5 g of agar (Aldrich^®) was dispersed in 30 mL of Milli-Q water and heated under magnetic stirring for 3 min. up to100 ºC for complete dissolution. Next, 1.5 g of acetic acid (Synth^®), 0.5 g of glycerol (Synth^®) as a plasticizer, 0.5 g of formaldehyde (Synth^®) and different quantities of NiO nanoparticles (0.001-0.25 g) were added to this solution under stirring for 6 additional minutes and heated up to 100 ºC. The resulting solution was then cooled down to 30 ºC, poured on Petri dishes and let to dry up for 48 hours between 30 and 40 ºC. The resulting films were stored in a dry box.

Characterization techniques

Impedance spectroscopy

The ionic conductivity measurements of the electrolyte-NiO samples with area of 1.5 cm² were then carried out using SOLARTRON instrument model SI1260 with the frequency response analyzer module. The samples were pressed between two steel electrodes in a Teflon^® cell under vacuum. The bulk resistances (R_b) of the electrolyte-NiO samples were obtained from the impedance spectrum collected over frequency range between 0.1 Hz and 10⁷ Hz with amplitude of 5 mV.

X-ray diffraction

The structures of the electrolyte films with and without NiO were examined by X-ray diffraction. The diffraction patterns were obtained with SHIMADZU model XRD 6000, with CuKα radiation (λ=1.5418 Å) in an angle range (2θ) of 10 to 80º.

UV-Vis spectroscopy

The UV-Vis optical spectra were recorded with an Agilent Instruments Spectrophotometer, operating in the190- 1100 nm range.

Results and Discussions

The ionic conductivity depends on several factors, such as ionic conducting species concentration, cationic or anionic types of charge carriers, the charge carriers mobility, the influence of nanofillers and the temperature^[28]. Figure 3 displays the impedance plots for agar-based electrolyte membranes with and without nanoparticles of NiO measured at different temperatures. The intercept of the semicircle with the real axis gives the electrolyte bulk resistance (R_b). The ionic conductivity is then deduced from the R_b values by employing the formula σ = l/R_bA, where l is the thickness of the electrolyte sample and A is the contact area between the electrolyte and the electrode. The ionic conductivity is found of 1.4×10^-5 and 5.19×10^-5 S/cm at room temperature, and 3.32×10^-4 and 5.14×10^-4 S/cm at ~80 ºC for agar and agar with NiO nanoparticles, respectively. The increase of ionic conductivity of the samples with increase of the temperature can be explained in therm of thermal movement of polymer chain segments and the dissociation of acetic acid. In fact, an incomplete semicircle is observed in Figure 3 that suggests the appearance of a capacitive component at high frequencies. As the blocking electrode was used in the experiment, thus conductive ions cannot easily cross the electrode/electrolyte interface^[29]. The increase in the ionic conductivity with the temperature can be also interpreted as a hopping mechanism between coordinating sites, assisted probably by local structural relaxations and segmental motions of the polymer system ^[30-32].

Figure 4 reveals Arrhenius plots for agar-based electrolyte with 0.25 g of NiO nanoparticles in room to 70 ºC temperature range.

Figure 5 shows typical X ray diffraction patterns obtained for the agar powder and agar based electrolytes with and without NiO nanoparticles. All diffractograms show broad diffuse band centered at about 2θ = 20º including the film with higher amount, i.e., 0.26 g of NiO nanoparticles. This result indicate that there is no influence on the pattern of the diffraction with addition of different concentration of NiO, maintaining the amorphous character of the films. This can be due to the presence of plasticizer in the sample. Similar behavior was already observed in the starch-based electrolytes, where an addition of plasticizer insured the amorphous character of the samples^[10,15]. The good homogeneity without any phase separation and very good surface uniformity of the agar-based electrolyte was also previously reported^[18].

However, Figure 6 show that the addition of NiO changed the morphology of the films, when compared with the membranes reported by Raphael et al.^[18]. Small long and light files are observed on SEM image, which can be atributed to the preferential nanoparticles and or polymer accumulation.

Nevertheless, the electrolyte sample with NiO nanoparticles was translucent, as confirmed by optical transmittance spectrum of the electrolytes in the 200-1000 nm range (Figure 7) and picture on Figure 7 (inset). From this figure it can be stated an increase of the transmittance of 0 % at 280 nm to 75 % at 633 nm in the visible region. The analysis of the presented results also revealed similarities to the results obtained with the samples based on chitosan^[15,18].

Conclusions

Polymer electrolytes based on agar and containing NiO nanoparticles were prepared and characterized by impedance spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and UV-Vis spectrosopy. The obtained results confirmed that the NiO nanoparticles concentration in the membrane formulation influenced the ionic conductivity values achieving the best value of 5.19x10^-5 S/cm at room temperature for the sample with 0.25 g of NiO. It was also stated that the increase in temperature up to 80 ºC promoted an increase in the ionic conductivity to 3.32x10^-4 cm ^-1 S/cm. Moreover, the samples were predominantly amorphous with almost uniform and homogeneous surfaces and transparency of 75 % in the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Finally, all the presented results suggest that agar-based polymer electrolyte with NiO nanoparticles are promising candidates for electrochemical devices application.

Acknowledgments

The authors are pleased to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Federal University of Pelotas for laboratory equipment and research staff. The authors are also indebted CNPq, CAPES and FAPESP, for the financial support given to this research.

