Morales, Carlos Romero; Polo, Jaime Almazán; Sanz, David Rodríguez; López, Daniel López; González, Sergio Vázquez; Buría, José Luis Arias; Lobo, César Calvo

doi:10.1590/1806-9282.64.10.936

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article • Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 64 (10) • Out 2018 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.64.10.936 copiar

Ultrasonography features of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue in elite and amateur basketball players: an observational study

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

RESUMO

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar com ultrassonografia de reabilitação (IUR) o tecido conjuntivo perimuscular da parede abdominal (PMPA) e interrecti distância (IRD) entre elite e jogadores de basquete amadores. Uma amostra de 22 jogadores de basquete saudáveis foi incluída e dividida em dois grupos: jogadores de basquete de elite da 1ᵃ divisão espanhola (n=11) e jogadores de basquete amadores de uma divisão de entretenimento espanhol (n=11). As imagens de ultrassom do oblíquo externo (OE), oblíquo interno (OI), transverso abdominal (TrAb), recto anterior (RA) e IRD PMPA foram medidas e analisadas pelo software ImageJ. Medições dos músculos da parede abdominal O PMPA apresentam diferenças estatisticamente (P<0,05) para o aumento do tecido conjuntivo perimuscular de oblíquo externo (PMOE), tecido conjuntivo perimuscular de transverso abdominal (PMTA) do lado esquerdo e aumento do PMOE do lado direito a favor do grupo de elite. Em vez disso, o estudo mostrou diferenças estatisticamente (P<0,05) para uma diminuição do tecido conjuntivo perimuscular entre o oblíquo interno e transverso abdominário (PMOI-TA) e uma diminuição no somatório total de PMTA do lado esquerdo do grupo de elite em relação ao amador grupo. Este estudo relatou um aumento do PMTOE esquerdo, PMTA esquerdo, PMCTOE direito, bem como uma diminuição do PMCTOI-TA esquerdo e no somatório total do PMTA no lado esquerdo.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE:
Tecido conjuntivo; Abdome oblíquo; Reto abdominal; Abdominal transverso; Ultrassonografia

Data	Amateur (n = 16)	Elite (n= 16)	P-value
Age, y	21.0 ± 3.0 f	23.0 ± 9.0 ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) was used.	.748 ^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized
Weight, kg	79.63 ± 10.29 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	92.18 ± 13.94 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	.026^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.
Height, m	1.84 ± 0.07 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	1.92 ± 0.10 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	.035^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.
BMI, kg/m2	21.55 ± 2.28 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	23.72 ± 2.67 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	.054^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.
Nijmegen test ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	3.72 ± 3.13 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	12.54 ± 3.77 ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was applied.	<.001 ^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.

Associação Médica Brasileira R. São Carlos do Pinhal, 324, 01333-903 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel: +55 11 3178-6800, Fax: +55 11 3178-6816 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: ramb@amb.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Carlos Romero Morales hysiotherapy Department; School of Health, Exercise and Sport; European University of Madrid; C/ Tajo s/n, 28670, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain; Phone no.: 0034-912-115-268 E-mail: carlosmorales92@hotmail.com

Measurement	Amateur (n=16) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	Elite (n=16) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	P-value
Distance (cm)
IRD	1.04 ± 0.51 (0.64-1.96) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	1.28 ± 0.69 (0.54-3.64) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.001^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Thickness (cm)
Right PMCTEO	2.00 ± 4.00 (0.01-11.00) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.45 ± 0.18 (1.15-0.81) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.001^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Right PMCTEO-IO	0.11 ± 0.05 (0.07-0.33) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.10 ± 0.07 (0.19-0.11) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.847^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Right PMCTIO-TA	0.12 ± 0.04 (0.07-0.24) '	0.04 ± 0.04 (0.09-0.25) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.371^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.
Right PMCTTA	0.09 ± 0.09 (0.06-0.29) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.13 ± 0.04 (0.09-0.22) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.193^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Right PMCTRA	0.16 ± 0.03 (0.11-0.24) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.14 ± 0.02 (0.11-0.18) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.334"
Right PMCTSUPRA	0.09 ± 0.02 (0.06-0.14) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.08 ± 0.02 (0.05-0.12) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.446"
Right PMCTDEERA	0.06 ± 0.03 (0.04-0.10) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.06 ± 0.01 (0.04-0.07) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.898^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Total Right PMCT	0.09 ± 0.04 (0.06-0.22) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.11 ± 0.03 (0.08-0.17) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.438^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Left PMCTEO	0.11 ± 0.05 (0.06-0.23) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.47 ± 0.12 (0.36-0.65) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.001^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Left PMCTEO-IO	0.11 ± 0.29 (0.07-0.17) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.11 ± 0.28 (0.08-0.16) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.520^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.
Left PMCTIO-TA	0.90 ± 0.01 (0.06-0.13) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.13 ± 0.06 (0.10-0.28) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.001^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.
Left PMCTTA	0.09 ± 0.03 (0.08-0.15) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.13 ± 0.03 (0.10-0.21) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.001^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Left PMCTRA	0.16 ± 0.05 (0.12-0.28) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.14 ± 0.04 (0.08-0.20) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.256^ Student's t-test for independent samples was performed.
Left PMCTSUPRA	0.09 ± 0.07 (0.20-0.14) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.08 ± 0.05 (0.05-0.13) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.401^‡ ‡ Mann-Whitney U test was utilized.
Left PMCTDEERA	0.06 ± 0.02 (0.04-0.12) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.05 ± 0.01 (0.03-0.09) ^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.	0.369"
Total Left PMCT	0.41 ± 0.15 (0.31-0.61) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.10 ± 0.03 (0.08-0.14) ^† † Median ± interquartile range (IR) (minimum-maximum) was used.	0.001^* * Mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum-maximum) was applied.