The conflicts of what is identified as methodological options on the structuring of academic products, particularly dissertations and theses, have, at a time, reveled and stressed the necessity of a search for a higher meaning which can guide that work and prevent it from the serious risk of falling lost in formalism. Formalism is a threat, as much as methodologies strive and compete in search of a better representation of reality. Which is the meaning of those academic products? This essay holds to be a preferable alternative the adoption of their pragmatic meaning itself, so taking them as assertive, communicative actions and argumentative, rational rhetoric, which is an Aristotelian concept re-elaborated by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca. Hermeneutic discourse analysis is, therefore, set in contrast with epistemological paradigm of modern knowledge. In the final part, theoretical discussion is followed by practical suggestions on how dissertations, theses and even academic papers could be structured, as they are also generally addressed to scientific community in an assertive way.
dissertations and theses; argumentative rhetoric; formalism; research methodology