Received: 01/29/13

Revised: 08/01/13

Accepted: 01/30/14

• 1. Wang, W. M. -"Preparation and characterization of composite polymer electrolyte", in: International Meeting on Opto-Electronics Engineering and Materials Research 2012, Advanced Materials Research Shenyang China, p.17 (2012).
• 2. Christie, A. M.; Lilley, S. J.; Staunton, E.; Andreev, Y. G. & Bruce, P. G. - Nature, 433, p.50 (2005). PMid:15635406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03186
• 3. Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. - Nature, 414, p.359 (2001). PMid:11713543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35104644
• 4. Armand, M. - Solid State Ion., 69, p.309 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(94)90419-7
• 5. Gray, F. M. - "Solid Polymer Electrolytes: Fundamentals and Technological Applications", VCH-Verlag-Ges., (1991).
• 6. Hashmi, S. A.; Latham, R. J.; Linford, R. G. & Schlindwein, W. S. - J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 93, p.4177 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a704661h
• 7. Tatsumisago, M.; Shinkuma, Y. & Minami, T. - Nature, 354, p.217 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/354217a0
• 8. Petty-Weeks, S. & Polak, A. J. - Sens. Actuators, 11, p.377 (1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0250-6874(87)80077-X
• 9. Berthier, C.; Gorecki, W.; Minier, M.; Armand, M. B.; Chabagno, J. M. & Rigaud, P. - Solid State Ion., 11, p.91 (1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(83)90068-1
• 10. Machado, G. O.; Ferreira, H. C. A. & Pawlicka, A. - Electrochim. Acta, 50, p.3827 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.041
• 11. Mattos, R. I.; Tambelli, C. E.; Donoso, J. P. & Pawlicka, A. - Electrochim. Acta, 53, p.1461 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.061
• 12. Pawlicka, A.; Danczuk, M.; Wieczorek, W. & Zygadlo-Monikowska, E. - J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, p.8888 (2008). PMid:18754600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp801573h
• 13. Khiar, A. S. A.; Puteh, R. & Arof, A. K. - Phys. B: Condensed. Matter., 373, p.23 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2005.10.104
• 14. Fuentes, S.; Retuert, P. J. & Gonzalez, G. - Electrochim. Acta, 53, p.1417 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. electacta.2007.05.057
• 15. Vieira, D. F.; Avellaneda, C. O. & Pawlicka, A. - Electrochim. Acta, 53, p.1404 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.034
• 16. Avellaneda, C. O.; Vieira, D. F.; Al-Kahlout, A.; Leite, E. R.; Pawlicka, A. & Aegerter, M. A. - Electrochim. Acta, 53, p.1648 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.065
• 17. Koh, J. C. H.; Ahmad, Z. A. & Mohamad, A. A. - Ionics, 18, p.359 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11581-011-0631-6
• 18. Raphael, E.; Avellaneda, C. O.; Manzolli, B. & Pawlicka, A. - Electrochim. Acta, 55, p.1455 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.010
• 19. Raphael, E.; Avellaneda, C. O.; Aegerter, M. A.; Silva, M. M. & Pawlicka, A. - Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 554, p.264 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2012.634349
• 20. Dygas, J. R.; Misztal-Faraj, B.; Florjanczyk, Z.; Krok, F.; Marzantowicz, M. & Zygadlo-Monikowska, E. - Solid State Ion., 157, p.249 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00217-5
• 21. Kalita, M.; Solgala, A.; Siekierski, M.; Pawlowska, M.; Rokicki, G. & Wieczorek, W. - J. Power Sources, 173, p.765 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.086
• 22. Florjanczyk, Z.; Zygadlo-Monikowska, E.; Wielgus-Barry, E.; Kuzwa, K. & Pasniewski, J. - Electrochim. Acta, 48, p.2201 (2003).
• 23. Vieira, D. F.; Avellaneda, C. O. & Pawlicka, A. - Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 485, p.843 (2008).
• 24. Pawlicka, A.; Mattos, R. I.; Tambelli, C. E.; Silva, I. D. A.; Magon, C. J. & Donoso, J. P. - J. Membrane Sci., 429, p.190 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.048
• 25. Ciosek, M.; Sannier, L.; Siekierski, M.; Golodnitsky, D.; Peled, E.; Scrosati, B.; Glowinkowski, S. & Wieczorek, W. - Electrochim. Acta, 53, p.1409 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.037
• 26. Przyluski, J. & Wieczorek, W. - Solid State Ion., 36, p.165 (1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(89)90163-X
• 27. Hu, Y.; Qian, H.; Mei, T.; Guo, J. & White, T. - Mater. Lett., 64, p.1095 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.02.023
• 28. Baskaram, R.; Selvasekarapandian, S.; Kuwata, N.; Kawamura, J. & Hattori, T. - Mater. Chem. Phys., 98, p.155 (2004).
• 29. Macdonald, J. R. - "Impedance Spectroscopy", Wiley, New York (1987).
• 30. Jaipal Reddy, M.; Sreekanth, T. & Subba Rao, U. V. - Solid State Ion., 126, p.55 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00225-8
• 31. Baskaran, R.; Selvasekarapandian, S.; Hirankumar, G. & Bhuvaneswari, M. S. - Ionics, 10, p.129 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02410321
• 32. Subba Reddy, C. V.; Sharma, A. K. & Narasimha Rao, V. V. R. - J. Power Sources, 114, p.338 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00582-7

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  18 Apr 2014
• Date of issue
  2014

History

• Received
  29 Jan 2013
• Accepted
  30 Jan 2014
• Reviewed
  08 Jan 2013