ABSTRACT
Studies on ministerial recruitment have identified the presence of professional politicians as well as technicians within the Brazilian ministerial cabinet. However, career analyses are restricted to technicians, while studies on political ministers have largely focused on party recruitment criteria. The objective of this article is twofold: to empirically demonstrate the differences and similarities between the careers of political and non-political ministers “technicians” during PSDB and PT presidential administrations between 1995 and 2014; and to explore the main aspects regarding the professionalization of politician ministers based on their experiences in elective and high-ranking positions in county and municipal administrations. The results indicate that both politicians and non-politicians have extensive professional experience, including administrative experience, although non-politicians have greater affinity with the ministerial area for which they were appointed as do ministers affiliated with the president’s party when compared to politicians of the allied base. Notwithstanding these nuances, no significant differences were found between PSDB and PT administrations regarding the expertise of their ministers.
Keywords:
ministerial recruitment; State ministers; political career; expertise; PT; PSDB.
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR. Number of cases: PSDB (113); PT (214). Pearson Chi Square: 2,098 (0,148).
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR., Number of cases: PSDB (109);
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR. Number of cases: PSDB (109); PT (211).
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR. Number of cases: PSDB (113); PT (214). Pearson Chi Square PSDB: 6,944 (,014); PT: 31,355 (,000).
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR. Number of cases: PSDB (112); PT (214).
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR. Number of cases: PSDB (46); PT (107) Pearson Chi Square: 14,386 (,002).
Source: Observatory of social and political elites of Brazil (<http://observatory-elites.org/>), UFPR. Number of cases: PSDB (46); allied base (7); PT (107); allied base (11).